Trial Outcomes & Findings for Shrinking the Size of the Tobacco Power Wall (NCT NCT04632030)

NCT ID: NCT04632030

Last Updated: 2023-10-25

Results Overview

A two item self-report assessment: 1) If one of your best friends offered you an unflavored cigarette would you use it? 2) If one of your best friends offered you a menthol cigarette would you use it? Responses to each item are made on a 10-point scale where 1 = definitely not; and 10 = definitely yes and responses across the two items are summed for a total scale score. Total scale scores are dichotomized: scores of 2 are coded as '0' (no risk) and any score greater than 2 is coded as '1' (at risk). Outcome is proportion at risk of cigarette smoking (number of participants at risk over number of participants within condition).

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

275 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

within 5 minutes of the intervention

Results posted on

2023-10-25

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Control
The tobacco power wall and number of products appears in a typical format: large power wall with a large number of products (defined here as three large cabinets) Tobacco power wall size and tobacco products displayed: The intervention varies the size of the tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products displayed on it.
Small
The tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products appear in their smallest format: small power wall with a small number of products displayed (defined here as one large cabinet) Tobacco power wall size and tobacco products displayed: The intervention varies the size of the tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products displayed on it.
Medium
The tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products appear in a format sized between the control and small conditions: a medium sized power wall with a medium number of products displayed (defined here as two large cabinets). Tobacco power wall size and tobacco products displayed: The intervention varies the size of the tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products displayed on it.
Overall Study
STARTED
96
86
93
Overall Study
COMPLETED
96
86
93
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Shrinking the Size of the Tobacco Power Wall

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Control
n=96 Participants
The tobacco power wall and number of products appears in a typical format: large power wall with a large number of products (defined here as three large cabinets) Tobacco power wall size and tobacco products displayed: The intervention varies the size of the tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products displayed on it.
Small
n=86 Participants
The tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products appear in their smallest format: small power wall with a small number of products displayed (defined here as one large cabinet) Tobacco power wall size and tobacco products displayed: The intervention varies the size of the tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products displayed on it.
Medium
n=93 Participants
The tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products appear in a format sized between the control and small conditions: a medium sized power wall with a medium number of products displayed (defined here as two large cabinets). Tobacco power wall size and tobacco products displayed: The intervention varies the size of the tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products displayed on it.
Total
n=275 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
16.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2 • n=5 Participants
16.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.1 • n=7 Participants
16.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.0 • n=5 Participants
16.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.1 • n=4 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
26 Participants
n=7 Participants
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
82 Participants
n=4 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
65 Participants
n=5 Participants
55 Participants
n=7 Participants
58 Participants
n=5 Participants
178 Participants
n=4 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Nonbinary/other
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
15 Participants
n=4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
12 Participants
n=4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
90 Participants
n=5 Participants
82 Participants
n=7 Participants
90 Participants
n=5 Participants
262 Participants
n=4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
43 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
20 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
66 Participants
n=5 Participants
64 Participants
n=7 Participants
55 Participants
n=5 Participants
185 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
18 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
96 participants
n=5 Participants
86 participants
n=7 Participants
93 participants
n=5 Participants
275 participants
n=4 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: within 5 minutes of the intervention

Population: Sample size may differ from baseline because of missing data.

A two item self-report assessment: 1) If one of your best friends offered you an unflavored cigarette would you use it? 2) If one of your best friends offered you a menthol cigarette would you use it? Responses to each item are made on a 10-point scale where 1 = definitely not; and 10 = definitely yes and responses across the two items are summed for a total scale score. Total scale scores are dichotomized: scores of 2 are coded as '0' (no risk) and any score greater than 2 is coded as '1' (at risk). Outcome is proportion at risk of cigarette smoking (number of participants at risk over number of participants within condition).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control
n=82 Participants
The tobacco power wall and number of products appears in a typical format: large power wall with a large number of products (defined here as three large cabinets) Tobacco power wall size and tobacco products displayed: The intervention varies the size of the tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products displayed on it.
Small
n=80 Participants
The tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products appear in their smallest format: small power wall with a small number of products displayed (defined here as one large cabinet) Tobacco power wall size and tobacco products displayed: The intervention varies the size of the tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products displayed on it.
Medium
n=78 Participants
The tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products appear in a format sized between the control and small conditions: a medium sized power wall with a medium number of products displayed (defined here as two large cabinets). Tobacco power wall size and tobacco products displayed: The intervention varies the size of the tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products displayed on it.
Proportion at Risk for Cigarette Smoking
.18 proportion of participants
Interval 0.11 to 0.29
.39 proportion of participants
Interval 0.27 to 0.53
.26 proportion of participants
Interval 0.16 to 0.38

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: within 5 minutes of the intervention

Population: Sample sizes may differ from baseline because of missing data.

A three item, self-report assessment: 1) If one of your best friends offered you an unflavored vaping product would you use it? 2) If one of your best friends offered you a vaping product flavored with menthol or mint, would you use it? 3) If one of your best friends offered you a vaping product flavored with fruit, candy, alcohol or non-alcohol drink, or some other sweet flavor, would you use it? Responses to each item are made on a 10-point scale where 1 = definitely not; and 10 = definitely yes and responses across the three items are summed for a total scale score. Total scale scores are dichotomized: scores of 3 are coded as '0' (no risk) and any score greater than 3 is coded as '1' (at risk). Outcome is proportion at risk of ENDS use (number of participants at risk over number of participants within condition).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control
n=81 Participants
The tobacco power wall and number of products appears in a typical format: large power wall with a large number of products (defined here as three large cabinets) Tobacco power wall size and tobacco products displayed: The intervention varies the size of the tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products displayed on it.
Small
n=78 Participants
The tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products appear in their smallest format: small power wall with a small number of products displayed (defined here as one large cabinet) Tobacco power wall size and tobacco products displayed: The intervention varies the size of the tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products displayed on it.
Medium
n=81 Participants
The tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products appear in a format sized between the control and small conditions: a medium sized power wall with a medium number of products displayed (defined here as two large cabinets). Tobacco power wall size and tobacco products displayed: The intervention varies the size of the tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products displayed on it.
Proportion at Risk of Using Electronic Nicotine Delivery Devices (ENDS)
.34 proportion of participants
Interval 0.22 to 0.47
.59 proportion of participants
Interval 0.46 to 0.72
.59 proportion of participants
Interval 0.45 to 0.72

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: within 5 minutes of the intervention

Population: Sample size may differ from baseline due to missing data.

A three item self report assessment: : 1) If one of your best friends offered you unflavored smokeless tobacco would you use it? 2) If one of your best friends offered you smokeless tobacco flavored with flavored with menthol, mint, spearmint, or wintergreen would you use it? 3) If one of your best friends offered you smokeless tobacco flavored with fruit would you use it? Responses to each item are made on a 10-point scale where 1 = definitely not; and 10 = definitely yes and responses across the three items are summed for a total scale score. Total scale scores are dichotomized: scores of 3 are coded as '0' (no risk) and any score greater than 3 is coded as '1' (at risk).Outcome is proportion at risk of smokeless tobacco use (number of participants at risk over number of participants within condition).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control
n=81 Participants
The tobacco power wall and number of products appears in a typical format: large power wall with a large number of products (defined here as three large cabinets) Tobacco power wall size and tobacco products displayed: The intervention varies the size of the tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products displayed on it.
Small
n=77 Participants
The tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products appear in their smallest format: small power wall with a small number of products displayed (defined here as one large cabinet) Tobacco power wall size and tobacco products displayed: The intervention varies the size of the tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products displayed on it.
Medium
n=78 Participants
The tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products appear in a format sized between the control and small conditions: a medium sized power wall with a medium number of products displayed (defined here as two large cabinets). Tobacco power wall size and tobacco products displayed: The intervention varies the size of the tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products displayed on it.
Proportion at Risk of Using Smokeless Tobacco
.12 proportion of participants
Interval 0.06 to 0.21
.20 proportion of participants
Interval 0.12 to 0.31
.17 proportion of participants
Interval 0.1 to 0.27

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: within 5 minutes of the intervention

Population: Sample sizes may differ from baseline due to missing data.

A three item, self report assessment: 1) If one of your best friends offered you an unflavored cigarillos/filtered cigar would you use it? 2) If one of your best friends offered you a cigarillos/filtered cigar flavored with menthol or mint would you use it? 3) If one of your best friends offered you a cigarillos/filtered cigar flavored with fruit, candy, alcohol, or some other sweet flavor, would you use it? Responses to each item are made on a 10-point scale where 1 = definitely not; and 10 = definitely yes and responses across the three items are summed for a total scale score. Total scale scores are dichotomized: scores of 3 are coded as '0' (no risk) and any score greater than 3 is coded as '1' (at risk). Outcome is proportion at risk of LCC use (number of participants at risk over number of participants within condition).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control
n=80 Participants
The tobacco power wall and number of products appears in a typical format: large power wall with a large number of products (defined here as three large cabinets) Tobacco power wall size and tobacco products displayed: The intervention varies the size of the tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products displayed on it.
Small
n=77 Participants
The tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products appear in their smallest format: small power wall with a small number of products displayed (defined here as one large cabinet) Tobacco power wall size and tobacco products displayed: The intervention varies the size of the tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products displayed on it.
Medium
n=77 Participants
The tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products appear in a format sized between the control and small conditions: a medium sized power wall with a medium number of products displayed (defined here as two large cabinets). Tobacco power wall size and tobacco products displayed: The intervention varies the size of the tobacco power wall and number of tobacco products displayed on it.
Proportion at Risk of Using Little Cigar/Cigarillos (LCC)
.17 proportion of participants
Interval 0.1 to 0.27
.31 proportion of participants
Interval 0.2 to 0.44
.20 proportion of participants
Interval 0.12 to 0.32

Adverse Events

Control

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Small

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Medium

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

William G. Shadel

RAND

Phone: 412-683-2300

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place