Computerized Cardiotocography Monitoring of Fetuses With pPROM

NCT ID: NCT04632017

Last Updated: 2020-11-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-06-15

Study Completion Date

2021-07-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) is associated with neonatal complications leading to a high rate of cerebral palsy, sepsis, and death. Choosing the best time of delivery is crucial to improve fetal outcome. The balance is between a premature delivery exposing the infant to all the risk of prematurity, and keeping the baby in utero, prolonging the exposure to an adverse intrauterine milieu. There are no objective and reproducible tools to help in this decision-making process. Techniques most frequently used for fetal surveillance are biased by high inter- and intra-observer variability. Computerized cardiotocography (cCTG) identifies several objective parameters related to fetal heart rate (FHR) to determine fetal well-being. cCTG has been successfully used in fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction, but it has never been used in prospective studies to assess its role in the management of fetuses with PPROM. The investigators designed a case control study to highlight cCTG differences in PPROM pregnancies versus physiological pregnancies, to establish the effectiveness in predicting adverse outcome, and to develop a score to predict neonatal outcome.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) occurs in 2 to 3% of pregnancies and is associated with higher maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Neonatal complications are primarily due to prematurity and to ascending infection of the amniotic cavity (chorioamnionitis), leading to a high rate of cerebral palsy, intracranial hemorrhage, sepsis, pneumonia, and death. Every physician is confronted with an extremely difficult and at the same time of paramount importance decision, when it comes to establish the timing of the delivery of a premature fetus with PPROM. The balance is between delivering a premature infant exposed to all the risk of prematurity, and keeping the baby in utero, prolonging the exposure to an adverse intrauterine milieu. At present, there are no objective and reproducible tools to help in this decision-making process. The technique most frequently used for fetal surveillance is cardiotocography (CTG). Assessment of the fetal heart rate is classified subjectively as 'reassuring' or 'not reassuring'. Dawes and Redman have suggested computerized CTG (cCTG), which eliminates inter- and intra-observer variability, identifying several objective parameters to determine fetal well-being. After the multicentre TRUFFLE-Study, cCTG became the best tool to manage fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). However, the use of cCTG has never been investigated in prospective studies to assess its role in the management of fetuses with PPROM. Of note, amniotic fluid concentration of glucose, lactate, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8) have been associated with neonatal septicemia, chorioamnionitis, preterm birth, and/or fetal inflammatory response syndrome in women with pPROM.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiotocography Premature Rupture of Membrane Rupture of Membranes; Premature Sepsis Premature Birth

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

cardiotocography Premature Rupture of Membrane computerized cardiotocography premature birth

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

pPROM

Singleton pregnancies admitted for pPROM to the Obstetrics ward

Computerized cardiotocography

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

To compare Dawes and Redman indices as determined by computer analysis of the fetal heart tracing

Control group

Healthy pregnant women matched for gestational age

Computerized cardiotocography

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

To compare Dawes and Redman indices as determined by computer analysis of the fetal heart tracing

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Computerized cardiotocography

To compare Dawes and Redman indices as determined by computer analysis of the fetal heart tracing

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* pPROM between 24 and 34 weeks (w)

Exclusion Criteria

* multiple pregnancy, structural fetal anomalies, preexisting or gestational diabetes mellitus and\\or hypertension, intrauterine growth restriction.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Maddalena Morlando

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Antonio Schiattarella, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"

Naples, , Italy

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Maddalena Morlando, MD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +39 333 426 3110

Email: [email protected]

Fabiana Savoia, MD

Role: CONTACT

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Maddalena Morlando, MD

Role: primary

Fabiana Savoia, MD

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

8452

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id