Clinical Comparison of a Monofocal eDOF IOL With a Monofocal IOL
NCT ID: NCT04631068
Last Updated: 2024-06-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
65 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-09-21
2023-03-17
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Primary Objectives:
* To evaluate the distance VA of the study IOLs
* To evaluate the intermediate VA of the study IOLs
* To explore the safety profile with regards to visual disturbances
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Myopic Monovision: EDOF vs. Monofocal IOL
NCT05194670
Bilateral Monofocal Versus Monofocal-EDOF IOL Implantation: Quality of Vision Comparison
NCT06002399
A Clinical Study of the ACRYSOF® IQ EDF Intraocular Lens (IOL)
NCT03010254
Clinical Outcomes of an New EDOF IOL (Isopure®)
NCT05704686
PMCF Study on EDOF (Isopure) vs Monofocal (Micropure) IOL
NCT04249492
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study will take place in 3 centers in Europe, including Oxford Eye Hospital, a part of Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust and will include 70 patients in total.
The aim of the study is to investigate the safety and effectiveness of a new Intraocular Lens (IOL): the Monofocal Extended Depth of Focus (Mono-EDoF ME4) IOL and to compare it to a standard Monofocal IOL (TECNIS ZBC00). Patients participating will be randomised to either receive the Mono-EDoF ME4 IOL in both eyes or the TECNIS ZCB00 IOL in both eyes. Twice as many subjects will receive the Mono-EDoF ME4 IOL compared to the TECNIS ZCB00 IOL.
Both IOLs have received the CE marked. The aim with both IOLs is to provide patients good vision at distance with no glasses. The Mono-eDoF ME4 might offer the additional benefit of achieving good vision at intermediate distance without glasses.
Total duration of clinical investigation is 12 months and the total expected duration for each patient is 8 months.
Patients will be screened for eligibility preoperatively obtaining a medical history and to establish a baseline ocular condition. Surgeries will be performed on different dates for both eyes but not more than one month apart. The patient will need to return to for seven follow-up visits after eye surgery where vision and health of the eye will be assessed.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
Both IOLs have received the CE marked. The aim with both IOLs is to provide patients good vision at distance with no glasses. The Mono-eDoF ME4 might offer the additional benefit of achieving good vision at intermediate distance without glasses.
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Santen xact Mono-EDoF ME4 Intraocular Lens (IOL)
The Monofocal Extended Depth of Focus (Mono-EDoF) posterior chamber foldable intraocular lens is ultraviolet and blue-light absorbing designed to be positioned in the lens capsule to replace the optical function of the natural crystalline lens. The diffractive technology of the IOL allows most of the light to converge in one focal point thereby providing high quality of distance vision and continuous focus to intermediate vision while minimizing the effects of unwanted visual disturbances. The visual quality is expected to be similar to monofocal IOLs.
Surgery to implant the Mono-EDoF ME4 Intraocular Lens (IOL) will be performed on Day 0 of the study, using standard microsurgical techniques. All instruments and procedures used will be identical to those routinely used for small incision phacoemulsification.
Cataract surgery
Small incision cataract surgery with implantation of an intraocular lens
J&J TECNIS ZCB00 Intraocular Lens (IOL)
The TECNIS 1-Piece Intraocular Lens (IOL), Model ZCB00, is a standard monofocal ultraviolet light absorbing posterior chamber IOL, which is designed to be positioned in the lens capsule to replace the optical function of the natural crystalline lens.
Surgery to implant the TECNIS ZCB00 Intraocular Lens (IOL) will be performed on Day 0 of the study, using standard microsurgical techniques. All instruments and procedures used will be identical to those routinely used for small incision phacoemulsification.
Cataract surgery
Small incision cataract surgery with implantation of an intraocular lens
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cataract surgery
Small incision cataract surgery with implantation of an intraocular lens
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Cataracts in both eyes.
3. Expected post-operative refractive astigmatism of ≤ 1.0 D.
4. Calculated lens power from 18 D to 30 D for both study IOLs.
5. Willing and able to return for all scheduled treatment and post-operative visits for a minimum of 6 months.
6. Planned removal of visually significant cataract (cortical, nuclear, posterior subcapsular, or a combination) by phacoemulsification cataract extraction in both eyes.
7. Willing to discontinue contact lens wear, if applicable, and demonstrate corneal stability prior to biometry and surgery.
8. Preoperative best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) of 20/32 or worse, with or without a glare source, or preoperative BCDVA of 20/25 or worse with patient complaining of severe visual disturbances attributable to cataract.
9. Post-operative BCVA projected to be 0.2 LogMAR or better (as determined by the medical judgment of the Investigator or measured by potential acuity meter / retinal acuity meter (PAM / RAM) if necessary).
10. Pharmacologically dilated pupil size at least 6.0 mm.
11. Must be able to understand and provide informed consent themselves or through a representative with a witness present on the IRB or EC approved Informed Consent Form (ICF).
5. History of any intraocular or corneal surgery in either eye (including LASIK, PRK, etc.).
6. Ocular conditions which could affect the stability of the IOL (e.g., pseudoexfoliation, zonular dialysis, evident zonular weakness or dehiscence, etc.) in either eye.
7. Any anterior segment pathology likely to increase the risk of complications from phacoemulsification cataract extraction (e.g., chronic uveitis, iritis, iridocyclitis, aniridia, rubeosis iridis, clinically significant corneal disease, Fuchs, or anterior membrane dystrophies, etc.) in either eye.
8. Mature cataract that is likely to prolong phacoemulsification and/or lead to intraoperative complications prior to attempted IOL implantation.
9. Any visually significant intraocular media opacity other than cataract in either eye.
10. History of any clinically significant retinal pathology or ocular diagnosis (e.g., diabetic retinopathy, ischemic disease, macular degeneration, retinal detachment, amblyopia, optic neuropathy, microphthalmos, aniridia, etc.) in either eye that could alter or limit final postoperative visual prognosis.
11. History of cystoid macular edema in either eye.
12. Severe dry eye that, in the opinion of the investigator, would impair the ability to obtain reliable study measurements.
13. Uncontrolled (e.g., non-medicated) glaucoma in either eye.
14. Extremely shallow anterior chamber (\< 2.0 mm).
15. Subjects with large refractive errors (hyperopia/myopia) of axial or pathologic origin that, in the opinion of the investigator, could confound outcomes.
16. Irregular astigmatism, corneal degeneration or dystrophy.
17. Uncontrolled systemic disease (e.g., diabetes mellitus, active cancer treatment, mental illness, etc.) in the opinion of the Investigator, would put the subject's health at risk and/or prevent the subject from completing all study visits.
18. Systemic medication that, in the opinion of the investigator, may confound the outcome or increase the intraoperative and post-operative risk to the subject (e.g., Tamsulosin Hydrochloride) or other medications including anticholinergics, alpha adrenergic blocking agents with similar side effects (e.g., small pupil/floppy iris syndrome).
19. Subjects who may reasonably be expected to require any additional ophthalmic surgical intervention at any time during the study (other than YAG capsulotomy).
20. Need for concomitant procedures (e.g., glaucoma surgery, RK, LASIK, etc.).
Exclusion Criteria
2. Pregnancy or lactation.
3. Subject who, in the clinical judgment of the Investigator, is not suitable for participation in the study for another clinical reason, as documented by the investigator (reason to be documented by the site on Case Report Forms - CRF's).
22 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Advanced Vision Science, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mark Packer, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Medical Monitor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital Pellegrin
Bordeaux, Cedex, France
Hospital de Braga
Braga, , Portugal
Oxford Eye Hospital
Oxford, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Black S. Successful Restoration of Visual Acuity with an Extended Range of Vision Intraocular Lens after Multifocal Laser Ablation. Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2016 Oct 11;7(3):193-197. doi: 10.1159/000450675. eCollection 2016 Sep-Dec.
Bostanci Ceran B, Takmaz T, Can I, Demirok G, Uysal BS. Clinical outcomes and optical performance of four differentmultifocal intraocular lenses. Turk J Med Sci. 2016 Apr 19;46(3):597-603. doi: 10.3906/sag-1403-24.
Cillino S, Casuccio A, Di Pace F, Morreale R, Pillitteri F, Cillino G, Lodato G. One-year outcomes with new-generation multifocal intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology. 2008 Sep;115(9):1508-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.04.017. Epub 2008 Jun 5.
Cochener B; Concerto Study Group. Clinical outcomes of a new extended range of vision intraocular lens: International Multicenter Concerto Study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Sep;42(9):1268-1275. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.06.033.
Davison JA, Simpson MJ. History and development of the apodized diffractive intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 May;32(5):849-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.02.006.
de Silva SR, Evans JR, Kirthi V, Ziaei M, Leyland M. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 12;12(12):CD003169. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003169.pub4.
Harman FE, Maling S, Kampougeris G, Langan L, Khan I, Lee N, Bloom PA. Comparing the 1CU accommodative, multifocal, and monofocal intraocular lenses: a randomized trial. Ophthalmology. 2008 Jun;115(6):993-1001.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.08.042. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Soroush S, Shariati R, Miraftab M, Yekta A. The location of incision in cataract surgery and its impact on induced astigmatism. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan;27(1):58-64. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000223.
Kaymak H, Hohn F, Breyer DR, Hagen P, Klabe K, Gerl RH, Mueller M, Auffarth GU, Gerl M, Kretz FT. [Functional Results 3 Months after Implantation of an "Extended Range of Vision" Intraocular Lens]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2016 Aug;233(8):923-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-104064. Epub 2016 Jul 6. German.
Lan J, Huang YS, Dai YH, Wu XM, Sun JJ, Xie LX. Visual performance with accommodating and multifocal intraocular lenses. Int J Ophthalmol. 2017 Feb 18;10(2):235-240. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2017.02.09. eCollection 2017.
Pedrotti E, Bruni E, Bonacci E, Badalamenti R, Mastropasqua R, Marchini G. Comparative Analysis of the Clinical Outcomes With a Monofocal and an Extended Range of Vision Intraocular Lens. J Refract Surg. 2016 Jul 1;32(7):436-42. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20160428-06.
Prasher P, Sandhu JS. Prevalence of corneal astigmatism before cataract surgery in Indian population. Int Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun;37(3):683-689. doi: 10.1007/s10792-016-0327-z. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
TECNIS Symfony DFU
Ruiz-Mesa R, Abengozar-Vela A, Aramburu A, Ruiz-Santos M. Comparison of visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of extended range of vision and trifocal intraocular lenses. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun 26;27(4):460-465. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000935. Epub 2017 Jan 28.
Weeber HA, Meijer ST, Piers PA. Extending the range of vision using diffractive intraocular lens technology. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Dec;41(12):2746-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.07.034.
Attia MSA, Auffarth GU, Kretz FTA, Tandogan T, Rabsilber TM, Holzer MP, Khoramnia R. Clinical Evaluation of an Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens With the Salzburg Reading Desk. J Refract Surg. 2017 Oct 1;33(10):664-669. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20170621-08.
Bellucci R. Multifocal intraocular lenses. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2005 Feb;16(1):33-7. doi: 10.1097/00055735-200502000-00006.
Packer M, Monteiro T, Schweitzer C, Rosen P. Prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter study of a monofocal EDOF intraocular lens compared with a standard aspheric monofocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2025 Aug 1;51(8):659-665. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001672.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AVS CP-7944
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.