Implantable Phakic Lens (IPCL) VS Implantable Collamer Lens

NCT ID: NCT04624035

Last Updated: 2020-11-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-10-10

Study Completion Date

2021-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Phakic intraocular lenses (pIOL) of different designs and materials have been used effectively instead of corneal refractive surgery in certain situations. The pIOL exhibits a number of advantages over corneal techniques as it is suitable for high myopes, with lower production of aberrations, and superior contrast sensitivity. Keeping the accommodation is its definite lead over refractive lens exchange. The Visian implantable collamer lens (ICL; Staar Surgical, Monrovia, CA), a posterior chamber pIOL, has been stated to be useful for the correction of high myopia. Nevertheless, as an intraocular procedure, it is associated with a risk of complications as probable injury to anterior segment, retinal detachment and endophthalmitis.

The Implantable Phakic Contact Lens (IPCL V2, Caregroup Sight Solutions, India) has been developed as an alternative for the ICL, at a noticeable financial advantage. Furthermore, the highestmyopic correction which is instantly accessible with ICL is -18.0 D. Meanwhile, IPCL can provide correction higher degrees up to -30.0 D.

Former researches have been made to assess the safety and efficiency of ICL implantation, to evaluate various devices for anterior segment imaging postoperatively and to identify changes in anterior segment after surgery. A recent study determined the safety of the IPCL over a minimum follow-up period of one year. In this work the investigators aimed to compare the refractive results and the adverse effects of the IPCL and the ICL in treatment of myopia in adults.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Myopia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL, V4c with central hole) in treatment of myopia in adults.

Implantation of ICL (V4c with central hole) for treatment of myopia in adults using peribulbar anesthesia. Thirty minutes before surgery, cycloplegic and phenylephrine eye drops were applied. Five minutes before surgery, povidone-iodine 5% was applied. The anterior chamber was filled with sodium hyaluronate 1%, which was completely removed at the end of the surgery. The lens was inserted using the ICL injector. Tobramycin and dexamethasone 0.1% eye drops were used four times a day for 10 days, after which diclofenac sodium eye drops were started four times a day for 2 weeks.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) in treatment of myopia in adults.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ICL Group: After mydriatic eye drops and topical anesthesia instillation, a 3-mm temporal corneal incision was done. Viscoelastic material was injected in the anterior chamber (AC). An injector cartridge (STAAR Surgical) was used to insert the ICL V4c model with central hole). The four footplates of the ICL were positioned on the ciliary sulcus at the 180° axis. Viscoelastic material was entirely taken away.

Acrylic Implantable Intraocular Lens (IPCL, V2) in treatment of myopia in adults

Implantation of IPCL for treatment of Myopia in adults using peribulbar anesthesia. Thirty minutes before surgery, cycloplegic and phenylephrine eye drops were applied. Five minutes before surgery, povidone-iodine 5% was applied. The anterior chamber was filled with sodium hyaluronate 1%, which was completely removed at the end of the surgery. The lens was inserted using the IPCL injector. Tobramycin and dexamethasone 0.1% eye drops were used four times a day for 10 days, after which diclofenac sodium eye drops were started four times a day for 2 weeks.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Implantable Intraocular Lens (IPCL) in treatment of myopia in adults.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

IPCL Group: Topical anesthetic and mydriatic agents were instilled before surgery. Using peripulbar anaesthesia, the IPCL (V2 model with central hole) was implanted into the AC through a 3 mm clear corneal incision after viscoelastic material injection. The footplates were subsequently tucked behind the iris, followed by a thorough viscoelastic removal.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) in treatment of myopia in adults.

ICL Group: After mydriatic eye drops and topical anesthesia instillation, a 3-mm temporal corneal incision was done. Viscoelastic material was injected in the anterior chamber (AC). An injector cartridge (STAAR Surgical) was used to insert the ICL V4c model with central hole). The four footplates of the ICL were positioned on the ciliary sulcus at the 180° axis. Viscoelastic material was entirely taken away.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Implantable Intraocular Lens (IPCL) in treatment of myopia in adults.

IPCL Group: Topical anesthetic and mydriatic agents were instilled before surgery. Using peripulbar anaesthesia, the IPCL (V2 model with central hole) was implanted into the AC through a 3 mm clear corneal incision after viscoelastic material injection. The footplates were subsequently tucked behind the iris, followed by a thorough viscoelastic removal.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

All drugs used were mentioned in the arm description All drugs used were mentioned in the arm description

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* myopia of more than 6 diopter
* central anterior chamber depth more than 2.8 mm

Exclusion Criteria

* unstable refraction
* any other ocular disease
* any systemic disease
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mahmoud F. Rateb

Associate professor of ophthalmology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mahmoud F Rateb, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assiut University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tiba eye center

Asyut, , Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Al Masa eye center

Banhā, , Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Mahmoud F Rateb, MD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: ‭+20 100 8348480‬

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Mahmoud Rateb, PhD

Role: primary

Mohamed ElMohamady, MD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Stulting RD, John ME, Maloney RK, Assil KK, Arrowsmith PN, Thompson VM; U.S. Verisyse Study Group. Three-year results of Artisan/Verisyse phakic intraocular lens implantation. Results of the United States Food And Drug Administration clinical trial. Ophthalmology. 2008 Mar;115(3):464-472.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.08.039. Epub 2007 Nov 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18031820 (View on PubMed)

Kamiya K, Igarashi A, Shimizu K, Matsumura K, Komatsu M. Visual performance after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jun;153(6):1178-86.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.12.005. Epub 2012 Feb 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22365084 (View on PubMed)

Sanders D, Vukich JA. Comparison of implantable collamer lens (ICL) and laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for low myopia. Cornea. 2006 Dec;25(10):1139-46. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31802cbf3c.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17172886 (View on PubMed)

Igarashi A, Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Komatsu M. Visual performance after implantable collamer lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jul;148(1):164-70.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.02.001. Epub 2009 Apr 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19375059 (View on PubMed)

Pineda-Fernandez A, Jaramillo J, Vargas J, Jaramillo M, Jaramillo J, Galindez A. Phakic posterior chamber intraocular lens for high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Nov;30(11):2277-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.03.035.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15519075 (View on PubMed)

Elmohamady MN, Abdelghaffar W. Anterior Chamber Changes After Implantable Collamer Lens Implantation in High Myopia Using Pentacam: A Prospective Study. Ophthalmol Ther. 2017 Dec;6(2):343-349. doi: 10.1007/s40123-017-0109-3. Epub 2017 Sep 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28933042 (View on PubMed)

Fernandes P, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Madrid-Costa D, Ferrer-Blasco T, Jorge J, Montes-Mico R. Implantable collamer posterior chamber intraocular lenses: a review of potential complications. J Refract Surg. 2011 Oct;27(10):765-76. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20110617-01. Epub 2011 Jun 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21710954 (View on PubMed)

Sachdev G, Ramamurthy D. Long-term safety of posterior chamber implantable phakic contact lens for the correction of myopia. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019 Jan 7;13:137-142. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S185304. eCollection 2019.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30662257 (View on PubMed)

Zhang J, Luo HH, Zhuang J, Yu KM. Comparison of anterior section parameters using anterior segment optical coherence tomography and ultrasound biomicroscopy in myopic patients after ICL implantation. Int J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan 18;9(1):58-62. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2016.01.10. eCollection 2016.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26949611 (View on PubMed)

Rateb M, Gad AAM, Tohamy D, Elmohamady MN. A Prospective Comparative Study between Implantable Phakic Intraocular Contact Lens and Implantable Collamer Lens in Treatment of Myopia in Adults. J Ophthalmol. 2022 Mar 28;2022:9212253. doi: 10.1155/2022/9212253. eCollection 2022.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35388352 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ICL vs IPCL

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id