Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study in Healthy Subjects to Evaluate Pharmacokinetics and Food Effect After Dosing of GS-248 (NCT NCT04617509)

NCT ID: NCT04617509

Last Updated: 2021-08-31

Results Overview

The Maximal Plasma Concentration (Cmax) after a single dose of Formulation A and B of GS 248 respectively in fasting conditions and after a single dose of Formulation A of GS-248 in fed condition. Blood samples for bioanalysis of GS-248 and subsequent PK analysis were collected as venous blood samples.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE1

Target enrollment

14 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

From time 0 (time of dosing) to 48 hours after dose (concentration measured at timepoints pre-dose and 0:15, 0:30, 1, 1:30, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 hours post-dose)

Results posted on

2021-08-31

Participant Flow

The subjects were recruited from CTC's database of healthy volunteers and from advertising in media (including social media). Screening visits were performed at CTC research clinic. Recruitment period started 24MAR2020 (the day after approval received from IEC and CA) and lasted until 06APR2020 (date for last subject screened).

Screening (Visit 1) took place from Day -28 to Day -1 and included an eligibility check and a general health assessment. A total of 29 subjects were screened for participation. Eleven subjects were screening failures and 4 subjects were reserves who were not used in the study. Fourteen subjects were included and dosed in the study.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Part I GS-248 Formulation A
Formulation A given in fasting state. Formulation A GS-248: Formulation A of GS-248 in a lipid-based size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
Part I GS-248 Formulation B
Formulation B given in fasting state. Formulation B GS-248: Formulation B of GS-248 in a dry powder size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fed Condition
Formulation A given in fed condition. Formulation A was selected for the Food Interaction Part of the study, based on the PK profiles of both Formulation A and B. Formulation A of GS-248 in a capsule, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
Period 1: Part 1 Formulation A
STARTED
14
0
0
Period 1: Part 1 Formulation A
COMPLETED
14
0
0
Period 1: Part 1 Formulation A
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
0
Period 2: Part 1 Formulation B
STARTED
0
14
0
Period 2: Part 1 Formulation B
COMPLETED
0
14
0
Period 2: Part 1 Formulation B
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
0
Period 3: Part 2 Formulation A Fed Cond.
STARTED
0
0
14
Period 3: Part 2 Formulation A Fed Cond.
COMPLETED
0
0
13
Period 3: Part 2 Formulation A Fed Cond.
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
1

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

A Study in Healthy Subjects to Evaluate Pharmacokinetics and Food Effect After Dosing of GS-248

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Overall Trial
n=14 Participants
All subjects who were included in the study i.e. randomized in Part I GS-248 Formulation A.
Age, Continuous
44.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.1 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
14 participants
n=5 Participants
Height
171.6 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8 • n=5 Participants
Weight
74.5 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.14 • n=5 Participants
BMI
25.1 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7 • n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From time 0 (time of dosing) to 48 hours after dose (concentration measured at timepoints pre-dose and 0:15, 0:30, 1, 1:30, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 hours post-dose)

Population: Part I Formulation A: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part I Formulation B: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part II Formulation A fed: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 13 subjects. Part II Formulation A fasting (partial set): Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 13 subjects.

The Maximal Plasma Concentration (Cmax) after a single dose of Formulation A and B of GS 248 respectively in fasting conditions and after a single dose of Formulation A of GS-248 in fed condition. Blood samples for bioanalysis of GS-248 and subsequent PK analysis were collected as venous blood samples.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Part I GS-248 Formulation A
n=14 Participants
Formulation A given in fasting state. Formulation A GS-248: Formulation A of GS-248 in a lipid-based size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
Part I GS-248 Formulation B
n=14 Participants
Formulation B given in fasting state. Formulation B GS-248: Formulation B of GS-248 in a dry powder size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fed Condition
n=13 Participants
Formulation A given in fed condition. Formulation A was selected for the Food Interaction Part of the study, based on the PK profiles of both Formulation A and B. Formulation A of GS-248 in a capsule, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg with breakfast.
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fasting Condition (Partial Set)
n=13 Participants
This arm (subject analysis set) was used for a comparison of PK parameters between Formulation A under fed and fasted conditions (namely calculation of the relative bioavailability). The analysis set is part of the Food Interaction PK Analysis Set (PKAS - Food Interaction), and consisted of all subjects in Arm 1 (receiving Formulation A under fasted conditions) who, subsequently, also received Formulation A under fed conditions in the third treatment period of the study (Arm 3). Since 1 subject terminated the study prematurely between study treatment period 1 and 3, only 13 subjects were included in this analysis set that was used for the assessment of the relative bioavailability of Formulation A in fed versus fasted conditions.
Cmax
508.6 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 220.9
384.5 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 219.1
289.5 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 184.4
499.5 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 227.2

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From time 0 (time of dosing) to 48 hours after dose (concentration measured at timepoints pre-dose and 0:15, 0:30, 1, 1:30, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 hours post-dose)

Population: Part I Formulation A: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part I Formulation B: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part II Formulation A fed: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 13 subjects. Part II Formulation A fasting (partial set): Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 13 subjects.

The Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the time interval 0-infinity of GS-248 after a single dose of Formulation A and B of GS 248 respectively in fasting conditions and after a single dose of Formulation A of GS-248 in fed condition. The mean AUC of GS-248 was assessed by means of non-compartmental analysis (NCA). Blood samples for bioanalysis of GS-248 and subsequent PK analysis were collected as venous blood samples.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Part I GS-248 Formulation A
n=14 Participants
Formulation A given in fasting state. Formulation A GS-248: Formulation A of GS-248 in a lipid-based size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
Part I GS-248 Formulation B
n=14 Participants
Formulation B given in fasting state. Formulation B GS-248: Formulation B of GS-248 in a dry powder size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fed Condition
n=13 Participants
Formulation A given in fed condition. Formulation A was selected for the Food Interaction Part of the study, based on the PK profiles of both Formulation A and B. Formulation A of GS-248 in a capsule, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg with breakfast.
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fasting Condition (Partial Set)
n=13 Participants
This arm (subject analysis set) was used for a comparison of PK parameters between Formulation A under fed and fasted conditions (namely calculation of the relative bioavailability). The analysis set is part of the Food Interaction PK Analysis Set (PKAS - Food Interaction), and consisted of all subjects in Arm 1 (receiving Formulation A under fasted conditions) who, subsequently, also received Formulation A under fed conditions in the third treatment period of the study (Arm 3). Since 1 subject terminated the study prematurely between study treatment period 1 and 3, only 13 subjects were included in this analysis set that was used for the assessment of the relative bioavailability of Formulation A in fed versus fasted conditions.
AUC0-inf
1491 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 478.1
1182 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 567.4
1119 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 463.9
1494 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 497.4

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From time 0 (time of dosing) to 24 hours after dose (concentration measured at timepoints pre-dose and 0:15, 0:30, 1, 1:30, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 hours post-dose)

Population: Part I Formulation A: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part I Formulation B: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part II Formulation A fed: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 13 subjects. Part II Formulation A fasting (partial set): Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 13 subjects.

The Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the time interval 0-24h of GS-248 after a single dose of Formulation A and B of GS 248 respectively in fasting conditions and after a single dose of Formulation A of GS-248 in fed condition. The mean AUC of GS-248 for the time interval 0-24 h was assessed by means of non-compartmental analysis (NCA). Blood samples for bioanalysis of GS-248 and subsequent PK analysis were collected as venous blood samples.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Part I GS-248 Formulation A
n=14 Participants
Formulation A given in fasting state. Formulation A GS-248: Formulation A of GS-248 in a lipid-based size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
Part I GS-248 Formulation B
n=14 Participants
Formulation B given in fasting state. Formulation B GS-248: Formulation B of GS-248 in a dry powder size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fed Condition
n=13 Participants
Formulation A given in fed condition. Formulation A was selected for the Food Interaction Part of the study, based on the PK profiles of both Formulation A and B. Formulation A of GS-248 in a capsule, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg with breakfast.
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fasting Condition (Partial Set)
n=13 Participants
This arm (subject analysis set) was used for a comparison of PK parameters between Formulation A under fed and fasted conditions (namely calculation of the relative bioavailability). The analysis set is part of the Food Interaction PK Analysis Set (PKAS - Food Interaction), and consisted of all subjects in Arm 1 (receiving Formulation A under fasted conditions) who, subsequently, also received Formulation A under fed conditions in the third treatment period of the study (Arm 3). Since 1 subject terminated the study prematurely between study treatment period 1 and 3, only 13 subjects were included in this analysis set that was used for the assessment of the relative bioavailability of Formulation A in fed versus fasted conditions.
AUC0-24h
1420 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 459.4
1104 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 527.2
1014 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 377.6
1419 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 478.2

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From time 0 (time of dosing) to 48 hours after dose (concentration measured at timepoints pre-dose and 0:15, 0:30, 1, 1:30, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 hours post-dose)

Population: Part I Formulation A: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part I Formulation B: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part II Formulation A fed: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 13 subjects. Part II Formulation A fasting (partial set): Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 13 subjects.

Time to Cmax (Tmax) after a single dose of Formulation A and B of GS 248 respectively in fasting conditions and after a single dose of Formulation A of GS-248 in fed condition. Blood samples for bioanalysis of GS-248 and subsequent PK analysis were collected as venous blood samples.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Part I GS-248 Formulation A
n=14 Participants
Formulation A given in fasting state. Formulation A GS-248: Formulation A of GS-248 in a lipid-based size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
Part I GS-248 Formulation B
n=14 Participants
Formulation B given in fasting state. Formulation B GS-248: Formulation B of GS-248 in a dry powder size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fed Condition
n=13 Participants
Formulation A given in fed condition. Formulation A was selected for the Food Interaction Part of the study, based on the PK profiles of both Formulation A and B. Formulation A of GS-248 in a capsule, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg with breakfast.
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fasting Condition (Partial Set)
n=13 Participants
This arm (subject analysis set) was used for a comparison of PK parameters between Formulation A under fed and fasted conditions (namely calculation of the relative bioavailability). The analysis set is part of the Food Interaction PK Analysis Set (PKAS - Food Interaction), and consisted of all subjects in Arm 1 (receiving Formulation A under fasted conditions) who, subsequently, also received Formulation A under fed conditions in the third treatment period of the study (Arm 3). Since 1 subject terminated the study prematurely between study treatment period 1 and 3, only 13 subjects were included in this analysis set that was used for the assessment of the relative bioavailability of Formulation A in fed versus fasted conditions.
Tmax
1.500 hours
Interval 1.0 to 3.0
1.500 hours
Interval 1.0 to 3.03
3.000 hours
Interval 1.0 to 4.03
1.500 hours
Interval 1.0 to 3.0

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: T1/2 (z) was assessed for the terminal elimination phase up to 48 hours

Population: Part I Formulation A: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part I Formulation B: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part II Formulation A fed: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 13 subjects. Part II Formulation A fasting (partial set): Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 13 subjects.

Plasma half-life associated with the terminal elimination phase (T1/2(z)) after a single dose of Formulation A and B of GS 248 respectively in fasting conditions and after a single dose of Formulation A of GS-248 in fed condition. Blood samples for bioanalysis of GS-248 and subsequent PK analysis were collected as venous blood samples.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Part I GS-248 Formulation A
n=14 Participants
Formulation A given in fasting state. Formulation A GS-248: Formulation A of GS-248 in a lipid-based size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
Part I GS-248 Formulation B
n=14 Participants
Formulation B given in fasting state. Formulation B GS-248: Formulation B of GS-248 in a dry powder size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fed Condition
n=13 Participants
Formulation A given in fed condition. Formulation A was selected for the Food Interaction Part of the study, based on the PK profiles of both Formulation A and B. Formulation A of GS-248 in a capsule, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg with breakfast.
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fasting Condition (Partial Set)
n=13 Participants
This arm (subject analysis set) was used for a comparison of PK parameters between Formulation A under fed and fasted conditions (namely calculation of the relative bioavailability). The analysis set is part of the Food Interaction PK Analysis Set (PKAS - Food Interaction), and consisted of all subjects in Arm 1 (receiving Formulation A under fasted conditions) who, subsequently, also received Formulation A under fed conditions in the third treatment period of the study (Arm 3). Since 1 subject terminated the study prematurely between study treatment period 1 and 3, only 13 subjects were included in this analysis set that was used for the assessment of the relative bioavailability of Formulation A in fed versus fasted conditions.
T1/2(z)
10.69 hours
Standard Deviation 2.912
16.09 hours
Standard Deviation 15.26
13.36 hours
Standard Deviation 9.914
10.91 hours
Standard Deviation 2.902

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Vz/F was assessed for the terminal elimination phase up to 48 hours.

Population: Part I Formulation A: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part I Formulation B: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part II Formulation A fed: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 13 subjects. Part II Formulation A fasting (partial set): Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 13 subjects.

The mean volume of distribution (Vz/F) after a single dose of Formulation A and B of GS 248 respectively in fasting conditions and after a single dose of Formulation A of GS-248 in fed condition. Blood samples for bioanalysis of GS-248 and subsequent PK analysis were collected as venous blood samples.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Part I GS-248 Formulation A
n=14 Participants
Formulation A given in fasting state. Formulation A GS-248: Formulation A of GS-248 in a lipid-based size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
Part I GS-248 Formulation B
n=14 Participants
Formulation B given in fasting state. Formulation B GS-248: Formulation B of GS-248 in a dry powder size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fed Condition
n=13 Participants
Formulation A given in fed condition. Formulation A was selected for the Food Interaction Part of the study, based on the PK profiles of both Formulation A and B. Formulation A of GS-248 in a capsule, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg with breakfast.
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fasting Condition (Partial Set)
n=13 Participants
This arm (subject analysis set) was used for a comparison of PK parameters between Formulation A under fed and fasted conditions (namely calculation of the relative bioavailability). The analysis set is part of the Food Interaction PK Analysis Set (PKAS - Food Interaction), and consisted of all subjects in Arm 1 (receiving Formulation A under fasted conditions) who, subsequently, also received Formulation A under fed conditions in the third treatment period of the study (Arm 3). Since 1 subject terminated the study prematurely between study treatment period 1 and 3, only 13 subjects were included in this analysis set that was used for the assessment of the relative bioavailability of Formulation A in fed versus fasted conditions.
Vz/F
2071 L
Standard Deviation 1035
3884 L
Standard Deviation 2940
3110 L
Standard Deviation 1588
2125 L
Standard Deviation 1057

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: CL/F was assessed for a single dose of GS-248 up to 48 hours.

Population: Part I Formulation A: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part I Formulation B: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part II Formulation A fed: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 13 subjects. Part II Formulation A fasting (partial set): Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 13 subjects.

The mean total clearance (CL/F) after a single dose of Formulation A and B of GS 248 respectively in fasting conditions and after a single dose of Formulation A of GS-248 in fed condition. The mean total clearance (CL/F) was calculated by non-compartmental analysis (NCA). Blood samples for bioanalysis of GS-248 and subsequent PK analysis were collected as venous blood samples.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Part I GS-248 Formulation A
n=14 Participants
Formulation A given in fasting state. Formulation A GS-248: Formulation A of GS-248 in a lipid-based size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
Part I GS-248 Formulation B
n=14 Participants
Formulation B given in fasting state. Formulation B GS-248: Formulation B of GS-248 in a dry powder size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fed Condition
n=13 Participants
Formulation A given in fed condition. Formulation A was selected for the Food Interaction Part of the study, based on the PK profiles of both Formulation A and B. Formulation A of GS-248 in a capsule, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg with breakfast.
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fasting Condition (Partial Set)
n=13 Participants
This arm (subject analysis set) was used for a comparison of PK parameters between Formulation A under fed and fasted conditions (namely calculation of the relative bioavailability). The analysis set is part of the Food Interaction PK Analysis Set (PKAS - Food Interaction), and consisted of all subjects in Arm 1 (receiving Formulation A under fasted conditions) who, subsequently, also received Formulation A under fed conditions in the third treatment period of the study (Arm 3). Since 1 subject terminated the study prematurely between study treatment period 1 and 3, only 13 subjects were included in this analysis set that was used for the assessment of the relative bioavailability of Formulation A in fed versus fasted conditions.
CL/F
132.9 L/h
Standard Deviation 50.59
191.4 L/h
Standard Deviation 105.0
185.2 L/h
Standard Deviation 76.08
133.7 L/h
Standard Deviation 52.56

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application in Part I until the end-of- study visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.

Population: Part I Formulation A: Data based on safety analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part I Formulation B: Data based on safety analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part II Formulation A fed: Data based on safety analysis set i.e. 13 subjects.

The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed by the Investigator as "unlikely", "possibly" or "probably" related to the IMP. An AE was considered causally related to the use of the IMP when the causality assessment was "probable" or "possible".

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Part I GS-248 Formulation A
n=14 Participants
Formulation A given in fasting state. Formulation A GS-248: Formulation A of GS-248 in a lipid-based size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
Part I GS-248 Formulation B
n=14 Participants
Formulation B given in fasting state. Formulation B GS-248: Formulation B of GS-248 in a dry powder size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fed Condition
n=13 Participants
Formulation A given in fed condition. Formulation A was selected for the Food Interaction Part of the study, based on the PK profiles of both Formulation A and B. Formulation A of GS-248 in a capsule, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg with breakfast.
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fasting Condition (Partial Set)
This arm (subject analysis set) was used for a comparison of PK parameters between Formulation A under fed and fasted conditions (namely calculation of the relative bioavailability). The analysis set is part of the Food Interaction PK Analysis Set (PKAS - Food Interaction), and consisted of all subjects in Arm 1 (receiving Formulation A under fasted conditions) who, subsequently, also received Formulation A under fed conditions in the third treatment period of the study (Arm 3). Since 1 subject terminated the study prematurely between study treatment period 1 and 3, only 13 subjects were included in this analysis set that was used for the assessment of the relative bioavailability of Formulation A in fed versus fasted conditions.
Number of Treatment Related Adverse Events
7 events
3 events
1 events

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Physical examination was performed at pre-defined timepoints from the Screening Visit until the End-of- Study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.

Population: Part I Formulation A: Data based on safety analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part I Formulation B: Data based on safety analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part II Formulation A fed: Data based on safety analysis set i.e. 13 subjects.

A complete physical examination included assessments of the head, eyes, ears, nose, throat, skin, thyroid, neurological, lungs, cardiovascular, abdomen (liver and spleen), lymph nodes and extremities. A short version of physical examination included an assessment of selected body systems at the judgement of the Investigator but at least included cardiovascular, lung and abdomen. The results of the examinations were documented in the eCRF as normal, abnormal not clinically significant (NCS) or abnormal clinically significant (CS). Post-dose physical examination findings judged as abnormal CS were reported as AEs.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Part I GS-248 Formulation A
n=14 Participants
Formulation A given in fasting state. Formulation A GS-248: Formulation A of GS-248 in a lipid-based size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
Part I GS-248 Formulation B
n=14 Participants
Formulation B given in fasting state. Formulation B GS-248: Formulation B of GS-248 in a dry powder size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fed Condition
n=13 Participants
Formulation A given in fed condition. Formulation A was selected for the Food Interaction Part of the study, based on the PK profiles of both Formulation A and B. Formulation A of GS-248 in a capsule, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg with breakfast.
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fasting Condition (Partial Set)
This arm (subject analysis set) was used for a comparison of PK parameters between Formulation A under fed and fasted conditions (namely calculation of the relative bioavailability). The analysis set is part of the Food Interaction PK Analysis Set (PKAS - Food Interaction), and consisted of all subjects in Arm 1 (receiving Formulation A under fasted conditions) who, subsequently, also received Formulation A under fed conditions in the third treatment period of the study (Arm 3). Since 1 subject terminated the study prematurely between study treatment period 1 and 3, only 13 subjects were included in this analysis set that was used for the assessment of the relative bioavailability of Formulation A in fed versus fasted conditions.
Number of Clinically Significant (CS) Changes in Physical Examination
0 Number of abnormal CS events
0 Number of abnormal CS events
0 Number of abnormal CS events

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Vital signs ware assessed at pre-defined timepoints from the Screening Visit until the End-of- Study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.

Population: Part I Formulation A: Data based on safety analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part I Formulation B: Data based on safety analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part II Formulation A fed: Data based on safety analysis set i.e. 13 subjects.

Systolic and diastolic blood pressure and pulse were measured in supine position after 10 minutes of rest. Vital signs were judged as normal, abnormal NCS or abnormal CS.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Part I GS-248 Formulation A
n=14 Participants
Formulation A given in fasting state. Formulation A GS-248: Formulation A of GS-248 in a lipid-based size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
Part I GS-248 Formulation B
n=14 Participants
Formulation B given in fasting state. Formulation B GS-248: Formulation B of GS-248 in a dry powder size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fed Condition
n=13 Participants
Formulation A given in fed condition. Formulation A was selected for the Food Interaction Part of the study, based on the PK profiles of both Formulation A and B. Formulation A of GS-248 in a capsule, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg with breakfast.
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fasting Condition (Partial Set)
This arm (subject analysis set) was used for a comparison of PK parameters between Formulation A under fed and fasted conditions (namely calculation of the relative bioavailability). The analysis set is part of the Food Interaction PK Analysis Set (PKAS - Food Interaction), and consisted of all subjects in Arm 1 (receiving Formulation A under fasted conditions) who, subsequently, also received Formulation A under fed conditions in the third treatment period of the study (Arm 3). Since 1 subject terminated the study prematurely between study treatment period 1 and 3, only 13 subjects were included in this analysis set that was used for the assessment of the relative bioavailability of Formulation A in fed versus fasted conditions.
Number of Clinically Significant (CS) Changes in Vital Signs
0 Number of abnormal CS events
0 Number of abnormal CS events
0 Number of abnormal CS events

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: ECG evaluation was assessed at pre-defined timepoints from the Screening Visit until the End-of- Study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.

Population: Part I Formulation A: Data based on safety analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part I Formulation B: Data based on safety analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part II Formulation A fed: Data based on safety analysis set i.e. 13 subjects.

Single 12-lead ECG was recorded in supine position after 10 minutes of rest using an ECG machine. HR and PR, QRS, QT and QTcF intervals were recorded. Safety ECGs were reviewed and interpreted on-site by the Investigator. All ECGs were categorised as "normal", "abnormal, not clinically significant", or "abnormal, clinically significant".

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Part I GS-248 Formulation A
n=14 Participants
Formulation A given in fasting state. Formulation A GS-248: Formulation A of GS-248 in a lipid-based size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
Part I GS-248 Formulation B
n=14 Participants
Formulation B given in fasting state. Formulation B GS-248: Formulation B of GS-248 in a dry powder size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fed Condition
n=13 Participants
Formulation A given in fed condition. Formulation A was selected for the Food Interaction Part of the study, based on the PK profiles of both Formulation A and B. Formulation A of GS-248 in a capsule, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg with breakfast.
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fasting Condition (Partial Set)
This arm (subject analysis set) was used for a comparison of PK parameters between Formulation A under fed and fasted conditions (namely calculation of the relative bioavailability). The analysis set is part of the Food Interaction PK Analysis Set (PKAS - Food Interaction), and consisted of all subjects in Arm 1 (receiving Formulation A under fasted conditions) who, subsequently, also received Formulation A under fed conditions in the third treatment period of the study (Arm 3). Since 1 subject terminated the study prematurely between study treatment period 1 and 3, only 13 subjects were included in this analysis set that was used for the assessment of the relative bioavailability of Formulation A in fed versus fasted conditions.
Number of Clinically Significant (CS) Changes in Resting 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)
0 Number of abnormal CS events
0 Number of abnormal CS events
0 Number of abnormal CS events

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Blood samples were collected at pre-defined timepoints from the Screening Visit until the End-of- Study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.

Population: Part I Formulation A: Data based on safety analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part I Formulation B: Data based on safety analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part II Formulation A fed: Data based on safety analysis set i.e. 13 subjects.

Blood samples for analysis of clinical chemistry and haematology parameters were collected through venepuncture or an indwelling venous catheter and sent to the certified clinical chemistry laboratory at Uppsala University Hospital and analysed by routine analytical methods. Urine analysis was performed at the research clinic using dip sticks. Safety laboratory parameters were judged as normal, abnormal NCS or abnormal CS.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Part I GS-248 Formulation A
n=14 Participants
Formulation A given in fasting state. Formulation A GS-248: Formulation A of GS-248 in a lipid-based size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
Part I GS-248 Formulation B
n=14 Participants
Formulation B given in fasting state. Formulation B GS-248: Formulation B of GS-248 in a dry powder size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fed Condition
n=13 Participants
Formulation A given in fed condition. Formulation A was selected for the Food Interaction Part of the study, based on the PK profiles of both Formulation A and B. Formulation A of GS-248 in a capsule, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg with breakfast.
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fasting Condition (Partial Set)
This arm (subject analysis set) was used for a comparison of PK parameters between Formulation A under fed and fasted conditions (namely calculation of the relative bioavailability). The analysis set is part of the Food Interaction PK Analysis Set (PKAS - Food Interaction), and consisted of all subjects in Arm 1 (receiving Formulation A under fasted conditions) who, subsequently, also received Formulation A under fed conditions in the third treatment period of the study (Arm 3). Since 1 subject terminated the study prematurely between study treatment period 1 and 3, only 13 subjects were included in this analysis set that was used for the assessment of the relative bioavailability of Formulation A in fed versus fasted conditions.
Number of Clinically Significant (CS) Changes in Safety Laboratory Parameters
0 Number of abnormal CS events
1 Number of abnormal CS events
1 Number of abnormal CS events

Adverse Events

Part I GS-248 Formulation A

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 6 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Part I GS-248 Formulation B

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 5 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fed Condition

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 2 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Part I GS-248 Formulation A
n=14 participants at risk
Formulation A given in fasting state. Formulation A GS-248: Formulation A of GS-248 in a lipid-based size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
Part I GS-248 Formulation B
n=14 participants at risk
Formulation B given in fasting state. Formulation B GS-248: Formulation B of GS-248 in a dry powder size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fed Condition
n=13 participants at risk
Formulation A given in fed condition. Formulation A was selected for the Food Interaction Part of the study, based on the PK profiles of both Formulation A and B. Formulation A of GS-248 in a capsule, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
42.9%
6/14 • Number of events 8 • Adverse events, AEs (including SAEs), were collected from the start of IMP administration until the End-of-study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.
The number of subjects that reported at least one adverse event (AE), or had at least one serious AE (SAE), including death, after administration of study product. The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as "unlikely", "possibly" or "probably" related to the IMP. An AE was considered causally related to the use of the IMP when the causality assessment was "probable" or "possible".
21.4%
3/14 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events, AEs (including SAEs), were collected from the start of IMP administration until the End-of-study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.
The number of subjects that reported at least one adverse event (AE), or had at least one serious AE (SAE), including death, after administration of study product. The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as "unlikely", "possibly" or "probably" related to the IMP. An AE was considered causally related to the use of the IMP when the causality assessment was "probable" or "possible".
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events, AEs (including SAEs), were collected from the start of IMP administration until the End-of-study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.
The number of subjects that reported at least one adverse event (AE), or had at least one serious AE (SAE), including death, after administration of study product. The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as "unlikely", "possibly" or "probably" related to the IMP. An AE was considered causally related to the use of the IMP when the causality assessment was "probable" or "possible".
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse events, AEs (including SAEs), were collected from the start of IMP administration until the End-of-study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.
The number of subjects that reported at least one adverse event (AE), or had at least one serious AE (SAE), including death, after administration of study product. The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as "unlikely", "possibly" or "probably" related to the IMP. An AE was considered causally related to the use of the IMP when the causality assessment was "probable" or "possible".
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events, AEs (including SAEs), were collected from the start of IMP administration until the End-of-study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.
The number of subjects that reported at least one adverse event (AE), or had at least one serious AE (SAE), including death, after administration of study product. The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as "unlikely", "possibly" or "probably" related to the IMP. An AE was considered causally related to the use of the IMP when the causality assessment was "probable" or "possible".
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse events, AEs (including SAEs), were collected from the start of IMP administration until the End-of-study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.
The number of subjects that reported at least one adverse event (AE), or had at least one serious AE (SAE), including death, after administration of study product. The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as "unlikely", "possibly" or "probably" related to the IMP. An AE was considered causally related to the use of the IMP when the causality assessment was "probable" or "possible".
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse events, AEs (including SAEs), were collected from the start of IMP administration until the End-of-study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.
The number of subjects that reported at least one adverse event (AE), or had at least one serious AE (SAE), including death, after administration of study product. The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as "unlikely", "possibly" or "probably" related to the IMP. An AE was considered causally related to the use of the IMP when the causality assessment was "probable" or "possible".
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events, AEs (including SAEs), were collected from the start of IMP administration until the End-of-study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.
The number of subjects that reported at least one adverse event (AE), or had at least one serious AE (SAE), including death, after administration of study product. The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as "unlikely", "possibly" or "probably" related to the IMP. An AE was considered causally related to the use of the IMP when the causality assessment was "probable" or "possible".
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse events, AEs (including SAEs), were collected from the start of IMP administration until the End-of-study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.
The number of subjects that reported at least one adverse event (AE), or had at least one serious AE (SAE), including death, after administration of study product. The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as "unlikely", "possibly" or "probably" related to the IMP. An AE was considered causally related to the use of the IMP when the causality assessment was "probable" or "possible".
Investigations
Haemoglobin decreased
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse events, AEs (including SAEs), were collected from the start of IMP administration until the End-of-study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.
The number of subjects that reported at least one adverse event (AE), or had at least one serious AE (SAE), including death, after administration of study product. The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as "unlikely", "possibly" or "probably" related to the IMP. An AE was considered causally related to the use of the IMP when the causality assessment was "probable" or "possible".
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse events, AEs (including SAEs), were collected from the start of IMP administration until the End-of-study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.
The number of subjects that reported at least one adverse event (AE), or had at least one serious AE (SAE), including death, after administration of study product. The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as "unlikely", "possibly" or "probably" related to the IMP. An AE was considered causally related to the use of the IMP when the causality assessment was "probable" or "possible".
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events, AEs (including SAEs), were collected from the start of IMP administration until the End-of-study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.
The number of subjects that reported at least one adverse event (AE), or had at least one serious AE (SAE), including death, after administration of study product. The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as "unlikely", "possibly" or "probably" related to the IMP. An AE was considered causally related to the use of the IMP when the causality assessment was "probable" or "possible".
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinitis allergic
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse events, AEs (including SAEs), were collected from the start of IMP administration until the End-of-study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.
The number of subjects that reported at least one adverse event (AE), or had at least one serious AE (SAE), including death, after administration of study product. The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as "unlikely", "possibly" or "probably" related to the IMP. An AE was considered causally related to the use of the IMP when the causality assessment was "probable" or "possible".
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events, AEs (including SAEs), were collected from the start of IMP administration until the End-of-study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.
The number of subjects that reported at least one adverse event (AE), or had at least one serious AE (SAE), including death, after administration of study product. The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as "unlikely", "possibly" or "probably" related to the IMP. An AE was considered causally related to the use of the IMP when the causality assessment was "probable" or "possible".
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse events, AEs (including SAEs), were collected from the start of IMP administration until the End-of-study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.
The number of subjects that reported at least one adverse event (AE), or had at least one serious AE (SAE), including death, after administration of study product. The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as "unlikely", "possibly" or "probably" related to the IMP. An AE was considered causally related to the use of the IMP when the causality assessment was "probable" or "possible".

Additional Information

Charlotte Edenius

Gesynta Pharma AB

Phone: +46733864246

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Any confidential information relating to the IMP or the study, including any data and results from the study, will be the exclusive property of the Sponsor. The Investigator and any other persons involved in the study are responsible for protecting the confidentiality of this proprietary information belonging to the Sponsor. The results from this study may be submitted for publication at the discretion of the Sponsor.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER