Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study in Healthy Subjects to Evaluate Pharmacokinetics and Food Effect After Dosing of GS-248 (NCT NCT04617509)
NCT ID: NCT04617509
Last Updated: 2021-08-31
Results Overview
The Maximal Plasma Concentration (Cmax) after a single dose of Formulation A and B of GS 248 respectively in fasting conditions and after a single dose of Formulation A of GS-248 in fed condition. Blood samples for bioanalysis of GS-248 and subsequent PK analysis were collected as venous blood samples.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
14 participants
From time 0 (time of dosing) to 48 hours after dose (concentration measured at timepoints pre-dose and 0:15, 0:30, 1, 1:30, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 hours post-dose)
2021-08-31
Participant Flow
The subjects were recruited from CTC's database of healthy volunteers and from advertising in media (including social media). Screening visits were performed at CTC research clinic. Recruitment period started 24MAR2020 (the day after approval received from IEC and CA) and lasted until 06APR2020 (date for last subject screened).
Screening (Visit 1) took place from Day -28 to Day -1 and included an eligibility check and a general health assessment. A total of 29 subjects were screened for participation. Eleven subjects were screening failures and 4 subjects were reserves who were not used in the study. Fourteen subjects were included and dosed in the study.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Part I GS-248 Formulation A
Formulation A given in fasting state.
Formulation A GS-248: Formulation A of GS-248 in a lipid-based size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
|
Part I GS-248 Formulation B
Formulation B given in fasting state.
Formulation B GS-248: Formulation B of GS-248 in a dry powder size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
|
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fed Condition
Formulation A given in fed condition. Formulation A was selected for the Food Interaction Part of the study, based on the PK profiles of both Formulation A and B.
Formulation A of GS-248 in a capsule, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Period 1: Part 1 Formulation A
STARTED
|
14
|
0
|
0
|
|
Period 1: Part 1 Formulation A
COMPLETED
|
14
|
0
|
0
|
|
Period 1: Part 1 Formulation A
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Period 2: Part 1 Formulation B
STARTED
|
0
|
14
|
0
|
|
Period 2: Part 1 Formulation B
COMPLETED
|
0
|
14
|
0
|
|
Period 2: Part 1 Formulation B
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Period 3: Part 2 Formulation A Fed Cond.
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
14
|
|
Period 3: Part 2 Formulation A Fed Cond.
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
13
|
|
Period 3: Part 2 Formulation A Fed Cond.
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
A Study in Healthy Subjects to Evaluate Pharmacokinetics and Food Effect After Dosing of GS-248
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Overall Trial
n=14 Participants
All subjects who were included in the study i.e. randomized in Part I GS-248 Formulation A.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
44.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.1 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
|
14 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Height
|
171.6 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Weight
|
74.5 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.14 • n=5 Participants
|
|
BMI
|
25.1 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From time 0 (time of dosing) to 48 hours after dose (concentration measured at timepoints pre-dose and 0:15, 0:30, 1, 1:30, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 hours post-dose)Population: Part I Formulation A: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part I Formulation B: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part II Formulation A fed: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 13 subjects. Part II Formulation A fasting (partial set): Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 13 subjects.
The Maximal Plasma Concentration (Cmax) after a single dose of Formulation A and B of GS 248 respectively in fasting conditions and after a single dose of Formulation A of GS-248 in fed condition. Blood samples for bioanalysis of GS-248 and subsequent PK analysis were collected as venous blood samples.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part I GS-248 Formulation A
n=14 Participants
Formulation A given in fasting state.
Formulation A GS-248: Formulation A of GS-248 in a lipid-based size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
|
Part I GS-248 Formulation B
n=14 Participants
Formulation B given in fasting state.
Formulation B GS-248: Formulation B of GS-248 in a dry powder size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
|
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fed Condition
n=13 Participants
Formulation A given in fed condition. Formulation A was selected for the Food Interaction Part of the study, based on the PK profiles of both Formulation A and B.
Formulation A of GS-248 in a capsule, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg with breakfast.
|
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fasting Condition (Partial Set)
n=13 Participants
This arm (subject analysis set) was used for a comparison of PK parameters between Formulation A under fed and fasted conditions (namely calculation of the relative bioavailability). The analysis set is part of the Food Interaction PK Analysis Set (PKAS - Food Interaction), and consisted of all subjects in Arm 1 (receiving Formulation A under fasted conditions) who, subsequently, also received Formulation A under fed conditions in the third treatment period of the study (Arm 3). Since 1 subject terminated the study prematurely between study treatment period 1 and 3, only 13 subjects were included in this analysis set that was used for the assessment of the relative bioavailability of Formulation A in fed versus fasted conditions.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cmax
|
508.6 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 220.9
|
384.5 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 219.1
|
289.5 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 184.4
|
499.5 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 227.2
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From time 0 (time of dosing) to 48 hours after dose (concentration measured at timepoints pre-dose and 0:15, 0:30, 1, 1:30, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 hours post-dose)Population: Part I Formulation A: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part I Formulation B: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part II Formulation A fed: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 13 subjects. Part II Formulation A fasting (partial set): Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 13 subjects.
The Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the time interval 0-infinity of GS-248 after a single dose of Formulation A and B of GS 248 respectively in fasting conditions and after a single dose of Formulation A of GS-248 in fed condition. The mean AUC of GS-248 was assessed by means of non-compartmental analysis (NCA). Blood samples for bioanalysis of GS-248 and subsequent PK analysis were collected as venous blood samples.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part I GS-248 Formulation A
n=14 Participants
Formulation A given in fasting state.
Formulation A GS-248: Formulation A of GS-248 in a lipid-based size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
|
Part I GS-248 Formulation B
n=14 Participants
Formulation B given in fasting state.
Formulation B GS-248: Formulation B of GS-248 in a dry powder size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
|
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fed Condition
n=13 Participants
Formulation A given in fed condition. Formulation A was selected for the Food Interaction Part of the study, based on the PK profiles of both Formulation A and B.
Formulation A of GS-248 in a capsule, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg with breakfast.
|
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fasting Condition (Partial Set)
n=13 Participants
This arm (subject analysis set) was used for a comparison of PK parameters between Formulation A under fed and fasted conditions (namely calculation of the relative bioavailability). The analysis set is part of the Food Interaction PK Analysis Set (PKAS - Food Interaction), and consisted of all subjects in Arm 1 (receiving Formulation A under fasted conditions) who, subsequently, also received Formulation A under fed conditions in the third treatment period of the study (Arm 3). Since 1 subject terminated the study prematurely between study treatment period 1 and 3, only 13 subjects were included in this analysis set that was used for the assessment of the relative bioavailability of Formulation A in fed versus fasted conditions.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AUC0-inf
|
1491 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 478.1
|
1182 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 567.4
|
1119 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 463.9
|
1494 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 497.4
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From time 0 (time of dosing) to 24 hours after dose (concentration measured at timepoints pre-dose and 0:15, 0:30, 1, 1:30, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 hours post-dose)Population: Part I Formulation A: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part I Formulation B: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part II Formulation A fed: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 13 subjects. Part II Formulation A fasting (partial set): Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 13 subjects.
The Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the time interval 0-24h of GS-248 after a single dose of Formulation A and B of GS 248 respectively in fasting conditions and after a single dose of Formulation A of GS-248 in fed condition. The mean AUC of GS-248 for the time interval 0-24 h was assessed by means of non-compartmental analysis (NCA). Blood samples for bioanalysis of GS-248 and subsequent PK analysis were collected as venous blood samples.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part I GS-248 Formulation A
n=14 Participants
Formulation A given in fasting state.
Formulation A GS-248: Formulation A of GS-248 in a lipid-based size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
|
Part I GS-248 Formulation B
n=14 Participants
Formulation B given in fasting state.
Formulation B GS-248: Formulation B of GS-248 in a dry powder size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
|
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fed Condition
n=13 Participants
Formulation A given in fed condition. Formulation A was selected for the Food Interaction Part of the study, based on the PK profiles of both Formulation A and B.
Formulation A of GS-248 in a capsule, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg with breakfast.
|
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fasting Condition (Partial Set)
n=13 Participants
This arm (subject analysis set) was used for a comparison of PK parameters between Formulation A under fed and fasted conditions (namely calculation of the relative bioavailability). The analysis set is part of the Food Interaction PK Analysis Set (PKAS - Food Interaction), and consisted of all subjects in Arm 1 (receiving Formulation A under fasted conditions) who, subsequently, also received Formulation A under fed conditions in the third treatment period of the study (Arm 3). Since 1 subject terminated the study prematurely between study treatment period 1 and 3, only 13 subjects were included in this analysis set that was used for the assessment of the relative bioavailability of Formulation A in fed versus fasted conditions.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AUC0-24h
|
1420 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 459.4
|
1104 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 527.2
|
1014 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 377.6
|
1419 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 478.2
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From time 0 (time of dosing) to 48 hours after dose (concentration measured at timepoints pre-dose and 0:15, 0:30, 1, 1:30, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 hours post-dose)Population: Part I Formulation A: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part I Formulation B: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part II Formulation A fed: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 13 subjects. Part II Formulation A fasting (partial set): Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 13 subjects.
Time to Cmax (Tmax) after a single dose of Formulation A and B of GS 248 respectively in fasting conditions and after a single dose of Formulation A of GS-248 in fed condition. Blood samples for bioanalysis of GS-248 and subsequent PK analysis were collected as venous blood samples.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part I GS-248 Formulation A
n=14 Participants
Formulation A given in fasting state.
Formulation A GS-248: Formulation A of GS-248 in a lipid-based size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
|
Part I GS-248 Formulation B
n=14 Participants
Formulation B given in fasting state.
Formulation B GS-248: Formulation B of GS-248 in a dry powder size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
|
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fed Condition
n=13 Participants
Formulation A given in fed condition. Formulation A was selected for the Food Interaction Part of the study, based on the PK profiles of both Formulation A and B.
Formulation A of GS-248 in a capsule, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg with breakfast.
|
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fasting Condition (Partial Set)
n=13 Participants
This arm (subject analysis set) was used for a comparison of PK parameters between Formulation A under fed and fasted conditions (namely calculation of the relative bioavailability). The analysis set is part of the Food Interaction PK Analysis Set (PKAS - Food Interaction), and consisted of all subjects in Arm 1 (receiving Formulation A under fasted conditions) who, subsequently, also received Formulation A under fed conditions in the third treatment period of the study (Arm 3). Since 1 subject terminated the study prematurely between study treatment period 1 and 3, only 13 subjects were included in this analysis set that was used for the assessment of the relative bioavailability of Formulation A in fed versus fasted conditions.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Tmax
|
1.500 hours
Interval 1.0 to 3.0
|
1.500 hours
Interval 1.0 to 3.03
|
3.000 hours
Interval 1.0 to 4.03
|
1.500 hours
Interval 1.0 to 3.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: T1/2 (z) was assessed for the terminal elimination phase up to 48 hoursPopulation: Part I Formulation A: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part I Formulation B: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part II Formulation A fed: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 13 subjects. Part II Formulation A fasting (partial set): Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 13 subjects.
Plasma half-life associated with the terminal elimination phase (T1/2(z)) after a single dose of Formulation A and B of GS 248 respectively in fasting conditions and after a single dose of Formulation A of GS-248 in fed condition. Blood samples for bioanalysis of GS-248 and subsequent PK analysis were collected as venous blood samples.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part I GS-248 Formulation A
n=14 Participants
Formulation A given in fasting state.
Formulation A GS-248: Formulation A of GS-248 in a lipid-based size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
|
Part I GS-248 Formulation B
n=14 Participants
Formulation B given in fasting state.
Formulation B GS-248: Formulation B of GS-248 in a dry powder size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
|
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fed Condition
n=13 Participants
Formulation A given in fed condition. Formulation A was selected for the Food Interaction Part of the study, based on the PK profiles of both Formulation A and B.
Formulation A of GS-248 in a capsule, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg with breakfast.
|
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fasting Condition (Partial Set)
n=13 Participants
This arm (subject analysis set) was used for a comparison of PK parameters between Formulation A under fed and fasted conditions (namely calculation of the relative bioavailability). The analysis set is part of the Food Interaction PK Analysis Set (PKAS - Food Interaction), and consisted of all subjects in Arm 1 (receiving Formulation A under fasted conditions) who, subsequently, also received Formulation A under fed conditions in the third treatment period of the study (Arm 3). Since 1 subject terminated the study prematurely between study treatment period 1 and 3, only 13 subjects were included in this analysis set that was used for the assessment of the relative bioavailability of Formulation A in fed versus fasted conditions.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
T1/2(z)
|
10.69 hours
Standard Deviation 2.912
|
16.09 hours
Standard Deviation 15.26
|
13.36 hours
Standard Deviation 9.914
|
10.91 hours
Standard Deviation 2.902
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Vz/F was assessed for the terminal elimination phase up to 48 hours.Population: Part I Formulation A: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part I Formulation B: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part II Formulation A fed: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 13 subjects. Part II Formulation A fasting (partial set): Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 13 subjects.
The mean volume of distribution (Vz/F) after a single dose of Formulation A and B of GS 248 respectively in fasting conditions and after a single dose of Formulation A of GS-248 in fed condition. Blood samples for bioanalysis of GS-248 and subsequent PK analysis were collected as venous blood samples.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part I GS-248 Formulation A
n=14 Participants
Formulation A given in fasting state.
Formulation A GS-248: Formulation A of GS-248 in a lipid-based size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
|
Part I GS-248 Formulation B
n=14 Participants
Formulation B given in fasting state.
Formulation B GS-248: Formulation B of GS-248 in a dry powder size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
|
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fed Condition
n=13 Participants
Formulation A given in fed condition. Formulation A was selected for the Food Interaction Part of the study, based on the PK profiles of both Formulation A and B.
Formulation A of GS-248 in a capsule, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg with breakfast.
|
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fasting Condition (Partial Set)
n=13 Participants
This arm (subject analysis set) was used for a comparison of PK parameters between Formulation A under fed and fasted conditions (namely calculation of the relative bioavailability). The analysis set is part of the Food Interaction PK Analysis Set (PKAS - Food Interaction), and consisted of all subjects in Arm 1 (receiving Formulation A under fasted conditions) who, subsequently, also received Formulation A under fed conditions in the third treatment period of the study (Arm 3). Since 1 subject terminated the study prematurely between study treatment period 1 and 3, only 13 subjects were included in this analysis set that was used for the assessment of the relative bioavailability of Formulation A in fed versus fasted conditions.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Vz/F
|
2071 L
Standard Deviation 1035
|
3884 L
Standard Deviation 2940
|
3110 L
Standard Deviation 1588
|
2125 L
Standard Deviation 1057
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: CL/F was assessed for a single dose of GS-248 up to 48 hours.Population: Part I Formulation A: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part I Formulation B: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part II Formulation A fed: Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 13 subjects. Part II Formulation A fasting (partial set): Data based on Formulation PK analysis set i.e. 13 subjects.
The mean total clearance (CL/F) after a single dose of Formulation A and B of GS 248 respectively in fasting conditions and after a single dose of Formulation A of GS-248 in fed condition. The mean total clearance (CL/F) was calculated by non-compartmental analysis (NCA). Blood samples for bioanalysis of GS-248 and subsequent PK analysis were collected as venous blood samples.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part I GS-248 Formulation A
n=14 Participants
Formulation A given in fasting state.
Formulation A GS-248: Formulation A of GS-248 in a lipid-based size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
|
Part I GS-248 Formulation B
n=14 Participants
Formulation B given in fasting state.
Formulation B GS-248: Formulation B of GS-248 in a dry powder size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
|
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fed Condition
n=13 Participants
Formulation A given in fed condition. Formulation A was selected for the Food Interaction Part of the study, based on the PK profiles of both Formulation A and B.
Formulation A of GS-248 in a capsule, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg with breakfast.
|
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fasting Condition (Partial Set)
n=13 Participants
This arm (subject analysis set) was used for a comparison of PK parameters between Formulation A under fed and fasted conditions (namely calculation of the relative bioavailability). The analysis set is part of the Food Interaction PK Analysis Set (PKAS - Food Interaction), and consisted of all subjects in Arm 1 (receiving Formulation A under fasted conditions) who, subsequently, also received Formulation A under fed conditions in the third treatment period of the study (Arm 3). Since 1 subject terminated the study prematurely between study treatment period 1 and 3, only 13 subjects were included in this analysis set that was used for the assessment of the relative bioavailability of Formulation A in fed versus fasted conditions.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CL/F
|
132.9 L/h
Standard Deviation 50.59
|
191.4 L/h
Standard Deviation 105.0
|
185.2 L/h
Standard Deviation 76.08
|
133.7 L/h
Standard Deviation 52.56
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application in Part I until the end-of- study visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.Population: Part I Formulation A: Data based on safety analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part I Formulation B: Data based on safety analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part II Formulation A fed: Data based on safety analysis set i.e. 13 subjects.
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed by the Investigator as "unlikely", "possibly" or "probably" related to the IMP. An AE was considered causally related to the use of the IMP when the causality assessment was "probable" or "possible".
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part I GS-248 Formulation A
n=14 Participants
Formulation A given in fasting state.
Formulation A GS-248: Formulation A of GS-248 in a lipid-based size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
|
Part I GS-248 Formulation B
n=14 Participants
Formulation B given in fasting state.
Formulation B GS-248: Formulation B of GS-248 in a dry powder size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
|
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fed Condition
n=13 Participants
Formulation A given in fed condition. Formulation A was selected for the Food Interaction Part of the study, based on the PK profiles of both Formulation A and B.
Formulation A of GS-248 in a capsule, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg with breakfast.
|
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fasting Condition (Partial Set)
This arm (subject analysis set) was used for a comparison of PK parameters between Formulation A under fed and fasted conditions (namely calculation of the relative bioavailability). The analysis set is part of the Food Interaction PK Analysis Set (PKAS - Food Interaction), and consisted of all subjects in Arm 1 (receiving Formulation A under fasted conditions) who, subsequently, also received Formulation A under fed conditions in the third treatment period of the study (Arm 3). Since 1 subject terminated the study prematurely between study treatment period 1 and 3, only 13 subjects were included in this analysis set that was used for the assessment of the relative bioavailability of Formulation A in fed versus fasted conditions.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Treatment Related Adverse Events
|
7 events
|
3 events
|
1 events
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Physical examination was performed at pre-defined timepoints from the Screening Visit until the End-of- Study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.Population: Part I Formulation A: Data based on safety analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part I Formulation B: Data based on safety analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part II Formulation A fed: Data based on safety analysis set i.e. 13 subjects.
A complete physical examination included assessments of the head, eyes, ears, nose, throat, skin, thyroid, neurological, lungs, cardiovascular, abdomen (liver and spleen), lymph nodes and extremities. A short version of physical examination included an assessment of selected body systems at the judgement of the Investigator but at least included cardiovascular, lung and abdomen. The results of the examinations were documented in the eCRF as normal, abnormal not clinically significant (NCS) or abnormal clinically significant (CS). Post-dose physical examination findings judged as abnormal CS were reported as AEs.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part I GS-248 Formulation A
n=14 Participants
Formulation A given in fasting state.
Formulation A GS-248: Formulation A of GS-248 in a lipid-based size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
|
Part I GS-248 Formulation B
n=14 Participants
Formulation B given in fasting state.
Formulation B GS-248: Formulation B of GS-248 in a dry powder size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
|
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fed Condition
n=13 Participants
Formulation A given in fed condition. Formulation A was selected for the Food Interaction Part of the study, based on the PK profiles of both Formulation A and B.
Formulation A of GS-248 in a capsule, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg with breakfast.
|
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fasting Condition (Partial Set)
This arm (subject analysis set) was used for a comparison of PK parameters between Formulation A under fed and fasted conditions (namely calculation of the relative bioavailability). The analysis set is part of the Food Interaction PK Analysis Set (PKAS - Food Interaction), and consisted of all subjects in Arm 1 (receiving Formulation A under fasted conditions) who, subsequently, also received Formulation A under fed conditions in the third treatment period of the study (Arm 3). Since 1 subject terminated the study prematurely between study treatment period 1 and 3, only 13 subjects were included in this analysis set that was used for the assessment of the relative bioavailability of Formulation A in fed versus fasted conditions.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Clinically Significant (CS) Changes in Physical Examination
|
0 Number of abnormal CS events
|
0 Number of abnormal CS events
|
0 Number of abnormal CS events
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Vital signs ware assessed at pre-defined timepoints from the Screening Visit until the End-of- Study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.Population: Part I Formulation A: Data based on safety analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part I Formulation B: Data based on safety analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part II Formulation A fed: Data based on safety analysis set i.e. 13 subjects.
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure and pulse were measured in supine position after 10 minutes of rest. Vital signs were judged as normal, abnormal NCS or abnormal CS.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part I GS-248 Formulation A
n=14 Participants
Formulation A given in fasting state.
Formulation A GS-248: Formulation A of GS-248 in a lipid-based size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
|
Part I GS-248 Formulation B
n=14 Participants
Formulation B given in fasting state.
Formulation B GS-248: Formulation B of GS-248 in a dry powder size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
|
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fed Condition
n=13 Participants
Formulation A given in fed condition. Formulation A was selected for the Food Interaction Part of the study, based on the PK profiles of both Formulation A and B.
Formulation A of GS-248 in a capsule, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg with breakfast.
|
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fasting Condition (Partial Set)
This arm (subject analysis set) was used for a comparison of PK parameters between Formulation A under fed and fasted conditions (namely calculation of the relative bioavailability). The analysis set is part of the Food Interaction PK Analysis Set (PKAS - Food Interaction), and consisted of all subjects in Arm 1 (receiving Formulation A under fasted conditions) who, subsequently, also received Formulation A under fed conditions in the third treatment period of the study (Arm 3). Since 1 subject terminated the study prematurely between study treatment period 1 and 3, only 13 subjects were included in this analysis set that was used for the assessment of the relative bioavailability of Formulation A in fed versus fasted conditions.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Clinically Significant (CS) Changes in Vital Signs
|
0 Number of abnormal CS events
|
0 Number of abnormal CS events
|
0 Number of abnormal CS events
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: ECG evaluation was assessed at pre-defined timepoints from the Screening Visit until the End-of- Study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.Population: Part I Formulation A: Data based on safety analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part I Formulation B: Data based on safety analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part II Formulation A fed: Data based on safety analysis set i.e. 13 subjects.
Single 12-lead ECG was recorded in supine position after 10 minutes of rest using an ECG machine. HR and PR, QRS, QT and QTcF intervals were recorded. Safety ECGs were reviewed and interpreted on-site by the Investigator. All ECGs were categorised as "normal", "abnormal, not clinically significant", or "abnormal, clinically significant".
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part I GS-248 Formulation A
n=14 Participants
Formulation A given in fasting state.
Formulation A GS-248: Formulation A of GS-248 in a lipid-based size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
|
Part I GS-248 Formulation B
n=14 Participants
Formulation B given in fasting state.
Formulation B GS-248: Formulation B of GS-248 in a dry powder size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
|
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fed Condition
n=13 Participants
Formulation A given in fed condition. Formulation A was selected for the Food Interaction Part of the study, based on the PK profiles of both Formulation A and B.
Formulation A of GS-248 in a capsule, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg with breakfast.
|
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fasting Condition (Partial Set)
This arm (subject analysis set) was used for a comparison of PK parameters between Formulation A under fed and fasted conditions (namely calculation of the relative bioavailability). The analysis set is part of the Food Interaction PK Analysis Set (PKAS - Food Interaction), and consisted of all subjects in Arm 1 (receiving Formulation A under fasted conditions) who, subsequently, also received Formulation A under fed conditions in the third treatment period of the study (Arm 3). Since 1 subject terminated the study prematurely between study treatment period 1 and 3, only 13 subjects were included in this analysis set that was used for the assessment of the relative bioavailability of Formulation A in fed versus fasted conditions.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Clinically Significant (CS) Changes in Resting 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)
|
0 Number of abnormal CS events
|
0 Number of abnormal CS events
|
0 Number of abnormal CS events
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Blood samples were collected at pre-defined timepoints from the Screening Visit until the End-of- Study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.Population: Part I Formulation A: Data based on safety analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part I Formulation B: Data based on safety analysis set i.e. 14 subjects. Part II Formulation A fed: Data based on safety analysis set i.e. 13 subjects.
Blood samples for analysis of clinical chemistry and haematology parameters were collected through venepuncture or an indwelling venous catheter and sent to the certified clinical chemistry laboratory at Uppsala University Hospital and analysed by routine analytical methods. Urine analysis was performed at the research clinic using dip sticks. Safety laboratory parameters were judged as normal, abnormal NCS or abnormal CS.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part I GS-248 Formulation A
n=14 Participants
Formulation A given in fasting state.
Formulation A GS-248: Formulation A of GS-248 in a lipid-based size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
|
Part I GS-248 Formulation B
n=14 Participants
Formulation B given in fasting state.
Formulation B GS-248: Formulation B of GS-248 in a dry powder size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
|
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fed Condition
n=13 Participants
Formulation A given in fed condition. Formulation A was selected for the Food Interaction Part of the study, based on the PK profiles of both Formulation A and B.
Formulation A of GS-248 in a capsule, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg with breakfast.
|
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fasting Condition (Partial Set)
This arm (subject analysis set) was used for a comparison of PK parameters between Formulation A under fed and fasted conditions (namely calculation of the relative bioavailability). The analysis set is part of the Food Interaction PK Analysis Set (PKAS - Food Interaction), and consisted of all subjects in Arm 1 (receiving Formulation A under fasted conditions) who, subsequently, also received Formulation A under fed conditions in the third treatment period of the study (Arm 3). Since 1 subject terminated the study prematurely between study treatment period 1 and 3, only 13 subjects were included in this analysis set that was used for the assessment of the relative bioavailability of Formulation A in fed versus fasted conditions.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Clinically Significant (CS) Changes in Safety Laboratory Parameters
|
0 Number of abnormal CS events
|
1 Number of abnormal CS events
|
1 Number of abnormal CS events
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Part I GS-248 Formulation A
Part I GS-248 Formulation B
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fed Condition
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Part I GS-248 Formulation A
n=14 participants at risk
Formulation A given in fasting state.
Formulation A GS-248: Formulation A of GS-248 in a lipid-based size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
|
Part I GS-248 Formulation B
n=14 participants at risk
Formulation B given in fasting state.
Formulation B GS-248: Formulation B of GS-248 in a dry powder size 1 capsules, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
|
Part II GS-248 Formulation A in Fed Condition
n=13 participants at risk
Formulation A given in fed condition. Formulation A was selected for the Food Interaction Part of the study, based on the PK profiles of both Formulation A and B.
Formulation A of GS-248 in a capsule, dose 120 mg given as a single-dose of 3 capsules a´40 mg.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
42.9%
6/14 • Number of events 8 • Adverse events, AEs (including SAEs), were collected from the start of IMP administration until the End-of-study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.
The number of subjects that reported at least one adverse event (AE), or had at least one serious AE (SAE), including death, after administration of study product. The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as "unlikely", "possibly" or "probably" related to the IMP. An AE was considered causally related to the use of the IMP when the causality assessment was "probable" or "possible".
|
21.4%
3/14 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events, AEs (including SAEs), were collected from the start of IMP administration until the End-of-study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.
The number of subjects that reported at least one adverse event (AE), or had at least one serious AE (SAE), including death, after administration of study product. The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as "unlikely", "possibly" or "probably" related to the IMP. An AE was considered causally related to the use of the IMP when the causality assessment was "probable" or "possible".
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events, AEs (including SAEs), were collected from the start of IMP administration until the End-of-study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.
The number of subjects that reported at least one adverse event (AE), or had at least one serious AE (SAE), including death, after administration of study product. The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as "unlikely", "possibly" or "probably" related to the IMP. An AE was considered causally related to the use of the IMP when the causality assessment was "probable" or "possible".
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse events, AEs (including SAEs), were collected from the start of IMP administration until the End-of-study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.
The number of subjects that reported at least one adverse event (AE), or had at least one serious AE (SAE), including death, after administration of study product. The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as "unlikely", "possibly" or "probably" related to the IMP. An AE was considered causally related to the use of the IMP when the causality assessment was "probable" or "possible".
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events, AEs (including SAEs), were collected from the start of IMP administration until the End-of-study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.
The number of subjects that reported at least one adverse event (AE), or had at least one serious AE (SAE), including death, after administration of study product. The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as "unlikely", "possibly" or "probably" related to the IMP. An AE was considered causally related to the use of the IMP when the causality assessment was "probable" or "possible".
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse events, AEs (including SAEs), were collected from the start of IMP administration until the End-of-study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.
The number of subjects that reported at least one adverse event (AE), or had at least one serious AE (SAE), including death, after administration of study product. The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as "unlikely", "possibly" or "probably" related to the IMP. An AE was considered causally related to the use of the IMP when the causality assessment was "probable" or "possible".
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse events, AEs (including SAEs), were collected from the start of IMP administration until the End-of-study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.
The number of subjects that reported at least one adverse event (AE), or had at least one serious AE (SAE), including death, after administration of study product. The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as "unlikely", "possibly" or "probably" related to the IMP. An AE was considered causally related to the use of the IMP when the causality assessment was "probable" or "possible".
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events, AEs (including SAEs), were collected from the start of IMP administration until the End-of-study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.
The number of subjects that reported at least one adverse event (AE), or had at least one serious AE (SAE), including death, after administration of study product. The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as "unlikely", "possibly" or "probably" related to the IMP. An AE was considered causally related to the use of the IMP when the causality assessment was "probable" or "possible".
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse events, AEs (including SAEs), were collected from the start of IMP administration until the End-of-study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.
The number of subjects that reported at least one adverse event (AE), or had at least one serious AE (SAE), including death, after administration of study product. The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as "unlikely", "possibly" or "probably" related to the IMP. An AE was considered causally related to the use of the IMP when the causality assessment was "probable" or "possible".
|
|
Investigations
Haemoglobin decreased
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse events, AEs (including SAEs), were collected from the start of IMP administration until the End-of-study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.
The number of subjects that reported at least one adverse event (AE), or had at least one serious AE (SAE), including death, after administration of study product. The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as "unlikely", "possibly" or "probably" related to the IMP. An AE was considered causally related to the use of the IMP when the causality assessment was "probable" or "possible".
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse events, AEs (including SAEs), were collected from the start of IMP administration until the End-of-study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.
The number of subjects that reported at least one adverse event (AE), or had at least one serious AE (SAE), including death, after administration of study product. The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as "unlikely", "possibly" or "probably" related to the IMP. An AE was considered causally related to the use of the IMP when the causality assessment was "probable" or "possible".
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events, AEs (including SAEs), were collected from the start of IMP administration until the End-of-study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.
The number of subjects that reported at least one adverse event (AE), or had at least one serious AE (SAE), including death, after administration of study product. The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as "unlikely", "possibly" or "probably" related to the IMP. An AE was considered causally related to the use of the IMP when the causality assessment was "probable" or "possible".
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinitis allergic
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse events, AEs (including SAEs), were collected from the start of IMP administration until the End-of-study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.
The number of subjects that reported at least one adverse event (AE), or had at least one serious AE (SAE), including death, after administration of study product. The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as "unlikely", "possibly" or "probably" related to the IMP. An AE was considered causally related to the use of the IMP when the causality assessment was "probable" or "possible".
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events, AEs (including SAEs), were collected from the start of IMP administration until the End-of-study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.
The number of subjects that reported at least one adverse event (AE), or had at least one serious AE (SAE), including death, after administration of study product. The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as "unlikely", "possibly" or "probably" related to the IMP. An AE was considered causally related to the use of the IMP when the causality assessment was "probable" or "possible".
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse events, AEs (including SAEs), were collected from the start of IMP administration until the End-of-study Visit i.e. Visit 7, day 3, up to 30 days.
The number of subjects that reported at least one adverse event (AE), or had at least one serious AE (SAE), including death, after administration of study product. The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as "unlikely", "possibly" or "probably" related to the IMP. An AE was considered causally related to the use of the IMP when the causality assessment was "probable" or "possible".
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Any confidential information relating to the IMP or the study, including any data and results from the study, will be the exclusive property of the Sponsor. The Investigator and any other persons involved in the study are responsible for protecting the confidentiality of this proprietary information belonging to the Sponsor. The results from this study may be submitted for publication at the discretion of the Sponsor.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER