Pilot Feasibility Study of Remote Problem Management Plus for Adults Affected by COVID-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

45 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-03-04

Study Completion Date

2023-05-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a pilot feasibility study of remotely delivered Problem Management Plus, a low-intensity psychological intervention, delivered in five sessions to adults affected by crisis. The current study will evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention when delivered remotely via Zoom to community members in New York City impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. The investigator's goal is to use qualitative and quantitative approaches to inform procedures for a subsequent cluster randomized control trial of Problem Management Plus versus enhanced usual care. A mixed-methods design will be used to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, perceived utility, and impact of the remotely delivered PM+ intervention, to determine recruitment and retention rates, to assess ethics and safety of trial procedures. Additionally, the study will evaluate the acceptability, feasibility and fidelity of the remote training and supervision of helpers trained to deliver the intervention.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Emotion Regulation Training Via Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic

NCT04615416

Distress, Emotional Emotional Dysfunction Anxiety +1 more

COMPLETED NA

Pilot Feasibility Study of Psychosocial Support to Improve Well-being of Adults in Humanitarian Crises in Nepal

NCT03359486

Depression

COMPLETED NA

Telemedicine for Improved Delivery of Psychosocial Treatments for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder

NCT01158001

Posttraumatic Stress Disorders Depression Anxiety

COMPLETED NA

Developing a Booster Session for Problem Management Plus in the Bahamas: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

NCT07208851

Depression Symptoms Anxiety Symptoms

RECRUITING NA

Reconnecting to Ourselves and Others in Virtual Meetings (ROOM)

NCT06360562

Mood Disorders Anxiety Disorders Psychotic Disorders

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Problem Management Plus (PM+) is recommended as part of the World Health Organization Mental Health Gap Action Program for communities affected by adversity. It is a low-intensity, scalable manualized intervention that was designed according to a task-sharing model of care. PM+ has four core features that make the intervention suitable for populations exposed to adversities in low-resource settings. First, it is a brief intervention (five sessions); second, it can be delivered by paraprofessionals (trained, non-specialist workers, lay or peer providers under the supervision of a mental health professional), using the principle of task shifting/task sharing; third, it is designed as a trans-diagnostic intervention to address a range of client-identified emotional (e.g. depression, anxiety, traumatic stress, general stress) and practical problems; and, fourth, it is designed for communities affected by any kind of adversity (e.g. violence, disasters) in low-income countries. The intervention was originally developed for adults affected by humanitarian crises and tested in low-income countries. A number of randomized controlled trials in Kenya, Pakistan, Nepal, as well as the Netherlands have indicated that PM+ delivered by non-specialist helpers is effective in decreasing symptoms of psychological distress (including depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms) and improving functioning; however, empirical evidence of the feasibility and efficacy of the remote training and delivery of PM+ is limited.

In May 2020, the United Nations released a policy brief emphasizing inclusion of mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) in national response plans including scaling up access to remote support (UN, 2020). The brief was released in response to emerging concerns of the negative mental health and psychosocial impacts arising from the health and societal consequences of COVID-19. Extant population-based research is showing high rates of anxiety, depression, and general distress in the US, while at the same time MHPSS provision has been disrupted or halted due to social distancing measures. Remote delivery forms of PM+ may serve as an important mechanism to facilitate access to care during the ongoing pandemic and into the future. Furthermore, there is very limited research with PM+ in high-income countries where specialized mental health interventions are available, but where access for certain populations or during periods of public health crisis is limited due to systemic and practical barriers. Even in high income countries, only 22.4% of those with depression receive minimally adequate care; however, 64.9% of those with depression perceive a need for treatment. The treatment gap may be considerably higher among marginalized groups and economically disadvantaged communities. COVID-19 continues to bring on widespread mental health disparities, particularly among vulnerable and underserved communities that are disproportionately affected by COVID-19. Brief, low-intensity interventions designed to be implemented by non-specialists represent a promising and scalable approach to minimize this treatment gap in under-served US populations by partnering with community-based organizations (CBO) to train and supervise staff already involved in social and public health services. An important first step before investing resources in training and implementation with CBOs is to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of remotely delivered PM+ with relevant community samples.

This is the first study to evaluate remotely delivered PM+ implemented by helpers whose training and supervision was conducted entirely online, as well as one of the first trials evaluating PM+ with community samples in the US. The aims of this pilot feasibility study are to a) assess interest from perspective beneficiaries by partnering with community-based organizations in New York City to recruit participants; b) to gather and evaluate information about the feasibility, acceptability and safety of the intervention, in particular when implemented via remote delivery; c) to identify whether the clinical and content adaptations that were made during the remote training, adaptation and conduct of initial practice cases are appropriate for the setting; and d) to assess possible problems of recruitment, delivery of the intervention and retention to ensure that procedures are adequate for a cluster randomized control trial. Additionally, the investigators will employ a single-arm, uncontrolled design in order to begin to examine the effectiveness and impact of remotely delivered PM+ among community members in New York City who are experiencing symptoms of common mental health problems. Lastly, trainees' knowledge and perceived self-efficacy in a) foundational helping skills based on common therapeutic factors and b) intervention-specific competencies will be evaluated pre-training, post-training and post-supervision.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Depression Anxiety Disorders Psychological Distress

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Remote Problem Management Plus

Five individual sessions of low-intensity psychological intervention

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Remote Problem Management Plus

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Five sessions of low-intensity, trans-diagnostic psychological intervention including the teaching and practice of the following strategies: stress management, problem solving, behavioral activation, and strengthening social support

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Remote Problem Management Plus

Five sessions of low-intensity, trans-diagnostic psychological intervention including the teaching and practice of the following strategies: stress management, problem solving, behavioral activation, and strengthening social support

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* English-speaking
* Help- or treatment-seeking
* Access to a device for conducting sessions via Zoom (e.g., smartphone, tablet, laptop or personal computer)

Exclusion Criteria

* Acute medical conditions or severe cognitive impairment (e.g., severe intellectual disability or dementia)
* Imminent suicide risk or expressed acute needs/protection risks (e.g., intimate partner violence risk)
* Presence of severe mental disorder (e.g., psychotic disorders)
* Hazardous substance use, substance dependency or substance use disorder (assessed using the Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST-10) and Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT-C)

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes