Vascular Graft Storage Solution Preserves Endothelial Function

NCT ID: NCT04614077

Last Updated: 2020-11-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

12 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-01

Study Completion Date

2020-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Since Saline is still the most widely used storage and flushing solution in cardiovascular procedures despite knowing evidence of its influence on the human endothelial cell function the main aim of this study was to assess the effect of DuraGraft©, an intraoperative graft treatment solution, on human saphenous vein segments 8 Remnants from the operation after trimming the bypass length), rat aortic segments and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) in comparison to saline.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Saline is still the most widely used storage and flushing solution in cardiovascular procedures despite knowing evidence of its influence on the human endothelial cell function. Aim of this study was to assess the effect of DuraGraft©, an intraoperative graft treatment solution, on human saphenous vein segments, rat aortic segments and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) in comparison to saline. According to literature saline could have detrimental effects on the endothelium but data shows conflicting evidence. Duragraft a so called endothelial preservation solution should protect the human endothelium. Intent of this observational study was to study the effects of both solutions and compare them.

Within 12 patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass surgery, left overs from saphenous vein graft segments were randomized to DuraGraft© (n=12/6) or saline (n=12/6) solution before intraoperative storage. These segments as well as rat aortic segments underwent assessment of vascular function in a multichamber isometric myograph system in comparison to Krebs-Henseleit solution (KHS), a physiologic organ buffer solution. Additionally, human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were used for cell viability tests.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Vein Injury

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A( saline)

The vein piece 1 cm is taken from one patient, then the piece is divided and assigned to saline or the specific solution.

ex vivo organ bath testing, preservation of vein sections without contact to patient

Intervention Type OTHER

1 piece of vein is separated during surgical bypass procedure, then randomized and put ex vivo in two solutions: saline and specific solution, then tested in the organ bath

B specific solution

The vein piece 1 cm is taken from one patient, then the piece is divided and assigned to saline or the specific solution.

ex vivo organ bath testing, preservation of vein sections without contact to patient

Intervention Type OTHER

1 piece of vein is separated during surgical bypass procedure, then randomized and put ex vivo in two solutions: saline and specific solution, then tested in the organ bath

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ex vivo organ bath testing, preservation of vein sections without contact to patient

1 piece of vein is separated during surgical bypass procedure, then randomized and put ex vivo in two solutions: saline and specific solution, then tested in the organ bath

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

organ bath ex vivo comparing saline vs specific solution

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient is undergoing isolated CABG procedure or CABG plus aortic or mitral valve surgery with at least one saphenous vein or radial artery grafts
* Patient is ≥18 years of age
* Patient (or a legally authorized representative) is willing and able to provide consent
* DuraGraft® is being used for the CABG procedure

Exclusion Criteria

* Participation in a device study or receiving active drug product in an investigational study within one month (30 days) prior to enrollment.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Klinikum Floridsdorf

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bernhard Winkler, Associate Professor Priv. Doz. DDR.

Associate Professor MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bernhard Winkler, Associate Professor Priv. Doz. DDR.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Klinikum Floridsdorf

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

KH North Vienna

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Santoli E, Di Mattia D, Boldorini R, Mingoli A, Tosoni A, Santoli C. University of Wisconsin solution and human saphenous vein graft preservation: preliminary anatomic report. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1993;7(10):548-52. doi: 10.1016/1010-7940(93)90055-g.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8267997 (View on PubMed)

Winkler B, Reineke D, Heinisch PP, Schonhoff F, Huber C, Kadner A, Englberger L, Carrel T. Graft preservation solutions in cardiovascular surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Aug;23(2):300-9. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw056. Epub 2016 Apr 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27068248 (View on PubMed)

Kiss A, Szabo PL, Dostal C, Arnold Z, Geisler D, Crailsheim I, Folkmann S, Grabenwoger M, Podesser BK, Winkler B. Specific Graft Treatment Solution Enhances Vascular Endothelial Function. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 28;23(11):368. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2311368. eCollection 2022 Nov.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39076175 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

A2020

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id