Trial Outcomes & Findings for Assessing an Animal-Assisted Treatment Program for Adults With Aphasia: The Persons With Aphasia Training Dogs Program (NCT NCT04610346)
NCT ID: NCT04610346
Last Updated: 2025-10-16
Results Overview
The Assessment of Living with Aphasia is a pictographic self-reported measure of quality of life living with aphasia across four domains (aphasia, participation, environment, and personal) and an overall evaluation of how well the participant judges that they are overcoming the 'wall' (obstacle) of aphasia. Participants respond using a visual-analog scale with nine points (0 (minimum), .5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4 (maximum) with higher values being associated with a better outcome. The total scaled score (0- minimum - 4- maximum) is the sum of the raw scores in each of the four domains divided by the number of questions pertaining to each domain, plus the response to the 'wall' question.
COMPLETED
NA
17 participants
Once within approximately 1 week of the end of training, then once approximately 3 months after end of training
2025-10-16
Participant Flow
Participants consented to participation either with a family dog or at a local animal shelter. People in the shelter dog condition were required to complete volunteer onboarding before beginning study activities. Five people consented to the shelter-dog condition were not able to complete shelter volunteer onboarding. They were withdrawn from the study prior to initiating study activities as they did not have access to a dog.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Immediate
Participants in this group will begin the training protocol immediately (within 1 week) after baseline pre-training evaluation is completed.
|
Delayed
Participants in the delayed arm will participate in two pre-training evaluations, one immediately upon enrollment and one at the end of the delay period immediately before beginning training
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
12
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Mid-point (Evaluation Immediately After Training)
|
9
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
9
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Immediate
Participants in this group will begin the training protocol immediately (within 1 week) after baseline pre-training evaluation is completed.
|
Delayed
Participants in the delayed arm will participate in two pre-training evaluations, one immediately upon enrollment and one at the end of the delay period immediately before beginning training
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
did not complete shelter onboarding
|
2
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Assessing an Animal-Assisted Treatment Program for Adults With Aphasia: The Persons With Aphasia Training Dogs Program
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Immediate
n=9 Participants
Participants in this group will begin the training protocol immediately (within 1 week) after baseline pre-training evaluation is completed.
|
Delayed
n=3 Participants
Participants in the delayed arm will participate in two pre-training evaluations, one immediately upon enrollment and one at the end of the delay period immediately before beginning training
|
Total
n=12 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
62.67 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.96 • n=5 Participants
|
53.33 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1 • n=7 Participants
|
60.33 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.14 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Western Aphasia Battery- Revised (WAB-R)
|
89.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5 • n=5 Participants
|
64.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 35.9 • n=7 Participants
|
83.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.1 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Assessment of Living with Aphasia (ALA)
|
2.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6 • n=5 Participants
|
2.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.057 • n=7 Participants
|
2.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Confidence after Stroke Measure (CaSM)
|
46.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9 • n=5 Participants
|
52 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.57 • n=7 Participants
|
48.17 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.52 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Behavioural Assessment of Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS)
|
13.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2 • n=5 Participants
|
13 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6 • n=7 Participants
|
13.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Once within approximately 1 week of the end of training, then once approximately 3 months after end of trainingThe Assessment of Living with Aphasia is a pictographic self-reported measure of quality of life living with aphasia across four domains (aphasia, participation, environment, and personal) and an overall evaluation of how well the participant judges that they are overcoming the 'wall' (obstacle) of aphasia. Participants respond using a visual-analog scale with nine points (0 (minimum), .5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4 (maximum) with higher values being associated with a better outcome. The total scaled score (0- minimum - 4- maximum) is the sum of the raw scores in each of the four domains divided by the number of questions pertaining to each domain, plus the response to the 'wall' question.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate
n=9 Participants
Participants in this group will begin the training protocol immediately (within 1 week) after baseline pre-training evaluation is completed.
|
Delayed
n=3 Participants
Participants in the delayed arm will participate in two pre-training evaluations, one immediately upon enrollment and one at the end of the delay period immediately before beginning training
|
|---|---|---|
|
Assessment of Living With Aphasia (ALA, Kagan et al., 2010)
Immediately after Training
|
2.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.67
|
2.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
|
Assessment of Living With Aphasia (ALA, Kagan et al., 2010)
Three months after training
|
2.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.69
|
2.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.23
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Once within approximately 1 week of the end of training, then once approximately 3 months after end of trainingParticipants were score on a PI-adapted version of the Pet Partners Animal-Handler Evaluation. Each participant was scored on a 3-point scale ( 0= not ready (minimum), 1= ok, 2= best (maximum)) by a certified professional dog trainer on their cueing of each of five basic obedience behaviors (LOOK, TOUCH TARGET, SIT, STAY, COME), hence the maximum score on each summative evaluation is 10 (rating of 2 x each of the 5 obedience behaviors). On this scale, a higher number indicates a better outcome. An a-priori criterion was set at 5 (out of 10) or higher for achieving competence.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate
n=9 Participants
Participants in this group will begin the training protocol immediately (within 1 week) after baseline pre-training evaluation is completed.
|
Delayed
n=3 Participants
Participants in the delayed arm will participate in two pre-training evaluations, one immediately upon enrollment and one at the end of the delay period immediately before beginning training
|
|---|---|---|
|
PI-adapted Version of Pet Partners Animal-handler Evaluation.
Immediately after training
|
8.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
|
5.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.0
|
|
PI-adapted Version of Pet Partners Animal-handler Evaluation.
Three months after training
|
9.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
|
8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Once within approximately 1 week of the end of training, then once approximately 3 months after end of trainingThe Confidence after Stroke Measures is a self-report measure that assesses three aspects of confidence after stroke, self-confidence, positive attitude, and social confidence. Per Horne et al., (2017) Participants self-rate on scales, with total values 0-81: Scale One -Self - Confidence = 0-27 Scale Two -Positive Attitude =0-24 Scale Three -Social Confidence =0-30 Higher scores are associated with higher levels of confidence. A change on total score of 4 or more is reported as being considered clinically significant. A score of 36 (-1 SD) indicates a possible concern, a score of 28(-2 SD) indicates a probable problem.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate
n=9 Participants
Participants in this group will begin the training protocol immediately (within 1 week) after baseline pre-training evaluation is completed.
|
Delayed
n=3 Participants
Participants in the delayed arm will participate in two pre-training evaluations, one immediately upon enrollment and one at the end of the delay period immediately before beginning training
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Confidence After Stroke Measure (Horne et al., 2017)
Immediately after training
|
47.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.7
|
55.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.6
|
|
The Confidence After Stroke Measure (Horne et al., 2017)
Three months after training
|
49.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.9
|
51.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Once within approximately 1 week of the end of training, then once approximately 3 months after end of trainingThe Behavioral Assessment of Dysexecutive Syndrome is a standardized assessment of executive function that evaluates skills including planning, organization, and problem-solving. Total profile scores range between 0 (min) - 24 (max), higher scores are associated with a better outcome, i.e., more accurate performance. Total profile scores comprise sub-scores from six subtests: Temporal judgement - ability to estimate how long to complete various activities of daily life events. Rule shift cards - ability to change an established pattern of responding Action program - practical problem solving. Key search - strategy formation. Zoo map - planning. Modified six elements - planning, task scheduling and performance monitoring. Complete details are available in the BADS manual. This measure was used for exploratory purposes. It has not been validated for use with individuals with aphasia and performance may be confounded by language difficulties associated with aphasia.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate
n=9 Participants
Participants in this group will begin the training protocol immediately (within 1 week) after baseline pre-training evaluation is completed.
|
Delayed
n=3 Participants
Participants in the delayed arm will participate in two pre-training evaluations, one immediately upon enrollment and one at the end of the delay period immediately before beginning training
|
|---|---|---|
|
Behavioural Assessment of Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS) (Wilson et al., 1996)
Immediately after training
|
14.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.56
|
16.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.5
|
|
Behavioural Assessment of Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS) (Wilson et al., 1996)
Three months after training
|
15.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.0
|
17.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.8
|
Adverse Events
Immediate
Delayed
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Sharon Antonucci, Ph.D CCC-SLP, C-AAIS
Jefferson Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place