Evaluation of the Sandblasting on the Rebonding Strength

NCT ID: NCT04606043

Last Updated: 2020-10-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-06-20

Study Completion Date

2012-06-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients at the Orthodontic Department of University of Aleppo Dental School will be selected if they meet the inclusion criteria then fixed orthodontic treatment with 0.018-inch slot MBT appliances will be applied for those patients.

The aim of this study is to compare Two rebonding procedures by applying a split-mouth design. The clinical failure rates of the two rebonding procedures will be evaluated.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The sample of this study will be chosen after examination of patients referred to the Department of Orthodontics at the University of Aleppo Dental School then subjects who meet the inclusion criteria will be included in this trial.

An information sheet will be given to each possible candidate. Then consent forms will be obtained.

All patients will receive both rebonding procedures by applying split-mouth design. Each patient will be asked to select an opaque sealed envelope from a box with 20 ones. Ten envelopes will Include instructions for applying sandblasting prior to acid-etching on the right upper premolars and acid-etching alone on the left upper premolars. In contrast, the other ten envelopes will include opposite instructions.

A total sample of 80 premolars will be obtained to study the clinical failure rates of the two rebonding procedures.

The 80 premolars will be randomly divided into two groups:

* The first group in which the enamel will be prepared using sandblasting prior to acid-etching.
* The second group in which the enamel will be prepared using acid-etching alone.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Orthodontic Appliance Complication

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Split-mouth design
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Sandblasting

The enamel surfaces will be subjected to sandblasting prior to acid etching

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sandblasting

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Sandblasting will be applied onto the vestibular surfaces of the teeth before applying the etchant.

Acid Etching Alone

Acid etching will be applied alone before the rebounding procedures

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Acid Etching

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Only acid etching will be applied onto the vestibular surfaces of the teeth before rebonding

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sandblasting

Sandblasting will be applied onto the vestibular surfaces of the teeth before applying the etchant.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Acid Etching

Only acid etching will be applied onto the vestibular surfaces of the teeth before rebonding

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. good general health and oral hygiene
2. willing and able to comply with the trial procedures
3. No crossbite, scissor bite, or occlusal interferences with the bonded/rebonded brackets in the premolars region (to prevent any potential early bond failure)
4. no craniofacial anomalies.

Exclusion Criteria

1. any type of pervious orthodontic therapy
2. any need for ortho-surgical treatment or teeth extraction.
Minimum Eligible Age

13 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Damascus University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ahmad Rami Dirie, DDS MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Specialist and Clinical Lecturer, Department of Orthodontics, University of Aleppo

Heba M. Al-Ibrahim, DDS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

MSc student in Orthodontics, University of Damascus

Jamal Dabbas, DDS MSc PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Professor of Orthodontics, Department of Orthodontics, University of Aleppo

Mohammad Y Hajeer, DDS MSc PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Professor of Orthodontics, Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Orthodontics, University of Aleppo Dental School

Aleppo, , Syria

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Syria

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Egan FR, Alexander SA, Cartwright GE. Bond strength of rebonded orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996 Jan;109(1):64-70. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(96)70164-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8540484 (View on PubMed)

Bishara SE, Laffoon JF, Vonwald L, Warren JJ. The effect of repeated bonding on the shear bond strength of different orthodontic adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002 May;121(5):521-5. doi: 10.1067/mod.2002.123042.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12045771 (View on PubMed)

Faust JB, Grego GN, Fan PL, Powers JM. Penetration coefficient, tensile strength, and bond strength of thirteen direct bonding orthodontic cements. Am J Orthod. 1978 May;73(5):512-25. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(78)90241-5. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 354405 (View on PubMed)

Mizrahi E. Success and failure of banding and bonding. A clinical study. Angle Orthod. 1982 Apr;52(2):113-7. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1982)0522.0.CO;2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7049010 (View on PubMed)

Dirie AR, Hajeer MY, Dabbas J, Al-Ibrahim HM. Evaluation of sandblasting with acid etching versus acid etching alone in the preparation of enamel for rebonding orthodontic brackets: An in vitro study and a randomized controlled trial. J World Fed Orthod. 2021 Mar;10(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2020.12.001. Epub 2021 Jan 7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33422476 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UADS-2020-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id