What is the Best Interval to Screen Women 45-49 and 70-74 for Breast Cancer?
NCT ID: NCT04590560
Last Updated: 2024-12-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
60000 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-02-06
2026-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To define the best interval for screening women 45-49 years old a three-arm multicenter randomized non-inferiority trial will be conducted. Women signing the written informed consent will be randomized with a 1:1:1 ratio to:
Arm 1: 1-year screening interval; Arm 2: 2-year screening interval; Arm 3: tailored screening interval on the basis of breast density. Women with very dense breast (Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System -BI-RADS- category D) will be referred to 1-year interval whereas women with less dense breast to 2-year interval (Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System -BI-RADS- category A, B, C).
Enrollment will last 2.5 years and all women will be followed for 6 years. 60,000 women will be enrolled.
The primary objective is to compare the cumulative incidence of stage 2 or higher breast cancer between different screening intervals and this will be evaluated at the end of the 6-year follow-up period.
At the same time, data from all women registered in screening archives who have had a negative mammogram at the age of 69-71 years will be collected and analyzed. The data will be retrieved up to the age of 78 and will concern screening mammograms as well as other screening procedures (e.g. biopsies) and also mammograms performed outside the program. Data from screening and outpatient information systems as well as from cancer registries will be used.
To identify the best strategy to communicate changes in screening protocols, especially when the new protocol would be less intensive than the actual one, a qualitative research will be conducted. In particular the following steps will be considered:
* Focus groups for discussing, with women from target population and health care professionals, key arguments identified in a preliminary research (i.e. scientific literature and case-studies research), with particular focus on how they should be translated into communication strategies.
* Pre-test of the study's communication material through web-based semi-structured interviews to eligible women and key-informants.
* Assessment of the effectiveness of the communication material through web-based semi-structured interviews to participants, that may bring insights on how planning communication strategies for the implementation of new screening protocols.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
Arm 1: 1-year screening interval; Arm 2: 2-year screening interval; Arm 3: tailored screening interval on the basis of breast density. Women with very dense breast (BI-RADS category D) will be referred to 1-year interval whereas women with less dense breast to 2-year interval (BI-RADS category A, B, C).
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1-year screening interval
Women will follow the normal screening program (they will be invited to screen every year)
No interventions assigned to this group
2-year screening interval
Women will be invited to screen every two years
screening for breast cancer with tomosynthesis and synthetic 2D mammography performed at different interval compared to actual clinical practice
women will be screened for breast cancer using tomosynthesis and synthetic 2D mammography with an interval defined according to their randomization arm for a follow-up period of 6 years;
3-tailored screening interval
the screening interval will be decided on the basis of breast density. Women with very dense breast (BI-RADS category D) will be referred to 1-year interval whereas women with less dense breast to 2-year interval (BI-RADS category A, B, C)
screening for breast cancer with tomosynthesis and synthetic 2D mammography performed at different interval compared to actual clinical practice
women will be screened for breast cancer using tomosynthesis and synthetic 2D mammography with an interval defined according to their randomization arm for a follow-up period of 6 years;
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
screening for breast cancer with tomosynthesis and synthetic 2D mammography performed at different interval compared to actual clinical practice
women will be screened for breast cancer using tomosynthesis and synthetic 2D mammography with an interval defined according to their randomization arm for a follow-up period of 6 years;
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Willingness and ability to comply with scheduled visits;
3. Written informed consent obtained prior to performing any protocol-related procedures.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Personal history of prior breast carcinoma, either invasive or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) diagnosis;
3. Ascertained heredo-familial risk according to the standard family history used in screening programs;
4. Participation in another clinical trial on BC screening;
5. Inability to provide signed informed consent.
45 Years
49 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori Dino Amadori IRST S.r.l. IRCCS
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Fabio Falcini, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
IRST IRCCS
Livia Giordano, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza
Marco Zappa, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
ISPRO Firenze
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Irst Irccs
Meldola (FC), FC, Italy
Istituto per lo studio, la prevenzione e la rete oncologica (ISPRO)
Florence, , Italy
AUSL Romagna
Forlì, , Italy
AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza
Torino, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Fabio Falcini, MD
Role: primary
Marco Zappa, MD
Role: primary
Paola Mantellini, MD
Role: backup
Fabio Falcini, MD
Role: primary
Livia Giordano, MD
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRST174.22
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id