Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
104 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-11-16
2025-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The IMPROVE pilot study will describe the proportion of patients with cancer with changes in physician-perception of treatment-related toxicity that result from routine physician review of PROMs reported during definitive radiotherapy.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Symptom Management Implementation of Patient Reported Outcomes in Oncology
NCT03850912
PATIENT VOICES Integration of Systematic Assessment of Patient Reported Outcomes Within Clinical Oncology Practice
NCT03968718
SymptomCare@Home: Deconstructing an Effective Symptom Management Intervention
NCT02779725
Ambulatory Cancer Care Electronic Symptom Self-Reporting for Surgical Patients
NCT03178045
Home-Based Symptom Monitoring: Its Impact on Cancer Care Team Behaviors and Patient Outcomes
NCT00300001
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The investigators hypothesize that routine physician review of PROMs during on-treatment visits will (1) increase proportion of patients with an increased in their physician' s assessment of their overall toxicity burden during definitive radiotherapy, and (2) correspondingly increase the proportion of patients receiving physician-directed interventions for treatment-related symptoms.
The IMPROVE pilot study will describe the proportion of patients with cancer with changes in physician-perception of treatment-related toxicity that result from routine physician review of PROMs reported during definitive radiotherapy. The IMPROVE study will also describe (1) the proportion of patients with changes in the management of treatment-related symptoms and (2) the type of management changes that result from routine physician review of PROMs reported during definitive radiotherapy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients with cancer treated with definitive-intent radiotherapy
Histologically confirmed loco-regional to advanced primary cancer, including but not limited to lung cancer, esophageal, or gastro-intestinal cancers at risk of developing radiotherapy-related toxicity.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Able to read and write in English or able to understand/answer questions with the aid of an interpreter
* Histologically confirmed loco-regional to advanced primary cancer, including but not limited to lung cancer, esophageal, or gastro-intestinal cancers at risk of developing radiotherapy-related toxicity.
* Receiving definitive conventionally-fractionated radiation treatment with or without chemotherapy
• Must be the physician overseeing the care of the patient who answers the PROMS
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who do not provide informed consent
* Patients who chose to withdraw from the study
Radiation Oncologists
• Have not provided informed consent
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
WellSpan Health
OTHER
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ranh Voong, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
SKCCC at Johns hopkins
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Bayview Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Khinh Voong
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Suburban Hospital
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB00218263
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
J2048
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.