Trial Outcomes & Findings for Tralokinumab in Combination With Topical Corticosteroids in Japanese Subjects With Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis (NCT NCT04587453)
NCT ID: NCT04587453
Last Updated: 2025-03-11
Results Overview
IGA is an instrument used in clinical trials to rate the severity of the participant's global AD and is based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe).
COMPLETED
PHASE3
106 participants
Week 16
2025-03-11
Participant Flow
First subject first visit: 27-Oct-2020. Subjects were recruited at 25 sites in Japan.
126 subjects were screened. 20 subjects were screening failures. 106 subjects were included in the trial and randomised 1:1 to tralokinumab+TCS and placebo+TCS. All randomised subjects received at least 1 dose of investigational medicinal product (IMP).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Tralokinumab+TCS
Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16): Participants received 600 mg tralokinumab (4 subcutaneous injections) as a loading dose on Day 0. Then they received 300 mg tralokinumab (2 subcutaneous injections) every 2 weeks until Week 14. Topical corticosteroids (TCS) (mometasone furoate, 0.1% cream, Japan classification: Very strong) were applied on the skin as needed.
Safety follow-up period (Week 17 to Week 20): Period without treatment.
Tralokinumab is a human recombinant monoclonal antibody of the immunoglobulin G4 subclass that specifically binds to human interleukin-13 (IL-13) and blocks the interaction with IL-13 receptors. It is presented as a liquid formulation for subcutaneous administration.
|
Placebo+TCS
Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16): Participants received 4 subcutaneous injections of placebo (resembling a loading dose) on Day 0. Then they received 2 subcutaneous injections of placebo every 2 weeks until Week 14. Topical corticosteroids (TCS) (mometasone furoate, 0.1% cream, Japan classification: Very strong) were applied on the skin as needed.
Safety follow-up period (Week 17 to Week 20): Period without treatment.
Placebo contains the same excipients in the same concentration, but without the active ingredient of tralokinumab.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Treatment Period (Week 0 to Week 16)
STARTED
|
53
|
53
|
|
Treatment Period (Week 0 to Week 16)
Full Analysis Set
|
53
|
53
|
|
Treatment Period (Week 0 to Week 16)
Safety Analysis Set
|
53
|
53
|
|
Treatment Period (Week 0 to Week 16)
COMPLETED
|
53
|
52
|
|
Treatment Period (Week 0 to Week 16)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
1
|
|
Safety Follow-up (Week 16 to Week 20)
STARTED
|
8
|
3
|
|
Safety Follow-up (Week 16 to Week 20)
Not Started
|
45
|
49
|
|
Safety Follow-up (Week 16 to Week 20)
Safety Follow-up Analysis Set
|
8
|
4
|
|
Safety Follow-up (Week 16 to Week 20)
COMPLETED
|
8
|
3
|
|
Safety Follow-up (Week 16 to Week 20)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Tralokinumab+TCS
Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16): Participants received 600 mg tralokinumab (4 subcutaneous injections) as a loading dose on Day 0. Then they received 300 mg tralokinumab (2 subcutaneous injections) every 2 weeks until Week 14. Topical corticosteroids (TCS) (mometasone furoate, 0.1% cream, Japan classification: Very strong) were applied on the skin as needed.
Safety follow-up period (Week 17 to Week 20): Period without treatment.
Tralokinumab is a human recombinant monoclonal antibody of the immunoglobulin G4 subclass that specifically binds to human interleukin-13 (IL-13) and blocks the interaction with IL-13 receptors. It is presented as a liquid formulation for subcutaneous administration.
|
Placebo+TCS
Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16): Participants received 4 subcutaneous injections of placebo (resembling a loading dose) on Day 0. Then they received 2 subcutaneous injections of placebo every 2 weeks until Week 14. Topical corticosteroids (TCS) (mometasone furoate, 0.1% cream, Japan classification: Very strong) were applied on the skin as needed.
Safety follow-up period (Week 17 to Week 20): Period without treatment.
Placebo contains the same excipients in the same concentration, but without the active ingredient of tralokinumab.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Treatment Period (Week 0 to Week 16)
Premature (before Week 16) discontinuation of IMP
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Tralokinumab in Combination With Topical Corticosteroids in Japanese Subjects With Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Tralokinumab+TCS
n=53 Participants
Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16): Participants were treated with 300 mg tralokinumab every 2 weeks until Week 14, after a loading dose of 600 mg tralokinumab at Week 0. TCS was applied on the skin as needed.
|
Placebo+TCS
n=53 Participants
Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16): Participants received placebo every 2 weeks until Week 14, after a loading dose of placebo at Week 0. TCS was applied on the skin as needed.
|
Total
n=106 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
52 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
53 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
105 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
39.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7 • n=5 Participants
|
38.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1 • n=7 Participants
|
39.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
67 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
53 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
53 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
106 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
53 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
53 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
106 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Japan
|
53 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
53 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
106 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age at onset of atopic dermatitis
|
3.0 years
n=5 Participants
|
5.0 years
n=7 Participants
|
4.0 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Duration of atopic dermatitis
|
32.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.0 • n=5 Participants
|
30.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.0 • n=7 Participants
|
31.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Body surface area (BSA) with atopic dermatitis
|
66.6 percentage of BSA affected
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.7 • n=5 Participants
|
64.4 percentage of BSA affected
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.5 • n=7 Participants
|
65.5 percentage of BSA affected
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.6 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA)
Clear
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA)
Almost clear
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA)
Mild
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA)
Moderate
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
46 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA)
Severe
|
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
60 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score
|
37.12 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.71 • n=5 Participants
|
32.30 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.32 • n=7 Participants
|
34.71 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.25 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD)
|
71.72 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.79 • n=5 Participants
|
69.82 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.39 • n=7 Participants
|
70.77 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.08 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)
|
13.09 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.92 • n=5 Participants
|
14.30 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.39 • n=7 Participants
|
13.70 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.65 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Worst Daily Pruritus numeric rating scale (NRS)
|
7.60 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.65 • n=5 Participants
|
7.81 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.37 • n=7 Participants
|
7.71 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.51 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: Full analysis set: 106 subjects, all randomised and treated.
IGA is an instrument used in clinical trials to rate the severity of the participant's global AD and is based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tralokinumab+TCS
n=53 Participants
Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16): Participants were treated with 300 mg tralokinumab every 2 weeks until Week 14, after a loading dose of 600 mg tralokinumab at Week 0. TCS was applied on the skin as needed.
|
Placebo+TCS
n=53 Participants
Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16): Participants received placebo every 2 weeks until Week 14, after a loading dose of placebo at Week 0. TCS was applied on the skin as needed.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 16
|
17 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 16Population: Full analysis set: 106 subjects, all randomised and treated.
Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) is a validated measure used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the severity and extent of AD. EASI is a composite index with scores ranging from 0 to 72, where higher values indicate a more severe or more extensive condition.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tralokinumab+TCS
n=53 Participants
Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16): Participants were treated with 300 mg tralokinumab every 2 weeks until Week 14, after a loading dose of 600 mg tralokinumab at Week 0. TCS was applied on the skin as needed.
|
Placebo+TCS
n=53 Participants
Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16): Participants received placebo every 2 weeks until Week 14, after a loading dose of placebo at Week 0. TCS was applied on the skin as needed.
|
|---|---|---|
|
At Least 75% Reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI75) at Week 16
|
38 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 16Population: Full analysis set: 106 subjects, all randomised and treated.
SCORAD is a validated tool to evaluate the AD disease based on 3 components: * A) The extent of AD lesions. Assessed as percentage of each defined body area and reported as sum of all areas (max score = 100%). * B) The severity of AD lesions. The intensity of 6 specific symptoms on a representative area was assessed using the scale: 0 = none/absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe (max score = 18). * C) Subjective symptoms. The itch and sleeplessness over the last 3 days/nights was recorded for each symptom by the subject on a VAS scale: 0 = no itch or trouble sleeping, 10 = unbearable itch or a lot of trouble sleeping (max score = 20). The SCORAD was calculated as: A/5+7B/2+C. The maximum total score is 103, with higher values indicating more severe disease.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tralokinumab+TCS
n=53 Participants
Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16): Participants were treated with 300 mg tralokinumab every 2 weeks until Week 14, after a loading dose of 600 mg tralokinumab at Week 0. TCS was applied on the skin as needed.
|
Placebo+TCS
n=53 Participants
Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16): Participants received placebo every 2 weeks until Week 14, after a loading dose of placebo at Week 0. TCS was applied on the skin as needed.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Total Score From Baseline to Week 16
|
-44.1 change in score on a scale
Standard Error 2.61
|
-39.0 change in score on a scale
Standard Error 2.61
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 16Population: Full analysis set: 106 subjects, all randomised and treated.
DLQI consists of 10 items addressing the participant's perception of the impact of their skin disease on different aspects of their health-related quality of life over the past week, such as dermatology-related symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert scale (0=not at all ⁄ not relevant; 1=a little; 2=a lot; 3=very much). The total score is the sum of the 10 items (ranging from 0 to 30), with higher scores indicating poorer health-related quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tralokinumab+TCS
n=53 Participants
Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16): Participants were treated with 300 mg tralokinumab every 2 weeks until Week 14, after a loading dose of 600 mg tralokinumab at Week 0. TCS was applied on the skin as needed.
|
Placebo+TCS
n=53 Participants
Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16): Participants received placebo every 2 weeks until Week 14, after a loading dose of placebo at Week 0. TCS was applied on the skin as needed.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score From Baseline to Week 16.
|
-10.0 change in score on a scale
Standard Error 0.56
|
-8.8 change in score on a scale
Standard Error 0.56
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 16Population: Full analysis set: 106 subjects, all randomised and treated.
Participants assessed the itch for the past 24 hours using the Worst Daily Pruritus NRS, consisting of 11 points, with 0 indicating 'no itch' and 10 indicating 'worst itch imaginable'.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tralokinumab+TCS
n=53 Participants
Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16): Participants were treated with 300 mg tralokinumab every 2 weeks until Week 14, after a loading dose of 600 mg tralokinumab at Week 0. TCS was applied on the skin as needed.
|
Placebo+TCS
n=53 Participants
Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16): Participants received placebo every 2 weeks until Week 14, after a loading dose of placebo at Week 0. TCS was applied on the skin as needed.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Reduction of Worst Daily Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score (Weekly Average) of at Least 4 From Baseline to Week 16
|
34 Participants
|
36 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 16Population: Full analysis set: 106 subjects, all randomised and treated.
EASI is a validated measure used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the severity and extent of AD. EASI is a composite index with scores ranging from 0 to 72, where higher values indicate a more severe or more extensive condition.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tralokinumab+TCS
n=53 Participants
Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16): Participants were treated with 300 mg tralokinumab every 2 weeks until Week 14, after a loading dose of 600 mg tralokinumab at Week 0. TCS was applied on the skin as needed.
|
Placebo+TCS
n=53 Participants
Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16): Participants received placebo every 2 weeks until Week 14, after a loading dose of placebo at Week 0. TCS was applied on the skin as needed.
|
|---|---|---|
|
At Least 90% Reduction in EASI (EASI90) at Week 16
|
24 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 16Population: Full analysis set: 106 subjects, all randomised and treated.
EASI is a validated measure used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the severity and extent of AD. EASI is a composite index with scores ranging from 0 to 72, where higher values indicate a more severe or more extensive condition.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tralokinumab+TCS
n=53 Participants
Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16): Participants were treated with 300 mg tralokinumab every 2 weeks until Week 14, after a loading dose of 600 mg tralokinumab at Week 0. TCS was applied on the skin as needed.
|
Placebo+TCS
n=53 Participants
Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16): Participants received placebo every 2 weeks until Week 14, after a loading dose of placebo at Week 0. TCS was applied on the skin as needed.
|
|---|---|---|
|
At Least 50% Reduction in EASI (EASI50) at Week 16
|
45 Participants
|
42 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 16Population: Full analysis set: 106 subjects, all randomised and treated.
EASI is a validated measure used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the severity and extent of AD. EASI is a composite index with scores ranging from 0 to 72, where higher values indicate a more severe or more extensive condition.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tralokinumab+TCS
n=53 Participants
Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16): Participants were treated with 300 mg tralokinumab every 2 weeks until Week 14, after a loading dose of 600 mg tralokinumab at Week 0. TCS was applied on the skin as needed.
|
Placebo+TCS
n=49 Participants
Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16): Participants received placebo every 2 weeks until Week 14, after a loading dose of placebo at Week 0. TCS was applied on the skin as needed.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Change in EASI Score From Baseline to Week 16
|
-77.8 percentage change in score on a scale
Standard Error 3.70
|
-73.5 percentage change in score on a scale
Standard Error 3.76
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 16Population: Full analysis set:106 subjects, all randomised and treated.
Participants assessed the itch for the past 24 hours using the Worst Daily Pruritus NRS, consisting of 11 points, with 0 indicating 'no itch' and 10 indicating 'worst itch imaginable'.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tralokinumab+TCS
n=53 Participants
Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16): Participants were treated with 300 mg tralokinumab every 2 weeks until Week 14, after a loading dose of 600 mg tralokinumab at Week 0. TCS was applied on the skin as needed.
|
Placebo+TCS
n=49 Participants
Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16): Participants received placebo every 2 weeks until Week 14, after a loading dose of placebo at Week 0. TCS was applied on the skin as needed.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Worst Daily Pruritus NRS Score (Weekly Average) From Baseline to Week 16
|
-4.6 change in score on a scale
Standard Error 0.26
|
-4.6 change in score on a scale
Standard Error 0.27
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 16Population: Full analysis set: 106 subjects, all randomised and treated.
Participants rated how much their eczema interfered with their sleep the last night using an 11-point NRS (0 indicating that it 'did not interfere' and 10 indicating that it 'completely interfered').
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tralokinumab+TCS
n=53 Participants
Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16): Participants were treated with 300 mg tralokinumab every 2 weeks until Week 14, after a loading dose of 600 mg tralokinumab at Week 0. TCS was applied on the skin as needed.
|
Placebo+TCS
n=49 Participants
Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16): Participants received placebo every 2 weeks until Week 14, after a loading dose of placebo at Week 0. TCS was applied on the skin as needed.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Eczema-related Sleep NRS Score (Weekly Average) From Baseline to Week 16
|
-4.2 change in score on a scale
Standard Error 0.25
|
-4.1 change in score on a scale
Standard Error 0.26
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 16Population: Full analysis set: 106 subjects, all randomised and treated.
POEM consists of 7 items, each addressing a specific symptom (itching, sleep, bleeding, weeping, cracking, flaking, and dryness). Participants score how often they have experienced each symptom over the previous week, using a 5-point categorical response scale (0=no days; 1=1 to 2 days; 2=3 to 4 days; 3=5 to 6 days; 4=every day). The total score is the sum of the 7 items (ranging from 0 to 28) and reflects disease-related morbidity; higher scores indicate more severe disease.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tralokinumab+TCS
n=53 Participants
Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16): Participants were treated with 300 mg tralokinumab every 2 weeks until Week 14, after a loading dose of 600 mg tralokinumab at Week 0. TCS was applied on the skin as needed.
|
Placebo+TCS
n=49 Participants
Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16): Participants received placebo every 2 weeks until Week 14, after a loading dose of placebo at Week 0. TCS was applied on the skin as needed.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Score Form Baseline to Week 16
|
-14.4 change in score on a scale
Standard Error 0.82
|
-11.2 change in score on a scale
Standard Error 0.83
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 16Population: Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
Number of events divided by patient years of exposure (= rate).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tralokinumab+TCS
n=53 Participants
Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16): Participants were treated with 300 mg tralokinumab every 2 weeks until Week 14, after a loading dose of 600 mg tralokinumab at Week 0. TCS was applied on the skin as needed.
|
Placebo+TCS
n=53 Participants
Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16): Participants received placebo every 2 weeks until Week 14, after a loading dose of placebo at Week 0. TCS was applied on the skin as needed.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events From Baseline to Week 16 Per Subject
|
605.9 events per patient year of exposure
|
332.8 events per patient year of exposure
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 16Population: Safety analysis set. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
Anti-tralokinumab antibody levels were analyzed using a validated bioanalytical method. Positive treatment-emergent ADA was defined as ADA negative or missing at baseline, and at least one positive post-baseline ADA response. Negative treatment-emergent ADA was defined as ADA negative or missing at baseline, and all post-baseline ADA assessments negative.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tralokinumab+TCS
n=53 Participants
Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16): Participants were treated with 300 mg tralokinumab every 2 weeks until Week 14, after a loading dose of 600 mg tralokinumab at Week 0. TCS was applied on the skin as needed.
|
Placebo+TCS
n=53 Participants
Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16): Participants received placebo every 2 weeks until Week 14, after a loading dose of placebo at Week 0. TCS was applied on the skin as needed.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Subjects With Presence of Treatment-emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) From Baseline to Week 16
|
0 participants with treatment-emergent ADA
|
0 participants with treatment-emergent ADA
|
Adverse Events
Treatment Period: Tralokinumab+TCS
Treatment Period: Placebo+TCS
Safety Follow-up Period: Tralokinumab+TCS
Safety Follow-up Period: Placebo+TCS
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Treatment Period: Tralokinumab+TCS
n=53 participants at risk
During the treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16), participants were treated with 300 mg tralokinumab every 2 weeks until Week 14, after a loading dose of 600 mg tralokinumab at Week 0. TCS was applied on the skin as needed.
|
Treatment Period: Placebo+TCS
n=53 participants at risk
During the treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16), participants received placebo every 2 weeks until Week 14, after a loading dose of placebo at Week 0. TCS was applied on the skin as needed.
|
Safety Follow-up Period: Tralokinumab+TCS
n=8 participants at risk
No treatment was administered during the safety-follow-up period (Week 17 to Week 20). Participants received tralokinumab+TCS in the treatment period.
Eligible participants were invited to enter a long-term extension trial conducted under a separate protocol (LP0162-1337, ECZTEND).
|
Safety Follow-up Period: Placebo+TCS
n=4 participants at risk
No treatment was administered during the safety-follow-up period (Week 17 to Week 20). Participants received placebo+TCS in the treatment period.
Eligible participants were invited to enter a long-term extension trial conducted under a separate protocol (LP0162-1337, ECZTEND).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site erythema
|
5.7%
3/53 • Number of events 12 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site reaction
|
9.4%
5/53 • Number of events 10 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
5.7%
3/53 • Number of events 3 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 1 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Seasonal allergy
|
5.7%
3/53 • Number of events 3 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Hordeolum
|
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
5.7%
3/53 • Number of events 4 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
9.4%
5/53 • Number of events 6 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral herpes
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 3 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 1 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Paronychia
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Presyncope
|
0.00%
0/53 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Acne
|
11.3%
6/53 • Number of events 7 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
7.5%
4/53 • Number of events 4 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis atopic
|
0.00%
0/53 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Treatment period: Week 0 to Week 16; Safety follow-up period: Week 16 to Week 20
Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee LEO Pharma A/S seeks publication of all clinical trials in peer-reviewed journals within 18 months after completion or termination of the clinical trial, regardless of whether the findings are positive or negative. If no publication is submitted by LEO Pharma A/S within these 18 months, the investigator has the right to publish the results from the clinical trial generated by him/herself.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER