Effect of Prophylactic Negative Pressure Versus Silver Impregnated Silicone Bandage on C-Section Infection Rates
NCT ID: NCT04582045
Last Updated: 2023-01-19
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
1064 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-03-01
2021-06-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Intra-operative Glove-changing During Cesarean Section on Post-op Complications: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT02907892
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy After Cesarean Delivery
NCT01637870
The Use of Abdominal Binders in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Sections
NCT02129894
Use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Morbidly Obese Women After Cesarean Delivery
NCT03269968
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Cesarean Section
NCT02289157
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
low risk, silver impregnated
low risk, silver impregnated
silver impregnated dressing
comparison of Mepilex versus our standard techniques
low risk, border bandage
low risk, border bandage
No interventions assigned to this group
high-risk, silver impregnated
high-risk, silver impregnated
silver impregnated dressing
comparison of Mepilex versus our standard techniques
high-risk, wound vacuum
high-risk, wound vacuum
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
silver impregnated dressing
comparison of Mepilex versus our standard techniques
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* surgery complicated by non-routine surgeries (Such as appendectomy)
18 Years
55 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
HealthPartners Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Larry Goldenberg
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Regions Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Regions Hospital
Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
A180389
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.