Autonomic Modulation Recovery After Acute Resistance Exercise

NCT ID: NCT04569617

Last Updated: 2020-09-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

49 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-08-01

Study Completion Date

2015-01-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To analyze the autonomic behavior in recovery post-acute resistance exercise performed in different intensities and body segments.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Resistance training (RT) is recommended to people with different health condition. RT is recognized as safe and effective method of increasing muscle strength, physical fitness, muscle mass, and overall cardiovascular health. The magnitude of the RT effects is associated with the structure of the training program. Understanding these aspects may provide guidance for the RT prescription while reducing potential risk of cardiovascular events associated with the recovery period after exercise. The objective of the study is to compare the acute responses of the Autonomic Nervous System post RT performed with different intensities (endurance and strength) in different body segments (UL and LL). Our hypothesis is that different intensities and body segments influence the acute responses of the ANS in the post RT recovery period.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Resistance Training

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

resistance training autonomic modulation heart rate exercise

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

This study is a cross-over clinical trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

upper limb endurance protocol

UL endurance protocol - elbow flexion

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Resistance Training - UL endurance protocol

Intervention Type OTHER

UL endurance protocol - 2 series of 20 repetitions, elbow flexion at 40% of the maximum test force of 1 maximum repetition, (recovery 1 minutes between sets).

upper limb strength protocol

UL strength protocol - elbow flexion

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Resistance Training - UL strength protocol

Intervention Type OTHER

UL strength protocol - 2 series of 8 repetitions, elbow flexion at 80% of the maximum test force of 1 maximum repetition, (recovery 1 minutes between sets).

lower limb endurance protocol

LL endurance protocol - knee extension

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Resistance Training - LL endurance protocol

Intervention Type OTHER

LL endurance protocol - 2 series of 20 repetitions, elbow flexion at 40% of the maximum test strength of 1 maximum repetition, (recovery 1 minutes between sets).

lower limb strength protocol

LL strength protocol - knee extension

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Resistance Training - LL strength protocol

Intervention Type OTHER

LL strength protocol - 2 series of 8 repetitions, knee extension at 80% of the maximum test force of 1 maximum repetition, (recovery 1 minutes between sets).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Resistance Training - UL endurance protocol

UL endurance protocol - 2 series of 20 repetitions, elbow flexion at 40% of the maximum test force of 1 maximum repetition, (recovery 1 minutes between sets).

Intervention Type OTHER

Resistance Training - UL strength protocol

UL strength protocol - 2 series of 8 repetitions, elbow flexion at 80% of the maximum test force of 1 maximum repetition, (recovery 1 minutes between sets).

Intervention Type OTHER

Resistance Training - LL endurance protocol

LL endurance protocol - 2 series of 20 repetitions, elbow flexion at 40% of the maximum test strength of 1 maximum repetition, (recovery 1 minutes between sets).

Intervention Type OTHER

Resistance Training - LL strength protocol

LL strength protocol - 2 series of 8 repetitions, knee extension at 80% of the maximum test force of 1 maximum repetition, (recovery 1 minutes between sets).

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Graduate students,
* Age between 18 to 30 years
* Healthy men, the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q) was used to determine safety and possible risk of exercising based on participants' health history, the according American College of Sports Medicine, 2010.
* Trained men, the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) was used to determine participants' physical activity level.

Exclusion Criteria

\-
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

30 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Luiz Carlos Marques Vanderlei

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Luiz Carlos M Vanderlei, Professor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Universidade Estadual Paulista - FCT/UNESP

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Luiz Carlos Marques Vanderlei

Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho

Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30852243/

Catai, A. M., Pastre, C. M., Godoy, M. F. de, Silva, E. da, Takahashi, A. C. de M., \& Vanderlei, L. C. M. (2019). Heart rate variability: are you using it properly? Standardisation checklist of procedures. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy

http://sportsmedicine-open.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40798-019-0205-0

Collins H., Booth J.N., Duncan A., Fawkner S., Niven A. The effect of resistance training interventions on 'The Self' in Youth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

http://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2019.00013/full

Evans JW. Periodized resistance training for enhancing skeletal muscle hypertrophy and strength: a mini review.

http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25524332/

Kingsley, J. D., \& Figueroa, A. (2016). Acute and training effects of resistance exercise on heart rate variability.

https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-86922005000200011

Guedes DP, Lopes CC, Guedes JERP. (2005). Reprodutibilidade e validade do Questionário Internacional de Atividade Física em adolescentes.

https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382009000200018

Vanderlei, Luiz Carlos Marques, Pastre, C. M., Hoshi, A., Dias, T., \& Fernandes, M. (2009). Noções básicas de variabilidade da frequência cardíaca e sua aplicabilidade clínica.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19204579/

American College of Sports Medicine. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(3):687-708. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181915670

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

34303014.6.0000.5515

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id