Reverse King-Devick Test and History of Multiple Concussions

NCT ID: NCT04560400

Last Updated: 2023-02-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

71 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-09-20

Study Completion Date

2022-05-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of concussion history and reading direction on baseline King- Devick Test (KDT) performance, a common component of sideline concussion assessments. The KDT is a timed assessment of saccades, or quick movements of the eyes between two points. This test is a form of rapid automatized naming and involved subjects reading digits arranged on a tablet screen as quickly and accurately as possible. The test has three progressively more challenging test "cards," as the horizontal guidelines between digits disappear from test card 1 to 2, and the vertical spacing between the lines of digits decreases from test card 2 to 3. KDT performance is evaluated in terms of both speed (duration to all three test cards) and the number of errors (digits read incorrectly or omitted). Previous studies have identified several factors that affect KDT performance aside from head injury, including age, sex, sleep deprivation, learning disabilities, and first languages other than English. History of concussion has not been shown to influence KDT performance. The investigators hypothesize that since the left-to-right (L-R) reading direction of the KDT is the same way in which to read English, the long-term effects of prior concussions on saccadic eye movements may be masked. The investigators want to answer the following three research questions: 1) What is the effect of KDT reading direction on baseline KDT performance? If the test is performed by reading digits in a right-to-left (R-L) direction, will KDT times be slower and the number of errors increase relative to a typical L-R KDT? 2) What is the effect of a history of multiple concussions on KDT performance relative to no history of concussion? 3) Is the R-L KDT more sensitive to a history of multiple concussions? The investigators hypothesize that individuals with a history of multiple concussions will perform significantly worse (longer test durations, more errors) than individuals with no concussion history on the R-L KDT. On the other hand, the investigators hypothesize that baseline performance on the traditional L-R KDT will not be able to discriminate individuals with a history of multiple concussions from those with no concussion history.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Subjects will first be asked to complete a questionnaire. This questionnaire will collect demographic data (age, sex, years of education, native language and other languages spoken) and other pertinent data (vision correction, concussion history, ocular/visual injury and disorder history, learning disability diagnoses). The questionnaire will take approximately 3 minutes to complete.

Based on the concussion history provided in the questionnaire, the subject will be assigned to either Group NoHx (no concussion history) or Group HxMC (history of multiple concussions.) Then the subject will be randomized into one of two KDT formats: L-R KDT (natural reading direction) or R-L KDT (reverse reading direction) via a coin flip. The researcher will explain the KDT procedure by saying, "This test evaluates your saccadic eye movements, or rapid eye movements from one fixation point to the next. This test is comprised of three test cards. Each test card has eight lines of several digits (numbers). Please read the digits aloud as quickly but as accurately as possible from \[L-R condition: 'left to right and top to bottom'; R-L condition: 'right to left and top to bottom'\]. If participants make a mistake, correct it if participants can and continue on. This is a timed test--tapping the tablet screen starts and stops the stopwatch. Participants will have a brief break in between cards to catch participants' breath. Each test card will get progressively harder. The horizontal lines guiding participants from digit to digit on each line on Test Card 1 disappear on Test Card 2. The lines of digits on Test Card 3 are closer together than they were on Test Card 2. Do you have any questions?"

The researcher will start the app and pull up the demonstration card for the L-R condition. For the R-L condition, the researcher will open a picture of the adapted demonstration card with the diagonal lines switched to indicate that subjects follow from the left-most digit to the right-most digit on the subsequent line. Subjects will complete the demonstration card twice according their condition instructions. Subjects will be reminded to "read the digits as quickly but accurately as possible" and in the direction according to their assigned test condition before starting the test. The researcher will silently count any errors while the subject completes each test card one at a time, taking a brief (1-2s) pause after tapping the screen to stop the timer and tapping again to start the timer and bringing up the next test card. At the conclusion of the test, the researcher will record the total time and number of errors on the subject data collection sheet. The subject will complete the test a second time, following the same instructions. The total time and number of errors for the second attempt will also be recorded. The investigators anticipate this portion of the data collection to take approximately 6 minutes. The total duration of the data collection will be approximately 10 minutes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Concussion, Mild

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

No Concussion Conventional KD

Participants without concussion history perform conventional King-Devick Test.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Conventional King-Devick test

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Conventional King-Devick test involves a series of number reading task from left to right and top to bottom, intending to test subjects' neuro-ophthalmologic function

No Concussion Reverse KD

Participants without concussion history perform reverse King-Devick Test.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Reverse King-Devick test

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Reverse King-Devick test involves a series of number reading task from right to left and bottom to top, intending to test subjects' neuro-ophthalmologic function

Single Concussion Conventional KD

Participants with 1 concussion history perform conventional King-Devick Test.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Conventional King-Devick test

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Conventional King-Devick test involves a series of number reading task from left to right and top to bottom, intending to test subjects' neuro-ophthalmologic function

Single Concussion Reverse KD

Participants with 1 concussion history perform reverse King-Devick Test.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Reverse King-Devick test

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Reverse King-Devick test involves a series of number reading task from right to left and bottom to top, intending to test subjects' neuro-ophthalmologic function

Multiple Concussion Conventional KD

Participants with 2 or more concussion history perform conventional King-Devick Test.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Conventional King-Devick test

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Conventional King-Devick test involves a series of number reading task from left to right and top to bottom, intending to test subjects' neuro-ophthalmologic function

Multiple Concussion Reverse KD

Participants with 2 or more concussion history perform reverse King-Devick Test.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Reverse King-Devick test

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Reverse King-Devick test involves a series of number reading task from right to left and bottom to top, intending to test subjects' neuro-ophthalmologic function

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Conventional King-Devick test

Conventional King-Devick test involves a series of number reading task from left to right and top to bottom, intending to test subjects' neuro-ophthalmologic function

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Reverse King-Devick test

Reverse King-Devick test involves a series of number reading task from right to left and bottom to top, intending to test subjects' neuro-ophthalmologic function

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. between 18 and 26 years old,
2. enrolled as an IU Bloomington student
3. a fluent English speaker.

Exclusion Criteria

1. proficient fluency of any language that reads right to left (e.g. Arabic, Hebrew, Persian/ Farsi, Urdu Sindhi) or top to bottom and right to left (e.g. Japanese, Korean, or Chinese)
2. a history of only one diagnosed concussion
3. any visual, ocular, or brain injury within the past 12 months
4. any history of an eye movement disorder
5. any noncorrected visual impairment
6. a diagnosis of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, attention deficit disorder, dyslexia, dyscalculia, or a language processing disorder.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

26 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Indiana University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Keisuke Kawata

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Indiana University School of Public Health

Bloomington, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1906713722

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.