Reverse King-Devick Test and History of Multiple Concussions
NCT ID: NCT04560400
Last Updated: 2023-02-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
71 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-09-20
2022-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Assessing Eye Tracking Features Following Sports-Related Concussion
NCT02103803
Effects of Soccer Heading on Ocular-motor Function and Blood Biomarker
NCT03488381
Eye Movement Recordings in the Diagnosis of Traumatic Brain Injury
NCT00875589
Assessment of Oculomotor, Vestibular and Reaction Time Response Following a Concussive Event
NCT01832714
Using fMRI to Evaluate Instructional Programs for Children With Developmental Dyslexia
NCT00068835
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Based on the concussion history provided in the questionnaire, the subject will be assigned to either Group NoHx (no concussion history) or Group HxMC (history of multiple concussions.) Then the subject will be randomized into one of two KDT formats: L-R KDT (natural reading direction) or R-L KDT (reverse reading direction) via a coin flip. The researcher will explain the KDT procedure by saying, "This test evaluates your saccadic eye movements, or rapid eye movements from one fixation point to the next. This test is comprised of three test cards. Each test card has eight lines of several digits (numbers). Please read the digits aloud as quickly but as accurately as possible from \[L-R condition: 'left to right and top to bottom'; R-L condition: 'right to left and top to bottom'\]. If participants make a mistake, correct it if participants can and continue on. This is a timed test--tapping the tablet screen starts and stops the stopwatch. Participants will have a brief break in between cards to catch participants' breath. Each test card will get progressively harder. The horizontal lines guiding participants from digit to digit on each line on Test Card 1 disappear on Test Card 2. The lines of digits on Test Card 3 are closer together than they were on Test Card 2. Do you have any questions?"
The researcher will start the app and pull up the demonstration card for the L-R condition. For the R-L condition, the researcher will open a picture of the adapted demonstration card with the diagonal lines switched to indicate that subjects follow from the left-most digit to the right-most digit on the subsequent line. Subjects will complete the demonstration card twice according their condition instructions. Subjects will be reminded to "read the digits as quickly but accurately as possible" and in the direction according to their assigned test condition before starting the test. The researcher will silently count any errors while the subject completes each test card one at a time, taking a brief (1-2s) pause after tapping the screen to stop the timer and tapping again to start the timer and bringing up the next test card. At the conclusion of the test, the researcher will record the total time and number of errors on the subject data collection sheet. The subject will complete the test a second time, following the same instructions. The total time and number of errors for the second attempt will also be recorded. The investigators anticipate this portion of the data collection to take approximately 6 minutes. The total duration of the data collection will be approximately 10 minutes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
No Concussion Conventional KD
Participants without concussion history perform conventional King-Devick Test.
Conventional King-Devick test
Conventional King-Devick test involves a series of number reading task from left to right and top to bottom, intending to test subjects' neuro-ophthalmologic function
No Concussion Reverse KD
Participants without concussion history perform reverse King-Devick Test.
Reverse King-Devick test
Reverse King-Devick test involves a series of number reading task from right to left and bottom to top, intending to test subjects' neuro-ophthalmologic function
Single Concussion Conventional KD
Participants with 1 concussion history perform conventional King-Devick Test.
Conventional King-Devick test
Conventional King-Devick test involves a series of number reading task from left to right and top to bottom, intending to test subjects' neuro-ophthalmologic function
Single Concussion Reverse KD
Participants with 1 concussion history perform reverse King-Devick Test.
Reverse King-Devick test
Reverse King-Devick test involves a series of number reading task from right to left and bottom to top, intending to test subjects' neuro-ophthalmologic function
Multiple Concussion Conventional KD
Participants with 2 or more concussion history perform conventional King-Devick Test.
Conventional King-Devick test
Conventional King-Devick test involves a series of number reading task from left to right and top to bottom, intending to test subjects' neuro-ophthalmologic function
Multiple Concussion Reverse KD
Participants with 2 or more concussion history perform reverse King-Devick Test.
Reverse King-Devick test
Reverse King-Devick test involves a series of number reading task from right to left and bottom to top, intending to test subjects' neuro-ophthalmologic function
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Conventional King-Devick test
Conventional King-Devick test involves a series of number reading task from left to right and top to bottom, intending to test subjects' neuro-ophthalmologic function
Reverse King-Devick test
Reverse King-Devick test involves a series of number reading task from right to left and bottom to top, intending to test subjects' neuro-ophthalmologic function
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. enrolled as an IU Bloomington student
3. a fluent English speaker.
Exclusion Criteria
2. a history of only one diagnosed concussion
3. any visual, ocular, or brain injury within the past 12 months
4. any history of an eye movement disorder
5. any noncorrected visual impairment
6. a diagnosis of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, attention deficit disorder, dyslexia, dyscalculia, or a language processing disorder.
18 Years
26 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Indiana University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Keisuke Kawata
Assistant Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Indiana University School of Public Health
Bloomington, Indiana, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1906713722
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.