Evaluation of Two Eating Disorders Prevention Interventions in At-Risk Female Students With Body Dissatisfaction

NCT ID: NCT04558073

Last Updated: 2023-11-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-01

Study Completion Date

2022-07-12

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Eating disorders are psychopathologies with serious repercussions on the somatic, psychological and social level. Currently available treatments are unfortunately for now not fully efficient, therefore researchers have recommended to develop prevention initiatives. Until now, no study has been carried out in Switzerland to evaluate the efficacy of an intervention for the prevention of eating disorders.

The goal of the present study is to evaluate two eating disorders prevention intervention that have been largely validated in the US, called the Body Project (BP) and the Healthy Weight Program (HW). Both interventions target body dissatisfaction, which is a well-identified risk factor of eating disorders. They will be compared to a one-month waiting list. Because of the pandemic situation due to the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (COVID-19), both interventions will be delivered virtually via a collaborative platform. The sessions will be recorded to carry out a quality control.

To compare the BP and HW interventions to a waiting list, a three-arm randomized controlled study will be carried out, including female students from French-speaking Switzerland. Recruitment will include 90 participants. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the three arms of the study. They will be evaluated before (T0) and after (T1) the interventions or the waiting list. Following the interventions, the participants will have one month of follow-up before a final evaluation (T2). Participants on the waiting list will receive the BP following the one-month waiting period and will then be evaluated (T2).

After having signed the consent form, the participant will be randomized to one of the three study arms, with a 1: 1: 1 allocation ratio. Interventions will be given in groups of six participants. Randomization will be blocked to ensure groups of equal size, and that groups of six participants for each arm are regularly formed. The blocks will be of variable size (3, 6, 9) to protect the concealment.

The hypotheses are as follows:

1. The two interventions BP and HW will have an effect on body dissatisfaction (primary outcome) as well as on the thin-ideal internalization, dietary restraint, negative affect, and eating disorders psychopathology (secondary outcomes), compared to the waiting list;
2. There will be no differences between the BP and the HW on the primary and secondary outcomes;
3. The effects observed thanks to the interventions will be maintained after one month of follow-up.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Body Dissatisfaction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
The participants and the collaborators performing the interventions will not be blinded to the conditions. In order to minimize bias, the main statistical analyses aimed at evaluating the hypotheses will be performed by a statistician blinded to the participants' allocation.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Body Project (BP)

The BP intervention includes four one-hour sessions given over a month by two facilitators. The sessions will be held on a collaborative platform in groups of six people.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Body Project (BP)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The BP intervention offers discussions and exercises to make participants realize the cost of pursuing social ideals valuing thinness. This produces "cognitive dissonance", a cognitive discomfort due to a contradiction between speech and beliefs, which motivates to modify one's beliefs. The curriculum includes discussions on techniques of the advertising industry and the unique ideal of beauty promoted worldwide, as well as on the costs of pursuing the thin-ideal. Participants are also challenged to try behaviours they avoid because their appearance bother them. Societal activism actions are also discussed.

Healthy Weight Program (HW)

The HW intervention includes four one-hour sessions given over a month by two facilitators. The sessions will be held on a collaborative platform in groups of six people.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Healthy Weight Program (HW)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The HW intervention allows participants to make personalized changes in their diet and physical activity each week gradually, to aim for a health-ideal rather than a thin-ideal. The intervention is based on small changes, based on behavioural change techniques. Advice is given on what types of changes introduce to promote health, and how to implement changes sustainably. Difficulties are discussed in the group with a problem-solving approach. The last session introduces a long-term view of lifestyle change.

Waiting-list (WL)

The waiting list will consist of two assessments each separated by a one-month interval. Following this waiting time, participants will receive the BP intervention.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Body Project (BP)

The BP intervention offers discussions and exercises to make participants realize the cost of pursuing social ideals valuing thinness. This produces "cognitive dissonance", a cognitive discomfort due to a contradiction between speech and beliefs, which motivates to modify one's beliefs. The curriculum includes discussions on techniques of the advertising industry and the unique ideal of beauty promoted worldwide, as well as on the costs of pursuing the thin-ideal. Participants are also challenged to try behaviours they avoid because their appearance bother them. Societal activism actions are also discussed.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Healthy Weight Program (HW)

The HW intervention allows participants to make personalized changes in their diet and physical activity each week gradually, to aim for a health-ideal rather than a thin-ideal. The intervention is based on small changes, based on behavioural change techniques. Advice is given on what types of changes introduce to promote health, and how to implement changes sustainably. Difficulties are discussed in the group with a problem-solving approach. The last session introduces a long-term view of lifestyle change.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Female student;
* Aged between 18 and 25 years old;
* BMI between 18.5 and 30 kg/m2;
* French-speaking (or understand French sufficiently to participate in the intervention) and having lived in Switzerland for at least six months;
* Suffering from body dissatisfaction and obtain a score of at least 26 on the Body Shape Questionnaire 8-item (BSQ-8C) which represents a moderate concern with her body image;
* Accepting the use of a collaborative platform to participate in the intervention group, which implies that her name may be revealed, and accept that the sessions be recorded.

Exclusion Criteria

* Eating disorder according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manuel of Mental Disorders 5th edition (DSM-5) diagnostic criteria (past or current);
* Diagnosis of mood disorder or anxiety disorder;
* Pregnancy.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

25 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

School of Health Sciences Geneva

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Isabelle Carrard, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

School of Health Sciences Geneva

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

School of Health Sciences (HES-SO Geneva)

Geneva, Carouge, Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Carrard I, Cekic S, Bucher Della Torre S. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the acceptability and effectiveness of two eating disorders prevention interventions: the HEIDI BP-HW project. BMC Womens Health. 2023 Aug 23;23(1):446. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02607-6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37612687 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

99021

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id