Analyzing Preoperative Stereotactic Radiosurgery With Gamma Knife Icon for Brain Metastases
NCT ID: NCT04545814
Last Updated: 2025-09-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
11 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-01-15
2024-08-22
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Pilot/Phase II Study of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases Using 3Tesla MRI and Rational Dose Selection
NCT02005614
A Single Arm Study of Neurocognitive Outcomes in Patients With Brain Metastases Managed With Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS)
NCT01821443
Pre-operative Stereotactic Radiosurgery Followed by Resection for Brain Metastases
NCT02514915
Exploring the Role of 3T MRI in Gamma Knife Radiosurgery
NCT00602992
Preop fSRS for Resectable Brain Metastases
NCT05267587
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
STUDY RATIONALE: Given the increased risk of leptomeningeal failure with surgery followed by SRS as well as the risk of radiation necrosis, new paradigms in therapy delivery and sequencing are being explored. Areas of investigation include optimization of target volume, marginal expansion, multi-fractionation, timeliness of SRS after surgery, and delivery of SRS prior to surgical resection. In theory, advantages of preoperative SRS include better target delineation, sterilization of tumor cells prior to surgical disruption of the tumor, vascular supply, and CSF spaces, and resection of tissue that would otherwise be at risk of radiation necrosis.
In 2014, Asher, et al. (Asher AL, Burri SH, Wiggins WF, et al. A new treatment paradigm: neoadjuvant radiosurgery before surgical resection of brain metastases with analysis of local tumor recurrence. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014;88:899-906.) reported that the use of neoadjuvant SRS prior to surgery was both safe and effective (even for metastases \>3 cm) with no reported leptomeningeal recurrences or radiation necrosis. More recently, Patel et al. (Patel KR, Burri SH, Asher AL, et al. Comparing Preoperative With Postoperative Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Resectable Brain Metastases: A Multi-institutional Analysis. Neurosurgery 2016;79:279-85.) performed a retrospective comparison of preoperative versus postoperative SRS and reported no difference in local control, distant brain failure, or overall survival. Furthermore, the authors reported significantly lower rates of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis and radiation necrosis with preoperative SRS.
Huff, et al. (Huff WX, Agrawal N, Shapiro S, et al. Efficacy of pre-operative stereotactic radiosurgery followed by surgical resection and correlative radiobiological analysis for patients with 1-4 brain metastases: study protocol for a phase II trial. Radiat Oncol 2018;13:252.) recently published a protocol for a phase II prospective trial designed to compare outcomes using preoperative SRS versus historically cited outcomes for postoperative SRS. This pilot study mirrors this design and aims to confirm study feasibility and to assess local control, central nervous system (CNS) progression-free survival, overall survival, rates of leptomeningeal spread, rates of radiation necrosis, and quality of life measures with the use of preoperative SRS.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Stereotactic Radiosurgery
SRS will be delivered utilizing gamma knife or linear accelerator-based techniques.
Stereotactic Radiosurgery
Maximum Tumor Diameter ≤ 2 cm = 20-24 Gy; Maximum Tumor Diameter 2.1-3.0 cm = 18 Gy; Maximum Tumor Diameter 3.1-5.0 cm = 15 Gy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Stereotactic Radiosurgery
Maximum Tumor Diameter ≤ 2 cm = 20-24 Gy; Maximum Tumor Diameter 2.1-3.0 cm = 18 Gy; Maximum Tumor Diameter 3.1-5.0 cm = 15 Gy
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Female or Male subject's ≥ 18 years old at the time of informed consent.
3. Radiographically confirmed solid tumor brain metastases.
4. Criteria for surgical resection of at least one metastasis per neurosurgeon discretion.
5. Stereotactic radiosurgery candidate per radiation oncologist discretion.
6. A diagnostic MRI Brain or CT Head demonstrating the presence of 1-4 solid tumor brain metastases and lesion to be resected no more than 5 cm in any direction, performed within 30 days prior to stereotactic radiosurgery.
7. For known and unknown primary, diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (ds-GPA) estimated median survival no less than 6 months.
8. Surgical resection able to be performed within 1-10 days after radiosurgery.
9. Patients currently on cytotoxic chemotherapy or immunotherapy are eligible, not including anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy.
10. Female subjects who:
1. Are postmenopausal for at least 1 year before the screening visit, OR
2. Are surgically sterile, OR
i. Agree to practice 1 highly effective method and 1 additional effective (barrier) method of contraception, at the same time, from the time of signing the informed consent through 4 months after the last study Intervention (female and male condoms should not be used together), OR ii. Agree to practice true abstinence, when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject. (Periodic abstinence \[eg, calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods\] withdrawal, spermicides only, and lactational amenorrhea are not acceptable methods of contraception.)
11. Male subjects, even if surgically sterilized (ie, status post-vasectomy), who:
1. Agree to practice effective barrier contraception during the entire study treatment period from the time of signing the informed consent through and through 4 months after the last study Intervention (female and male condoms should not be used together), OR
2. Agree to practice true abstinence, when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject. (Periodic abstinence \[eg, calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods for the female partner\] withdrawal, spermicides only, and lactational amenorrhea are not acceptable methods of contraception.)
Exclusion Criteria
2. Major medical illnesses or psychiatric impairments, which in the investigator's opinion will prevent administration or completion of the protocol therapy and/or interfere with surveillance.
3. Patients with more than 4 brain metastases on MRI Brain.
4. Lesion to be resected is more than 5 cm in any dimension.
5. Patients with leptomeningeal metastases documented by MRI or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) evaluation.
6. Previous whole brain radiation therapy.
7. Previous radiation therapy to the lesion to be resected.
8. Planned adjuvant focal therapy including additional radiation therapy to the brain.
9. Not a surgical candidate per neurosurgeon discretion.
10. Not a stereotactic radiosurgery candidate per radiation oncologist discretion.
11. Surgery unable to be performed between 1 - 10 days after radiosurgery.
12. Women who are pregnant or nursing as treatment involves unforeseeable risks to the fetus or child.
13. Patients who have a known or unknown primary and have an estimated median survival of less than 6 months per ds-GPA.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medical College of Wisconsin
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michael Straza, MD, PhD
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael Straza, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical College of Wisconsin
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Froedtert Hospital & Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Asher AL, Burri SH, Wiggins WF, Kelly RP, Boltes MO, Mehrlich M, Norton HJ, Fraser RW. A new treatment paradigm: neoadjuvant radiosurgery before surgical resection of brain metastases with analysis of local tumor recurrence. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Mar 15;88(4):899-906. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.12.013.
Patel KR, Burri SH, Asher AL, Crocker IR, Fraser RW, Zhang C, Chen Z, Kandula S, Zhong J, Press RH, Olson JJ, Oyesiku NM, Wait SD, Curran WJ, Shu HK, Prabhu RS. Comparing Preoperative With Postoperative Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Resectable Brain Metastases: A Multi-institutional Analysis. Neurosurgery. 2016 Aug;79(2):279-85. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001096.
Huff WX, Agrawal N, Shapiro S, Miller J, Kulwin C, Shah M, Savage JJ, Payner T, Vortmeyer A, Watson G, Dey M. Efficacy of pre-operative stereotactic radiosurgery followed by surgical resection and correlative radiobiological analysis for patients with 1-4 brain metastases: study protocol for a phase II trial. Radiat Oncol. 2018 Dec 20;13(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s13014-018-1178-8.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PRO00038835
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.