Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study of Safety and Tolerability of CFZ533 in Patients With Sjögren's Syndrome (NCT NCT04541589)
NCT ID: NCT04541589
Last Updated: 2025-10-16
Results Overview
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence (e.g., any unfavorable and unintended sign \[including abnormal laboratory findings\], symptom or disease) in a participant. TEAE included all AEs up to the last dose date plus 14 weeks or the end of the entire study (including the safety follow-up period), whichever occurred earlier. A patient with multiple severity ratings for an AE was only counted under the maximum rating. Additionally, a patient with multiple occurrences of an event was counted only once. The severity of AEs was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, with the following grading system: Mild: usually transient in nature and generally not interfering with normal activities; Moderate: sufficiently discomforting to interfere with normal activities; Severe: prevented normal activities. A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any AE that required medical intervention, hospitalization, or results in death, disability, or a birth defect.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
206 participants
From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
2025-10-16
Participant Flow
Participants who completed the core study (CCFZ533B2201, NCT03905525) and were deemed by the Investigator to clinically benefit from continued iscalimab therapy based upon response to therapy at the end of the treatment period of the core study were enrolled in this study
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Arm 1: Iscalimab 600 mg
Participants received 600 mg (2 injections of 300 mg/2 mL) of iscalimab subcutaneously weekly for the initial 3 weeks as loading doses, followed by a bi-weekly maintenance regimen at 600 mg (2 injections of 300 mg/2 mL).
|
Arm 2 - Iscalimab 300 mg
Participants received one dose of 600 mg (2 injections of 300 mg/2 mL) of iscalimab subcutaneously on the first day of the extension study; then 300 mg weekly (1 injection of 300 mg/2 mL of iscalimab and 1 injection of 2 mL of placebo) for the next 2 weeks as loading doses. This was followed by a bi-weekly maintenance regimen of 300 mg (1 injection of 300 mg/2 mL of iscalimab and 1 injection of 2 mL of placebo). After the final database lock of the core study, participants underwent unblinding, leading to the discontinuation of placebo injections.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Treatment Period
STARTED
|
152
|
54
|
|
Treatment Period
COMPLETED
|
133
|
47
|
|
Treatment Period
NOT COMPLETED
|
19
|
7
|
|
Safety Follow-up Period
STARTED
|
152
|
54
|
|
Safety Follow-up Period
COMPLETED
|
143
|
49
|
|
Safety Follow-up Period
NOT COMPLETED
|
9
|
5
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Arm 1: Iscalimab 600 mg
Participants received 600 mg (2 injections of 300 mg/2 mL) of iscalimab subcutaneously weekly for the initial 3 weeks as loading doses, followed by a bi-weekly maintenance regimen at 600 mg (2 injections of 300 mg/2 mL).
|
Arm 2 - Iscalimab 300 mg
Participants received one dose of 600 mg (2 injections of 300 mg/2 mL) of iscalimab subcutaneously on the first day of the extension study; then 300 mg weekly (1 injection of 300 mg/2 mL of iscalimab and 1 injection of 2 mL of placebo) for the next 2 weeks as loading doses. This was followed by a bi-weekly maintenance regimen of 300 mg (1 injection of 300 mg/2 mL of iscalimab and 1 injection of 2 mL of placebo). After the final database lock of the core study, participants underwent unblinding, leading to the discontinuation of placebo injections.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Treatment Period
Adverse Event
|
8
|
2
|
|
Treatment Period
Physician Decision
|
3
|
1
|
|
Treatment Period
Subject decision
|
7
|
4
|
|
Treatment Period
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
0
|
|
Safety Follow-up Period
Adverse Event
|
2
|
1
|
|
Safety Follow-up Period
Physician Decision
|
1
|
0
|
|
Safety Follow-up Period
Subject decision
|
5
|
3
|
|
Safety Follow-up Period
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Study of Safety and Tolerability of CFZ533 in Patients With Sjögren's Syndrome
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Arm 1: Iscalimab 600 mg
n=152 Participants
Participants received 600 mg (2 injections of 300 mg/2 mL) of iscalimab subcutaneously weekly for the initial 3 weeks as loading doses, followed by a bi-weekly maintenance regimen at 600 mg (2 injections of 300 mg/2 mL).
|
Arm 2 - Iscalimab 300 mg
n=54 Participants
Participants received one dose of 600 mg (2 injections of 300 mg/2 mL) of iscalimab subcutaneously on the first day of the extension study; then 300 mg weekly (1 injection of 300 mg/2 mL of iscalimab and 1 injection of 2 mL of placebo) for the next 2 weeks as loading doses. This was followed by a bi-weekly maintenance regimen of 300 mg (1 injection of 300 mg/2 mL of iscalimab and 1 injection of 2 mL of placebo). After the final database lock of the core study, participants underwent unblinding, leading to the discontinuation of placebo injections.
|
Total
n=206 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
126 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
45 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
171 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
148 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
53 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
201 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
125 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
45 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
170 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeksPopulation: The Safety Set (SAF) included all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence (e.g., any unfavorable and unintended sign \[including abnormal laboratory findings\], symptom or disease) in a participant. TEAE included all AEs up to the last dose date plus 14 weeks or the end of the entire study (including the safety follow-up period), whichever occurred earlier. A patient with multiple severity ratings for an AE was only counted under the maximum rating. Additionally, a patient with multiple occurrences of an event was counted only once. The severity of AEs was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, with the following grading system: Mild: usually transient in nature and generally not interfering with normal activities; Moderate: sufficiently discomforting to interfere with normal activities; Severe: prevented normal activities. A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any AE that required medical intervention, hospitalization, or results in death, disability, or a birth defect.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Iscalimab 600 mg
n=152 Participants
Participants received 600 mg (2 injections of 300 mg/2 mL) of iscalimab subcutaneously weekly for the initial 3 weeks as loading doses, followed by a bi-weekly maintenance regimen at 600 mg (2 injections of 300 mg/2 mL).
|
Arm 2 - Iscalimab 300 mg
n=54 Participants
Participants received one dose of 600 mg (2 injections of 300 mg/2 mL) of iscalimab subcutaneously on the first day of the extension study; then 300 mg weekly (1 injection of 300 mg/2 mL of iscalimab and 1 injection of 2 mL of placebo) for the next 2 weeks as loading doses. This was followed by a bi-weekly maintenance regimen of 300 mg (1 injection of 300 mg/2 mL of iscalimab and 1 injection of 2 mL of placebo). After the final database lock of the core study, participants underwent unblinding, leading to the discontinuation of placebo injections.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Death
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Adverse event (all severities)
|
127 Participants
|
43 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Adverse Event- Mild
|
57 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Adverse Event- Moderate
|
62 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Adverse Event- Severe
|
8 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Serious Adverse Event
|
13 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Adverse Event leading to study medication discontinuation
|
8 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose at Day 1, 113, 225, 337 and 421Population: The pharmacokinetic set (PKS) included all participants who received at least one dose of iscalimab treatment and had quantifiable PK measurements of iscalimab. Number analysed refers to the number of participants with a quantifiable PK measurement at the specified time point
Free iscalimab concentration in plasma during the treatment (Ctrough) and follow-up (up to end of study) periods. Blood sample was collected at the specified timepoints to assess the concentration of free iscalimab. The baseline assessment of this extension study (Day 1) was identical to the last timepoint (FUP3/Week 60) of the core study (CCFZ533B2201).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Iscalimab 600 mg
n=149 Participants
Participants received 600 mg (2 injections of 300 mg/2 mL) of iscalimab subcutaneously weekly for the initial 3 weeks as loading doses, followed by a bi-weekly maintenance regimen at 600 mg (2 injections of 300 mg/2 mL).
|
Arm 2 - Iscalimab 300 mg
n=52 Participants
Participants received one dose of 600 mg (2 injections of 300 mg/2 mL) of iscalimab subcutaneously on the first day of the extension study; then 300 mg weekly (1 injection of 300 mg/2 mL of iscalimab and 1 injection of 2 mL of placebo) for the next 2 weeks as loading doses. This was followed by a bi-weekly maintenance regimen of 300 mg (1 injection of 300 mg/2 mL of iscalimab and 1 injection of 2 mL of placebo). After the final database lock of the core study, participants underwent unblinding, leading to the discontinuation of placebo injections.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Free Iscalimab Concentration in Plasma
Day 225
|
126 microgram / mililiter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 104.7
|
50.3 microgram / mililiter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 57.0
|
|
Free Iscalimab Concentration in Plasma
Day 1
|
3.56 microgram / mililiter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 372.2
|
451.8 microgram / mililiter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.751
|
|
Free Iscalimab Concentration in Plasma
Day 113
|
125 microgram / mililiter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 62.7
|
56.9 microgram / mililiter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 54.0
|
|
Free Iscalimab Concentration in Plasma
Day 337
|
138 microgram / mililiter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 69.3
|
62.6 microgram / mililiter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 63.3
|
|
Free Iscalimab Concentration in Plasma
Day 421
|
4.47 microgram / mililiter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 533.7
|
350.4 microgram / mililiter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.336
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 60 weeksPopulation: The immunogenicity Set (IMS) included all subjects who received at least one dose of iscalimab treatment and had quantifiable immunogenicity measurements of iscalimab.
Number of participants with anti-iscalimab antibodies (ADA) in plasma at any time during the study. The baseline assessment of this extension study (Day 1) was identical to the last timepoint (FUP3/Week 60) of the core study (CCFZ533B2201).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Iscalimab 600 mg
n=152 Participants
Participants received 600 mg (2 injections of 300 mg/2 mL) of iscalimab subcutaneously weekly for the initial 3 weeks as loading doses, followed by a bi-weekly maintenance regimen at 600 mg (2 injections of 300 mg/2 mL).
|
Arm 2 - Iscalimab 300 mg
n=54 Participants
Participants received one dose of 600 mg (2 injections of 300 mg/2 mL) of iscalimab subcutaneously on the first day of the extension study; then 300 mg weekly (1 injection of 300 mg/2 mL of iscalimab and 1 injection of 2 mL of placebo) for the next 2 weeks as loading doses. This was followed by a bi-weekly maintenance regimen of 300 mg (1 injection of 300 mg/2 mL of iscalimab and 1 injection of 2 mL of placebo). After the final database lock of the core study, participants underwent unblinding, leading to the discontinuation of placebo injections.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of Anti-iscalimab Antibodies in Plasma
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Arm 1: Iscalimab 600 mg
Arm 2 - Iscalimab 300 mg
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Arm 1: Iscalimab 600 mg
n=152 participants at risk
Participants received 600 mg (2 injections of 300 mg/2 mL) of iscalimab subcutaneously weekly for the initial 3 weeks as loading doses, followed by a bi-weekly maintenance regimen at 600 mg (2 injections of 300 mg/2 mL).
|
Arm 2 - Iscalimab 300 mg
n=54 participants at risk
Participants received one dose of 600 mg (2 injections of 300 mg/2 mL) of iscalimab subcutaneously on the first day of the extension study; then 300 mg weekly (1 injection of 300 mg/2 mL of iscalimab and 1 injection of 2 mL of placebo) for the next 2 weeks as loading doses. This was followed by a bi-weekly maintenance regimen of 300 mg (1 injection of 300 mg/2 mL of iscalimab and 1 injection of 2 mL of placebo). After the final database lock of the core study, participants underwent unblinding, leading to the discontinuation of placebo injections.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Febrile neutropenia
|
1.3%
2/152 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/54 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Granulocytopenia
|
0.66%
1/152 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/54 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
0.66%
1/152 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/54 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Eye disorders
Glaucoma
|
0.66%
1/152 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/54 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anal prolapse
|
0.66%
1/152 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/54 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholangitis
|
0.00%
0/152 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
1.9%
1/54 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Food allergy
|
0.66%
1/152 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/54 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bartholinitis
|
0.66%
1/152 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/54 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
|
0.66%
1/152 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/54 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19 pneumonia
|
0.66%
1/152 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/54 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Sjogren's syndrome
|
0.66%
1/152 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/54 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancer
|
0.00%
0/152 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
1.9%
1/54 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Invasive ductal breast carcinoma
|
0.66%
1/152 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/54 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Status epilepticus
|
0.66%
1/152 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/54 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Adjustment disorder with depressed mood
|
0.66%
1/152 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/54 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.66%
1/152 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/54 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleurisy
|
0.66%
1/152 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/54 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Arm 1: Iscalimab 600 mg
n=152 participants at risk
Participants received 600 mg (2 injections of 300 mg/2 mL) of iscalimab subcutaneously weekly for the initial 3 weeks as loading doses, followed by a bi-weekly maintenance regimen at 600 mg (2 injections of 300 mg/2 mL).
|
Arm 2 - Iscalimab 300 mg
n=54 participants at risk
Participants received one dose of 600 mg (2 injections of 300 mg/2 mL) of iscalimab subcutaneously on the first day of the extension study; then 300 mg weekly (1 injection of 300 mg/2 mL of iscalimab and 1 injection of 2 mL of placebo) for the next 2 weeks as loading doses. This was followed by a bi-weekly maintenance regimen of 300 mg (1 injection of 300 mg/2 mL of iscalimab and 1 injection of 2 mL of placebo). After the final database lock of the core study, participants underwent unblinding, leading to the discontinuation of placebo injections.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
6.6%
10/152 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
3.7%
2/54 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
8.6%
13/152 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
7.4%
4/54 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
5.3%
8/152 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
3.7%
2/54 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
|
25.7%
39/152 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
29.6%
16/54 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
4.6%
7/152 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
13.0%
7/54 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
14.5%
22/152 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
16.7%
9/54 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral herpes
|
4.6%
7/152 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
5.6%
3/54 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
4.6%
7/152 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
5.6%
3/54 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
12.5%
19/152 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
9.3%
5/54 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
10.5%
16/152 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
9.3%
5/54 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
5.9%
9/152 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
9.3%
5/54 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
3.3%
5/152 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
5.6%
3/54 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
4.6%
7/152 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
5.6%
3/54 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
5.9%
9/152 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
5.6%
3/54 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
5.9%
9/152 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
7.4%
4/54 • From start of extension study up to 14 weeks after last study-drug administration or end of study (whichever occurred earlier), assessed up to approximately 60 weeks
Any sign or symptom that occurred during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. The safety analysis were done on the safety population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The terms and conditions of Novartis' agreements with its investigators may vary. However, Novartis does not prohibit any investigator from publishing. Any publications from a single-site are postponed until the publication of the pooled data (i.e., data from all sites) in the clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER