Immunogenicity of the Hepatitis B Vaccine

NCT ID: NCT04540653

Last Updated: 2020-09-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

240 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-07-29

Study Completion Date

2022-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

More than five decades have passed since the identification of the etiologic agent of hepatitis B and yet this infection is a challenge for public health worldwide. The development and availability of the first hepatitis B vaccines, still in the 1980s, was a milestone for the prevention of the hepatitis B virus, and currently known as the gold standard strategy for the elimination of this infectious disease.

In several countries, the introduction of the immunobiological occurred gradually, by age groups and risk groups, and in general, started with newborns and children. This universal immunization strategy has contributed to reducing the incidence and changing the epidemiological profile of HBV worldwide. At the beginning of the 21st century, it was already possible to shift the epidemiological curve of the infection to parasitize with 50 years or more. On the other hand, despite vaccination against hepatitis B being the most assertive tool for the prevention of HBV, the low performance of the vaccine in older groups remains a challenge for public health and the object of this study. To our knowledge, there are no data showing the efficacy of doses of enhanced hepatitis B vaccines for older adults, and the purpose of this study is to investigate and compare the immunogenicity of the hepatitis B vaccine in adult adults aged 50 years and over, using conventional doses (20μg) versus (vs) booster doses.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

More than five decades have passed since the identification of the etiologic agent of hepatitis B and yet this infection is a challenge for public health worldwide. The development and availability of the first hepatitis B vaccines, still in the 1980s, was a milestone for the prevention of the hepatitis B virus, and currently known as the gold standard strategy for the elimination of this infectious disease.

In several countries, the introduction of the immunobiological occurred gradually, by age groups and risk groups, and in general, started with newborns and children. In Brazil, only in 2015, a free offer of the hepatitis B vaccine expanded a population aged 50 years or older. This universal immunization strategy has contributed to reducing the incidence and changing the epidemiological profile of HBV worldwide. At the beginning of the 21st century, it was already possible to shift the epidemiological curve of the infection to parasitize with 50 years or more.

Consider this scenario of vulnerability to HBV in older adults, it is important to highlight some aspects. The increase in life expectancy around the world is real data and must be evaluated. In addition, contemporary aging is accompanied by an increase and improvement in sexual performance, overcoming myths about "asexual old age" and outdated stereotypes about sexuality for an adult population in the middle and late stages. On the other hand, sexual risk behavior in older people being observed, including unprotected sexual intercourse, multiple sexual partnerships, sexual intercourse with a sex worker, among others. Studies have been increasing the high prevalence of Sexually Transmitted Infections, especially hepatitis B in the elderly.

Given this situation, hepatitis B vaccination is the most assertive tool for preventing HBV. However, even in countries that expand the offer of the vaccine to the entire population, poor performance of the hepatitis B vaccine in older groups remains a challenge for public health and is the object of this study.

A study conducted by Meeren and collaborators, characterized the relationship age vs. age. vaccine response to hepatitis B in immunocompetent adults. The protection index identified, considering all age groups, was 94.5%. However, there was a continuous reduction in seroprotection associated with age, ranging from 98.6% for young adults aged 20-24 years to 64.8% for the elderly (≥65 years). In addition, this study suggested that the aging of the immune system starts in adulthood and is intensified after 50-60 years of age.

In the United States, research conducted with competence aged ≥50 years, showed lower rates of seroconversion compared to younger people, with protection rates ranging from 68% to 82.2%. Another study carried out in this country, elucidated the risk of non-response to the anti-HBV vaccine in 63% for products ≥40 years old (p = 0.046).

Finally, in Brazil, an investigation conducted by Caetano et al. with settlers in Goiás, also illustrated a low responsiveness to the hepatitis B vaccine in the older population. In the age group aged 40-49 years, seroprotection was identified in only 61.9% of the participants, and for the age group aged 50-59 years the rate of seroresponse was even lower, only 55.9% protective titles of anti- HBs. Another study with this same population in Mato Grosso do Sul, showed an average age above 40 years for our non-responders.

Thus, the program that supplants this limitation is necessary, until the cohort of children immunized at birth from a late adulthood. The use of third generation vaccines for this population seems to be difficult to implement due to the high cost of this immunogen. In this way, more frequent or more concentrated doses of the second generation vaccine can be a safe alternative for the older population.

To our knowledge, there are no data showing the efficacy of doses of enhanced hepatitis B vaccines for older adults, and the purpose of this study is to investigate and compare the immunogenicity of the hepatitis B vaccine in adult adults aged 50 years and over, using conventional doses (20μg) versus (vs) booster doses.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Vaccine Response Impaired Hepatitis B Aging

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The intervention group (Reinforced Intervention Scheme - EIR) indicates 3 doses of 40 μg (2 mL) of hepatitis B vaccine, in months 0, 1 and 6, while the comparison group (Conventional Comparison Scheme - ECC) completes 3 doses of 20 μg (1 mL) of the vaccine, in months 0, 1 and 6. To evaluate the kinetics of the hepatitis B vaccine, after each dose administered, about 30 to 60 days, 5 mL of blood was again collected from the participants for quantitative detection of anti-HBs, using the Microparticle Chemiluminescent Immunoassay (CMIA) method, according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard vaccination schedule

To evaluate the immunogenicity of the monovalent hepatitis B vaccine, expressed in Hansenula polymorpha, aged ≥50 years old, using a standard vaccination schedule (three doses of 20 μg, in months 0, 1, 6).

Group Type OTHER

Standard vaccination schedule

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Administer a standard vaccination schedule (three doses of 20 μg of the hepatitis B vaccine, in months 0, 1, 6) at an age of ≥50 years and evaluate a production kinetics after each dose administered in the period of about 30 to 60 days.

Reinforced vaccination schedule

To evaluate the immunogenicity of the monovalent hepatitis B vaccine, expressed in Hansenula polymorpha, in individuals aged ≥50 years, using a reinforced vaccination schedule (three doses of 40 μg, in months 0, 1, 6).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Reinforced vaccination schedule

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Administer an enhanced vaccination schedule (three doses of 40 μg of the hepatitis B vaccine, in months 0, 1, 6) in individuals aged ≥50 years and assess the kinetics of antibody production after each dose administered in the period of approximately 30 to 60 days.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Standard vaccination schedule

Administer a standard vaccination schedule (three doses of 20 μg of the hepatitis B vaccine, in months 0, 1, 6) at an age of ≥50 years and evaluate a production kinetics after each dose administered in the period of about 30 to 60 days.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Reinforced vaccination schedule

Administer an enhanced vaccination schedule (three doses of 40 μg of the hepatitis B vaccine, in months 0, 1, 6) in individuals aged ≥50 years and assess the kinetics of antibody production after each dose administered in the period of approximately 30 to 60 days.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* person is 50 years of age or older.

Exclusion Criteria

* people with chronic renal failure, cancer and HIV / AIDS, using corticosteroids;
* people with a history of hepatitis B vaccination (vaccination record of hepatitis B vaccine doses or previous report of hepatitis B vaccination);
* people who are positive for anti-HBs and / or total anti-HBc serological markers.
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidade Federal de Goias

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Karlla Antonieta Amorim Caetano

Clinical Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Karlla Caetano, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universidade Federal de Goiás

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Karlla Antonieta Amorim Caetano

Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Aguiar RB, Leal MCC, Marques APO, Torres KMS, Tavares MTDB. [Elderly people living with HIV - behavior and knowledge about sexuality: an integrative review]. Cien Saude Colet. 2020 Feb;25(2):575-584. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232020252.12052018. Epub 2018 Jun 27. Portuguese.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32022197 (View on PubMed)

Bastos LM, Tolentino JMS, Frota MAO, Tomaz WC, Fialho MLS, Batista ACB, Teixeira AKM, Barbosa FCB. [Evaluation of the level of knowledge about Aids and syphilis among the elderly from a city in the interior of the state of Ceara, Brazil]. Cien Saude Colet. 2018 Aug;23(8):2495-2502. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232018238.10072016. Portuguese.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30137119 (View on PubMed)

BLUMBERG BS, ALTER HJ, VISNICH S. A "NEW" ANTIGEN IN LEUKEMIA SERA. JAMA. 1965 Feb 15;191:541-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.1965.03080070025007. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14239025 (View on PubMed)

Caetano KA, Del-Rios NH, Pinheiro RS, Bergamaschi FP, Carneiro MA, Teles SA. Low Immunogenicity of Recombinant Hepatitis B Vaccine Derived from Hansenula polymorpha in Adults Aged Over 40 Years. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Jan 11;96(1):118-121. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0475. Epub 2016 Oct 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27799647 (View on PubMed)

Gerlich WH. Prophylactic vaccination against hepatitis B: achievements, challenges and perspectives. Med Microbiol Immunol. 2015 Feb;204(1):39-55. doi: 10.1007/s00430-014-0373-y. Epub 2014 Dec 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25523195 (View on PubMed)

Gilbert CL, Klopfer SO, Martin JC, Schodel FP, Bhuyan PK. Safety and immunogenicity of a modified process hepatitis B vaccine in healthy adults >/=50 years. Hum Vaccin. 2011 Dec;7(12):1336-42. doi: 10.4161/hv.7.12.18333. Epub 2011 Dec 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22185811 (View on PubMed)

Liu Z, Yang Q, Shi O, Ye W, Chen X, Zhang T. The epidemiology of hepatitis B and hepatitis C infections in China from 2004 to 2014: An observational population-based study. J Viral Hepat. 2018 Dec;25(12):1543-1554. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12938. Epub 2018 Jun 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29851287 (View on PubMed)

Lyons A, Heywood W, Fileborn B, Minichiello V, Barrett C, Brown G, Hinchliff S, Malta S, Crameri P. The Sex, Age, and Me study: recruitment and sampling for a large mixed-methods study of sexual health and relationships in an older Australian population. Cult Health Sex. 2017 Sep;19(9):1038-1052. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2017.1288268. Epub 2017 Feb 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28276921 (View on PubMed)

Van Der Meeren O, Crasta P, Cheuvart B, De Ridder M. Characterization of an age-response relationship to GSK's recombinant hepatitis B vaccine in healthy adults: An integrated analysis. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015;11(7):1726-9. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1039758.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25996260 (View on PubMed)

Minichiello V, Rahman S, Hawkes G, Pitts M. STI epidemiology in the global older population: emerging challenges. Perspect Public Health. 2012 Jul;132(4):178-81. doi: 10.1177/1757913912445688.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22729008 (View on PubMed)

Monsell E, McLuskey J. Factors influencing STI transmission in middle-aged heterosexual individuals. Br J Nurs. 2016 Jun 23;25(12):676-80. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2016.25.12.676.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27345071 (View on PubMed)

Rosenberg C, Bovin NV, Bram LV, Flyvbjerg E, Erlandsen M, Vorup-Jensen T, Petersen E. Age is an important determinant in humoral and T cell responses to immunization with hepatitis B surface antigen. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013 Jul;9(7):1466-76. doi: 10.4161/hv.24480. Epub 2013 Apr 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23571167 (View on PubMed)

Sagnelli E, Stroffolini T, Sagnelli C, Morisco F, Coppola N, Smedile A, Pisaturo M, Colloredo G, Babudieri S, Licata A, Brancaccio G, Andriulli A, Almasio PL, Gaeta GB; EPACRON study group. Influence of universal HBV vaccination on chronic HBV infection in Italy: Results of a cross-sectional multicenter study. J Med Virol. 2017 Dec;89(12):2138-2143. doi: 10.1002/jmv.24873. Epub 2017 Aug 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28608566 (View on PubMed)

Sharma R, Ahlm C, Ostergaard L, Dowell A, Tran C, Thomas S, Eymin C. Persistence of immunity in healthy adults aged >/= 50 years primed with a hepatitis B vaccine 3 years previously. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015;11(7):1709-16. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1019187.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25996838 (View on PubMed)

Szmuness W, Stevens CE, Harley EJ, Zang EA, Oleszko WR, William DC, Sadovsky R, Morrison JM, Kellner A. Hepatitis B vaccine: demonstration of efficacy in a controlled clinical trial in a high-risk population in the United States. N Engl J Med. 1980 Oct 9;303(15):833-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198010093031501.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 6997738 (View on PubMed)

Tran TQ, Grimes CZ, Lai D, Troisi CL, Hwang LY. Effect of age and frequency of injections on immune response to hepatitis B vaccination in drug users. Vaccine. 2012 Jan 5;30(2):342-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.10.084. Epub 2011 Nov 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22075088 (View on PubMed)

Vermeulen M, Swanevelder R, Chowdhury D, Ingram C, Reddy R, Bloch EM, Custer BS, Murphy EL; NHLBI Recipient Epidemiology and Donor evaluation Study-III (REDS-III) International Component. Use of Blood Donor Screening to Monitor Prevalence of HIV and Hepatitis B and C Viruses, South Africa. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017 Sep;23(9):1560-1563. doi: 10.3201/eid2309.161594.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28820374 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.who.int/hepatitis/publications/global-hepatitis-report2017/en/

WHO; World Health Organization. Global Hepatitis Report 2017. Geneva: WHO; 2017.

https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WorldPopulationAgeing2019-Highlights.pdf

United Nations; Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2019). World Population Ageing 2019. New York: United Nations; 2019.

https://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/3785

Bergamaschi FPR. Epidemiologia da infecção pelo vírus da hepatite b em assentamento rural em Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil Central \[Tese\]. Goiânia-GO: Universidade Federal de Goiás; 2013. 95p

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PI02102-2017

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.