Modified Step by Step Mitrofanoff Continent Cystostomy : Functional Results of a Teachable Procedure
NCT ID: NCT04539743
Last Updated: 2020-12-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
70 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-10-15
2021-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This operation, the principle of which was described by Paul Mitrofanoff in 1980, has benefited from countless descriptions, difficult realization and questionable design, so it is insufficiently proposed.
Faced with this learning difficulty at the beginning of the year, we decided to define a "step-by-step" technique, in seven well-differentiated steps. This approach has simplified the teaching and dissemination of this technique.
To validate its quality, it is necessary to evaluate the expected results of a continental cystostomy, by answering two simple questions:
-is the cystostomy opening really continent? Is the cystostomy tube easy to catheterize?
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To do this, we must validate the quality of this method and therefore we will evaluate the results expected from a continuous cystostomy via a questionnaire. After a first telephone contact by Dr BOILLOT for a presentation of the study, patient will therefore be contacted by telephone by the Clinical Research Associate of the service.
During this interview patient will be asked to answer a questionnaire consisting of five questions.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients operated on by other surgeons
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Grenoble
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Chu Grenoble Alpes
Grenoble, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
BERNARD BOILLOT
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2020-A0156534
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
38RC20.193
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id