Vision Stability and Preference for Soft Toric vs. Soft Spherical Contact Lenses

NCT ID: NCT04536571

Last Updated: 2021-11-22

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

27 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-09-03

Study Completion Date

2021-06-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The principal hypothesis is to be tested in this work is that vision stability (the primary outcome measure) with a spherical contact lens correction vs. a toric contact lens correction will be the same.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This will be a randomised, subject-masked, crossover, bilateral non-dispensing study, controlled by cross-comparison. Thirty subjects will use each lens type at a single visit in random sequence.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Astigmatism Myopia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Test Contact lens

Subjects will be randomized to wear test lenses for 30 minutes, and then cross-over to control lenses.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Test Contact lens

Intervention Type DEVICE

Subjects will be randomized to wear test lenses for 30 minutes, and then cross-over to control lenses.

Control Contact lens

Intervention Type DEVICE

Subjects will be randomized to wear control lenses for 30 minutes, and then cross-over to test lenses.

Control Contact lens

Subjects will be randomized to wear control lenses for 30 minutes, and then cross-over to test lenses.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Test Contact lens

Intervention Type DEVICE

Subjects will be randomized to wear test lenses for 30 minutes, and then cross-over to control lenses.

Control Contact lens

Intervention Type DEVICE

Subjects will be randomized to wear control lenses for 30 minutes, and then cross-over to test lenses.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Test Contact lens

Subjects will be randomized to wear test lenses for 30 minutes, and then cross-over to control lenses.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Control Contact lens

Subjects will be randomized to wear control lenses for 30 minutes, and then cross-over to test lenses.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Soft comfilcon A toric contact lenses Soft comfilcon A sphere contact lenses

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. They are aged 18-35 years and have capacity to volunteer.
2. They understand their rights as a research subject and are willing and able to sign a Statement of Informed Consent.
3. They are willing and able to follow the protocol.
4. They are an existing wearer of soft spherical contact lenses in both eyes.
5. They have a spherical component of their spectacle refractive error between

-0.50DS and -6.50DS in both eyes.
6. They have a cylindrical component of their spectacle refractive error between

-0.75DC and -1.25DC in both eyes.
7. They can be fitted satisfactorily with both lens types.
8. They own an acceptable pair of spectacles.
9. They agree not to participate in other clinical research for the duration of the study.

Exclusion Criteria

1. They have an ocular disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
2. They have a systemic disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
3. They are using any topical medication such as eye drops (including comfort drops) or ointment on a regular basis.
4. They are aphakic.
5. They have had corneal refractive surgery.
6. They have any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid lens wear or have keratoconus.
7. They are pregnant or breastfeeding.
8. They have any ocular abnormality which would, in the opinion of the investigator, normally contraindicate contact lens wear.
9. They have any infectious disease which would, in the opinion of the investigator, contraindicate contact lens wear or pose a risk to study personnel; or they have any immunosuppressive disease (e.g. HIV), or a history of anaphylaxis or severe allergic reaction.
10. They have taken part in any other contact lens or care solution clinical trial or research, within two weeks prior to starting this study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

35 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

CooperVision, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Philip Morgan, PhD.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Manchester

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Eurolens Research

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

C19-679 (EX-MKTG-115)

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id