Valproic Acid (VPA) for Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) in Liver Transplant Patients
NCT ID: NCT04531592
Last Updated: 2021-10-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
PHASE2
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-01-31
2023-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
VPA is an anticonvulsant drug that was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1978. VPA was developed for use as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy for the treatment of seizure disorders, mania associated with bipolar disorder, and migraine. Both oral and intravenous (IV) formulations are available. Doses up to 60 milligram (mg)/kilogram (kg)/day for up to 14 days have been demonstrated to be safe and effective. More recently, a study has shown that a single dose of intravenous VPA at up to 140 mg/kg is safe in healthy volunteers. VPA has been recognized as an HDAC inhibitor (HDACI) shown to reduce the inflammatory response and oxidative stress in septic mice, thereby protecting against renal injury. The molecular mechanisms conferring anticonvulsant properties associated with VPA have not been clearly elucidated to date but likely include increasing levels of γ-aminobutyric acid in the central nervous system (CNS), reduction in N-Methyl-D-Aspartate-mediated excitation, and blockade of voltage gated sodium and L-type calcium channels. More recently, VPA has shown HDACI potential, specifically targeting class I (subclasses Ia and Ib) and class II (subclass IIa) HDAC proteins. Given that VPA modulates multiple pathways involved in AKI, it theoretically could prevent kidney dysfunction and inflammation that is induced by I/R injury.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of VPA on reducing I/R injury related to organ damage in the kidneys in liver transplant patients with moderate-to-severe hemorrhage. The primary objective is to evaluate the effect of VPA on reducing AKI compared with placebo in liver transplant patients with expected moderated-to-severe hemorrhage at risk for I/R injury. The two secondary objectives are: 1) To assess the perioperative pharmacokinetics (PK) of VPA in liver transplant patients with moderate-to-severe hemorrhage, and 2) To evaluate the safety of VPA administered as IV infusion in liver transplant patients with moderate-to-severe hemorrhage at risk of I/R injury.
This is a phase 2, single-dose, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a single dose of 140 mg/kg of VPA plus standard of care (SOC) or the placebo plus SOC, administered via IV infusion in the OR within 45 min after induction of anesthesia (administration of hypnotic). Clinical evaluations such as physical examination, vital signs, electrocardiogram, and laboratory results will be collected. AKI will be used to assess VPA efficacy. Myocardial injury and laboratory measurements (hematology, chemistry, coagulation profile, and urinalysis) will be used to monitor subject safety. Outcome measures including in-hospital mortality, length of intensive care unit (ICU) and/or stepdown unit (SDU) stay, length of hospital stay, number of alive and ventilator free days (aVFD), and incidence of renal replacement therapy (RRT) will also be collected. Blood samples will be collected for PK analysis. The PK analysis will correlate study drug exposures with safety profiles. Specimens (plasma, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), and urine) will be stored for future undetermined study-related analyses, including pharmacodynamics (PD) and VPA responsiveness studies. These studies may correlate PK profiles to molecular changes related to beneficial properties of VPA.
Male and non-pregnant, non-breastfeeding female liver transplant patients between 18 and 80 years old will be recruited for the study. Patients will be those scheduled to undergo liver transplant surgery and expected to require transfusion of 3 or more units of red cell product. Only patients who can provide consent or for whom a Legally Authorized Representative (LAR) can provide consent, will be enrolled. Approximately 50 subjects will be recruited from across four major medical centers for participation in this study.
Based on the available safety profile data from multi-dose clinical trials of VPA, the product safety information sheet, as well as the VPA Phase 1 study which evaluated the safety of single ascending doses of VPA, it has been determined that a dose of 140 mg/kg is safe and well-tolerated with minimal adverse reactions. However, given that patients studied at the 140 mg/kg dose in the phase 1 study were relatively healthy compared to the proposed patient population in this study and unanticipated Adverse Events (AEs) may occur, the study team will monitor all study subjects closely for AEs throughout the study. All AEs will be evaluated for duration, seriousness, severity, and relationship to the study drug, and reported accordingly.
This study will be monitored according to the data and safety monitoring plan which will outline the different levels of monitoring and the responsible parties. A Safety Review Committee (SRC) will review and monitor all safety information and compliance data as well as the overall study progress on a regular basis. A Medical Monitor (MM) with relevant clinical and research expertise will oversee the clinical study and provide ongoing medical monitoring. The clinical site Principal Investigators (PIs) will be responsible for ensuring that all AEs that occur in subjects during the AE reporting period are managed and reported in accordance with the protocol, Sponsor requirements, and any applicable regulations and institutional policies. A Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) will monitor implementation and progress of the study and review the accumulating endpoint and safety data by treatment arm to detect evidence of early significant benefit or harm for subjects while the study is in progress.
As the main purpose of this study is to evaluate safety of VPA in the study population and to investigate efficacy signal, this is a proof-of-concept (PoC) study. Because it is a PoC study rather than a confirmatory one, it has been assumed that a total sample size of 50 subjects (25 in each treatment arm) will be sufficient to provide adequate clinical evidence of safety and potential efficacy, and to support decision-making on whether a larger pivotal confirmatory Phase 3 study would be justified.
A statistical analysis plan (SAP) that details the analytical principles and statistical techniques to be employed in order to address the primary and secondary objectives will be developed. Demographic and relevant baseline characteristics will be presented and summarized descriptively by treatment for the randomized, modified intent-to-treat (mITT), and per-protocol (PP) populations. The primary endpoint of KDIGO stages will be measured in ordinal scale as 0, 1, 2, or 3, where 0 indicates normal renal function and the progressively higher values indicate worsening renal function. The ordinal scale measurements will be analyzed using the proportional odds ordinal logistic regression model. The KDIGO stages will be the dependent variable and drug treatment will be used as the independent variable. The common odds ratio across the KDIGO stages and its 95% confidence interval will be calculated. Binary endpoints (e.g., incidence of AKI) will be analyzed by Fisher's exact test or logistic regression with treatment as an independent variable. The odds ratio and its 95% confidence interval will be calculated. Continuous outcomes will be analyzed by missed effects models with treatment and baseline value of the outcome (if applicable) as independent variables. Un-ordered categorical variables with more than two levels of outcome will be analyzed by a chi-square test. Ordered categorical variables with more than two levels of outcome will be analyzed in the same way as for the primary endpoint. Safety endpoints will be analyzed and summarized descriptively. Categorical variables will be summarized by count and percentage. Odds ratios and relative risks may be calculated to compare study drug with placebo in incidence of certain safety events. Continuous variables will be summarized by mean, SD, median, minimum, and maximum. Shift tables may be used to describe changes in certain laboratory values. The plan for the PK analysis is two-fold. First, a standard noncompartmental analysis will be performed to obtain descriptors of VPA exposure to explore potential relationships to the primary outcome), secondary outcomes, or any observed adverse effects. A population PK analysis will be performed to examine and, perhaps, explain the anticipated differing PK of VPA in the trial. Specifically, low protein binding of VPA and massive blood loss are expected to affect the elimination clearance and, perhaps, the volume of distribution of VPA. Characterizing the degree to which the PK are perturbed as well as the parameter variability in this population will be important for analyzing the relationship of VPA exposure to primary and secondary outcomes and determining the effects, if any, of factors related to disease or perioperative conditions to the PK of VPA.
No interim analyses will be performed for this study. This study does not have a formal stopping rule based on statistical testing. See Section 3.9 for more information on stopping rules. Missing data can occur in clinical studies, and they may have an impact on the results of statistical analyses. Every effort will be made to ensure that the amount of missing data is kept at a minimum.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
VPA plus SOC
A single dose of 140 mg/kg of VPA plus standard of care
Valproic acid
Valproate sodium in 5-ml single-dose vials containing 100 mg/ml of VPA. The appropriate dose of 140 mg/kg, based on the subject's weight at study entry, will be diluted in isotonic saline solution to a final volume of 300 ml for administration
Placebo plus SOC
A single dose of isotonic saline solution plus standard of care
Isotonic saline solution
Isotonic saline solution consisting of 0.9% sodium chloride in the volume of 300 ml for administration
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Valproic acid
Valproate sodium in 5-ml single-dose vials containing 100 mg/ml of VPA. The appropriate dose of 140 mg/kg, based on the subject's weight at study entry, will be diluted in isotonic saline solution to a final volume of 300 ml for administration
Isotonic saline solution
Isotonic saline solution consisting of 0.9% sodium chloride in the volume of 300 ml for administration
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Is male or non-pregnant, non-breastfeeding female;
* Is able to provide written informed consent or has an LAR from whom consent can be obtained;
* Body mass index (BMI) is between 18 kg/m2 and 35 kg/m2;
* Expected transfusion of 3 or more units of red cell product, as determined by the patient's provider; and
* Is scheduled to undergo liver transplant surgery without hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) exception points.
Exclusion Criteria
* Is currently receiving VPA;
* Is pregnant or breastfeeding;
* Is in need of a simultaneous kidney transplant, or currently on RRT for either AKI or hepato-renal syndrome, type I (HRS-I);
* Is currently incarcerated or pending incarceration;
* Is known to have mitochondrial disorders caused by polymerase γ (POLG) mutations;
* Has acute liver failure;
* Has porto-pulmonary hypertension;
* Has hepato-pulmonary syndrome;
* Transplant procedure is a veno-venous bypass procedure;
* Is a living-donor transplant or a split liver transplant;
* Is scheduled to undergo liver transplant surgery with HCC exception points; or
* Has other unspecified reason/condition that, in the opinion of the clinical site PI, make the patient unsuitable for enrollment.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
United States Department of Defense
FED
Clinipace Worldwide
INDUSTRY
Westat
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Cristina Rabadan-Diehl, PharmD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Westat
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
University of Colorado - Denver
Denver, Colorado, United States
University of Texas Southwest
Dallas, Texas, United States
Houston Methodist Specialty and Transplant Hospital
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hilmi IA, Damian D, Al-Khafaji A, Planinsic R, Boucek C, Sakai T, Chang CC, Kellum JA. Acute kidney injury following orthotopic liver transplantation: incidence, risk factors, and effects on patient and graft outcomes. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Jun;114(6):919-26. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu556. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
Georgoff PE, Nikolian VC, Bonham T, Pai MP, Tafatia C, Halaweish I, To K, Watcharotone K, Parameswaran A, Luo R, Sun D, Alam HB. Safety and Tolerability of Intravenous Valproic Acid in Healthy Subjects: A Phase I Dose-Escalation Trial. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018 Feb;57(2):209-219. doi: 10.1007/s40262-017-0553-1.
Zheng Q, Liu W, Liu Z, Zhao H, Han X, Zhao M. Valproic acid protects septic mice from renal injury by reducing the inflammatory response. J Surg Res. 2014 Nov;192(1):163-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.05.030. Epub 2014 May 20.
Chateauvieux S, Morceau F, Dicato M, Diederich M. Molecular and therapeutic potential and toxicity of valproic acid. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010;2010:479364. doi: 10.1155/2010/479364. Epub 2010 Jul 29.
Li Y, Alam HB. Creating a pro-survival and anti-inflammatory phenotype by modulation of acetylation in models of hemorrhagic and septic shock. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012;710:107-33. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-5638-5_11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
VPA-202
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id