Trial Outcomes & Findings for User Acceptability of a Device-Based Opioid Overdose Intervention (NCT NCT04530591)

NCT ID: NCT04530591

Last Updated: 2021-07-07

Results Overview

We aim to characterize the degree of need for a device-based opioid overdose intervention. These were extracted from the participant survey questions as well as from the words, phrases, and sentences used by participants during the interview.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Target enrollment

97 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Day 1

Results posted on

2021-07-07

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Patient Participants
This group of participants will complete a survey about their opioid use history and their preferences for a device-based intervention. They will then participate in a semi-structured interview to provide feedback on non-functional, "looks-like" prototypes of such a device. Survey: Participants will complete a survey about their opioid use history, its impact on their lives, their current strategies for preventing or reversing opioid overdoses, and their preferences for a device-based intervention. Interview: Participants will participate in a semi-structured interview, during which they will provide feedback on non-functional, "looks-like" prototypes of a naloxone delivery device.
Overall Study
STARTED
97
Overall Study
COMPLETED
97
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

User Acceptability of a Device-Based Opioid Overdose Intervention

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Patient Participants
n=97 Participants
This group of participants will complete a survey about their opioid use history and their preferences for a device-based intervention. They will then participate in a semi-structured interview to provide feedback on non-functional, "looks-like" prototypes of such a device. Survey: Participants will complete a survey about their opioid use history, its impact on their lives, their current strategies for preventing or reversing opioid overdoses, and their preferences for a device-based intervention. Interview: Participants will participate in a semi-structured interview, during which they will provide feedback on non-functional, "looks-like" prototypes of a naloxone delivery device.
Age, Continuous
41 Years
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
40 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
57 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
74 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
46 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
Housing Status
Homeless
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
Housing Status
House
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
Housing Status
Apartment
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
Housing Status
Shelter
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
Housing Status
Unknown
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
Started After Injury/Surgery
Yes
46 Participants
n=5 Participants
Started After Injury/Surgery
No
51 Participants
n=5 Participants
Duration of Opioid Use
12 years
n=5 Participants
Opioid Use Frequency (Days per Week)
1
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Opioid Use Frequency (Days per Week)
2-3
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
Opioid Use Frequency (Days per Week)
4-6
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
Opioid Use Frequency (Days per Week)
7
80 Participants
n=5 Participants
Opioid Use Frequency (Days per Week)
Unknown
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Opioid Use Frequency (Uses per Day)
1
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Opioid Use Frequency (Uses per Day)
2-3
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
Opioid Use Frequency (Uses per Day)
4-6
46 Participants
n=5 Participants
Opioid Use Frequency (Uses per Day)
7+
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
Opioid Use Frequency (Uses per Day)
Unknown
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Been to an Inpatient Rehab
Yes
79 Participants
n=5 Participants
Been to an Inpatient Rehab
No
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
Used MOUD
Yes
84 Participants
n=5 Participants
Used MOUD
No
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
Perceived likelihood of bystander intervention in the event of an overdose
Likely
53 Participants
n=5 Participants
Perceived likelihood of bystander intervention in the event of an overdose
Unlikely
44 Participants
n=5 Participants
Friends/Family Who have Overdosed
Yes
77 Participants
n=5 Participants
Friends/Family Who have Overdosed
No
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
Friends/Family Who have had Overdose Complications
Yes
56 Participants
n=5 Participants
Friends/Family Who have had Overdose Complications
No
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
Friends/Family Who have Died from Overdose
Yes
75 Participants
n=5 Participants
Friends/Family Who have Died from Overdose
No
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
Has Overdosed
Yes
69 Participants
n=5 Participants
Has Overdosed
No
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
Number of Prior Overdoses
3 Incidents
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 1

Population: Some participants did not answer all the questions or selected more than one answer

We aim to characterize the degree of need for a device-based opioid overdose intervention. These were extracted from the participant survey questions as well as from the words, phrases, and sentences used by participants during the interview.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patient Participants
n=91 Participants
This group of participants will complete a survey about their opioid use history and their preferences for a device-based intervention. They will then participate in a semi-structured interview to provide feedback on non-functional, "looks-like" prototypes of such a device. Survey: Participants will complete a survey about their opioid use history, its impact on their lives, their current strategies for preventing or reversing opioid overdoses, and their preferences for a device-based intervention. Interview: Participants will participate in a semi-structured interview, during which they will provide feedback on non-functional, "looks-like" prototypes of a naloxone delivery device.
Community Need for a Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
Likely
69 Participants
Community Need for a Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
Unlikely
22 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 1

Population: Some participants did not answer all the questions or selected more than one answer

We aim to characterize the functional and aesthetic preferences of the participant population for a device-based opioid overdose intervention. These were extracted from the participant survey questions as well as from the words, phrases, and sentences used by participants during the interview.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patient Participants
n=97 Participants
This group of participants will complete a survey about their opioid use history and their preferences for a device-based intervention. They will then participate in a semi-structured interview to provide feedback on non-functional, "looks-like" prototypes of such a device. Survey: Participants will complete a survey about their opioid use history, its impact on their lives, their current strategies for preventing or reversing opioid overdoses, and their preferences for a device-based intervention. Interview: Participants will participate in a semi-structured interview, during which they will provide feedback on non-functional, "looks-like" prototypes of a naloxone delivery device.
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
For a device that sense overdose - likely to wear an ankle strap · Unlikely
52 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
Likely to use a device that senses an overdose · Likely
70 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
Likely to use a device that senses an overdose · Unlikely
26 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
Likely to use a device that indicates the wearer is at risk of an overdose · Likely
66 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
Likely to use a device that indicates the wearer is at risk of an overdose · Unlikely
29 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
Likely to use a device that straps naloxone to the body for a bystander to administer · Likely
52 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
Likely to use a device that straps naloxone to the body for a bystander to administer · Unlikely
44 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
Likely to use a device that senses an overdose and administers naloxone if needed · Likely
64 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
Likely to use a device that senses an overdose and administers naloxone if needed · Unlikely
32 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
Likely to use a device that alerts medical first responders if needed · Likely
68 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
Likely to use a device that alerts medical first responders if needed · Unlikely
28 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
Likely to use a device that alerts bystanders if needed · Likely
60 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
Likely to use a device that alerts bystanders if needed · Unlikely
35 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
Likely to use a device that monitors vital signs · Likely
73 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
Likely to use a device that monitors vital signs · Unlikely
22 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
For a device that sense overdose - likely to wear a necklace · Likely
48 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
For a device that sense overdose - likely to wear a necklace · Unlikely
46 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
For a device that sense overdose - likely to wear a canula · Likely
12 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
For a device that sense overdose - likely to wear a canula · Unlikely
84 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
For a device that sense overdose - likely to wear a skin-patch on chest · Likely
42 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
For a device that sense overdose - likely to wear a skin-patch on chest · Unlikely
54 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
For a device that sense overdose - likely to wear a skin-patch on upper arm · Likely
53 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
For a device that sense overdose - likely to wear a skin-patch on upper arm · Unlikely
43 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
For a device that sense overdose - likely to wear a watch-appearing bracelet · Likely
72 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
For a device that sense overdose - likely to wear a watch-appearing bracelet · Unlikely
22 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
For a device that sense overdose - likely to wear a wrist bracelet · Likely
69 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
For a device that sense overdose - likely to wear a wrist bracelet · Unlikely
26 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
For a device that sense overdose - likely to wear a shoulder strap · Likely
21 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
For a device that sense overdose - likely to wear a shoulder strap · Unlikely
30 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
For a device that sense overdose - likely to wear a thigh strap · Likely
15 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
For a device that sense overdose - likely to wear a thigh strap · Unlikely
33 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
For a device that sense overdose - likely to wear a chest strap · Likely
22 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
For a device that sense overdose - likely to wear a chest strap · Unlikely
72 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
For a device that sense overdose - likely to wear glasses · Likely
24 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
For a device that sense overdose - likely to wear glasses · Unlikely
70 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
For a device that sense overdose - likely to wear a knee brace · Likely
16 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
For a device that sense overdose - likely to wear a knee brace · Unlikely
32 Participants
Functional and Aesthetic Preferences for Device-based Opioid Overdose Intervention
For a device that sense overdose - likely to wear an ankle strap · Likely
44 Participants

Adverse Events

Patient Participants

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Jacob Brenner, Assistant Professor of Medicine

Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania

Phone: 215-662-2222

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place