Encouraging Annual Wellness Visits Among ACO Beneficiaries

NCT ID: NCT04526873

Last Updated: 2021-01-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

41472 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-09-11

Study Completion Date

2020-12-18

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Annual Wellness Visits (AWVs) are a type of detailed healthcare checkup to which Medicare beneficiaries are entitled, free of charge, once per year. The purpose of the current study is to assess what content and communication modality results in the most effective messaging campaign to encourage Medicare beneficiaries to schedule their AWVs.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Annual Wellness Visits (AWVs) are a type of detailed healthcare checkup to which Medicare beneficiaries are entitled, free of charge, once per year. The Keystone Affordable Care Organization (KACO), of which Geisinger is a part, is working to increase the number of eligible patients who take advantage of AWVs via mail and telephone outreach.

The purpose of the current study is to assess what content and communication modality results in the most effective messaging campaign. Patients will either receive a phone call or a mailed postcard, or they will be part of a no-contact control condition. Furthermore, the content of the postcard will vary in terms of humor and salience, as well as whether telehealth is mentioned as an AWV option.\* Although telehealth is a great option for patients who are unable to attend an in-person visit, the latter is preferable in terms of quality of care. Furthermore, insurance coverage for telehealth visits may not extend indefinitely beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. Highlighting the telehealth option may help attract patients who would not otherwise get an AWV, increasing the effectiveness of the intervention. On the other hand, it may unintentionally nudge patients who would otherwise have scheduled an in-person visit to opt for telehealth instead.

The following research questions will assess effectiveness in increasing patient scheduling of an AWV:

1. Are postcards effective compared with a no-contact control condition?
2. How effective are postcards when compared with phone calls, a presumably more intrusive type of intervention?
3. Is a humorous cartoon, accompanied by language using examples to make salient the future health risks that could be prevented, more effective than stock photography of similar patient-doctor situations (typically used in outreach), accompanied by prevention language that is less specific?
4. Is it more effective to highlight the availability of telehealth video visits than not to mention that option?
5. Are in-person AWVs are scheduled at least as frequently when the telehealth option is highlighted as when it is not?

Included in the study will be patients from 7 KACO partner sites: Caring Community Health Center, Evangelical Community Hospital, Geisinger, Geisinger-Hm Joint Venture, Holy Spirit, Wayne Memorial Hospital, and Wright Center. Generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) will examine the primary study outcomes as a function of the study arms (between-subjects), with partner site included as a random effect, assuming high intraclass correlation coefficients.

\* Wayne Memorial Hospital patients will not receive postcards with tele-health content. In addition, only patients from the following partner sites will be randomized to receive a phone call: Evangelical Community Hospital, Wayne Memorial Hospital, and the Wright Center. Geisinger patients will not be randomized to receive phone calls, but Geisinger patients who are randomized to other conditions may receive phone calls as part of regular operations. This will be accounted for during analysis as a model regressor.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Health Promotion Prevention Risk Reduction Behavior Telehealth

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Postcard content will follow a factorial design (crossing telehealth vs. non-telehealth with cartoon/salience vs. stock photo). In addition, there will be a no-contact control group and a phone call group.
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers
Participants (i.e., patients) will not be informed specifically of their assignment to different arms throughout the study. Providers who conduct AWVs will not be randomized to study arms or informed of patient assignment.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control

No intervention control group

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Postcard: non-telehealth, photo

This group receives a postcard that does not include telehealth information and features a stock photo

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Postcard

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Mailed

Postcard: non-telehealth, salience/humorous cartoon

This group receives a postcard that does not include telehealth information and features a humorous cartoon as well as examples of serious health risks that the visit could help prevent (stroke and heart attack)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Postcard

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Mailed

Humor/Salience

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Funny cartoon + health risk examples

Postcard: telehealth, photo

This group receives a postcard that does includes telehealth information and features a stock photo

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Postcard

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Mailed

Telehealth

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Information about video visit

Postcard: telehealth, salience/humorous cartoon

This group receives a postcard that includes telehealth information and features a humorous cartoon as well as examples of serious health risks that the visit could help prevent (stroke and heart attack)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Postcard

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Mailed

Humor/Salience

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Funny cartoon + health risk examples

Telehealth

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Information about video visit

Phone call

This group receives a phone call

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Phone call

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

May be automated or by human

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Postcard

Mailed

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Phone call

May be automated or by human

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Humor/Salience

Funny cartoon + health risk examples

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Telehealth

Information about video visit

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* KACO Medicare beneficiary
* Haven't had an AWV or due for their next one
* For phone call condition only: patients of Evangelical Community Hospital, Wayne Memorial Hospital, and the Wright Center

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient has already been called about AWV or had a visit scheduled
* For "patient initiated contact" outcome only: patients of Wayne Memorial Hospital or who have not been assigned to a partner site. This is because postcards received by these patients will not include a specific phone number to call.
* For telehealth conditions only: patients of Wayne Memorial Hospital
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Geisinger Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Amir Goren

Program Director, Behavioral Insights Team

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Amir Goren, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Geisinger Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Geisinger

Danville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2020-0577

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

AWV Practice Redesign Toolkit (Tailored Intervention)
NCT05563415 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA