Influence of Femoral Head Size During Total Hip Arthroplasty on Gait

NCT ID: NCT04521842

Last Updated: 2021-10-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-01-31

Study Completion Date

2020-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Total hip replacement (THR) is being considered as one of the most effective medical procedures. Since its introduction, there was a worldwide debate over proper implant selection in terms of size, bearing type and shape. The diameter of used femoral heads components grew throughout the years - from 22 mm in the 1960s to 32 mm in the 2000s, which is the most commonly used size nowadays. In recent years there was a visible use of large femoral heads (\>=36mm) in several registers. In the USA there was a significant grow in use of this heads rising from 1% in early 200s to even 58% in 2009. There is a strong evidence data and many researchers concerning range of movement, risk of dislocation, functional results, pain and prosthesis wear depending of femoral head size.

In terms of gait characteristics there are several deviations reported concerning both patients with hip osteoarthritis (OA) and following THR. There is a lack of literature concerning influence of used implants on gait parameters and whether this goal of the surgery can be achieved.

The aim of this study was to assess potential differences of lower limb biomechanics during gait in patients following total hip replacement surgery depending on femoral head diameter and compare them to the normal gait of healthy volunteers. As a secondary outcome authors wanted to inspect correlation between gait parameters and patient-reported outcome.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Total hip replacement (THR) is being considered as one of the most effective medical procedures. Since its introduction, there was a worldwide debate over proper implant selection in terms of size, bearing type and shape. The diameter of used femoral heads components grew throughout the years - from 22 mm in the 1960s to 32 mm in the 2000s, which is the most commonly used size nowadays. In recent years there was a visible use of large femoral heads (\>=36mm) in several registers. In the USA there was a significant grow in use of this heads rising from 1% in early 200s to even 58% in 2009. There is a strong evidence data and many researchers concerning range of movement, risk of dislocation, functional results, pain and prosthesis wear depending of femoral head size.

In terms of gait characteristics there are several deviations reported concerning both patients with hip osteoarthritis (OA) and following THR. It is well-proven that those with hip OA have reduced stride length and reduced cadence, reduced gait velocity, and reduced joint excursion. Patients after THR walk with lower hip-abduction moments, sagittal-plane range of motion. It is believed that it might be a consequence of pain-avoidance mechanism developed as an adaptation for joint disease, which is still present after the surgery. What is more, there are publications, which underline that lower limb biomechanics during gait do not return to normal following THR.

However there is a lack of literature concerning influence of used implants on gait parameters and whether this goal of the surgery can be achieved.

According to authors best knowledge this study is the first to ever describe potential differences in gait parameters between THR performed with standard femoral heads (28-32mm) and large ones (\>=36mm).

Aim of the study The aim of this study was to assess potential differences of lower limb biomechanics during gait in patients following total hip replacement surgery depending on femoral head diameter and compare them to the normal gait of healthy volunteers. As a secondary outcome authors wanted to inspect correlation between gait parameters and patient-reported outcome.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis, Hip Hip Arthritis Gait, Frontal

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients qualified to undergo total hip arthroplasty due to the end-stage osteoarthritis will be randomly allocated to receive either standard femoral head size implants nor large ones. Pre- and postoperatively they will undergo gait analysis. To avoid risk of bias assessor will be blinded in terms of used implants in every participants case.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard size femoral head implant

Participants qualified to undergo total hip replacement who will receive standard femoral head size implant

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Total hip replacement

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Total hip replacement in treatment of end-stage osteoarthritis

Large size femoral head

Participants qualified to undergo total hip replacement who will receive large femoral head size implant

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Total hip replacement

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Total hip replacement in treatment of end-stage osteoarthritis

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Total hip replacement

Total hip replacement in treatment of end-stage osteoarthritis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* BMI \<35
* Ability to walk for 10 meters
* 60-80 years of age
* Bilateral THR

Exclusion Criteria

* Revision surgeries before and after THR
* Any other lower limbs surgeries
* Secondary OA
* Neurological disorders
* Cardiac disorders
* Severly impaired balance
* Severe dizziness
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medical University of Warsaw

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bartosz M. MaciÄ…g, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medical University of Warsaw

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Othopedics and Rehabilitation, Medical University of Warsaw

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Poland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

WarsawMU/Head

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id