Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
64 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-12-18
2021-12-17
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The intervention component includes access to the web-based platform, routine monitoring of irAEs every week for twelve weeks and then bi-weekly for an additional eight weeks, and messages to healthcare providers and patients if a reported irAE is deemed severe enough that it warrants provider attention.
Participants are randomized into either an intervention group (described above) or a control group, in which their irAEs are monitored once after a twelve week interval and again after an additional eight weeks. Additionally, both intervention and control participants complete three assessments: baseline (at the beginning of the research study), 12-week follow-up, and 20-week follow-up.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Nivolumab With or Without Ipilimumab in Treating Patients With Metastatic Sarcoma That Cannot Be Removed by Surgery
NCT02500797
Testing of an Educational Tool for Patients With Melanoma and Pre-Existing Autoimmune Disease Who Are Candidates for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
NCT04751396
Nivolumab or Expectant Observation Following Ipilimumab, Nivolumab, and Surgery in Treating Patients With High Risk Localized, Locoregionally Advanced, or Recurrent Mucosal Melanoma
NCT03220009
Nivolumab for the Treatment of Metastatic or Unresectable Solid Tumors With ARID1A Mutation and CXCL13 Expression
NCT04957615
Study of IMC-3G3 in Patients With Tumors That Are Not Responding to Standard Therapies or No Therapy is Available
NCT00768391
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Web-based interventions provide flexibility and overcome many obstacles to accessibility for patients who may not be able to meet at a certain location due to disease-related physical limitations or logistical limitations. Specific to cancer, web-based interventions have demonstrated efficacy in reducing depressive symptoms, distress, and improved functional well-being among patients with cancer. Finally, web based platforms are useful for monitoring patient-reported outcomes and linking outcomes to providers. Overall, web-based monitoring and embedding of patient-reported adverse events into clinical care can improve cancer outcomes. To the best of our knowledge, no study has established the efficacy of a platform that links patient-reported irAEs to oncology providers.
Our primary outcome will measure the feasibility of the digital health program, ImmunOncoTool. Our secondary outcome will be the preliminary intended effects of ImmunOncoTool which will be assessed through endpoints such as clinician response and time to clinician response of patient-reported irAEs, number and length of unscheduled breaks in checkpoint inhibitor treatment and discontinuation of checkpoint inhibitor treatment, length of time spent managing any irAEs, provider reported irAEs, and concurrence between patientreported irAE and provider reported irAEs as these factors may explain the effect of ImmunOncoTool on improved clinical outcomes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ImmunOncoTool Condition
The ImmunOncoTool condition includes access to the web-based platform, routine monitoring of irAEs every week for twelve weeks and then bi-weekly for an additional eight weeks, and messages to healthcare providers and patients if a reported irAE is deemed severe enough that it warrants provider attention.
ImmunOncoTool Condition
Immunotherapy education + irAE monitoring + Facilitation of patient-provider communication
Control
Participants in the control condition are not assigned an intervention. They receive standard of care.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ImmunOncoTool Condition
Immunotherapy education + irAE monitoring + Facilitation of patient-provider communication
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Provider and electronic medical report (EMR) confirmed diagnosis of lung, kidney, urothelial, or melanoma cancer as checkpoint inhibitors are used primarily in these disease sites
* English-speaking as the content and website will only be available in English for feasibility testing
* Have initiated a checkpoint inhibitor
* Have access to the internet
Exclusion Criteria
* concurrent cancer-related treatment aside from checkpoint inhibitors
* pre-existing auto-immune condition which may impact the course of treatment.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
American Cancer Society, Inc.
OTHER
Bristol-Myers Squibb
INDUSTRY
Melanoma Research Foundation Breakthrough Consortium
OTHER
Northwestern University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Betina Yanez
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Betina Yanez, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Northwestern University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STU00207560
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.