Trial Outcomes & Findings for Functional Change With MMS (NCT NCT04506502)
NCT ID: NCT04506502
Last Updated: 2025-05-16
Results Overview
Measurement of participant's perception about body shape, assessed using the Body Satisfaction Questionnaire (BSQ) at the 1-month post-treatment follow-up visit. The scale measures body image using a set of dichotomous items used to describe aspects of shape and appearance. The questionnaire has total score range from 10 to 50. An increase in score (when compared to baseline) reflects the participant's perceived improvement in appearance in the treated region (abdomen). Questionnaire results were tabulated as the numerical change between mean baseline scores and scores recorded at the 1-month post-treatment follow-up visit. A positive change reflects an increase in the body satisfaction questionnaire total score.
COMPLETED
NA
16 participants
Baseline, 1-month post-treatment follow-up visit
2025-05-16
Participant Flow
Per protocol, subjects received magnetic muscle stimulation (MMS) treatments in the abdominal area in 8 sessions over a 1-month period. Office follow-up visits were required at 4 days, 1 month, 2 months and 3 months after the final treatment. During all visits, subjects were assessed for pain and adverse events and required study activities were performed per protocol.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Magnetic Muscle Stimulation (MMS) Treatment Group
Each subject received two MMS treatment sessions, at least two days apart, per week for a four-week period. Treatment was performed on the abdominal region.
The treatments are designed to evaluate muscle toning, firming and strengthening in the abdomen.
The ZELTIQ System: The MMS device was used to perform the treatments.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
16
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
14
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Magnetic Muscle Stimulation (MMS) Treatment Group
Each subject received two MMS treatment sessions, at least two days apart, per week for a four-week period. Treatment was performed on the abdominal region.
The treatments are designed to evaluate muscle toning, firming and strengthening in the abdomen.
The ZELTIQ System: The MMS device was used to perform the treatments.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Illness and subsequent quarantine requirements related to SARS-CoV-2 local guidelines
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Functional Change With MMS
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Magnetic Muscle Stimulation (MMS) Treatment Group
n=16 Participants
Each subject received two MMS treatment sessions, at least two days apart, per week for a four-week period. Treatment was performed on the abdominal region.
The treatments are designed to evaluate muscle toning, firming and strengthening in the abdomen.
The ZELTIQ System: The MMS device was used to perform the treatments.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
39.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 1-month post-treatment follow-up visitPopulation: Two subjects were excluded from per protocol population due to incomplete treatments and withdrawal of consent. The Per Protocol population consisted of all treated subjects that received 8 MMS treatments and with a weight change of no more than 5% of total body weight at the time the 1-month assessments were performed compared to the weight obtained at the first treatment visit.
Measurement of participant's perception about body shape, assessed using the Body Satisfaction Questionnaire (BSQ) at the 1-month post-treatment follow-up visit. The scale measures body image using a set of dichotomous items used to describe aspects of shape and appearance. The questionnaire has total score range from 10 to 50. An increase in score (when compared to baseline) reflects the participant's perceived improvement in appearance in the treated region (abdomen). Questionnaire results were tabulated as the numerical change between mean baseline scores and scores recorded at the 1-month post-treatment follow-up visit. A positive change reflects an increase in the body satisfaction questionnaire total score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Magnetic Muscle Stimulation (MMS) Treatment Group
n=14 Participants
Each subject received two MMS treatment sessions, at least two days apart, per week for a four-week period. Treatment was performed on the abdominal region.
The treatments are designed to evaluate muscle toning, firming and strengthening in the abdomen.
The ZELTIQ System: The MMS device was used to perform the treatments.
|
|---|---|
|
Change in Body Satisfaction Questionnaire From Baseline to 1-month Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit
|
8.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.4
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: AE information will be collected from the time of enrollment to the final follow-up visit at 3-months following the final treatment (approximately 4 months).Population: All participants enrolled in the study and treated with the EMS device were evaluated for adverse events throughout the study. Investigators determined if an AE was not related, possibly related, probably related or definitely related to the study device. Data is presented here as planned and collected per protocol by the total As-Treated Population (defined as all treated participants regardless of weight change).
The incidence of device-related adverse events (AE) including device-related serious AEs will be tabulated.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Magnetic Muscle Stimulation (MMS) Treatment Group
n=16 Participants
Each subject received two MMS treatment sessions, at least two days apart, per week for a four-week period. Treatment was performed on the abdominal region.
The treatments are designed to evaluate muscle toning, firming and strengthening in the abdomen.
The ZELTIQ System: The MMS device was used to perform the treatments.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Incidents of Device-Related Adverse Events
|
1 Device-Related Adverse Events
|
Adverse Events
Magnetic Muscle Stimulation (MMS) Treatment Group
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Magnetic Muscle Stimulation (MMS) Treatment Group
n=16 participants at risk
Each subject received two MMS treatment sessions, at least two days apart, per week for a four-week period. Treatment was performed on the abdominal region.
The treatments are designed to evaluate muscle toning, firming and strengthening in the abdomen.
The ZELTIQ System: The MMS device was used to perform the treatments.
|
|---|---|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Menstrual Cycle Irregularity
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected from the time of enrollment through the 4-week post final treatment follow-up visit, approximately 4 months.
Safety data is presented here as planned and collected per protocol, by the total As-Treated Population (defined as all treated participants regardless of weight change).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back Alignment Flare-up
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected from the time of enrollment through the 4-week post final treatment follow-up visit, approximately 4 months.
Safety data is presented here as planned and collected per protocol, by the total As-Treated Population (defined as all treated participants regardless of weight change).
|
|
General disorders
Abdominal Discomfort (Right Side)
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected from the time of enrollment through the 4-week post final treatment follow-up visit, approximately 4 months.
Safety data is presented here as planned and collected per protocol, by the total As-Treated Population (defined as all treated participants regardless of weight change).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Upper Back Pain
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected from the time of enrollment through the 4-week post final treatment follow-up visit, approximately 4 months.
Safety data is presented here as planned and collected per protocol, by the total As-Treated Population (defined as all treated participants regardless of weight change).
|
|
General disorders
Cold (Virus)
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected from the time of enrollment through the 4-week post final treatment follow-up visit, approximately 4 months.
Safety data is presented here as planned and collected per protocol, by the total As-Treated Population (defined as all treated participants regardless of weight change).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Tingling Sensation in Lower Leg (Right)
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected from the time of enrollment through the 4-week post final treatment follow-up visit, approximately 4 months.
Safety data is presented here as planned and collected per protocol, by the total As-Treated Population (defined as all treated participants regardless of weight change).
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash on Wrist (Right)
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected from the time of enrollment through the 4-week post final treatment follow-up visit, approximately 4 months.
Safety data is presented here as planned and collected per protocol, by the total As-Treated Population (defined as all treated participants regardless of weight change).
|
Additional Information
Sally Hallas, RN, Director Clinical Development - Body Contouring
Zeltiq Aesthetics
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place