Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy and Safety of MM-II for Treatment of Knee Pain in Subjects With Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis (NCT NCT04506463)
NCT ID: NCT04506463
Last Updated: 2024-08-29
Results Overview
The pain score is based on a score of 0 to 4; the higher the score, the higher the amount of pain.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
397 participants
Week 12
2024-08-29
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Arm A: MM-II 1 ml
MM-II 1 ml
MM-II dose I: Intra-articular injection
|
Arm B: MM-II 3 ml
MM-II 3 ml
MM-II dose II: Intra-articular injection
|
Arm C: MM-II 6 ml
MM-II 6 ml
MM-II dose III: Intra-articular injection
|
Arm 4: Placebo 1 ml
Placebo 1 ml
Placebo: Intra-articular injection
|
Arm 5: Placebo 3 ml
Placebo 3 ml
Placebo: Intra-articular injection
|
Arm 6: Placebo 6 ml
Placebo 6 ml
Placebo: Intra-articular injection
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
103
|
83
|
76
|
28
|
79
|
28
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
98
|
80
|
66
|
27
|
71
|
27
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
5
|
3
|
10
|
1
|
8
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Efficacy and Safety of MM-II for Treatment of Knee Pain in Subjects With Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Arm A: MM-II 1 ml
n=103 Participants
MM-II 1 ml
MM-II dose I: Intra-articular injection
|
Arm B: MM-II 3 ml
n=83 Participants
MM-II 3 ml
MM-II dose II: Intra-articular injection
|
Arm C: MM-II 6 ml
n=76 Participants
MM-II 6 ml
MM-II dose III: Intra-articular injection
|
Arm 4: Placebo 1ml
n=28 Participants
Placebo 1ml
Placebo: Intra-articular injection
|
Arm 5: Placebo 3ml
n=79 Participants
Placebo 3ml
Placebo: Intra-articular injection
|
Arm 6: Placebo 6ml
n=28 Participants
Placebo 6ml
Placebo: Intra-articular injection
|
Total
n=397 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
≤ 65 Years
|
65 participants
n=5 Participants
|
41 participants
n=7 Participants
|
52 participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 participants
n=4 Participants
|
50 participants
n=21 Participants
|
15 participants
n=10 Participants
|
242 participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
> 65 Years
|
38 participants
n=5 Participants
|
42 participants
n=7 Participants
|
24 participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 participants
n=4 Participants
|
29 participants
n=21 Participants
|
13 participants
n=10 Participants
|
155 participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
71 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
58 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
51 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
258 Participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
139 Participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
59 Participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
89 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
70 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
60 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
71 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
338 Participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Hong Kong
|
29 participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 participants
n=7 Participants
|
17 participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 participants
n=4 Participants
|
21 participants
n=21 Participants
|
5 participants
n=10 Participants
|
96 participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
27 participants
n=5 Participants
|
37 participants
n=7 Participants
|
32 participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 participants
n=4 Participants
|
27 participants
n=21 Participants
|
14 participants
n=10 Participants
|
147 participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Denmark
|
47 participants
n=5 Participants
|
27 participants
n=7 Participants
|
27 participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 participants
n=4 Participants
|
31 participants
n=21 Participants
|
9 participants
n=10 Participants
|
154 participants
n=115 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12The pain score is based on a score of 0 to 4; the higher the score, the higher the amount of pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm A: MM-II 1 ml
n=103 Participants
MM-II 1 ml
MM-II dose I: Intra-articular injection
|
Arm B: MM-II 3 ml
n=83 Participants
MM-II 3 ml
MM-II dose II: Intra-articular injection
|
Arm C: MM-II 6 ml
n=76 Participants
MM-II 6 ml
MM-II dose III: Intra-articular injection
|
Arm 4: Placebo 1 ml
n=28 Participants
Placebo 1 ml
Placebo: Intra-articular injection
|
Arm 5: Placebo 3 ml
n=78 Participants
Placebo 3 ml
Placebo: Intra-articular injection
|
Arm 6: Placebo 6 ml
n=28 Participants
Placebo 6ml
Placebo: Intra-articular injection
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) A Pain Score
|
-1.28 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.079
|
-1.35 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.086
|
-1.14 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.092
|
-0.96 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.143
|
-1.11 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.089
|
-1.10 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.142
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 26Knee pain will be assessed on a score of 0 to 100; the lower on the scale, the less the amount of knee pain experienced. Weekly post-baseline average daily knee pain scores will be calculated.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm A: MM-II 1 ml
n=103 Participants
MM-II 1 ml
MM-II dose I: Intra-articular injection
|
Arm B: MM-II 3 ml
n=83 Participants
MM-II 3 ml
MM-II dose II: Intra-articular injection
|
Arm C: MM-II 6 ml
n=76 Participants
MM-II 6 ml
MM-II dose III: Intra-articular injection
|
Arm 4: Placebo 1 ml
n=28 Participants
Placebo 1 ml
Placebo: Intra-articular injection
|
Arm 5: Placebo 3 ml
n=78 Participants
Placebo 3 ml
Placebo: Intra-articular injection
|
Arm 6: Placebo 6 ml
n=28 Participants
Placebo 6ml
Placebo: Intra-articular injection
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Knee Pain Scores by VAS
|
-30.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.81
|
-34.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 3.08
|
-23.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 3.26
|
-28.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 5.19
|
-22.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 3.20
|
-30.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 5.15
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 26Global pain will be assessed on a score of 0 to 100; the lower on the scale, the less the amount of global pain experienced. Weekly post-baseline average daily global pain scores will be calculated
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm A: MM-II 1 ml
n=103 Participants
MM-II 1 ml
MM-II dose I: Intra-articular injection
|
Arm B: MM-II 3 ml
n=83 Participants
MM-II 3 ml
MM-II dose II: Intra-articular injection
|
Arm C: MM-II 6 ml
n=76 Participants
MM-II 6 ml
MM-II dose III: Intra-articular injection
|
Arm 4: Placebo 1 ml
n=28 Participants
Placebo 1 ml
Placebo: Intra-articular injection
|
Arm 5: Placebo 3 ml
n=78 Participants
Placebo 3 ml
Placebo: Intra-articular injection
|
Arm 6: Placebo 6 ml
n=28 Participants
Placebo 6ml
Placebo: Intra-articular injection
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Global Pain Scores by VAS
|
-21.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 3.12
|
-22.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 3.54
|
-14.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 3.69
|
-17.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 5.86
|
-12.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 3.55
|
-26.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 6.15
|
Adverse Events
Arm A: MM-II 1 ml
Arm B: MM-II 3 ml
Arm C: MM-II 6 ml
Arm 4: Placebo 1 ml
Arm 5: Placebo 3 ml
Arm 6: Placebo 6 ml
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Arm A: MM-II 1 ml
n=102 participants at risk
MM-II 1 ml
MM-II dose I: Intra-articular injection
|
Arm B: MM-II 3 ml
n=86 participants at risk
MM-II 3 ml
MM-II dose II: Intra-articular injection
|
Arm C: MM-II 6 ml
n=74 participants at risk
MM-II 6 ml
MM-II dose III: Intra-articular injection
|
Arm 4: Placebo 1 ml
n=28 participants at risk
Placebo 1 ml
Placebo: Intra-articular injection
|
Arm 5: Placebo 3 ml
n=78 participants at risk
Placebo 3 ml
Placebo: Intra-articular injection
|
Arm 6: Placebo 6 ml
n=28 participants at risk
Placebo 6 ml
Placebo: Intra-articular injection
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Endocrine disorders
Thyroid cyst
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac disorder
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Esophageal adenocarcinoma
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral thrombosis
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Blood loss anemia
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
2.6%
2/78 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal hemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Arm A: MM-II 1 ml
n=102 participants at risk
MM-II 1 ml
MM-II dose I: Intra-articular injection
|
Arm B: MM-II 3 ml
n=86 participants at risk
MM-II 3 ml
MM-II dose II: Intra-articular injection
|
Arm C: MM-II 6 ml
n=74 participants at risk
MM-II 6 ml
MM-II dose III: Intra-articular injection
|
Arm 4: Placebo 1 ml
n=28 participants at risk
Placebo 1 ml
Placebo: Intra-articular injection
|
Arm 5: Placebo 3 ml
n=78 participants at risk
Placebo 3 ml
Placebo: Intra-articular injection
|
Arm 6: Placebo 6 ml
n=28 participants at risk
Placebo 6 ml
Placebo: Intra-articular injection
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Influenza like illness
|
4.9%
5/102 • Number of events 6 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
2.7%
2/74 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
10.7%
3/28 • Number of events 3 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.8%
3/78 • Number of events 4 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
6.9%
7/102 • Number of events 7 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
5.8%
5/86 • Number of events 5 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
13.5%
10/74 • Number of events 12 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
7.7%
6/78 • Number of events 8 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
10.7%
3/28 • Number of events 3 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint instability
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint stiffness
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint swelling
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
7.1%
2/28 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
2.9%
3/102 • Number of events 3 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
2.7%
2/74 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
5.1%
4/78 • Number of events 4 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
General disorders
Injection site joint pain
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
2.3%
2/86 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
2.7%
2/74 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
General disorders
Gait disturbance
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
General disorders
Injection site pruritus
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
|
17.6%
18/102 • Number of events 18 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
8.1%
7/86 • Number of events 7 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
9.5%
7/74 • Number of events 7 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
14.3%
4/28 • Number of events 4 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
10.3%
8/78 • Number of events 8 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
10.7%
3/28 • Number of events 3 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
7.8%
8/102 • Number of events 8 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.5%
3/86 • Number of events 3 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
8.1%
6/74 • Number of events 6 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.8%
3/78 • Number of events 3 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
7.1%
2/28 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
4.9%
5/102 • Number of events 5 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
2.7%
2/74 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
5.1%
4/78 • Number of events 4 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
7.1%
2/28 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cystitis
|
2.0%
2/102 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
|
2.0%
2/102 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
2.3%
2/86 • Number of events 3 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
7.1%
2/28 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
2.3%
2/86 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
2.0%
2/102 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
2.0%
2/102 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Infections and infestations
Otitis externa
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Infections and infestations
Root canal infection
|
0.98%
1/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tooth infection
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bacterial infection
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Infections and infestations
Conjunctivitis
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infected bite
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral herpes
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral infection
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Infections and infestations
Post procedural infection
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Infections and infestations
Acarodermatitis
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Infections and infestations
Ear infection
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Infections and infestations
Hordeolum
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Infections and infestations
Skin infection
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
2.9%
3/102 • Number of events 3 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
5.8%
5/86 • Number of events 5 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
4.1%
3/74 • Number of events 3 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
2.6%
2/78 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
2.0%
2/102 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
4.1%
3/74 • Number of events 3 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.98%
1/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
2.6%
2/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoporosis
|
0.98%
1/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Synovial cyst
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
2.3%
2/86 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Costochondritis
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Exostosis
|
0.98%
1/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint effusion
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Mandibular mass
|
0.98%
1/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Metatarsalgia
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal chest pain
|
0.98%
1/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck pain
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
2.6%
2/78 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteopenia
|
0.98%
1/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Patellofemoral pain syndrome
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Rheumatoid arthritis
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Trigger finger
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Soft tissue swelling
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
3.9%
4/102 • Number of events 4 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
7.0%
6/86 • Number of events 6 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
4.1%
3/74 • Number of events 3 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
2.6%
2/78 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
10.7%
3/28 • Number of events 3 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
6.9%
7/102 • Number of events 7 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.5%
3/86 • Number of events 3 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
2.7%
2/74 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
5.1%
4/78 • Number of events 4 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Blood loss anaemia
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ligament sprain
|
2.9%
3/102 • Number of events 3 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
2.7%
2/74 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.8%
3/78 • Number of events 3 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Vaccination complication
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
5.4%
4/74 • Number of events 4 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
10.7%
3/28 • Number of events 3 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Joint injury
|
2.9%
3/102 • Number of events 4 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Foot fracture
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural pain
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Cataract operation complication
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Epicondylitis
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
7.1%
2/28 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Limb injury
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Muscle injury
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Tibia fracture
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wound
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Buttock injury
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Chest injury
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
7.1%
2/28 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Muscle strain
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Radius fracture
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin abrasion
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
2.6%
2/78 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin laceration
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
General disorders
Chills
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Investigations
White blood cells urine
|
2.9%
3/102 • Number of events 3 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Investigations
Hepatic enzyme increased
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Investigations
White blood cells urine positive
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
2.3%
2/86 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Investigations
Blood cholesterol increased
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatine phosphokinase increased
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Investigations
Blood glucose decreased
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Investigations
Blood pressure increased
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Investigations
Electrocardiogram QT interval normal
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Investigations
Electrocardiogram T wave inversion
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Investigations
Haemoglobin decreased
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Investigations
Platelet count increased
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Investigations
White blood cell count increased
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatinine increased
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Investigations
Blood glucose increased
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Investigations
Blood potassium increased
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltran sferase increased
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
8.1%
7/86 • Number of events 11 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
5.4%
4/74 • Number of events 4 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
7.1%
2/28 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
10.3%
8/78 • Number of events 8 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
2.3%
2/86 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
2.7%
2/74 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
2.0%
2/102 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anal haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dental caries
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Paraesthesia oral
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Proctitis
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
10.7%
3/28 • Number of events 3 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haemorrhoids
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Salivary gland pain
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypercholesterolaemia
|
2.9%
3/102 • Number of events 3 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperlipidaemia
|
2.0%
2/102 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
2.7%
2/74 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
5.1%
4/78 • Number of events 4 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
|
2.9%
3/102 • Number of events 3 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Glucose tolerance impaired
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
2.3%
2/86 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
2.6%
2/78 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Impaired fasting glucose
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes mellitus
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Gout
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
7.8%
8/102 • Number of events 8 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.5%
3/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
4.1%
3/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.8%
3/78 • Number of events 4 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Vascular disorders
Thrombophlebitis superficial
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Bundle branch block left
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac disorder
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial ischaemia
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sinus bradycardia
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular extrasystoles
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Palpitations
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypoaesthesia
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral thrombosis
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cubital tunnel syndrome
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
2.6%
2/78 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Post-traumatic headache
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Tremor
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal oedema
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal polyps
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sleep apnoea syndrome
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
2.6%
2/78 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
2.0%
2/102 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis atopic
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Eczema
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis contact
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 2 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Eye disorders
Age-related macular degeneration
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Eye disorders
Keratitis
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Benign neoplasm of skin
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Haemangioma of liver
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Oesophageal adenocarcinoma
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Skin papilloma
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Melanocytic naevus
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
Thalassaemia minor
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Hypothyroidism
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Thyroid cyst
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Gallbladder polyp
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic cyst
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Benign prostatic hyperplasia
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Atrophic vulvovaginitis
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria
|
0.00%
0/102 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/86 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/74 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/78 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
0.00%
0/28 • 27 week
Safety was assessed using the Safety Analysis Set.The Safety Analysis Set will include all randomized subjects who received the single dose of IP. Note:Two subjects were randomized to 6 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II; One subject was randomized to 1 mL MM-II but received 3 mL MM-II
|
Additional Information
Head-Clinical Development
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place