A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CAEL-101 in Patients With Mayo Stage IIIb AL Amyloidosis (CARES)

NCT ID: NCT04504825

Last Updated: 2025-12-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

125 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-08-25

Study Completion Date

2027-10-22

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

AL (or light chain) amyloidosis begins in the bone marrow where abnormal proteins misfold and create free light chains that cannot be broken down. These free light chains bind together to form amyloid fibrils that build up in the extracellular space of organs, affecting the kidneys, heart, liver, spleen, nervous system and digestive tract.

The primary purpose of this study is to determine whether CAEL-101, a monoclonal antibody that removes AL amyloid deposits from tissues and organs, improves overall survival, reduces cardiovascular related hospitalizations and it is safe and well tolerated in patients with stage IIIb AL amyloidosis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a double-blind, randomized, multicenter international Phase 3 study of CAEL-101 combined with standard of care (SoC) plasma cell dyscrasia (PCD) treatment versus placebo combined with SoC PCD treatment in Mayo stage IIIb PCD treatment-naïve AL amyloidosis patients. The primary evaluation treatment period (PETP) part of the study will stop when the last patient is randomized in the PETP plus 18 months. Approximately 124 patients will be enrolled using a 2:1 randomization ratio. Stratification will be based on geographic region across investigator sites. The primary endpoint is a composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and frequency of cardiovascular hospitalizations. Patients in both study intervention groups will be followed from randomization until death from any cause, heart transplant, left wall assist device (LVAD) implantation or until the end of study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

AL Amyloidosis

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Plasma Cell Dyscrasia cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (CyBorD) AL Amyloidosis Amyloid, Light chain Amyloidosis treatment-naïve Mayo Stage IIIb

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This is a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, international Phase 3 study of CAEL-101 combined with SoC PCD treatment versus placebo combined with SoC PCD treatment in Mayo stage IIIb PCD treatment-naïve AL amyloidosis patients.

Approximately 124 patients will be enrolled using a 2:1 randomization ratio and stratification will be based on geographic region across investigator sites.

The primary evaluation treatment period (PETP) part of the study will stop when the last patient is randomized in the PETP plus 18 months. Patients in both study intervention groups will be followed from randomization until death from any cause, heart transplant, left valve assist device (LVAD) implantation or until the end of study.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
This is a double-blind, randomized, multicenter international Phase 3 study.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CAEL-101 combined with SoC plasma cell dyscrasia

CAEL-101 is administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over approximately 2 hours. It is planned that all patients will continue their double-blind treatment until the last patient is randomized in the study plus 18 months. The study is divided into 2 parts, the Primary Evaluation Treatment period part and the Open-Label Extension period of Study.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CAEL-101

Intervention Type DRUG

The investigational product, CAEL-101, is formulated as a sterile liquid solution of protein plus excipients for dilution in a single-use, stoppered, glass vial. Each 10 mL vial contains 300 mg of CAEL-101 at a concentration of 30 mg/mL. CAEL-101 will be diluted with commercially available 0.9% Normal Saline.

cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (CyBorD) regimen

Intervention Type DRUG

According to institutional standard of care.

Placebo combined with SoC plasma cell dyscrasia

Patients randomized to receive placebo will receive 0.9% normal saline in an equivalent volume to a CAEL-101 infusion (approximately 250 cc). It is planned that all patients will continue their double-blind treatment until the last patient is randomized in the study plus 18 months.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Commercially available 0.9% Normal Saline will be used as the placebo.

cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (CyBorD) regimen

Intervention Type DRUG

According to institutional standard of care.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CAEL-101

The investigational product, CAEL-101, is formulated as a sterile liquid solution of protein plus excipients for dilution in a single-use, stoppered, glass vial. Each 10 mL vial contains 300 mg of CAEL-101 at a concentration of 30 mg/mL. CAEL-101 will be diluted with commercially available 0.9% Normal Saline.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Commercially available 0.9% Normal Saline will be used as the placebo.

Intervention Type OTHER

cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (CyBorD) regimen

According to institutional standard of care.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* AL amyloidosis stage IIIb based on the European Modification of the 2004 Standard Mayo Clinic Staging (NT-proBNP \> 8,500 ng/L) at the time of Screening
* Measurable hematologic disease at Screening as defined by at least one of the following:

1. Involved/uninvolved free light chain difference (dFLC) \> 4 mg/dL or
2. Involved free light chain (iFLC) \> 4 mg/dL with abnormal Kappa/Lambda ratio or
3. Serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) m-spike \> 0.5 g/dL
* Histopathological diagnosis of amyloidosis based on polarizing light microscopy of green bi-refringent material in Congo red stained tissue specimens AND confirmation of AL derived amyloid deposits by at least one of the following:

1. Immunohistochemistry/Immunofluorescence or
2. Mass spectrometry or
3. Characteristic electron microscopy appearance/Immunoelectron microscopy
* Cardiac involvement as defined by:

1. Documented clinical signs and symptoms supportive of a diagnosis of heart failure in the setting of a confirmed diagnosis of AL amyloidosis in the absence of an alternative explanation for heart failure AND
2. At least one of the following:

i. Endomyocardial biopsy demonstrating AL cardiac amyloidosis or ii. Echocardiogram demonstrating a mean left ventricular wall thickness (calculated as \[IVSd+LPWd\]/2) of \> 12 mm at diastole in the absence of other causes (e.g., severe hypertension, aortic stenosis), which would adequately explain the degree of wall thickening or iii. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with gadolinium contrast agent diagnostic of cardiac amyloidosis
* Planned first-line treatment for plasma cell dyscrasia is cyclophosphamide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (CyBorD)-based regimen administered as SoC
* Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must have a negative pregnancy test during Screening and must agree to use highly effective contraception from Screening to at least 5 months following the last study drug administration or 12 months following the last dose of her PCD therapy, whichever is longer
* Men must be surgically sterile or must agree to use highly effective contraception and refrain from donating sperm from Screening to at least 5 months following the last study drug administration or 12 months following the last dose of their PCD therapy, whichever is longer

Exclusion Criteria

* Have any other form of amyloidosis other than AL amyloidosis
* Received prior therapy for AL amyloidosis or multiple myeloma. A maximum exposure of 2 weeks of a CyBorD-based PCD treatment after Screening laboratory samples are obtained and prior to randomization is allowed
* Has POEMS (plasma cell dyscrasia with polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal protein and skin changes) syndrome or multiple myeloma defined as clonal bone marrow plasma cells \> 10% from a bone marrow biopsy (performed ≤ 3 months prior to signing the ICF) or biopsy-proven (performed ≤ 3 months prior to signing the ICF) bony or extramedullary plasmacytoma AND one or more of the following CRAB features:

a. Evidence of end organ damage that can be attributed to the underlying plasma cell proliferative disorder (e.g., multiple myeloma and POEMS syndrome), specifically: i. Hypercalcemia: serum calcium \> 0.25 mmol/L (\> 1 mg/dL) higher than the ULN or \> 2.75 mmol/L (\> 11 mg/dL) OR ii. Renal insufficiency: creatinine clearance \< 40 mL per minute or serum creatinine \> 177 mol/L (\> 2 mg/dL) OR iii. Anemia: hemoglobin value of \> 20 g/L below the lowest limit of normal, or a hemoglobin value \< 100 g/L OR iv. Bone lesions: one or more osteolytic lesion on imaging tests (performed ≤ 3 months prior to signing the ICF): skeletal radiography, CT, or PET/CT, or MRI. If bone marrow has \< 10% clonal plasma cells, more than one bone lesion is required to distinguish from solitary plasmacytoma with minimal marrow involvement OR b. Any one of the following biomarkers of malignancy: i. 60% or greater clonal plasma cells on bone marrow examination OR ii. More than one focal lesion on MRI that is at least 5mm or greater in size
* Have supine systolic blood pressure \< 90 mmHg or symptomatic orthostatic hypotension, defined as a decrease in systolic blood pressure upon standing of \> 30 mmHg despite medical management (e.g., midodrine, fludrocortisones) in the absence of volume depletion
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Scott Swenson, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Duarte, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Palo Alto, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Weston, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Research Site

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Box Hill, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Brisbane, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Westmead, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Linz, , Austria

Site Status

Research Site

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Research Site

Anderlecht, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Porto Alegre, , Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

Ribeirão Preto, , Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

Salvador, , Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

São José do Rio Preto, , Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Research Site

Guangzhou, , China

Site Status

Research Site

Hangzhou, , China

Site Status

Research Site

Wenzhou, , China

Site Status

Research Site

Wuhan, , China

Site Status

Research Site

Ostrava - Poruba, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Caen, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Créteil, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Limoges, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Paris, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Pessac, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Pierre-Bénite, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Poitiers, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Tours, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Düsseldorf, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Würzburg, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Rio, , Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Tel Litwinsky, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Napoli, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Pavia, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Pisa, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Fukushima, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Nagoya, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Shibuya-ku, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Groningen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Research Site

Utrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Research Site

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Gijón, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Majadahonda, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Pamplona, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Russia Switzerland United States Australia Austria Belgium Brazil Canada China Czechia France Germany Greece Israel Italy Japan Netherlands Poland South Korea Spain United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CAEL101-301

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id