Improving Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Catheter Ablation
NCT ID: NCT04499326
Last Updated: 2025-11-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
70 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-06-13
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
It is designed to have feasibility outcomes which contribute to answering the above.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Biventricular Epicardial Pacing Post Cardiac Surgery in Patients With Left Ventricular Ejection Fractions Less Than 45%
NCT00604110
LV Endocardial CRT for Patients With Intermediate QRS Width
NCT03573427
Impact of Intraventricular Electrical Activation in Resynchronization Therapy
NCT01270646
Impedance Cardiography: Clinical Evaluation of Endotracheal Cardiac Output Monitor (ECOM)
NCT00924482
Comparison of Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy (CRT) Response Using High Frequency (HF) - ECG or Q-LV Guided Optimisation for Left Ventricular, Pacing Site.
NCT05829876
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients can experience clinical events including worsening of any underlying heart failure regardless of either VT ablation or medical therapy treatment strategy (anti-arrhythmic drugs (AAD)). VT ablation is a specialist procedure which has been proven in randomised clinical trials (RCTs) to confer symptomatic relief from VT, reduced hospitalisations and reduced shocks from ICDs. However, there is no effect on mortality.
The frequent nature of clinical events in this group of patients may affect their health status quite dramatically and yet based on current trial evidence, only 3 out of 6 randomised trials in VT ablation reported PROMs. This can lead to brittle conclusions about the overall cost-effectiveness profile of a procedure such as VT ablation.
This study will assess for the feasibility of more frequent HRQL monitoring and its impact on whether it is able to better capture the clinical narrative and quality of life changes of patients with severe heart failure and an ICD. And thus the assessment of both clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of catheter ablation of VT or continuing anti arrhythmic drug therapy.
METHOD \& SETTING Single centre study at St Bartholomew's Hospital London. Patients will be identified through established local pathways - there are traditional outpatient specialist clinics where Consultant Cardiologists receive referrals of patients for consideration of managing patients with VT, including ablation. In addition, there are joint VT clinics operated by Consultants as well as by cardiac physiologists. In the outpatient VT clinic, 85 patients were seen in a 10-month window - it is assumed that this scale will allow feasible identification of patients to be recruited to the both the groups of this study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention
Patients undergoing catheter ablation of VT
Validated quality of life questionnaire (EQ-5D & C-CAP)
Patient quality of life to be assessed at baseline, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9 and 12 months
Comparator
Patients undergoing AAD therapy for VT
Validated quality of life questionnaire (EQ-5D & C-CAP)
Patient quality of life to be assessed at baseline, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9 and 12 months
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Validated quality of life questionnaire (EQ-5D & C-CAP)
Patient quality of life to be assessed at baseline, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9 and 12 months
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
And impaired LV/RV function Willing and able to give written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University College, London
OTHER
Barts & The London NHS Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Pier Lambiase, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
UCL
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St Bartholomew's Hospital
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRAS 264743
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.