Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis Conservative Treatment

NCT ID: NCT04492774

Last Updated: 2021-03-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-07-01

Study Completion Date

2022-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The trial aims to compare the effectiveness of three methods of conservative treatment of degenerative lumbar spine stenosis (DLSS): GOLDIC autologous serum epidural injections, steroid epidural injections and manual therapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

BACKGROUND: Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (DLSS) is a serious health problem for patients over 65 years of age. It is assumed that in the United States alone, it affects about 200 thousand patients causing significant impairment of their quality of life. Although it is relatively easy to confirm the nature of spinal canal encroaching (disc protrusion, facet hypertrophy, ligamentous folding) by several methods of imaging, the golden standard of DLSS management, especially in the group of older patients, is still the matter of debate. Three main concepts of conservative treatment are considered: 1) pharmacological care - symptom-oriented systemic anty-inflammatory and analgesic agents or local steroid injections, 2) rehabilitations protocols and mechanical devices like traction facilities or corsets to decompress spinal canal or support in case of instability, 3) biological - stimulation of anti-inflammatory action and regeneration capacity by biologically active substances. All methods are offered without strong evidence of its efficacy.

AIM: Comparison of the effectiveness of three treatment protocols in DLSS: epidural injections of autologous serum (Gold Induced Cytokines, Goldic), epidural steroid injections, manual therapy in the concept of spinal canal venous drainage.

Research hypothesis: The use of Goldic serum in epidural injections improves the condition of patients with DLSS during the observation period longer than steroid injections and the rehabilitation protocol.

DESIGN: Randomized prospective trial without blinding. SETTING: Open study for outpatients, single-centre study. POPULATION: the local adult population METHODS: Three groups of patients (A, B, C) with confirmed DLSS in MRI, without limiting sex, age, meeting health conditions according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. There will be 30 people in each group (90 people in total).

Group A - Goldic serum therapy - 4 injections at 3-day intervals containing single doses of serum (4 doses of 3 ml in total), injections performed into the epidural space under ultrasound control by the same operator.

Group B - steroid therapy with Dexaven 4 mg / 1 ml - 2 injections at weekly intervals containing single doses of dexamethasone (total dose of 8 mg), injections will be performed into the epidural space under ultrasound control by the same operator.

Group C - manual therapy according to the concept of venous drainage - a repeatable treatment scheme for each patient; decompression of the thoracic outlet, diaphragm release, sacroiliac joints (SI) mobilizations, rib-sternum release, rib raising technique - 4 sessions (1 x weekly - approx. 40 min).

Control tools: NRS Pain Scale (0-10), Oswestry Disability Index, Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ), EQ-5D-5L, Control points: Initial Assessment (IA), 4,12, 24 weeks after last intervention.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Stenosis Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Parallel Assignment
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

None (Open label)

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

GOLDIC serum

Epidural ultrasound guided injections

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Goldic serum

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

epidural injections

Steroid

Epidural ultrasound guided injections

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Steroid injections

Intervention Type DRUG

epidural injections

Manual therapy

veno-lymphatic spinal drainage

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Manual therapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Veno-lymphatic drainage

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Goldic serum

epidural injections

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Steroid injections

epidural injections

Intervention Type DRUG

Manual therapy

Veno-lymphatic drainage

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Autologous serum Dexamethasone drainage

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Clinical signs of lumbar spinal stenosis
2. Radiological signs of lumbar spinal stenosis confirmed by MRI
3. No contraindications to steroid therapy or spinal epidural injections (glaucoma, high RR values, diabetes, anticoagulants, active infections, etc.)
4. Mental state allowing cooperation during manual therapy
5. An adult who consents to participate in the study
6. No previous surgery or spinal epidural injections

Exclusion Criteria

1. The presence of serious neurological deficits
2. Stenosis of other origin - post-traumatic, spondylolisthesis, cancer, infection
3. Contraindications to steroid therapy or spinal injections (glaucoma, high RR values, diabetes, anticoagulants, active infections, etc.)
4. Previous surgery or spinal epidural injections of lumbar spine
5. Mental state preventing cooperation during manual therapy
6. Lack of consent to participate in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sutherland Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Piotr Godek

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Piotr Godek, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sutherland Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sutherland Medical Center

Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, Poland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Poland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Godek P, Szczepanowska-Wolowiec B, Golicki D. GOLDIC therapy in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: randomized, controlled trial. Regen Med. 2022 Oct;17(10):709-718. doi: 10.2217/rme-2022-0047. Epub 2022 Jul 28.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35899459 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SMC2020002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.