Trial Outcomes & Findings for Transpelvic Magnetic Stimulation to Improve Urogenital Function (NCT NCT04488068)

NCT ID: NCT04488068

Last Updated: 2024-07-29

Results Overview

Primary outcome measure will be to determine feasibility of recruitment of prostate cancer survivors. We will demonstrate recruitment in VASDHS urology clinics .

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

12 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

During 12-weeks therapy

Results posted on

2024-07-29

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Magnetic Stimulation
Patients will be subjected to TPMS. Sham Magnetic stimulation: Sham Magnetic stimulation for comparison.
Sham TPMS
Patients will be subjected to sham TPMS
Overall Study
STARTED
12
0
Overall Study
COMPLETED
9
0
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
3
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Out of the 12 patients consented, only 9 completed the 12-week treatment.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Magnetic Stimulation
n=12 Participants
Patients will be subjected to TPMS. Sham Magnetic stimulation: Sham Magnetic stimulation for comparison. Despite the pandemic related restrictions during the initial study period, we managed to consent 12 and retain nine patients (age 55-75) for this feasibility study
Sham TPMS
No patients could be recruited for sham arm
Total
n=12 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • Out of the 12 patients consented, only 9 completed the 12-week treatment.
0 Participants
n=7 Participants • Out of the 12 patients consented, only 9 completed the 12-week treatment.
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • Out of the 12 patients consented, only 9 completed the 12-week treatment.
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
6 Participants
n=5 Participants • Out of the 12 patients consented, only 9 completed the 12-week treatment.
0 Participants
n=7 Participants • Out of the 12 patients consented, only 9 completed the 12-week treatment.
6 Participants
n=5 Participants • Out of the 12 patients consented, only 9 completed the 12-week treatment.
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
6 Participants
n=5 Participants • Out of the 12 patients consented, only 9 completed the 12-week treatment.
0 Participants
n=7 Participants • Out of the 12 patients consented, only 9 completed the 12-week treatment.
6 Participants
n=5 Participants • Out of the 12 patients consented, only 9 completed the 12-week treatment.
Age, Continuous
65 percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5 • n=5 Participants
65 percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • Out of 12 recruited patients, only 9 completed the 12-week treatment.
0 Participants
n=7 Participants • Out of 12 recruited patients, only 9 completed the 12-week treatment.
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • Out of 12 recruited patients, only 9 completed the 12-week treatment.
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants
n=5 Participants • Out of 12 recruited patients, only 9 completed the 12-week treatment.
0 Participants
n=7 Participants • Out of 12 recruited patients, only 9 completed the 12-week treatment.
12 Participants
n=5 Participants • Out of 12 recruited patients, only 9 completed the 12-week treatment.
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
Patient recruitment
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
12 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: During 12-weeks therapy

Population: Prostate cancer survivors with UI and ED.

Primary outcome measure will be to determine feasibility of recruitment of prostate cancer survivors. We will demonstrate recruitment in VASDHS urology clinics .

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Magnetic Stimulation
n=12 Participants
Patients (prostate cancer survivors; with symptoms of urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction) will be subjected to TPMS. Sham Magnetic stimulation: Sham Magnetic stimulation for comparison.
Sham TPMS
Patients ((prostate cancer survivors; with symptoms of urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction) will be subjected to sham TPMS
Number of Participants Recruited
12 Participants
0 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Retention for 12 week study period.

Population: Prostate cancer survivors with UI and ED.

Retention of these prostate cancer survivors for the study duration.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Magnetic Stimulation
n=12 Participants
Patients (prostate cancer survivors; with symptoms of urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction) will be subjected to TPMS. Sham Magnetic stimulation: Sham Magnetic stimulation for comparison.
Sham TPMS
Patients ((prostate cancer survivors; with symptoms of urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction) will be subjected to sham TPMS
Patient Retention
9 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 weeks Post-therapy

Population: Prostate cancer survivors with UI and ED.

Acceptability of TPMS treatment

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Magnetic Stimulation
n=9 Participants
Patients (prostate cancer survivors; with symptoms of urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction) will be subjected to TPMS. Sham Magnetic stimulation: Sham Magnetic stimulation for comparison.
Sham TPMS
Patients ((prostate cancer survivors; with symptoms of urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction) will be subjected to sham TPMS
Patient Acceptability
9 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 weeks post-therapy

Population: Prostate cancer survivors with UI and ED.

The second objective is to test the feasibility of administering symptom scores in this population to detect severity and early recovery of functional impairment. The investigators will use International Consultation of Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ)-symptom score, which assesses the symptoms and effect of UI on quality of life.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Magnetic Stimulation
n=9 Participants
Patients (prostate cancer survivors; with symptoms of urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction) will be subjected to TPMS. Sham Magnetic stimulation: Sham Magnetic stimulation for comparison.
Sham TPMS
Patients ((prostate cancer survivors; with symptoms of urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction) will be subjected to sham TPMS
Number of Participants Who Completed the The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ) to Determine Feasibility to Determine Treatment Outcome
9 Participants
0 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 weeks Post-therapy

Population: Prostate cancer survivors with UI and ED.

The second objective is to test the feasibility of administering symptom scores in this population to detect severity and early recovery of functional impairment. The investigators will evaluate The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) symptom scores to test the role of these changes in sexual function symptom severity.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Magnetic Stimulation
n=9 Participants
Patients (prostate cancer survivors; with symptoms of urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction) will be subjected to TPMS. Sham Magnetic stimulation: Sham Magnetic stimulation for comparison.
Sham TPMS
Patients ((prostate cancer survivors; with symptoms of urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction) will be subjected to sham TPMS
Number of Participants Who Completed the The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) to Determine Feasibility to Determine Treatment Outcome
9 Participants

Adverse Events

Magnetic Stimulation

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Sham TPMS

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Mahadevan Rajasekaran, Ph.D.

VA San Diego Healthcare System

Phone: 8585528585

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place