Trial Outcomes & Findings for DigiVis: Self-testing Vision App for Telephone Consultations (NCT NCT04482387)
NCT ID: NCT04482387
Last Updated: 2024-08-05
Results Overview
The mean bias (difference) in visual acuity assessment score between the difference in DigiVis and standard testing in logMAR units and the mean of DigiVis and standard testing in logMAR units was calculated. Where 0.00 logMAR is the value representing perfect distance visual acuity (equivalent to 20/20 Snellen acuity) and 1.00 logMAR is the value representing worst distance visual acuity (equivalent to 20/200 Snellen acuity).
COMPLETED
NA
120 participants
within 30 days
2024-08-05
Participant Flow
Over a two month period, research administrators posted study invitations and information leaflets to all patients due to attend an eye clinic appointment. Inclusion criteria were: age over 4 years, VA of +0.8 (6/38 Snellen) or better in each eye and no documentation of cognitive disability. The clinician researcher phoned the patient to explain the study, take verbal consent and give password access to the DigiVis test.
All participants underwent both the DigiVis testing and the standard clinical visual acuity test.
Unit of analysis: Eyes
Participant milestones
| Measure |
All Study Participants
Right eye data for all 120 participants to the study.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
120 120
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
120 120
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0 0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
All Study Participants
n=120 Participants
Right eye data for all 120 participants to the study.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
Age category · 5-10 years
|
44 Participants
n=120 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Age category · 11-54 years
|
37 Participants
n=120 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Age category · 55 - 75 years
|
32 Participants
n=120 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Age category · 76-85
|
7 Participants
n=120 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
66 Participants
n=120 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
54 Participants
n=120 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: within 30 daysPopulation: All participants had their right eye tested firstly with the standard chart technique and subsequently with DigiVis
The mean bias (difference) in visual acuity assessment score between the difference in DigiVis and standard testing in logMAR units and the mean of DigiVis and standard testing in logMAR units was calculated. Where 0.00 logMAR is the value representing perfect distance visual acuity (equivalent to 20/20 Snellen acuity) and 1.00 logMAR is the value representing worst distance visual acuity (equivalent to 20/200 Snellen acuity).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standard Vision Testing
n=120 Participants
Participants had standard chart testing of their right eye.
|
DigiVis Vision Testing
n=120 Participants
The same cohort of patients then had DigiVis vision testing
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Bias Between the Difference Between DigiVis and Standard Visual Assessment Compared to the Mean of DigiVis and Standard Visual Assessment
|
0.112 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.247
|
0.100 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.270
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: within 30 daysPopulation: Participants able to undertake DigiVis testing twice to analyse test repeatability
Mean bias between the difference of two DigiVis visual acuity assessments compared to the mean of two digiVis assessments measured in logMAR units.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standard Vision Testing
n=105 Participants
Participants had standard chart testing of their right eye.
|
DigiVis Vision Testing
n=105 Participants
The same cohort of patients then had DigiVis vision testing
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Bias Between Repeated DigiVis Test Assessments
|
0.100 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.270
|
0.105 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.258
|
Adverse Events
All Study Participants
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Stephen Kelleher
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place