Clip Marker Placement in Primary Lesions of Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Therapy
NCT ID: NCT04468113
Last Updated: 2023-11-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
339 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-05-14
2023-07-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The present prospective registry study aims to evaluate how often the intramammary Tumark® Vision clip can be detected by ultrasound after completion of NST in patients with TNBC and HER2+ breast cancer and thus, in the case of pCR, how often the elaborate clipping with mammographic (stereotactic) guidance can be avoided.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There are a number of commercially available markers (clips) which are indicated for intramammary marking of a lesion and which differ in terms of shape and material. Difficulties may arise in placing the clip in the tumor or the tumor center. In addition, the clip can dislocate from the initial location and/or the clip might not be visualized during response monitoring. Evaluations of the ultrasound-visible clip made of nitinol investigated in this study showed very good results regarding marker dislocation and visibility within 7 days after inital placement.The clip, which immediately unfolds into a 3-dimensional spherical structure after insertion into the tissue, could be detected by both sonography and mammography in all 50 cases after the intervention; however, long-term data data at follow-up controls during and after NST are not available so far.
According to current German guidelines, imaging-assisted wire marking is recommended without restriction before breast conserving surgery for non-palpable lesions. The clip is considered the target lesion for wire marking, which can be done under sonographic or stereotactic control. If the clip is reliably visible on ultrasound (even in patients with pCR), the stereotactic control of wire marking can be omitted. Therefore, the ability to visualize a clip in breast ultrasonography is of great importance.
The present multicenter study aims to evaluate the sonographic detection rate of the intramammary Tumark® Vision clips after NST in clinical routine and the proportion of cases in which the clip cannot be detected, and thus the rate of mammography-guided wire markings.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
US-guided core biopsy and clip placement
Female patients with sonographically suspicious, intramammary foci, scheduled for ultrasound-guided core biopsy and marking of the lesion with the Tumark® Vision Clip
Tumark® Vision clip
Suspicious intramammary lesion is marked with clip
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Tumark® Vision clip
Suspicious intramammary lesion is marked with clip
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* written informed consent
* patient's consent to NST
* suspicious unilateral or bilateral intramammary foci that can be safely identified by ultrasound
* no evidence of distant metastasis (complete staging does not have to be present at inclusion)
* indication for breast conserving therapy
* no prior clip placement in the confirmed intramammary carcinoma
* patient is able to undergo NST treatment (even if the indication based on tumor biology is not yet available)
* high compliance and high number of planned relevant surgical interventions in participating study center
* patient can understand the scope of this prospective registry study
Exclusion Criteria
* pregnancy
* ipsilateral relapse (when NST: no exclusion criterion)
* prior extensive breast surgery (starting from quadrant resection)
* inflammatory breast cancer
* extramammary breast cancer
* multicentric or multifocal breast cancer
* patient is not operable
* patient is already undergoing adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy
* inability to understand the purpose of the clinical trial or to comply with study procedures
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kliniken Essen-Mitte
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sherko Kuemmel, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Interdisciplinary Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Germany
Mattea Reinisch, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Interdisciplinary Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Germany
Jörg Heil, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Department of Gynecology, Breast Center, Heidelberg University, Germany
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Interdisciplinary Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte
Essen, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ruland AM, Hagemann F, Reinisch M, Holtschmidt J, Kummel A, Dittmer-Grabowski C, Stoblen F, Rotthaus H, Dreesmann V, Blohmer JU, Kummel S. Using a New Marker Clip System in Breast Cancer: Tumark Vision(R) Clip - Feasibility Testing in Everyday Clinical Practice. Breast Care (Basel). 2018 Apr;13(2):116-120. doi: 10.1159/000486388. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
Hurvitz SA, Martin M, Symmans WF, Jung KH, Huang CS, Thompson AM, Harbeck N, Valero V, Stroyakovskiy D, Wildiers H, Campone M, Boileau JF, Beckmann MW, Afenjar K, Fresco R, Helms HJ, Xu J, Lin YG, Sparano J, Slamon D. Neoadjuvant trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and chemotherapy versus trastuzumab emtansine plus pertuzumab in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (KRISTINE): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jan;19(1):115-126. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30716-7. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Blohmer JU, Costa SD, Eidtmann H, Fasching PA, Gerber B, Eiermann W, Hilfrich J, Huober J, Jackisch C, Kaufmann M, Konecny GE, Denkert C, Nekljudova V, Mehta K, Loibl S. Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 20;30(15):1796-804. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.8595. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
Shah AD, Mehta AK, Talati N, Brem R, Margolies LR. Breast tissue markers: Why? What's out there? How do I choose? Clin Imaging. 2018 Nov-Dec;52:123-136. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
V2_16-04-2020
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id