Trial Outcomes & Findings for Vagus Nerve Stimulation: Integration of Behavior and Cardiac Modulation (NCT NCT04467164)
NCT ID: NCT04467164
Last Updated: 2025-03-27
Results Overview
A functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) analysis was used to evaluate changes in brain activity \[blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signal\] in response to a visual stress challenge (post- and pre-stimulation). For this analysis a General Lineal Model analsysis with the statistical parametrical software (SPM) was used to model the change in BOLD signals during exposure to negative vs neutral images of the stress tasks. A voxel-wise height threshold of p \< 0.001, and a cluster correction with FWE p-value\<0.05 was used to identify brain areas with significant activation in response to the task. Mean beta weights within each significant cluster were extracted for each participant, and average differences in beta weights (Post minus Pre stimulation) were estimated for each group. A positive difference indicates increased activation of a particular brain region in response to the stimulation, whereas a negative difference indicates a reduction in brain activity.
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
1 hour
2025-03-27
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Exhalatory-gated tVNS Then Inhalatory-gated tVNS
Participants first received exhalatory-gated tVNS for 30 minutes during a first functional MRI session. After a washout period of 1 week, they then received inhalatory-gated tVNS for 30 minutes during a second fMRI session.
|
Inhalatory-gated tVNS Then Exhalatory-gated tVNS
Participants first received inhalatory-gated tVNS for 30 minutes during a first functional MRI session. After a washout period of 1 week, they then received exhalatory-gated tVNS for 30 minutes during a second fMRI session.
|
|---|---|---|
|
First Intervention (30 Minutes)
STARTED
|
10
|
10
|
|
First Intervention (30 Minutes)
COMPLETED
|
10
|
10
|
|
First Intervention (30 Minutes)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
|
Washout (1 Week)
STARTED
|
10
|
10
|
|
Washout (1 Week)
COMPLETED
|
8
|
10
|
|
Washout (1 Week)
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
0
|
|
Second Intervention (30 Minutes)
STARTED
|
8
|
10
|
|
Second Intervention (30 Minutes)
COMPLETED
|
8
|
10
|
|
Second Intervention (30 Minutes)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Exhalatory-gated tVNS Then Inhalatory-gated tVNS
Participants first received exhalatory-gated tVNS for 30 minutes during a first functional MRI session. After a washout period of 1 week, they then received inhalatory-gated tVNS for 30 minutes during a second fMRI session.
|
Inhalatory-gated tVNS Then Exhalatory-gated tVNS
Participants first received inhalatory-gated tVNS for 30 minutes during a first functional MRI session. After a washout period of 1 week, they then received exhalatory-gated tVNS for 30 minutes during a second fMRI session.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Washout (1 Week)
Lost to Follow-up
|
2
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Vagus Nerve Stimulation: Integration of Behavior and Cardiac Modulation
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Exhalatory-gated tVNS Then Inhalatory-gated tVNS
n=10 Participants
Participants first received exhalatory-gated tVNS for 30 minutes during a first functional MRI session. After a washout period of 1 week, they then received inhalatory-gated tVNS for 30 minutes during a second fMRI session.
|
Inhalatory-gated tVNS Then Exhalatory-gated tVNS
n=10 Participants
Participants first received inhalatory-gated tVNS for 30 minutes during a first functional MRI session. After a washout period of 1 week, they then received exhalatory-gated tVNS for 30 minutes during a second fMRI session.
|
Total
n=20 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
30.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9 • n=5 Participants
|
30.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7 • n=7 Participants
|
30.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Beck Depression Inventory score
|
30.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1 • n=5 Participants
|
25.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1 • n=7 Participants
|
27.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 hourPopulation: This is a crossover study. 20 participants were enrolled. 20 subjects completed an exhalatory-gated tVNS session and 18 and inhalatory-gated session.
A functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) analysis was used to evaluate changes in brain activity \[blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signal\] in response to a visual stress challenge (post- and pre-stimulation). For this analysis a General Lineal Model analsysis with the statistical parametrical software (SPM) was used to model the change in BOLD signals during exposure to negative vs neutral images of the stress tasks. A voxel-wise height threshold of p \< 0.001, and a cluster correction with FWE p-value\<0.05 was used to identify brain areas with significant activation in response to the task. Mean beta weights within each significant cluster were extracted for each participant, and average differences in beta weights (Post minus Pre stimulation) were estimated for each group. A positive difference indicates increased activation of a particular brain region in response to the stimulation, whereas a negative difference indicates a reduction in brain activity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Exhalatory-gated tVNS
n=20 Participants
exhalatory-gated tVNS on the left auricle
exhalatory-gated transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (e-RAVANS): Non-painful exhalatory-gated electrical stimulation of the auricle for 30 minutes during a functional magnetic resonance imaging session.
|
Inhalatory-gated tVNS
n=18 Participants
inhalatory-gated tVNS on the left auricle
Inhalatory-gated transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (i-RAVANS): Non-painful inhalatory-gated electrical stimulation of the auricle for 30 minutes during a functional magnetic resonance imaging session.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Brain Activity Changes (Average Differences in Beta Weights From Significantly Activated Regions: Post-stimulation Minus Pre-stimulation) Evaluated Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Subgenual anterior cingulate cortex activity (Beta weight difference post-pre stimulation)
|
0.60 Beta weight difference
Standard Deviation 0.29
|
-0.05 Beta weight difference
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
|
Brain Activity Changes (Average Differences in Beta Weights From Significantly Activated Regions: Post-stimulation Minus Pre-stimulation) Evaluated Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Orbitofrontal cortex activity (Beta weight difference post-pre stimulation)
|
0.28 Beta weight difference
Standard Deviation 0.27
|
-0.16 Beta weight difference
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
|
Brain Activity Changes (Average Differences in Beta Weights From Significantly Activated Regions: Post-stimulation Minus Pre-stimulation) Evaluated Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Ventromedial prefrontal cortex activity (Beta weight difference post-pre stimulation)
|
0.44 Beta weight difference
Standard Deviation 0.38
|
-0.24 Beta weight difference
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 hoursPopulation: This is a crossover study. 20 participants were enrolled. 20 subjects completed an exhalatory-gated tVNS session and 18 and inhalatory-gated session.
Changes from baseline to post-stimulation in the total score of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) compared between exhalatory and inhalatory-gated tVNS. (Beck depression inventory minimum score= 0, maximum score= 63; higher total scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms). A positive difference at post-stimulation compared to baseline indicates an increase in depressive symptoms, whereas a negative difference indicates a reduction in depressive symptomatology.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Exhalatory-gated tVNS
n=20 Participants
exhalatory-gated tVNS on the left auricle
exhalatory-gated transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (e-RAVANS): Non-painful exhalatory-gated electrical stimulation of the auricle for 30 minutes during a functional magnetic resonance imaging session.
|
Inhalatory-gated tVNS
n=18 Participants
inhalatory-gated tVNS on the left auricle
Inhalatory-gated transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (i-RAVANS): Non-painful inhalatory-gated electrical stimulation of the auricle for 30 minutes during a functional magnetic resonance imaging session.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Depressive Symptoms Assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory (1 Hour Post Intervention Minus Baseline)
|
-8.21 Difference in BDI scale score
Standard Deviation 7.4
|
-3.58 Difference in BDI scale score
Standard Deviation 4.83
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 hourPopulation: This is a crossover study that enrolled 20 participants. HRV data from four subjects were excluded due to low-quality cardiac pulsatility signals. Thus, the HRV-related analyses were performed on data from 16 exhalatory-gated and and 16 inhalatory-gated tVNS sessions.
Cardiac pulsatility data was collected during exposure to visual stress tasks pre- and post-stimulation and were used to estimate inter-beat intervals. A point process algorithm was then used to analyze the inter-beat intervals and evaluate heart rate variability (HRV) by separating its dynamics in the classic spectral components within the high-frequency (HF) and low-frequency (LF) ranges. Differences in normalized HF \[HFn= (HF/(LF + HF))\] were estimated during exposure to negative images in the fMRI stress task as a metric of parasympathetic cardiac regulation. Percent change in HFn-HRV values (Post vs Pre stimulation) were calculated for each intervention group. A positive percent change value indicates an increase in cardiovagal activity, whereas a negative change indicates a reduction in cardiovagal activity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Exhalatory-gated tVNS
n=16 Participants
exhalatory-gated tVNS on the left auricle
exhalatory-gated transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (e-RAVANS): Non-painful exhalatory-gated electrical stimulation of the auricle for 30 minutes during a functional magnetic resonance imaging session.
|
Inhalatory-gated tVNS
n=16 Participants
inhalatory-gated tVNS on the left auricle
Inhalatory-gated transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (i-RAVANS): Non-painful inhalatory-gated electrical stimulation of the auricle for 30 minutes during a functional magnetic resonance imaging session.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in Cardiac Autonomic Function (Percent Change in Normalized High-frequency Power of Heart Rate Variability (HFn-HRV): Post-stimulation Versus Pre-stimulation)
|
28.1 Percent change in HF normalized units
Standard Deviation 33.9
|
-0.31 Percent change in HF normalized units
Standard Deviation 24.1
|
Adverse Events
Exhalatory-gated tVNS
Inhalatory-gated tVNS
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Jill M. Goldstein
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place