Topical Naloxone to Diagnose Ocular Pain

NCT ID: NCT04454281

Last Updated: 2022-11-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

1 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-10-01

Study Completion Date

2020-12-03

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Chronic ocular neuropathic pain may be misdiagnosed as dry eye disease. Our study aims to identify a population with previous monocular trauma and dry eye symptoms and differentiate neuropathic from dry eye pain using topical corneal naloxone hydrochloride.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Dry eye is a ubiquitous and debilitating ocular condition that affects tens of millions in the United States (DEWS, 2007). However, there is increasing evidence that the symptoms of dry eye overlap with the distinct condition of ocular neuropathic pain, and that many patients given a dry eye diagnosis are mislabeled (Galor, 2017). These shared symptoms include but are not limited to: hypoesthesia, hyperalgesia, and allodynia. According to the 2017 DEWS II (Dry Eye Workshop) pain and sensation report by the Tear Film and Ocular Surface Society, neuropathic pain can manifest itself in the eye and may present similarly to dry eye, but should not be classified as such (Belmonte, 2017). Our study aims to further characterize this distinction by translating the rodent model of latent sensitization to the human eye.

Latent sensitization is a model of chronic pain that reproduces both its episodic nature and its sensitivity to stress. It can be induced by an array of insults and follows a characteristic time course in which a hyperalgesic pain phase is followed by pain remission phase. Of clinical relevance, administration of mu-opioid antagonists (i.e. naloxone) during the remission phase reinstates animal pain behavior and physiologic reflexes to peak levels seen in the hyperalgesia phase (Marvizon, 2015). This phenomenon suggests that the animals are in a state of latent sensitization that can be unmasked by blocking the activity of the opioid signaling pathway through compounds like naloxone hydrochloride. Furthermore, the undulating course of chronic pain syndromes can be mimicked by introducing environmental and physical stressors that trigger and exacerbate pain states (Marvizon, 2015).

Neuropathic pain is a common cause of chronic pain. It is defined by the International Association for the Study of Pain as pain that arises as a direct consequence of a lesion or disease affecting the somatosensory system. In contrast, nociceptive pain is produced by the normal function of nociceptors. Hence, neuropathic lesions do not necessarily involve the nociceptive pathway; instead, they can involve other somatosensory pathways including tactile, mechanical, and thermal pathways. These lesions manifest allodynia-a central pain sensation following a normally non-painful stimuli and a clinical hallmark of neuropathic pain. In the eye, allodynia may manifest as non-specific dry-eye-like-symptoms to stimuli including wind, temperature change, and humidity (Galor, 2017).

Hyperalgesia is a heightened pain sensation to a normally painful stimulus and is another hallmark of neuropathic pain. Importantly, hyperalgesia is a symptom of both neuropathic and nociceptive pain, however the pathophysiologies are distinct. Neuropathic hyperalgesia is a sustained phenomenon that arises from neuronal remodeling and sensitization of nociceptive peripheral and/or central nerves. In distinction, nociceptive hyperalgesia arises from inflammatory cytokine mediators that sensitize nociceptors and resolves after the conclusion of inflammation. Given all of this, it can be difficult to clinically differentiate the two forms of hyperalgesia; similarly, it can be difficult to differentiate between neuropathic and nociceptive pain.

In our murine model (Cho, 2019), we study latent sensitization of the eye after injuring the cornea with an alkali solution. We find that pain behavior (quantified by the number of eye wipes in thirty seconds after the topical administration of 2M NaCl to the corneal surface) peaks at day 10 post injury and returns to baseline by day 14 post injury (figure 3.1; next page). Topical administration of naloxone (100uM, one drop), reinstated peak pain behavior 16 weeks after initial corneal surface injury (figure 3.2; next page).

We hypothesize that our patient population with monocular trauma and dry eye symptoms mirrors our murine model. The monocular trauma represents the initial corneal surface injury, and the dry eye symptoms represent the breakthrough pain. It is important to note that in other models of latent sensitization, peak pain responses can be reinstated by stressors other than opioid antagonism. Specifically, novel environment stressors and forced swims reproduce peak pain behavior experienced in the hyperalgesic phase. In a similar way, our patient population endorses exacerbation of dry eye symptoms in the setting of stress, sleep, and environmental changes.

Our study aims to differentiate dry eye disease from ocular neuropathic pain by testing the latent sensitization model in the human eye. Given that there is good data to suggest chronic pain states, including our ocular model, can be masked by upregulation of the mu-opioid receptor signaling pathway, we hypothesize that our naloxone hydrochloride drop will induce a hyperalgesic response to hypertonic saline in a population with dry eye diagnosis and monocular trauma. We believe a topical naloxone ophthalmic drop is a potentially easy, cheap, and safe diagnostic tool for ocular neuropathic pain.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dry Eye Syndromes Neuropathic Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Naloxone HCl Low dose: 0.02 mg

This arm will receive 0.02 mg naloxone hcl on the experimental visit and balance salt solution on the control visit.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Naloxone Hydrochloride 0.4 MG/ML

Intervention Type DRUG

Drug will be topically applied to the corneal surface then study evaluations will ensue.

Naloxone HCl High dose: 0.08 mg

This arm will receive 0.08 mg naloxone hcl on the experimental visit and balance salt solution on the control visit.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Naloxone Hydrochloride 0.4 MG/ML

Intervention Type DRUG

Drug will be topically applied to the corneal surface then study evaluations will ensue.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Naloxone Hydrochloride 0.4 MG/ML

Drug will be topically applied to the corneal surface then study evaluations will ensue.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* monocular trauma
* dry eye disease diagnosis

Exclusion Criteria

* any pathology that might contribute to ocular pain, including corneal surface ulcers, uveitis, or other chronic inflammatory processes
* any current corneal surface pathology
* history of bilateral ocular trauma
* currently taking any of the following medications: TCAs, opioids, gabapentin, SNRIs
* pregnant nor breastfeeding.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Seema Capoor

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Seema Capoor

Principal Investigator, Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Seema Capoor, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Kentucky

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Kentucky

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

48303

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Combination Therapy for Alcohol Use Disorder
NCT07249554 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE2
ENA-001 for Opioid Induced Respiratory Depression
NCT06967259 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE1
Pilot Research on Opioid Use Disorder
NCT04244227 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Buprenorphine Naltrexone-P1 A-Cocaine
NCT00733720 COMPLETED PHASE1