Trial Outcomes & Findings for Prevention of Opioid-Induced Hypoxemia (NCT NCT04453722)

NCT ID: NCT04453722

Last Updated: 2025-08-29

Results Overview

Time-weighted average of SpO2 below a threshold of 90%. Oxygen Saturation measured between 0% - 100%. Oxygen Saturation \<90% is considered abnormal.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Target enrollment

49 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

during hospitalization up to 6 days and post-discharge 24 hours

Results posted on

2025-08-29

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Oxalert in Monitor Only Mode
Randomization will be to Oxalert in monitor-only mode Oxalert Monitor: The investigator will evaluate the feasibility of a fully randomized validation trial for the Oxalert EPO. Using the Oxalert in monitor only mode.
Oxalert in Monitor in Normal Mode
Randomization will be to Oxalert in monitor normal mode which provides progressive audible and tactile alerts for hypoxemia. Oxalert Monitor: The investigator will evaluate the feasibility of a fully randomized validation trial for the Oxalert EPO using the Oxalert in monitor in normal mode
Overall Study
STARTED
24
25
Overall Study
COMPLETED
23
24
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
1
1

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Prevention of Opioid-Induced Hypoxemia

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Oxalert in Monitor Only Mode
n=24 Participants
Randomization will be to Oxalert in monitor-only mode Oxalert Monitor: The investigator will evaluate the feasibility of a fully randomized validation trial for the Oxalert EPO. Using the Oxalert in monitor only mode.
Oxalert in Monitor in Normal Mode
n=25 Participants
Randomization will be to Oxalert in monitor normal mode which provides progressive audible and tactile alerts for hypoxemia. Oxalert Monitor: The investigator will evaluate the feasibility of a fully randomized validation trial for the Oxalert EPO using the Oxalert in monitor in normal mode
Total
n=49 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12 • n=5 Participants
52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16 • n=7 Participants
55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
20 Participants
n=7 Participants
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · White
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
21 Participants
n=7 Participants
43 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · Black
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · Unknown
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
ASA
mild systemic disease (2)
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
ASA
severe systemic disease (3)
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
21 Participants
n=7 Participants
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
ASA
severe systemic disease that is a constant threat to life (4)
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Surgery type
Laparoscopy
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
Surgery type
Open
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
Height
170 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10 • n=5 Participants
168 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8 • n=7 Participants
169 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 • n=5 Participants
Weight
94 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19 • n=5 Participants
92 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16 • n=7 Participants
93 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18 • n=5 Participants
Body mass index
32 kg/m^2
n=5 Participants
30 kg/m^2
n=7 Participants
31 kg/m^2
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: during hospitalization up to 6 days and post-discharge 24 hours

Population: number of participants analyzed for in hospital outcome and post-discharge outcome are different

Time-weighted average of SpO2 below a threshold of 90%. Oxygen Saturation measured between 0% - 100%. Oxygen Saturation \<90% is considered abnormal.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Oxalert in Monitor Only Mode
n=23 Participants
Randomization will be to Oxalert in monitor-only mode Oxalert Monitor: The investigator will evaluate the feasibility of a fully randomized validation trial for the Oxalert EPO. Using the Oxalert in monitor only mode.
Oxalert in Monitor in Normal Mode
n=24 Participants
Randomization will be to Oxalert in monitor normal mode which provides progressive audible and tactile alerts for hypoxemia. Oxalert Monitor: The investigator will evaluate the feasibility of a fully randomized validation trial for the Oxalert EPO using the Oxalert in monitor in normal mode
Time-weighted Average of SpO2 Below a Threshold of 90%
In hospital TWA SpO2 <90% (%)
0.29 % of SpO2
Interval 0.04 to 0.71
0.11 % of SpO2
Interval 0.03 to 0.25
Time-weighted Average of SpO2 Below a Threshold of 90%
Post-discharge TWA SpO2 <90% (%)
0.16 % of SpO2
Interval 0.04 to 0.81
0.10 % of SpO2
Interval 0.04 to 0.32

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: during hospitalization up to 6 days and post-discharge 24 hours

Population: number of participants analyzed for in hospital outcome and post-discharge outcome are different

Number of Participants with Desaturation Events (Saturation \<90%) Lasting at Least 2 Min. All the patients were included.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Oxalert in Monitor Only Mode
n=23 Participants
Randomization will be to Oxalert in monitor-only mode Oxalert Monitor: The investigator will evaluate the feasibility of a fully randomized validation trial for the Oxalert EPO. Using the Oxalert in monitor only mode.
Oxalert in Monitor in Normal Mode
n=24 Participants
Randomization will be to Oxalert in monitor normal mode which provides progressive audible and tactile alerts for hypoxemia. Oxalert Monitor: The investigator will evaluate the feasibility of a fully randomized validation trial for the Oxalert EPO using the Oxalert in monitor in normal mode
Number of Participants With Desaturation Events (Saturation <90%) Lasting at Least 2 Min
In hospital any event
20 Participants
21 Participants
Number of Participants With Desaturation Events (Saturation <90%) Lasting at Least 2 Min
Post-discharge any event
14 Participants
14 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: during hospitalization up to 6 days and post-discharge 24 hours

Population: number of participants analyzed for in hospital outcome and post-discharge outcome are different

Duration of Desaturation Events (Saturation \<90%) Lasting at Least 2 Mi. All desaturation events were included.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Oxalert in Monitor Only Mode
n=23 Participants
Randomization will be to Oxalert in monitor-only mode Oxalert Monitor: The investigator will evaluate the feasibility of a fully randomized validation trial for the Oxalert EPO. Using the Oxalert in monitor only mode.
Oxalert in Monitor in Normal Mode
n=24 Participants
Randomization will be to Oxalert in monitor normal mode which provides progressive audible and tactile alerts for hypoxemia. Oxalert Monitor: The investigator will evaluate the feasibility of a fully randomized validation trial for the Oxalert EPO using the Oxalert in monitor in normal mode
Duration of Desaturation Events (Saturation <90%) Lasting at Least 2 Min
In hospital Total duration
76 counts / minutes
Interval 3.0 to 531.0
30 counts / minutes
Interval 7.0 to 145.0
Duration of Desaturation Events (Saturation <90%) Lasting at Least 2 Min
In hospital Duration> 2 min
34 counts / minutes
Interval 0.8 to 465.0
8 counts / minutes
Interval 2.0 to 63.0
Duration of Desaturation Events (Saturation <90%) Lasting at Least 2 Min
In hospital Mean duration-all patients
4.7 counts / minutes
Interval 2.8 to 8.6
2.7 counts / minutes
Interval 2.3 to 3.6
Duration of Desaturation Events (Saturation <90%) Lasting at Least 2 Min
In hospital Mean duration for events in those with any events
5.1 counts / minutes
Interval 3.5 to 8.7
2.7 counts / minutes
Interval 2.6 to 3.7
Duration of Desaturation Events (Saturation <90%) Lasting at Least 2 Min
Post-discharge Duration
5 counts / minutes
Interval 0.0 to 70.0
6 counts / minutes
Interval 0.0 to 12.0

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: during hospitalization up to 6 days and post-discharge 24 hours

AUC of SpO2 Below a Threshold of 90%. SpO2 from 0% -100%.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Oxalert in Monitor Only Mode
n=23 Participants
Randomization will be to Oxalert in monitor-only mode Oxalert Monitor: The investigator will evaluate the feasibility of a fully randomized validation trial for the Oxalert EPO. Using the Oxalert in monitor only mode.
Oxalert in Monitor in Normal Mode
n=24 Participants
Randomization will be to Oxalert in monitor normal mode which provides progressive audible and tactile alerts for hypoxemia. Oxalert Monitor: The investigator will evaluate the feasibility of a fully randomized validation trial for the Oxalert EPO using the Oxalert in monitor in normal mode
AUC of SpO2 Below a Threshold of 90%
In hospital AUC
1260 % * min
Interval 117.0 to 5278.0
635 % * min
Interval 204.0 to 1513.0
AUC of SpO2 Below a Threshold of 90%
Post-discharge AUC
130 % * min
Interval 47.0 to 1038.0
121 % * min
Interval 27.0 to 428.0

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: during hospitalization up to 6 days and post-discharge 24 hours

Number of desaturation events (Saturation \<90%) Lasting at Least 2 Mi. All desaturation events were included.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Oxalert in Monitor Only Mode
n=23 Participants
Randomization will be to Oxalert in monitor-only mode Oxalert Monitor: The investigator will evaluate the feasibility of a fully randomized validation trial for the Oxalert EPO. Using the Oxalert in monitor only mode.
Oxalert in Monitor in Normal Mode
n=24 Participants
Randomization will be to Oxalert in monitor normal mode which provides progressive audible and tactile alerts for hypoxemia. Oxalert Monitor: The investigator will evaluate the feasibility of a fully randomized validation trial for the Oxalert EPO using the Oxalert in monitor in normal mode
Number of Desaturation Events (Saturation <90%) Lasting at Least 2 Min
In hospital Number
21 counts
Interval 1.0 to 69.0
12 counts
Interval 3.0 to 23.0
Number of Desaturation Events (Saturation <90%) Lasting at Least 2 Min
Post Discharge Number
2 counts
Interval 0.0 to 13.0
2 counts
Interval 0.0 to 5.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At the day of discharge and after 24 hours of discharge

Population: number of participants analyzed for in hospital outcome and post-discharge outcome are different

We used 0-to-10 (Better - Worst) numerical rating scale to measure the degree of disturbing: 0 = "Not disturbed" and 10 = "Severely disturbed"; others are measured with 5-point numerical rating scales:1="Strongly disagree", 5="Strongly agree" (1=Better - 5= Worst). No subscales combining to compute a total score.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Oxalert in Monitor Only Mode
n=21 Participants
Randomization will be to Oxalert in monitor-only mode Oxalert Monitor: The investigator will evaluate the feasibility of a fully randomized validation trial for the Oxalert EPO. Using the Oxalert in monitor only mode.
Oxalert in Monitor in Normal Mode
n=21 Participants
Randomization will be to Oxalert in monitor normal mode which provides progressive audible and tactile alerts for hypoxemia. Oxalert Monitor: The investigator will evaluate the feasibility of a fully randomized validation trial for the Oxalert EPO using the Oxalert in monitor in normal mode
Patients' Attitude Toward the Device
Willing to use after study (after 24 hours of discharge)
4.0 score on a scale
Interval 4.0 to 4.0
3.5 score on a scale
Interval 3.0 to 4.0
Patients' Attitude Toward the Device
Degree of disturbing daily life except sleep (after 24 hours of discharge)
2.0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 3.0
3.0 score on a scale
Interval 0.5 to 5.0
Patients' Attitude Toward the Device
Degree of disturbing sleep (after 24 hours of discharge)
0.50 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 2.5
2.0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 4.5
Patients' Attitude Toward the Device
Comfortable to wear (after 24 hours of discharge)
4.0 score on a scale
Interval 3.0 to 4.0
3.5 score on a scale
Interval 2.0 to 4.0
Patients' Attitude Toward the Device
Tolerable to audible alert (after 24 hours of discharge)
4.0 score on a scale
Interval 4.0 to 4.0
4.0 score on a scale
Interval 4.0 to 4.0
Patients' Attitude Toward the Device
Tolerable to tactile alert (after 24 hours of discharge)
2.0 score on a scale
Interval 2.0 to 4.0
4.0 score on a scale
Interval 3.0 to 4.0
Patients' Attitude Toward the Device
Easily cleaned/ disinfected (after 24 hours of discharge)
4.0 score on a scale
Interval 4.0 to 4.0
4.0 score on a scale
Interval 4.0 to 4.0
Patients' Attitude Toward the Device
Adequate battery life (after 24 hours of discharge)
4.0 score on a scale
Interval 3.0 to 4.0
4.0 score on a scale
Interval 3.0 to 4.0
Patients' Attitude Toward the Device
Satisfy with the electrode patch (after 24 hours of discharge)
4.0 score on a scale
Interval 3.5 to 4.0
2.5 score on a scale
Interval 2.0 to 4.0
Patients' Attitude Toward the Device
Adequate battery life (at the day of discharge)
4.0 score on a scale
Interval 3.0 to 4.0
4.0 score on a scale
Interval 3.0 to 4.0
Patients' Attitude Toward the Device
Satisfy with the electrode patch (at the day of discharge)
4.0 score on a scale
Interval 3.0 to 4.0
3.0 score on a scale
Interval 2.0 to 4.0
Patients' Attitude Toward the Device
Willing to use after study (at the day of discharge)
4.0 score on a scale
Interval 4.0 to 4.0
4.0 score on a scale
Interval 3.0 to 4.0
Patients' Attitude Toward the Device
Disturb IV line (at the day of discharge)
2.0 score on a scale
Interval 2.0 to 4.0
2.0 score on a scale
Interval 1.0 to 3.0
Patients' Attitude Toward the Device
Degree of disturbing daily life except sleep (at the day of discharge)
1.0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 3.0
2.0 score on a scale
Interval 1.0 to 4.0
Patients' Attitude Toward the Device
Degree of disturbing sleep (at the day of discharge)
1.0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
2.0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 3.0
Patients' Attitude Toward the Device
Comfortable to wear (at the day of discharge)
4.0 score on a scale
Interval 3.0 to 4.0
4.0 score on a scale
Interval 3.0 to 4.0
Patients' Attitude Toward the Device
Tolerable to audible alert (At the day of discharge)
4.0 score on a scale
Interval 4.0 to 4.0
4.0 score on a scale
Interval 4.0 to 4.0
Patients' Attitude Toward the Device
Tolerable to tactile alert (at the day of discharge)
4.0 score on a scale
Interval 3.0 to 4.0
4.0 score on a scale
Interval 3.5 to 4.0
Patients' Attitude Toward the Device
Easily cleaned/ disinfected (at the day of discharge)
4.0 score on a scale
Interval 4.0 to 4.0
4.0 score on a scale
Interval 4.0 to 4.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Post-operative day 1 (POD 1)

Population: number of participants analyzed for in hospital outcome and post-discharge outcome are different

We used 0-to-10 (better- worst) numerical rating scale to measure the degree of disturbing: 0 = "Not disturbed" and 10 = "Severely disturbed"; others are measured with 5-point numerical rating scales:1="Strongly disagree", 5="Strongly agree" (1= better- 5=worst).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Oxalert in Monitor Only Mode
n=23 Participants
Randomization will be to Oxalert in monitor-only mode Oxalert Monitor: The investigator will evaluate the feasibility of a fully randomized validation trial for the Oxalert EPO. Using the Oxalert in monitor only mode.
Oxalert in Monitor in Normal Mode
n=25 Participants
Randomization will be to Oxalert in monitor normal mode which provides progressive audible and tactile alerts for hypoxemia. Oxalert Monitor: The investigator will evaluate the feasibility of a fully randomized validation trial for the Oxalert EPO using the Oxalert in monitor in normal mode
Nurses' Attitude Toward the Device
Degree of disturbing routine work
1.0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 2.0
0.0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 2.0
Nurses' Attitude Toward the Device
Easily cleaned/ disinfected
4.0 score on a scale
Interval 4.0 to 5.0
5.0 score on a scale
Interval 4.0 to 5.0
Nurses' Attitude Toward the Device
Adequate battery life
4.0 score on a scale
Interval 3.0 to 4.0
4.0 score on a scale
Interval 4.0 to 5.0
Nurses' Attitude Toward the Device
Satisfy with the electrode patch
4.0 score on a scale
Interval 3.0 to 4.0
4.0 score on a scale
Interval 4.0 to 4.0
Nurses' Attitude Toward the Device
Tolerable to audible alert
4.0 score on a scale
Interval 3.5 to 4.5
4.0 score on a scale
Interval 3.0 to 4.0
Nurses' Attitude Toward the Device
Willing to use after study
4.0 score on a scale
Interval 3.0 to 4.0
4.0 score on a scale
Interval 4.0 to 5.0
Nurses' Attitude Toward the Device
Patients' complaint about the device
2.0 score on a scale
Interval 1.0 to 2.0
2.0 score on a scale
Interval 1.0 to 2.0
Nurses' Attitude Toward the Device
Disturb IV line
2.0 score on a scale
Interval 2.0 to 2.0
2.0 score on a scale
Interval 1.0 to 2.0

Adverse Events

Oxalert in Monitor Only Mode

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 3 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Oxalert in Monitor in Normal Mode

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 2 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Oxalert in Monitor Only Mode
n=24 participants at risk
Randomization will be to Oxalert in monitor-only mode Oxalert Monitor: The investigator will evaluate the feasibility of a fully randomized validation trial for the Oxalert EPO. Using the Oxalert in monitor only mode.
Oxalert in Monitor in Normal Mode
n=25 participants at risk
Randomization will be to Oxalert in monitor normal mode which provides progressive audible and tactile alerts for hypoxemia. Oxalert Monitor: The investigator will evaluate the feasibility of a fully randomized validation trial for the Oxalert EPO using the Oxalert in monitor in normal mode
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
mild blisters on top of Arm after taking off the sticky patch after completing the monitoring part
4.2%
1/24 • During hospitalization up to13 days
0.00%
0/25 • During hospitalization up to13 days
Product Issues
monitor malfunction
4.2%
1/24 • During hospitalization up to13 days
0.00%
0/25 • During hospitalization up to13 days
Cardiac disorders
transferred to SICU On POD 1 1/20/2021 due to tachycardia
4.2%
1/24 • During hospitalization up to13 days
0.00%
0/25 • During hospitalization up to13 days
Product Issues
had 2 episodes of successive tactile and verbal stimulation that caused extreme discomfort
0.00%
0/24 • During hospitalization up to13 days
4.0%
1/25 • During hospitalization up to13 days
Surgical and medical procedures
Transfer form ward to SICU because of surgical reason
0.00%
0/24 • During hospitalization up to13 days
4.0%
1/25 • During hospitalization up to13 days
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
transferred to SICU On POD 1 1/20/2021 due to shortness of breath and desaturation
4.2%
1/24 • During hospitalization up to13 days
100.0%
1/1 • During hospitalization up to13 days

Additional Information

Daniel I. Sessler, Professor & Chair

Cleveland Clinic

Phone: 216-445-6500

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place