Trial Outcomes & Findings for From Short-term Surgical Missions Towards Sustainable Partnerships (NCT NCT04450823)
NCT ID: NCT04450823
Last Updated: 2020-12-19
Results Overview
Answer on the question: What was the country where your last mission took place?
Recruitment status
COMPLETED
Target enrollment
61 participants
Primary outcome timeframe
approximately 20 minutes
Results posted on
2020-12-19
Participant Flow
Recruitment was June through October of 2019
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Experts
Included were English speaking experienced members of foreign teams and local team members from LMIC, that did participate in at least one short-term surgical mission in a hospital in a LMIC.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
61
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
58
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
From Short-term Surgical Missions Towards Sustainable Partnerships
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
All Participants of the Study
n=58 Participants
Included were English speaking experienced members of foreign teams and local team members from LMIC, that did participate in at least one short-term surgical mission in a hospital in a LMIC.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
43 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
38 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
NA Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
NA Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
NA Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
NA Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
NA Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
NA Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
NA Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Nationality
Dutch
|
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Nationality
German
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Nationality
British
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Nationality
American
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Nationality
Australian
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Nationality
South African
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Nationality
Tanzanian
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Nationality
Lebanese
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Nationality
Nigerian
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Nationality
Danish
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Nationality
Indian
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Nationality
Haitian
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Nationality
Ethiopian
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Profession
plastic surgeons
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Profession
orthopedic surgeons
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Profession
general surgeons
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Profession
local doctors/surgeons in training
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Profession
anaesthetists
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Profession
nurses
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Profession
physiotherapists
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Profession
NGO executive officer
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of missions performed
|
6 missions
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: approximately 20 minutesAnswer on the question: What was the country where your last mission took place?
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Included Participants of the Study
n=58 Participants
Included were English speaking experienced members of foreign teams and local team members from LMIC, that did participate in at least one short-term surgical mission in a hospital in a LMIC.
|
|---|---|
|
Q7: Country Where the Last Mission Took Place
Burkino fase
|
2 Participants
|
|
Q7: Country Where the Last Mission Took Place
Bangladesh
|
2 Participants
|
|
Q7: Country Where the Last Mission Took Place
Cambodia
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q7: Country Where the Last Mission Took Place
Ecuador
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q7: Country Where the Last Mission Took Place
Ethiopia
|
3 Participants
|
|
Q7: Country Where the Last Mission Took Place
Gaza
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q7: Country Where the Last Mission Took Place
Guinea
|
9 Participants
|
|
Q7: Country Where the Last Mission Took Place
Guinee Bissau
|
2 Participants
|
|
Q7: Country Where the Last Mission Took Place
Haiti
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q7: Country Where the Last Mission Took Place
Indonesia
|
2 Participants
|
|
Q7: Country Where the Last Mission Took Place
Laos
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q7: Country Where the Last Mission Took Place
Lebanon
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q7: Country Where the Last Mission Took Place
Malawi
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q7: Country Where the Last Mission Took Place
Morocco
|
2 Participants
|
|
Q7: Country Where the Last Mission Took Place
Nigeria
|
3 Participants
|
|
Q7: Country Where the Last Mission Took Place
Peru
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q7: Country Where the Last Mission Took Place
Rwanda
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q7: Country Where the Last Mission Took Place
Senegal
|
2 Participants
|
|
Q7: Country Where the Last Mission Took Place
Sierra Leone
|
3 Participants
|
|
Q7: Country Where the Last Mission Took Place
Sri LAnka
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q7: Country Where the Last Mission Took Place
Tanzania
|
13 Participants
|
|
Q7: Country Where the Last Mission Took Place
Uganda
|
4 Participants
|
|
Q7: Country Where the Last Mission Took Place
Vietnam
|
1 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: approximately 20 minutesList with names of the places and hospitals where the last mission took place
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Included Participants of the Study
n=58 Participants
Included were English speaking experienced members of foreign teams and local team members from LMIC, that did participate in at least one short-term surgical mission in a hospital in a LMIC.
|
|---|---|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
Paul VI, Ouaga
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
Sekou Toure Regional Referral hospital
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
Harapan, pematang Siantar, Sumatera Bissau Hospita
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
Haydom Lutheran Hospital, Haydom
|
9 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
St Josephs, Kitgum
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
Comprehensive Health Centre, totoro Abeokuta.
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
Sengerema hospital, sengerema
|
3 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
Masanga Hospital
|
3 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
Pius VI, Ouagadougou
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
St Francis hospital Mutolere
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
Pemantang siantar, rumah sakit harapan
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
Virgen de la puerta
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
Gatagara
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
Rach Gia
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
Yekatit 12 hospital, Addis Ababa
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
Guercif, Morocco;
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
Munshiganj, Bangladesh
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
Ambroseli Hospital Kalongo
|
2 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
Conakry, Port. Mercy Ships
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
Mahossot Hospiatl Vientiane
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
Vavuniya General Hospital
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
Guayaquil
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
Bekhazi Medical Center, Beirut
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
Bissau teaching hospital
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
Conakry
|
5 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
Malamulo Hospital
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
Yekatit 12
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
CSC, Phnom Penh
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
Africa Mercy
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
Mercships
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
Hopital National Donka, Conakry
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
Africa Mercy, Conakry
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
Exeter
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
Mangu Hospital, Mangu Plateau state
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
Cocin, Mangu
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
Yekatit 12 Hospital, Addis Ababa
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
Shifa Hospital, Gaza City
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q8: Name of the Place and Hospital Where the Last Mission Took Place
MSF burn hospital in Port-au-Prince, Haiti
|
1 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: approximately 20 minutesName of the organization that supported the last mission of the participant
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Included Participants of the Study
n=58 Participants
Included were English speaking experienced members of foreign teams and local team members from LMIC, that did participate in at least one short-term surgical mission in a hospital in a LMIC.
|
|---|---|
|
Q9: Number of Participants Per Organization
Bridge the Gap Foundation
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q9: Number of Participants Per Organization
B-first
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q9: Number of Participants Per Organization
Doctors of the World
|
11 Participants
|
|
Q9: Number of Participants Per Organization
Global Smile Foundation
|
3 Participants
|
|
Q9: Number of Participants Per Organization
Harapan Jaya
|
2 Participants
|
|
Q9: Number of Participants Per Organization
Ka Dounia Dia
|
2 Participants
|
|
Q9: Number of Participants Per Organization
Mercy Ships
|
12 Participants
|
|
Q9: Number of Participants Per Organization
Mission Restore
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q9: Number of Participants Per Organization
MSF
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q9: Number of Participants Per Organization
Njokuti
|
3 Participants
|
|
Q9: Number of Participants Per Organization
Operation Hernia
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q9: Number of Participants Per Organization
Orthopaedic Outreach
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q9: Number of Participants Per Organization
Pan-African Academy of Christian Surgeons
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q9: Number of Participants Per Organization
Project Harar
|
2 Participants
|
|
Q9: Number of Participants Per Organization
Resurge
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q9: Number of Participants Per Organization
Interplast Holland
|
6 Participants
|
|
Q9: Number of Participants Per Organization
Simba Health
|
2 Participants
|
|
Q9: Number of Participants Per Organization
Stichting 'Op Gelijke Voet'
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q9: Number of Participants Per Organization
Trinitas Health Care Partners
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q9: Number of Participants Per Organization
Mission without a supporting NGO
|
4 Participants
|
|
Q9: Number of Participants Per Organization
MAP
|
1 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: approximately 20 minutesList of countries where the supporting NGOs of the last mission are based
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Included Participants of the Study
n=58 Participants
Included were English speaking experienced members of foreign teams and local team members from LMIC, that did participate in at least one short-term surgical mission in a hospital in a LMIC.
|
|---|---|
|
Q10: Countries Where the NGOs Are Based
Netherlands
|
29 Participants
|
|
Q10: Countries Where the NGOs Are Based
USA
|
17 Participants
|
|
Q10: Countries Where the NGOs Are Based
No supporting NGO
|
4 Participants
|
|
Q10: Countries Where the NGOs Are Based
UK
|
4 Participants
|
|
Q10: Countries Where the NGOs Are Based
Australia
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q10: Countries Where the NGOs Are Based
France
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q10: Countries Where the NGOs Are Based
Nigeria
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q10: Countries Where the NGOs Are Based
Sierra Leone
|
1 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: approximately 20 minutesPoints provided (1-4) for four potential activities of a visiting team (more points = more important activity) The points provided by all participants are summed per specific activity and the total scores are compared The four potential activities are: * Treat patients yourself * Provide surgical equipment and consumables for the local team * Provide free treatment * Facilitate teaching of local staff Scale with importance of potential activities. Maximum score: 4x58 = 232
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Included Participants of the Study
n=58 Participants
Included were English speaking experienced members of foreign teams and local team members from LMIC, that did participate in at least one short-term surgical mission in a hospital in a LMIC.
|
|---|---|
|
Q11: Importance of Potential Activities
Treat patients yourself
|
157 score on a scale
|
|
Q11: Importance of Potential Activities
Provide surgical equipment and consumables for the
|
153 score on a scale
|
|
Q11: Importance of Potential Activities
Provide free treatment
|
175 score on a scale
|
|
Q11: Importance of Potential Activities
Facilitate teaching of local staff
|
210 score on a scale
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: approximately 20 minutesPopulation: Question 12 was asked to all participants but only 29 stated that an activity was missing in question 11
Respondents that were missing this activity as an option in question 11 Total number of respondents that were missing an activity: 29 Activities that were missing: * Financial collaboration * Advocacy * Academic collaboration * Sustainability * Collaboration with local staff * Follow-up
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Included Participants of the Study
n=29 Participants
Included were English speaking experienced members of foreign teams and local team members from LMIC, that did participate in at least one short-term surgical mission in a hospital in a LMIC.
|
|---|---|
|
Q12: Activities That Where Missing in Question 11.
Financial collaboration
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q12: Activities That Where Missing in Question 11.
Advocacy
|
2 Participants
|
|
Q12: Activities That Where Missing in Question 11.
Academic collaboration
|
4 Participants
|
|
Q12: Activities That Where Missing in Question 11.
Sustainability
|
5 Participants
|
|
Q12: Activities That Where Missing in Question 11.
Collaboration with local staff
|
8 Participants
|
|
Q12: Activities That Where Missing in Question 11.
Follow up
|
9 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: approximately 20 minutesMedical registration in the host country is required for specialists performing short-term reconstructive missions Participants of the survey were asked what they think of this statement: * Strongly agree * Agree * Neither agree nor disagree * Disagree * Strongly disagree
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Included Participants of the Study
n=58 Participants
Included were English speaking experienced members of foreign teams and local team members from LMIC, that did participate in at least one short-term surgical mission in a hospital in a LMIC.
|
|---|---|
|
Q13. Medical Registration is Required in the Host Country
Strongly agree
|
28 Participants
|
|
Q13. Medical Registration is Required in the Host Country
Agree
|
16 Participants
|
|
Q13. Medical Registration is Required in the Host Country
Neither agree nor disagree
|
7 Participants
|
|
Q13. Medical Registration is Required in the Host Country
Disagree
|
7 Participants
|
|
Q13. Medical Registration is Required in the Host Country
Strongly disagree
|
0 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: approximately 20 minutesThe Process of Obtaining Medical Registration Was Straightforward Participants of the survey were asked what they think of this statement: * Strongly agree * Agree * Neither agree nor disagree * Disagree * Strongly disagree
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Included Participants of the Study
n=58 Participants
Included were English speaking experienced members of foreign teams and local team members from LMIC, that did participate in at least one short-term surgical mission in a hospital in a LMIC.
|
|---|---|
|
Q14: The Process of Obtaining Medical Registration Was Straightforward
Strongly agree
|
8 Participants
|
|
Q14: The Process of Obtaining Medical Registration Was Straightforward
Agree
|
19 Participants
|
|
Q14: The Process of Obtaining Medical Registration Was Straightforward
Neither agree nor disagree
|
16 Participants
|
|
Q14: The Process of Obtaining Medical Registration Was Straightforward
Disagree
|
10 Participants
|
|
Q14: The Process of Obtaining Medical Registration Was Straightforward
Strongly disagree
|
5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: approximately 20 minutesWhat can you say about the collaboration between authorities in LMICs and visiting surgical teams? Participants of the survey were asked to choose one of the following answers on this question: * collaboration is present but improvement is needed * there is no collaboration and it should be developed as a priority * collaboration has no benefits nor disadvantages * collaboration will likely be more harmful than beneficial for the mission
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Included Participants of the Study
n=58 Participants
Included were English speaking experienced members of foreign teams and local team members from LMIC, that did participate in at least one short-term surgical mission in a hospital in a LMIC.
|
|---|---|
|
Q15: Collaboration
collaboration is present but improvement is neede
|
39 Participants
|
|
Q15: Collaboration
there is no collaboration and it should be develop
|
16 Participants
|
|
Q15: Collaboration
collaboration has no benefits nor disadvantages
|
3 Participants
|
|
Q15: Collaboration
-collaboration has no benefits nor disadvantages
|
1 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: approximately 20 minutesPopulation: 5 respondents did't make a choice In the comments section 9 respondents declared that preferable both should be equally addressed
What should have a higher priority in the hospital of your last mission ? Respondents were asked to choose on the these two answers: Teaching in anesthesia care or teaching in surgical care
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Included Participants of the Study
n=53 Participants
Included were English speaking experienced members of foreign teams and local team members from LMIC, that did participate in at least one short-term surgical mission in a hospital in a LMIC.
|
|---|---|
|
Q16. What Should Have a Higher Priority in the Hospital of Your Last Mission?
Surgical care
|
31 Participants
|
|
Q16. What Should Have a Higher Priority in the Hospital of Your Last Mission?
Anaesthesia care
|
22 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: approximately 20 minutesA structured follow-up strategy (\>6 months) of patients is required for short-term reconstructive surgical missions. Participants of the survey were asked what they think of this statement: * Strongly agree * Agree * Neither agree nor disagree * Disagree * Strongly disagree
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Included Participants of the Study
n=58 Participants
Included were English speaking experienced members of foreign teams and local team members from LMIC, that did participate in at least one short-term surgical mission in a hospital in a LMIC.
|
|---|---|
|
Q17. A Structured Follow-up Strategy is Required
Strongly agree
|
37 Participants
|
|
Q17. A Structured Follow-up Strategy is Required
Agree
|
17 Participants
|
|
Q17. A Structured Follow-up Strategy is Required
Neither agree nor disagree
|
4 Participants
|
|
Q17. A Structured Follow-up Strategy is Required
Disagree
|
0 Participants
|
|
Q17. A Structured Follow-up Strategy is Required
Strongly disagree
|
0 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: approximately 20 minutesOne month after the mission, an official report on the outcome including all complications encountered is recommended for all missions. Participants of the survey were asked what they think of this statement: * Strongly agree * Agree * Neither agree nor disagree * Disagree * Strongly disagree
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Included Participants of the Study
n=58 Participants
Included were English speaking experienced members of foreign teams and local team members from LMIC, that did participate in at least one short-term surgical mission in a hospital in a LMIC.
|
|---|---|
|
Q18. One Month After the Mission, an Official Report is Recommended
Strongly agree
|
39 Participants
|
|
Q18. One Month After the Mission, an Official Report is Recommended
Agree
|
16 Participants
|
|
Q18. One Month After the Mission, an Official Report is Recommended
Neither agree nor disagree
|
2 Participants
|
|
Q18. One Month After the Mission, an Official Report is Recommended
Disagree
|
1 Participants
|
|
Q18. One Month After the Mission, an Official Report is Recommended
Strongly disagree
|
0 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: approximately 20 minutesA written long-term strategy (\>5 years) with clear goals, developed by the visiting team and the local actors together, is recommended at the start of a new project. Participants of the survey were asked what they think of this statement: * Strongly agree * Agree * Neither agree nor disagree * Disagree * Strongly disagree
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Included Participants of the Study
n=58 Participants
Included were English speaking experienced members of foreign teams and local team members from LMIC, that did participate in at least one short-term surgical mission in a hospital in a LMIC.
|
|---|---|
|
Q19. A Written Long-term Strategy is Recommended at the Start of a New Project.
Strongly agree
|
37 Participants
|
|
Q19. A Written Long-term Strategy is Recommended at the Start of a New Project.
Agree
|
17 Participants
|
|
Q19. A Written Long-term Strategy is Recommended at the Start of a New Project.
Neither agree nor disagree
|
4 Participants
|
|
Q19. A Written Long-term Strategy is Recommended at the Start of a New Project.
Disagree
|
0 Participants
|
|
Q19. A Written Long-term Strategy is Recommended at the Start of a New Project.
Strongly disagree
|
0 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: approximately 20 minutesPopulation: the 58 participants mentioned the top three activities 68 times
What would you suggest to improve the impact of short term reconstructive missions? The answers were categorized and the three most mentioned categories are: * Teaching of local staff * Follow-up * Building sustainable partnerships The three activities were mentioned in total 68 times in the comments The distribution among the three categories is shown below
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Included Participants of the Study
n=58 Participants
Included were English speaking experienced members of foreign teams and local team members from LMIC, that did participate in at least one short-term surgical mission in a hospital in a LMIC.
|
|---|---|
|
Q20. Suggestions to Improve the Impact of Short Term Reconstructive Missions.
Teaching of local staff
|
24 answers mentioning this activity
|
|
Q20. Suggestions to Improve the Impact of Short Term Reconstructive Missions.
Follow-up
|
10 answers mentioning this activity
|
|
Q20. Suggestions to Improve the Impact of Short Term Reconstructive Missions.
Building sustainable partnerships
|
34 answers mentioning this activity
|
Adverse Events
Experts
Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place