Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Compare SB15 (Proposed Aflibercept Biosimilar) to Eylea in Subjects With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) (NCT NCT04450329)
NCT ID: NCT04450329
Last Updated: 2024-02-05
Results Overview
The VA was assessed using original series ETDRS charts or 2702 series number charts.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
449 participants
Baseline and Week 8
2024-02-05
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
SB15 (Proposed Aflibercept Biosimilar)
Subjects who were randomized at Week 0 to receive SB15 (Aflibercept) every 4 weeks for the first 3 months (i.e., at Weeks 0, 4, and 8), followed by once every 8 weeks until Week 32.
After re-randomization at Week 32, all the subjects continued to receive SB15 once every 8 weeks in transition period (Week 32 to Week 48).
|
Eylea (Aflibercept)
Subjects who were randomized at Week 0 to receive Eylea (Aflibercept) every 4 weeks for the first 3 months (i.e., at Weeks 0, 4, and 8), followed by once every 8 weeks until Week 32.
After re-randomization at Week 32, subjects were transitioned to SB15 or Eylea 2mg (0.05 mL) once every 8 weeks in transition period (Week 32 to Week 48).
|
Eylea (Aflibercept) to SB15
Subjects who were randomized at Week 0 to receive Eylea (Aflibercept) in the Main Period, and after re-randomization at Week 32, transitioned to receive SB15 (Aflibercept) once every 8 weeks in transition period (Week 32 to Week 48).
|
Eylea (Aflibercept) to Eylea
Subjects who were randomized at Week 0 to receive Eylea (Aflibercept) in the Main Period, and after re-randomization at Week 32, continued to receive Eylea once every 8 weeks in transition period (Week 32 to Week 48).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Main Period
STARTED
|
224
|
225
|
0
|
0
|
|
Main Period
COMPLETED
|
219
|
219
|
0
|
0
|
|
Main Period
NOT COMPLETED
|
5
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
|
Transition Period
STARTED
|
219
|
0
|
111
|
108
|
|
Transition Period
COMPLETED
|
215
|
0
|
109
|
101
|
|
Transition Period
NOT COMPLETED
|
4
|
0
|
2
|
7
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
A Study to Compare SB15 (Proposed Aflibercept Biosimilar) to Eylea in Subjects With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
SB15 (Proposed Aflibercept Biosimilar)
n=224 Participants
Subjects randomized into SB15 group will receive SB15 2 mg (0.05 mL) via intravitreal injection every 4 weeks for the first 3 months, followed by 2 mg (0.05 mL) once every 8 weeks until Week 48.
SB15 (Proposed aflibercept biosimilar): Subjects randomized into SB15 group will receive SB15 2 mg (0.05 mL) via intravitreal injection every 4 weeks for the first 3 months, followed by 2 mg (0.05 mL) once every 8 weeks until Week 48. Starting at Week 32, subjects transited from Eylea to SB15 will receive SB15 2 mg (0.05 mL) via intravitreal injection every 8 weeks.
|
Eylea (Aflibercept)
n=225 Participants
Subjects randomized into Eylea group will receive Eylea 2 mg (0.05 mL) via intravitreal injection every 4 weeks for the first 3 months, followed by 2 mg (0.05 mL) once every 8 weeks until Week 48.
At Week 32, subjects in Eylea group will re-randomized into SB15 or Eylea group. After re-randomization, subjects transited to SB15 group will receive SB15 2 mg (0.05 mL) once every 8 weeks until Week 48 and subjects remaining in Eylea group will continue to receive Eylea 2 mg (0.05 mL) once every 8 weeks until Week 48.
SB15 (Proposed aflibercept biosimilar): Subjects randomized into SB15 group will receive SB15 2 mg (0.05 mL) via intravitreal injection every 4 weeks for the first 3 months, followed by 2 mg (0.05 mL) once every 8 weeks until Week 48. Starting at Week 32, subjects transited from Eylea to SB15 will receive SB15 2 mg (0.05 mL) via intravitreal injection every 8 weeks.
Eylea (Aflibercept): Subjects randomized into Eylea group will receive Eylea 2 mg (0.05 mL) via intravitreal injection every 4 weeks for the first 3 months, followed by 2 mg (0.05 mL) once every 8 weeks until Week 48.
|
Total
n=449 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
56 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
191 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
202 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
393 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
73.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.05 • n=5 Participants
|
74.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.09 • n=7 Participants
|
74.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.07 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
118 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
132 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
250 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
106 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
93 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
199 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
52 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
51 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
103 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
170 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
172 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
342 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8Population: Primary outcome was analyzed on 448 subjects who were randomised at Week 0 in a 1:1 ratio to either SB15 or Eylea. Among 449 randomised subjects at Week 0, one subject in Eylea group did not receive IP during the study and was excluded from the analysis as pre-specified in analysis plan.
The VA was assessed using original series ETDRS charts or 2702 series number charts.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SB15 (Proposed Aflibercept Biosimilar)
n=224 Participants
Subjects randomized into SB15 group will receive SB15 2 mg (0.05 mL) via intravitreal injection every 4 weeks for the first 3 months, followed by 2 mg (0.05 mL) once every 8 weeks until Week 48.
SB15 (Proposed aflibercept biosimilar): Subjects randomized into SB15 group will receive SB15 2 mg (0.05 mL) via intravitreal injection every 4 weeks for the first 3 months, followed by 2 mg (0.05 mL) once every 8 weeks until Week 48. Starting at Week 32, subjects transited from Eylea to SB15 will receive SB15 2 mg (0.05 mL) via intravitreal injection every 8 weeks.
|
Eylea (Aflibercept)
n=224 Participants
Subjects randomized into Eylea group will receive Eylea 2 mg (0.05 mL) via intravitreal injection every 4 weeks for the first 3 months, followed by 2 mg (0.05 mL) once every 8 weeks until Week 48.
At Week 32, subjects in Eylea group will re-randomized into SB15 or Eylea group. After re-randomization, subjects transited to SB15 group will receive SB15 2 mg (0.05 mL) once every 8 weeks until Week 48 and subjects remaining in Eylea group will continue to receive Eylea 2 mg (0.05 mL) once every 8 weeks until Week 48.
SB15 (Proposed aflibercept biosimilar): Subjects randomized into SB15 group will receive SB15 2 mg (0.05 mL) via intravitreal injection every 4 weeks for the first 3 months, followed by 2 mg (0.05 mL) once every 8 weeks until Week 48. Starting at Week 32, subjects transited from Eylea to SB15 will receive SB15 2 mg (0.05 mL) via intravitreal injection every 8 weeks.
Eylea (Aflibercept): Subjects randomized into Eylea group will receive Eylea 2 mg (0.05 mL) via intravitreal injection every 4 weeks for the first 3 months, followed by 2 mg (0.05 mL) once every 8 weeks until Week 48.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)
|
6.7 letters
Standard Error 0.56
|
6.6 letters
Standard Error 0.57
|
Adverse Events
SB15 (Proposed Aflibercept Biosimilar)
Eylea (Aflibercept)
Eylea (Aflibercept) to SB15
Eylea (Aflibercept) to Eylea
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
SB15 (Proposed Aflibercept Biosimilar)
n=224 participants at risk
Subjects who were randomized at Week 0 to receive SB15 (Aflibercept) every 4 weeks for the first 3 months (i.e., at Weeks 0, 4, and 8), followed by once every 8 weeks until Week 32.
After re-randomization at Week 32, all the subjects continued to receive SB15 once every 8 weeks in transition period (Week 32 to Week 48).
|
Eylea (Aflibercept)
n=224 participants at risk
Subjects who were randomized at Week 0 to receive Eylea (Aflibercept) every 4 weeks for the first 3 months (i.e., at Weeks 0, 4, and 8), followed by once every 8 weeks until Week 32.
After re-randomization at Week 32, subjects were transitioned to SB15 or Eylea 2mg (0.05 mL) once every 8 weeks in transition period (Week 32 to Week 48).
|
Eylea (Aflibercept) to SB15
n=111 participants at risk
Subjects who were randomized at Week 0 to receive Eylea (Aflibercept) in the Main Period, and after re-randomization at Week 32, transitioned to receive SB15 (Aflibercept) once every 8 weeks in transition period (Week 32 to Week 48).
|
Eylea (Aflibercept) to Eylea
n=104 participants at risk
Subjects who were randomized at Week 0 to receive Eylea (Aflibercept) in the Main Period, and after re-randomization at Week 32, continued to receive Eylea once every 8 weeks in transition period (Week 32 to Week 48).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina unstable
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure acute
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo positional
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Eye disorders
Retinal haemorrhage
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.96%
1/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Eye disorders
Neovascular age-related macular degeneration
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Eye disorders
Retinal vascular disorder
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Eye disorders
Visual acuity reduced
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.90%
1/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Eye disorders
Vitreous haemorrhage
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Duodenal ulcer haemorrhage
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ileus
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.90%
1/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mechanical ileus
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis acute
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.90%
1/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Subileus
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.90%
1/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
General disorders
Disease progression
|
0.89%
2/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
General disorders
Death
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Bile duct stone
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis acute
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.96%
1/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.89%
2/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.96%
1/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19 pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.90%
1/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.96%
1/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.96%
1/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Device placement issue
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.96%
1/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femur fracture
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Lower limb fracture
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.90%
1/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.89%
2/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc protrusion
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Adenocarcinoma gastric
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.96%
1/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Benign gastric neoplasm
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.96%
1/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Benign neoplasm of bladder
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.90%
1/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancer
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.96%
1/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Colon cancer metastatic
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.90%
1/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Intestinal adenocarcinoma
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Metastatic malignant melanoma
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.90%
1/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Neuroendocrine carcinoma metastatic
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.96%
1/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Ovarian clear cell carcinoma
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Prostate cancer
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.90%
1/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Squamous cell carcinoma of lung
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.96%
1/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Ischaemic stroke
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.89%
2/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.96%
1/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.96%
1/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Presyncope
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Transient ischaemic attack
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal artery stenosis
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Lung infiltration
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.90%
1/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.90%
1/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Aortic stenosis
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Circulatory collapse
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.90%
1/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Varicose vein
|
0.45%
1/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
0.00%
0/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
SB15 (Proposed Aflibercept Biosimilar)
n=224 participants at risk
Subjects who were randomized at Week 0 to receive SB15 (Aflibercept) every 4 weeks for the first 3 months (i.e., at Weeks 0, 4, and 8), followed by once every 8 weeks until Week 32.
After re-randomization at Week 32, all the subjects continued to receive SB15 once every 8 weeks in transition period (Week 32 to Week 48).
|
Eylea (Aflibercept)
n=224 participants at risk
Subjects who were randomized at Week 0 to receive Eylea (Aflibercept) every 4 weeks for the first 3 months (i.e., at Weeks 0, 4, and 8), followed by once every 8 weeks until Week 32.
After re-randomization at Week 32, subjects were transitioned to SB15 or Eylea 2mg (0.05 mL) once every 8 weeks in transition period (Week 32 to Week 48).
|
Eylea (Aflibercept) to SB15
n=111 participants at risk
Subjects who were randomized at Week 0 to receive Eylea (Aflibercept) in the Main Period, and after re-randomization at Week 32, transitioned to receive SB15 (Aflibercept) once every 8 weeks in transition period (Week 32 to Week 48).
|
Eylea (Aflibercept) to Eylea
n=104 participants at risk
Subjects who were randomized at Week 0 to receive Eylea (Aflibercept) in the Main Period, and after re-randomization at Week 32, continued to receive Eylea once every 8 weeks in transition period (Week 32 to Week 48).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Neovascular age-related macular degeneration
|
8.0%
18/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
6.2%
14/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
9.0%
10/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
3.8%
4/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
|
Eye disorders
Visual acuity reduced
|
6.7%
15/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
4.9%
11/224 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
5.4%
6/111 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
3.8%
4/104 • Overall Period (56 weeks)
Safety analysis was performed on subjects who received at least one IP during the study period. Among 224 and 225 subjects initially randomised to SB15 and Eylea group, each of 224 and 224 subjects received the IP on Day 1. Safety analysis after Week 32 was performed on subjects who received at least one IP after re-randomisation. Among 111 and 108 subjects re-randomised to "Eylea to SB15" and "Eylea to Eylea" group, each of 111 and 104 subjects received at least one IP after Week 32.
|
Additional Information
Director of Clinical Trials
Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place