Artificial Intelligence for Prostate Cancer Treatment Planning
NCT ID: NCT04441775
Last Updated: 2023-10-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
5 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-06-22
2022-03-04
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
At the conclusion of this contract, the awardees will provide a software product which, when given the input of a description of desired anatomical target volumes and target doses along with a patient's CT scans, will generate target volumes and radiation treatment plans based upon a "gold standard" amalgamated from the input of multiple experts, thereby achieving desired doses to target volumes while meeting or exceeding the dose-volume constraints imposed by adjacent normal tissues.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Use of Artificial Intelligence Generated Contours in Radiation Planning of the Prostate Brachytherapy
NCT06964412
Integrating Quantitative MRI and Artificial Intelligence to Improve Prostate Cancer Classification
NCT04765150
Profiling of Radiological Factors in Treatment and Outcomes in Prostate Cancer
NCT03354416
Artificial Intelligence Models for Precision Prediction and Treatment of Prostate Cancer
NCT06662708
Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
NCT05513638
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Develop a process and tools (DAST) to capture the rationale, criteria, and logical basis behind the treatment planning process using well understood Human Factors knowledge gathering methodologies and Machine Learning tools.
2. Build the AI technology to learn the process and apply it to generating treatment plans. Images and expert-drawn volumes from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0938 will be used for initial training of the AI system. These data are not Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center (DHMC) patients, but rather were consented and acquired through RTOG 0938. These data are housed at NRG/RTOG headquarters in Philadelphia. NRG already has an established, IRB-approved protocol for exploring AI systems for the 0938 data set. A minimum of 30 cases will be used for this initial training work for the AI system to "learn" volume segmentation of important structures and targets. Additional patients from the available 200+ patients on 0938 may be added for additional AI learning of volume segmentation as initial software programming is implemented.
3. Determine the optimal number of historic treatment plans to train the AI technology and test it. 45 cases will be provided by NRG from NRG/RTOG studies 0415, 0126, and 0521 (totaling 135 cases), respectively representing favorable-, intermediate-, and high-risk prostate cancer treatments. These scans and expert-defined volumes are part of NRG datasets housed in Philadelphia. All these patients already signed study-specific consents which included permissions to allow personally specific clinical information to be used for other cancer-related studies. IRB review of the use of these data for this specific study is anticipated to be achieved through NRG mechanisms in the context of these prior consents, to assure that the use of these data for this specific AI study is appropriate and approved. Provision is anticipated of a total of 30 additional patient cases as "gold standards," 10 each from DHMC, University of Massachusetts (UMass), and Oregon Health Sciences University (OHSU), respectively, all initially planned and treated within the 2015-2018 time frame. The first 5 from each institution will be favorable-risk patients, and the next 5 from each institution will be high-risk patients (thereby achieving a wide range of treatment approaches, with more to be added subsequently). As part of this effort, each individual institution will contact its own specific patients (5 favorable-risk, 5 high-risk) to obtain study-specific consent for the use of their data for this protocol. Once anonymized, these scans and plans will be shared across all three institutions. For each of these patients, the other two ("non-host") institutions will create their own volumes and plans. Using a modified Delphi approach, the three teams will then meet to generate an agreed-upon "composite" plan for each patient. Thus, in total there will be four treatment plans for each of these 30 patients, yielding 120 total plans that will serve as the "gold standard" for this AI project, and will be inputted for testing/validation to the AI system.
PHASE 2
4. Expand the database to include intermediate-risk patients, 5 respectively from each institution, following the above procedures, to yield an additional 60 plans to serve as additional inputs for the AI system.
5. Validate and test the AI technology by inputting patient images and target delineations from historic case data and assessing whether the AI technology-generated plans are "consistent" with the final plans that were created by expert clinicians.
6. Test the technology with new patient case data and validate the plan with a team of expert clinicians. This will involve "modified Turing tests," as developed in NRG-RTOG studies exploring AI applications.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
All patients for enrollment and analysis
Patients previously treated with RT for prostate cancer who are now being enrolled into this study for data analysis and incorporation into Artificial Intelligence (AI) models
AI-assisted RT modelling
Artificial Intelligence assisted Radiation Treatment
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
AI-assisted RT modelling
Artificial Intelligence assisted Radiation Treatment
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Gleason Score \<= 3+4 = 7 ( with less than 50% of all cores positive, and no more than one core with Gleason 3+4=7)
3. Clinical stage T1-T2b
4. Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) \<10 ng/ml within 180 days prior to treatment planning. PSA may not have been acquired within 30 days of stopping finasteride, or within 90 days of stopping dutasteride
5. RT treatment initiated between 1/1/15 and 12/31/16
6. Prostate MRI used as part of RT treatment planning
7. No previous hormonal therapy, such as LHRH agonists, estrogens, anti-androgens, or surgical castration
8. No previous use of finasteride within 30 days prior to planning
9. No previous use of dutasteride within 90 days prior to planning
1. Histologically confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma
2. PSA \< 150
3. One of the following combinations:
1. Gleason 7 or 8 and PSA \>= 20
2. Gleason 8 and clinical T-stage \> T2a
3. Gleason 9 or 10
4. Negative bone scan within 180 days of planning
5. XRT treatment initiated between 1/1/15 and 12/31/16
6. Prostate MRI used as part of RT treatment planning
7. No previous hormonal therapy, such as LHRH agonists, estrogens, anti-androgens, or surgical castration, prior to prostate cancer diagnosis
1. Histologically confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma
2. PSA \< 20
3. Gleason 7 or 8
4. Not meeting criteria for favorable- or high-risk disease, as per above
5. XRT treatment initiated between 1/1/15 and 12/31/16
6. Prostate MRI used as part of RT treatment planning
7. No previous hormonal therapy, such as LHRH agonists, estrogens, anti-androgens, or surgical castration, prior to prostate cancer diagnosis
Exclusion Criteria
2. Evidence of distant metastases
3. Regional lymph node involvement
4. Previous radical prostate surgery or cryosurgery
5. Previous pelvic irradiation or prostate brachytherapy
6. Previous or concurrent cytotoxic chemotherapy for prostate cancer
7. Severe, active comorbidity, defined as follows:
1. Unstable angina, congestive heart failure, and/or transmural myocardial infarction requiring hospitalization within the last 6 months
2. Acute bacterial or fungal infection requiring intravenous antibiotics
3. Hepatic insufficiency resulting in clinical jaundice or coagulopathy
4. Acquired immune deficiency syndrome based upon current CDC-defined criteria
8. Zubrod performance status 2 or worse
9. Previous use of finasteride within 60 days of planning
10. Previous use of dutasteride within 180 days of planning
21 Years
90 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Oregon Health and Science University
OTHER
University of Massachusetts, Worcester
OTHER
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
NRG Oncology
OTHER
Nicolalde R&D
UNKNOWN
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Alan Hartford
Associate Professor of Medicine (Radiation Oncology)
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Alan C. Hartford, MD PhD FACR
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
D20003
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.