CRPS - Diagnostics, Pathophysiological Mechanisms, and Response to Treatment With Noninvasive Brain Stimulation
NCT ID: NCT04439669
Last Updated: 2024-07-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
62 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-08-28
2022-08-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
rTMS and Rehabilitation for Individuals With CRPS Type 1
NCT05745025
Treatment of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
NCT05197959
Reducing Pain in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Using Personalized Brain Stimulation: A Feasibility Study
NCT06987747
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) for CRPS
NCT02067273
TMS for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
NCT03137472
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
For active, navigated stimulation targets the investigators have the parietal opercular cortex overlying the secondary somatosensory cortex ("S2") and the primary motor cortex (M1).
The investigators randomize participants to first receive nrTMS to the right "S2" or sham stimulation. After ten sessions the investigators follow up the participants up to three months. At three months, if the average pain is ≥5/10 in numeric rating scale (NRS), the participant is offered an active, open nrTMS treatment phase depending on which treatment the participant first received. If the participant benefits from the open label treatment, a maintenance therapy is offered (6 months with gradually reducing nrTMS treatment frequency). The symptoms and quality of life are followed with questionnaires and diaries. After the maintenance period, the RN calls a structured interview at 1, 3, and 6 months.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Starts with active stimulation
Active nrTMS is given to "S2" at the right side (10 sessions in a three week period). Thereafter, a new, open label phase will start if the average pain at 3 month follow-up is ≥5/10. Then, the nrTMS will be targeted to M1 contralateral to the side of pain. After 5 stimulation sessions the response is evaluated. If pain is still ≥510, the investigators change the target to the "S2" on the left side for five sessions. If there is response with pain relief, a maintenance therapy with this target is offered for 6 months with gradually reducing stimulation sessions.
Active nrTMS and open phase
Navigated repetitive TMS treatment (10 sessions during a three-week period) randomized to "S2". In the following open phase stimulation the treatment targets are contralateral M1 and left "S2". If the patient benefited from active "S2" stimulation, but the treatment effect faded in follow-up, the open phase stimulation starts with right "S2".
Starts with sham stimulation
Sham nrTMS will be targeted to the "S2" on the right side, but using a sham box/coil. Stimulation period is similar than for the active comparator. Similarly, thereafter, a new, open label phase will start if the average pain at 3 month follow-up is ≥5/10. Then, the nrTMS will be targeted to "S2" at the right side. After 5 stimulation sessions the response is evaluated. If pain is still ≥5/10, the investigators change the target to M1 on the contralateral side of the pain and furthermore to "S2" at the left side after 5 stimulation sessions, if pain is still ≥5/10.
Sham nrTMS and open phase
Navigated repetitive TMS treatment (10 sessions during a three-week period) randomized to sham. In the following open phase stimulation the treatment targets are the right "S2"-contralateral M1-left "S2".
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sham nrTMS and open phase
Navigated repetitive TMS treatment (10 sessions during a three-week period) randomized to sham. In the following open phase stimulation the treatment targets are the right "S2"-contralateral M1-left "S2".
Active nrTMS and open phase
Navigated repetitive TMS treatment (10 sessions during a three-week period) randomized to "S2". In the following open phase stimulation the treatment targets are contralateral M1 and left "S2". If the patient benefited from active "S2" stimulation, but the treatment effect faded in follow-up, the open phase stimulation starts with right "S2".
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Duration ≥ 6 months
* Mean pain (NRS) intensity ≥5/10
* Medical and other therapies have failed
Exclusion Criteria
* psychotic disorder
* severe depression
* use of strong opioids
* epilepsy
* any contraindication for MRI
* abuse of alcohol or drugs
* ongoing insurance or other entitlement cases
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Turku University Hospital
OTHER_GOV
Helsinki University Central Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hanna Harno
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Eija Kalso, Professor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Helsinki University Hospital, Pain Clinic
Satu Jääskeläinen, Professor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Turku University Hospital, Dept. of Clinical Neurophysiology
Hanna Harno, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Helsinki University Hospital, Pain Clinic
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Turku University Hospital, Pain Clinic
Turku, Southwest Finland, Finland
Helsinki University Hospital, Pain Clinic
Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lefaucheur JP, Aleman A, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Brunelin J, Di Lazzaro V, Filipovic SR, Grefkes C, Hasan A, Hummel FC, Jaaskelainen SK, Langguth B, Leocani L, Londero A, Nardone R, Nguyen JP, Nyffeler T, Oliveira-Maia AJ, Oliviero A, Padberg F, Palm U, Paulus W, Poulet E, Quartarone A, Rachid F, Rektorova I, Rossi S, Sahlsten H, Schecklmann M, Szekely D, Ziemann U. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018). Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Feb;131(2):474-528. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.002. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
Lefaucheur JP, Andre-Obadia N, Antal A, Ayache SS, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Cantello RM, Cincotta M, de Carvalho M, De Ridder D, Devanne H, Di Lazzaro V, Filipovic SR, Hummel FC, Jaaskelainen SK, Kimiskidis VK, Koch G, Langguth B, Nyffeler T, Oliviero A, Padberg F, Poulet E, Rossi S, Rossini PM, Rothwell JC, Schonfeldt-Lecuona C, Siebner HR, Slotema CW, Stagg CJ, Valls-Sole J, Ziemann U, Paulus W, Garcia-Larrea L. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Nov;125(11):2150-2206. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.021. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
Jaaskelainen SK, Lindholm P, Valmunen T, Pesonen U, Taiminen T, Virtanen A, Lamusuo S, Forssell H, Hagelberg N, Hietala J, Pertovaara A. Variation in the dopamine D2 receptor gene plays a key role in human pain and its modulation by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Pain. 2014 Oct;155(10):2180-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.08.029. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
Liesto S, Aho T, Jaaskelainen SK, Hietanen M, Kalso E. Cognitive Function in Patients With Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS). Eur J Pain. 2025 Jul;29(6):e70070. doi: 10.1002/ejp.70070.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TYH20162222
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.