Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Anti-Spike (S) SARS-CoV-2 Monoclonal Antibodies for Hospitalized Adult Patients With COVID-19

NCT ID: NCT04426695

Last Updated: 2023-01-27

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

2252 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-06-10

Study Completion Date

2021-10-22

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objectives are:

Pooled Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A)

* To evaluate the virologic efficacy of REGN10933+REGN10987 compared to placebo in reducing viral load of SARS-CoV-2
* To evaluate the clinical efficacy of REGN10933+REGN10987 compared to placebo, as measured by death or mechanical ventilation

Phase 1/2 (Cohort 1)

* To exclude futility of REGN10933+REGN10987 compared to placebo, as measured by death or mechanical ventilation
* To evaluate the safety and tolerability of REGN10933+REGN10987 compared to placebo

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

COVID-19

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Phase 1/Phase 2/Phase 3
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

On Low-Flow Oxygen

Cohort 1 (C1): O2 saturation \>93% on low-flow oxygen via nasal cannula, simple face mask, or other similar device

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

REGN10933+REGN10987 combination therapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Administered intravenously (IV) single dose

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo IV Single Dose

With COVID-19 symptoms but not requiring supplemental O2

Cohort 1A (C1A): With COVID-19 symptoms but not requiring supplemental oxygen

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

REGN10933+REGN10987 combination therapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Administered intravenously (IV) single dose

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo IV Single Dose

High O2 No Mechanical Ventilation

Cohort 2 (C2): On high-intensity oxygen (O2) therapy but not on mechanical ventilation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

REGN10933+REGN10987 combination therapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Administered intravenously (IV) single dose

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo IV Single Dose

On Mechanical Ventilation

Cohort 3 (C3): On mechanical ventilation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

REGN10933+REGN10987 combination therapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Administered intravenously (IV) single dose

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo IV Single Dose

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

REGN10933+REGN10987 combination therapy

Administered intravenously (IV) single dose

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Placebo IV Single Dose

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

REGN-COV2 REGEN-COV™ Ronapreve™ casirivimab imdevimab

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Has SARS-CoV-2-positive antigen or molecular diagnostic test (by validated SARS-CoV-2 antigen, RT-PCR, or other molecular diagnostic assay, using an appropriate sample such as NP, nasal, oropharyngeal \[OP\], or saliva) ≤72 hours prior to randomization and no alternative explanation for current clinical condition. A historical record of positive result from test conducted ≤72 hours prior to randomization is acceptable.
* Has symptoms consistent with COVID-19, as determined by investigator, with onset ≤10 days before randomization
* Hospitalized for ≤72 hours with at least 1 of the following at randomization; patients meeting more than one criterion will be categorized in the most severely affected category:

1. Cohort 1A: With COVID-19 symptoms but not requiring supplemental oxygen
2. Cohort 1: Maintains O2 saturation \>93% on low-flow oxygen as defined in the protocol
3. Cohort 2: High-intensity oxygen therapy without mechanical ventilation as defined in the protocol
4. Cohort 3: On mechanical ventilation

Exclusion Criteria

* Phase 1 Only: Patients maintaining O2 saturation \>94% on room air
* In the opinion of the investigator, unlikely to survive for \>48 hours from screening
* Receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)
* Has new-onset stroke or seizure disorder during hospitalization
* Initiated on renal replacement therapy due to COVID-19
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Clinical Trial Management

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Regeneron Study Site

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Chandler, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site 1

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Mission Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Santa Monica, California, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Boca Raton, Florida, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Ft. Pierce, Florida, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Pensacola, Florida, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Glenview, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Urbana, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Royal Oak, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Chesterfield, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Englewood, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Morristown, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Neptune City, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Pennington, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Summit, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Teaneck, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site 1

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site 2

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Jamaica, New York, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

West Islip, New York, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

White Plains, New York, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site 1

Amarillo, Texas, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site 2

Amarillo, Texas, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Lubbock, Texas, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Sugar Land, Texas, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Tyler, Texas, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Murray, Utah, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Everett, Washington, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site 1

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Salvador, Estado de Bahia, Brazil

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Passo Fundo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Chapecó, Santa Catarina, Brazil

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Criciúma, Santa Catarina, Brazil

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site 1

Las Condes, Santiago de Chile, Chile

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site 2

Las Condes, Santiago de Chile, Chile

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Vitacura, Santiago de Chile, Chile

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Santiago, , Chile

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Culiacán, , Mexico

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site 1

Mérida, , Mexico

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site 2

Mérida, , Mexico

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Monterrey, , Mexico

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Veracruz, , Mexico

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Zapopan, , Mexico

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Chisinau, , Moldova

Site Status

Regeneron Study Site

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Brazil Chile Mexico Moldova Romania

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Somersan-Karakaya S, Mylonakis E, Mou J, Oviedo-Orta E, O'Brien MP, Mas Casullo V, Mahmood A, Hooper AT, Hussein M, Ali S, Marty FM, Forleo-Neto E, Bhore R, Hamilton JD, Herman GA, Hirshberg B, Weinreich DM. Effectiveness of Casirivimab and Imdevimab Antibody Combination in Immunocompromised Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Post Hoc Analysis in a Phase 1/2/3 Double-Blind Trial. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Apr 19;10(5):ofad211. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad211. eCollection 2023 May.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37229174 (View on PubMed)

Hooper AT, Somersan-Karakaya S, McCarthy SE, Mylonakis E, Ali S, Mei J, Bhore R, Mahmood A, Geba GP, Dakin P, Weinreich DM, Yancopoulos GD, Herman GA, Hamilton JD; COVID-19 Phase 2/3 Hospitalized Trial Team. Casirivimab and Imdevimab Treatment Reduces Viral Load and Improves Clinical Outcomes in Seropositive Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients with Nonneutralizing or Borderline Neutralizing Antibodies. mBio. 2022 Dec 20;13(6):e0169922. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01699-22. Epub 2022 Oct 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36255239 (View on PubMed)

Somersan-Karakaya S, Mylonakis E, Menon VP, Wells JC, Ali S, Sivapalasingam S, Sun Y, Bhore R, Mei J, Miller J, Cupelli L, Forleo-Neto E, Hooper AT, Hamilton JD, Pan C, Pham V, Zhao Y, Hosain R, Mahmood A, Davis JD, Turner KC, Kim Y, Cook A, Kowal B, Soo Y, DiCioccio AT, Geba GP, Stahl N, Lipsich L, Braunstein N, Herman GA, Yancopoulos GD, Weinreich DM; COVID-19 Phase 2/3 Hospitalized Trial Team. Casirivimab and Imdevimab for the Treatment of Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19. J Infect Dis. 2022 Dec 28;227(1):23-34. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiac320.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35895508 (View on PubMed)

Hirsch C, Park YS, Piechotta V, Chai KL, Estcourt LJ, Monsef I, Salomon S, Wood EM, So-Osman C, McQuilten Z, Spinner CD, Malin JJ, Stegemann M, Skoetz N, Kreuzberger N. SARS-CoV-2-neutralising monoclonal antibodies to prevent COVID-19. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 17;6(6):CD014945. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014945.pub2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35713300 (View on PubMed)

Kreuzberger N, Hirsch C, Chai KL, Tomlinson E, Khosravi Z, Popp M, Neidhardt M, Piechotta V, Salomon S, Valk SJ, Monsef I, Schmaderer C, Wood EM, So-Osman C, Roberts DJ, McQuilten Z, Estcourt LJ, Skoetz N. SARS-CoV-2-neutralising monoclonal antibodies for treatment of COVID-19. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 2;9(9):CD013825. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013825.pub2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34473343 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2020-002537-15

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

R10933-10987-COV-2066

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.