Trial Outcomes & Findings for Parent Emotion Coaching for Anorexia Nervosa (NCT NCT04421989)
NCT ID: NCT04421989
Last Updated: 2025-02-26
Results Overview
Parent Criticism was assessed by the Five Minute Speech Sample. This is a recorded five-minute unstructured response that the parent gives when prompted to talk about their feelings about their child. Eligible families will be categorized as high expressed emotion using a modified version of the Family Affective Attitudes Rating Scale (FAARS), which was developed to code the Five Minute Speech Sample in families with adolescents. Scores on Criticism range from 1-9 with higher scores reflective of greater parent criticism towards their adolescent (worse outcome).
COMPLETED
NA
41 participants
baseline, 1-month (halfway through the 10-session emotion coaching intervention), post-treatment, and 3-month follow- up
2025-02-26
Participant Flow
Participants were excluded from the study before assignment to groups if their caregiver did not screen high in expressed emotion on the Five Minute Speech Sample.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Emotion Coaching
Participants (eligible parent/adolescent dyads) randomized to FBT + EC parent group condition received FBT as part of their standard of care. In addition to FBT, parents (alone without adolescents present) received 10 additional, weekly, parent group sessions (each session is 60 minutes, 6-8 group members), within a 3-month time frame to account for cancellations. The EC intervention is designed to reduce expressed emotion (e.g., critical comments) and increase parental warmth. The intervention includes emotional awareness and emotion regulation skills for parents, and emotion communication skills for parents to use with their teens undergoing FBT including active listening, emotion support, labeling emotions, and coping with emotions. The structure of EC parent group sessions begins with review of homework as applicable, a didactic component to teach new skills, followed by role plays between parents in the group and interventionist, and live coaching and feedback from the interventionist.
|
Support Group
Participants (eligible parent/adolescent dyads) randomized to FBT + Support parent group condition received family based treatment (FBT) as part of their standard of care. In addition to FBT, parents only (without the adolescent) received 10 additional, weekly, parent group sessions (each session is 60 minutes, 6-8 group members), within a 3-month time frame to account for cancellations. The parent support group facilitates parent discussion and support around a variety of topics central to treatment for pediatric AN including: understanding medical co-morbidities, levels of care for treatment, understanding expected body weight, navigating FMLA, and medications. The facilitator introduces each topic weekly and opens up discussion between parents. The facilitator's role is to ensure the group remains on topic and on time.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
22
|
19
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
11
|
14
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
11
|
5
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Data characterizes n = 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) in the Emotion Coaching group and n = 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) in the Support group.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Emotion Coaching
n=44 Participants
Participants (eligible parent/adolescent dyads) randomized to FBT + EC parent group condition received family based treatment (FBT) as part of their standard of care. In addition to FBT, parents only (without adolescents present) received 10 additional, weekly, parent group sessions (each session is 60 minutes, 6-8 group members), within a 3-month time frame to account for cancellations. The EC intervention is designed to reduce expressed emotion (e.g., critical comments) and increase parental warmth. The intervention includes emotional awareness and emotion regulation skills for parents, and emotion communication skills for parents to use with their teens undergoing FBT including active listening, emotion support, labeling emotions, and coping with emotions. The structure of EC parent group sessions begins with review of homework as applicable, a didactic component to teach new skills, followed by role plays between parents in the group and interventionist, and live coaching and feedback from the interventionist.
|
Support Group
n=38 Participants
Participants (eligible parent/adolescent dyads) randomized to FBT + Support parent group condition received family based treatment (FBT) as part of their standard of care. In addition to FBT, parents only (without adolescents present) received 10 additional, weekly, parent group sessions (each session is 60 minutes, 6-8 group members), within a 3-month time frame to account for cancellations. The parent support group facilitates parent discussion and support around a variety of topics central to treatment for pediatric AN including: understanding medical co-morbidities, levels of care for treatment, understanding expected body weight, navigating FMLA, and medications. The facilitator introduces each topic weekly and opens up discussion between parents. The facilitator's role is to ensure the group remains on topic and on time.
|
Total
n=82 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
Adolescents · <=18 years
|
22 Participants
n=22 Participants • Data characterizes n = 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) in the Emotion Coaching group and n = 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) in the Support group.
|
19 Participants
n=19 Participants • Data characterizes n = 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) in the Emotion Coaching group and n = 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) in the Support group.
|
41 Participants
n=41 Participants • Data characterizes n = 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) in the Emotion Coaching group and n = 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) in the Support group.
|
|
Age, Categorical
Adolescents · Between 18 and 65 years
|
0 Participants
n=22 Participants • Data characterizes n = 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) in the Emotion Coaching group and n = 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) in the Support group.
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants • Data characterizes n = 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) in the Emotion Coaching group and n = 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) in the Support group.
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants • Data characterizes n = 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) in the Emotion Coaching group and n = 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) in the Support group.
|
|
Age, Categorical
Adolescents · >=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=22 Participants • Data characterizes n = 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) in the Emotion Coaching group and n = 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) in the Support group.
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants • Data characterizes n = 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) in the Emotion Coaching group and n = 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) in the Support group.
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants • Data characterizes n = 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) in the Emotion Coaching group and n = 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) in the Support group.
|
|
Age, Categorical
Caregivers · <=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=22 Participants • Data characterizes n = 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) in the Emotion Coaching group and n = 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) in the Support group.
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants • Data characterizes n = 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) in the Emotion Coaching group and n = 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) in the Support group.
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants • Data characterizes n = 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) in the Emotion Coaching group and n = 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) in the Support group.
|
|
Age, Categorical
Caregivers · Between 18 and 65 years
|
22 Participants
n=22 Participants • Data characterizes n = 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) in the Emotion Coaching group and n = 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) in the Support group.
|
19 Participants
n=19 Participants • Data characterizes n = 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) in the Emotion Coaching group and n = 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) in the Support group.
|
41 Participants
n=41 Participants • Data characterizes n = 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) in the Emotion Coaching group and n = 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) in the Support group.
|
|
Age, Categorical
Caregivers · >=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=22 Participants • Data characterizes n = 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) in the Emotion Coaching group and n = 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) in the Support group.
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants • Data characterizes n = 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) in the Emotion Coaching group and n = 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) in the Support group.
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants • Data characterizes n = 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) in the Emotion Coaching group and n = 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) in the Support group.
|
|
Age, Continuous
Adolescents
|
15 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6 • n=22 Participants • 44 participants in the emotion coaching arm (n = 22 adolescents and their caregivers, n = 22). 38 participants in the support group arm (n = 19 adolescents and their caregivers, n = 19 caregivers)
|
14.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7 • n=19 Participants • 44 participants in the emotion coaching arm (n = 22 adolescents and their caregivers, n = 22). 38 participants in the support group arm (n = 19 adolescents and their caregivers, n = 19 caregivers)
|
14.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6 • n=41 Participants • 44 participants in the emotion coaching arm (n = 22 adolescents and their caregivers, n = 22). 38 participants in the support group arm (n = 19 adolescents and their caregivers, n = 19 caregivers)
|
|
Age, Continuous
Caregivers
|
46.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5 • n=22 Participants • 44 participants in the emotion coaching arm (n = 22 adolescents and their caregivers, n = 22). 38 participants in the support group arm (n = 19 adolescents and their caregivers, n = 19 caregivers)
|
46.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.0 • n=19 Participants • 44 participants in the emotion coaching arm (n = 22 adolescents and their caregivers, n = 22). 38 participants in the support group arm (n = 19 adolescents and their caregivers, n = 19 caregivers)
|
46.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2 • n=41 Participants • 44 participants in the emotion coaching arm (n = 22 adolescents and their caregivers, n = 22). 38 participants in the support group arm (n = 19 adolescents and their caregivers, n = 19 caregivers)
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Adolescents · Female
|
20 Participants
n=22 Participants • We analyzed data from n = 22 Emotion coaching adolescents and their caregivers (n = 22) and n = 19 Support group adolescents and their caregivers (n = 19).
|
17 Participants
n=19 Participants • We analyzed data from n = 22 Emotion coaching adolescents and their caregivers (n = 22) and n = 19 Support group adolescents and their caregivers (n = 19).
|
37 Participants
n=41 Participants • We analyzed data from n = 22 Emotion coaching adolescents and their caregivers (n = 22) and n = 19 Support group adolescents and their caregivers (n = 19).
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Adolescents · Male
|
2 Participants
n=22 Participants • We analyzed data from n = 22 Emotion coaching adolescents and their caregivers (n = 22) and n = 19 Support group adolescents and their caregivers (n = 19).
|
2 Participants
n=19 Participants • We analyzed data from n = 22 Emotion coaching adolescents and their caregivers (n = 22) and n = 19 Support group adolescents and their caregivers (n = 19).
|
4 Participants
n=41 Participants • We analyzed data from n = 22 Emotion coaching adolescents and their caregivers (n = 22) and n = 19 Support group adolescents and their caregivers (n = 19).
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Caregivers · Female
|
22 Participants
n=22 Participants • We analyzed data from n = 22 Emotion coaching adolescents and their caregivers (n = 22) and n = 19 Support group adolescents and their caregivers (n = 19).
|
18 Participants
n=19 Participants • We analyzed data from n = 22 Emotion coaching adolescents and their caregivers (n = 22) and n = 19 Support group adolescents and their caregivers (n = 19).
|
40 Participants
n=41 Participants • We analyzed data from n = 22 Emotion coaching adolescents and their caregivers (n = 22) and n = 19 Support group adolescents and their caregivers (n = 19).
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Caregivers · Male
|
0 Participants
n=22 Participants • We analyzed data from n = 22 Emotion coaching adolescents and their caregivers (n = 22) and n = 19 Support group adolescents and their caregivers (n = 19).
|
1 Participants
n=19 Participants • We analyzed data from n = 22 Emotion coaching adolescents and their caregivers (n = 22) and n = 19 Support group adolescents and their caregivers (n = 19).
|
1 Participants
n=41 Participants • We analyzed data from n = 22 Emotion coaching adolescents and their caregivers (n = 22) and n = 19 Support group adolescents and their caregivers (n = 19).
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Adolescents · Hispanic or Latino
|
1 Participants
n=22 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
1 Participants
n=41 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Adolescents · Not Hispanic or Latino
|
21 Participants
n=22 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
19 Participants
n=19 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
40 Participants
n=41 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Adolescents · Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=22 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers · Hispanic or Latino
|
1 Participants
n=22 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
1 Participants
n=41 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers · Not Hispanic or Latino
|
21 Participants
n=22 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
19 Participants
n=19 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
40 Participants
n=41 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers · Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=22 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Adolescents · American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=22 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Adolescents · Asian
|
0 Participants
n=22 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Adolescents · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=22 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Adolescents · Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=22 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Adolescents · White
|
21 Participants
n=22 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
19 Participants
n=19 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
40 Participants
n=41 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Adolescents · More than one race
|
1 Participants
n=22 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
1 Participants
n=41 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Adolescents · Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=22 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers · American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=22 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers · Asian
|
0 Participants
n=22 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=22 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers · Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=22 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers · White
|
22 Participants
n=22 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
19 Participants
n=19 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
41 Participants
n=41 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers · More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=22 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers · Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=22 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants • 22 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 22) were randomized to the Emotion Coaching group while 19 adolescents and their primary caregivers (n = 19) were randomized to the Support Group.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
44 participants
n=44 Participants
|
38 participants
n=38 Participants
|
82 participants
n=82 Participants
|
|
Eating Disorder Examination
|
3.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7 • n=22 Participants • Only adolescents completed this measure
|
2.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5 • n=19 Participants • Only adolescents completed this measure
|
3.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7 • n=41 Participants • Only adolescents completed this measure
|
|
Five Minute Speech Sample
Criticism Score: Coders rate caregiver's critical remarks regarding the adolescent.
|
5.36 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3 • n=22 Participants • Only caregivers completed this measure
|
5.26 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7 • n=19 Participants • Only caregivers completed this measure
|
5.32 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.0 • n=41 Participants • Only caregivers completed this measure
|
|
Five Minute Speech Sample
Warmth Score: Coders rate caregiver's positive remarks regarding the adolescent.
|
5.50 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7 • n=22 Participants • Only caregivers completed this measure
|
5.95 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8 • n=19 Participants • Only caregivers completed this measure
|
5.71 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7 • n=41 Participants • Only caregivers completed this measure
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 1-month (halfway through the 10-session emotion coaching intervention), post-treatment, and 3-month follow- upParent Criticism was assessed by the Five Minute Speech Sample. This is a recorded five-minute unstructured response that the parent gives when prompted to talk about their feelings about their child. Eligible families will be categorized as high expressed emotion using a modified version of the Family Affective Attitudes Rating Scale (FAARS), which was developed to code the Five Minute Speech Sample in families with adolescents. Scores on Criticism range from 1-9 with higher scores reflective of greater parent criticism towards their adolescent (worse outcome).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Emotion Coaching
n=11 Participants
Participants randomized to FBT + EC parent group condition will also receive FBT as part of their standard of care. In addition to FBT, they will receive 10 additional, weekly, parent group sessions (each session is 60 minutes, 6-8 group members), within a 3-month time frame to account for cancellations. The EC intervention is designed to reduce expressed emotion (e.g., critical comments) and increase parental warmth. The intervention includes emotional awareness and emotion regulation skills for parents, and emotion communication skills for parents to use with their teens undergoing FBT including active listening, emotion support, labeling emotions, and coping with emotions. The structure of EC parent group sessions will begin with review of homework as applicable, a didactic component to teach new skills, followed by role plays between parents in the group and interventionist, and live coaching and feedback from the interventionist.
|
Support Group
n=14 Participants
Participants randomized to FBT + Support parent group condition will also receive FBT as part of their standard of care. In addition to FBT, they will receive 10 additional, weekly, parent group sessions (each session is 60 minutes, 6-8 group members), within a 3-month time frame to account for cancellations. The parent support group facilitates parent discussion and support around a variety of topics central to treatment for pediatric AN including: understanding medical co-morbidities, levels of care for treatment, understanding expected body weight, navigating FMLA, and medications. The facilitator introduces each topic weekly and opens up discussion between parents. The facilitator's role is to ensure the group remains on topic and on time.
Support Group: Participants randomized to FBT + Support Group parent group condition will also receive FBT as part of their standard of care. In addition to FBT, they will receive 10 additional, weekly, parent group sessions (each session is 60 minutes, 6-8 group members), within a 3-month time frame to account for cancellations. The support group will have a facilitator introduce each topic weekly and parents will discuss. The facilitator's role is to ensure the group remains on topic and on time. Weekly discussion topics include: co-morbid medical diagnoses, understanding levels of care in treatment, taking time off from work, and medications.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Criticism
3 Month Follow-Up
|
2.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.6
|
3.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.0
|
|
Criticism
1-Month
|
5.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.8
|
3.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.1
|
|
Criticism
Post-Treatment
|
3.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.0
|
4.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.1
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 1-month, post-treatment, and 3-month follow upPercent Expected Body Weight is the current weight divided by the adolescent's Expected Body Weight based on their premorbid body mass index percentile for age-and-sex (Body Mass Index Percentile; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2000). Expected Body Weights were calculated by research team members to ensure a standardized calculation methodology. One research team member extracted the highest and lowest premorbid Body Mass Index Percentile from each participant's medical chart and calculated the mean premorbid Body Mass Index Percentile, and Percent Expected Body Weight (i.e., current weight divided by Expected Body Weight). A second coder completed the same process for double data coding. Any discrepancies in weights entered or Expected Body Weight calculations were double checked for accuracy and entered. Higher Percent Expected Body Weight corresponds to better outcomes (e.g., 100% = full weight restoration for individuals with anorexia nervosa).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Emotion Coaching
n=11 Participants
Participants randomized to FBT + EC parent group condition will also receive FBT as part of their standard of care. In addition to FBT, they will receive 10 additional, weekly, parent group sessions (each session is 60 minutes, 6-8 group members), within a 3-month time frame to account for cancellations. The EC intervention is designed to reduce expressed emotion (e.g., critical comments) and increase parental warmth. The intervention includes emotional awareness and emotion regulation skills for parents, and emotion communication skills for parents to use with their teens undergoing FBT including active listening, emotion support, labeling emotions, and coping with emotions. The structure of EC parent group sessions will begin with review of homework as applicable, a didactic component to teach new skills, followed by role plays between parents in the group and interventionist, and live coaching and feedback from the interventionist.
|
Support Group
n=14 Participants
Participants randomized to FBT + Support parent group condition will also receive FBT as part of their standard of care. In addition to FBT, they will receive 10 additional, weekly, parent group sessions (each session is 60 minutes, 6-8 group members), within a 3-month time frame to account for cancellations. The parent support group facilitates parent discussion and support around a variety of topics central to treatment for pediatric AN including: understanding medical co-morbidities, levels of care for treatment, understanding expected body weight, navigating FMLA, and medications. The facilitator introduces each topic weekly and opens up discussion between parents. The facilitator's role is to ensure the group remains on topic and on time.
Support Group: Participants randomized to FBT + Support Group parent group condition will also receive FBT as part of their standard of care. In addition to FBT, they will receive 10 additional, weekly, parent group sessions (each session is 60 minutes, 6-8 group members), within a 3-month time frame to account for cancellations. The support group will have a facilitator introduce each topic weekly and parents will discuss. The facilitator's role is to ensure the group remains on topic and on time. Weekly discussion topics include: co-morbid medical diagnoses, understanding levels of care in treatment, taking time off from work, and medications.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Expected Body Weight (%EBW)
1-Month
|
95.1 percentage of expected body weight
Standard Deviation 7.1
|
90.8 percentage of expected body weight
Standard Deviation 7.8
|
|
Percent Expected Body Weight (%EBW)
Post-Treatment
|
96.6 percentage of expected body weight
Standard Deviation 6.3
|
92.5 percentage of expected body weight
Standard Deviation 8.3
|
|
Percent Expected Body Weight (%EBW)
3 Month Follow-up
|
98.0 percentage of expected body weight
Standard Deviation 5.6
|
92.6 percentage of expected body weight
Standard Deviation 10.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 1-month, post-treatment, and 3 month follow-upParental Warmth was assessed by the Five Minute Speech Sample. This is a recorded five-minute unstructured response that the parent gives when prompted to talk about their feelings about their child. Eligible families will be categorized as high expressed emotion using a modified version of the Family Affective Attitudes Rating Scale (FAARS), which was developed to code the Five Minute Speech Sample in families with adolescents. Scores on Warmth range from 1-9 with higher scores reflective of greater parent warmth towards their adolescent (better outcome).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Emotion Coaching
n=11 Participants
Participants randomized to FBT + EC parent group condition will also receive FBT as part of their standard of care. In addition to FBT, they will receive 10 additional, weekly, parent group sessions (each session is 60 minutes, 6-8 group members), within a 3-month time frame to account for cancellations. The EC intervention is designed to reduce expressed emotion (e.g., critical comments) and increase parental warmth. The intervention includes emotional awareness and emotion regulation skills for parents, and emotion communication skills for parents to use with their teens undergoing FBT including active listening, emotion support, labeling emotions, and coping with emotions. The structure of EC parent group sessions will begin with review of homework as applicable, a didactic component to teach new skills, followed by role plays between parents in the group and interventionist, and live coaching and feedback from the interventionist.
|
Support Group
n=14 Participants
Participants randomized to FBT + Support parent group condition will also receive FBT as part of their standard of care. In addition to FBT, they will receive 10 additional, weekly, parent group sessions (each session is 60 minutes, 6-8 group members), within a 3-month time frame to account for cancellations. The parent support group facilitates parent discussion and support around a variety of topics central to treatment for pediatric AN including: understanding medical co-morbidities, levels of care for treatment, understanding expected body weight, navigating FMLA, and medications. The facilitator introduces each topic weekly and opens up discussion between parents. The facilitator's role is to ensure the group remains on topic and on time.
Support Group: Participants randomized to FBT + Support Group parent group condition will also receive FBT as part of their standard of care. In addition to FBT, they will receive 10 additional, weekly, parent group sessions (each session is 60 minutes, 6-8 group members), within a 3-month time frame to account for cancellations. The support group will have a facilitator introduce each topic weekly and parents will discuss. The facilitator's role is to ensure the group remains on topic and on time. Weekly discussion topics include: co-morbid medical diagnoses, understanding levels of care in treatment, taking time off from work, and medications.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Parental Warmth
1-Month
|
7.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
6.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.8
|
|
Parental Warmth
Post-Treatment
|
7.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6
|
5.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.9
|
|
Parental Warmth
3 Month Follow-Up
|
7.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7
|
7.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.6
|
Adverse Events
Emotion Coaching
Support Group
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Emotion Coaching
n=22 participants at risk
Participants randomized to FBT + EC parent group condition will also receive FBT as part of their standard of care. In addition to FBT, they will receive 10 additional, weekly, parent group sessions (each session is 60 minutes, 6-8 group members), within a 3-month time frame to account for cancellations. The EC intervention is designed to reduce expressed emotion (e.g., critical comments) and increase parental warmth. The intervention includes emotional awareness and emotion regulation skills for parents, and emotion communication skills for parents to use with their teens undergoing FBT including active listening, emotion support, labeling emotions, and coping with emotions. The structure of EC parent group sessions will begin with review of homework as applicable, a didactic component to teach new skills, followed by role plays between parents in the group and interventionist, and live coaching and feedback from the interventionist.
|
Support Group
n=19 participants at risk
Participants randomized to FBT + Support parent group condition will also receive FBT as part of their standard of care. In addition to FBT, they will receive 10 additional, weekly, parent group sessions (each session is 60 minutes, 6-8 group members), within a 3-month time frame to account for cancellations. The parent support group facilitates parent discussion and support around a variety of topics central to treatment for pediatric AN including: understanding medical co-morbidities, levels of care for treatment, understanding expected body weight, navigating FMLA, and medications. The facilitator introduces each topic weekly and opens up discussion between parents. The facilitator's role is to ensure the group remains on topic and on time.
Support Group: Participants randomized to FBT + Support Group parent group condition will also receive FBT as part of their standard of care. In addition to FBT, they will receive 10 additional, weekly, parent group sessions (each session is 60 minutes, 6-8 group members), within a 3-month time frame to account for cancellations. The support group will have a facilitator introduce each topic weekly and parents will discuss. The facilitator's role is to ensure the group remains on topic and on time. Weekly discussion topics include: co-morbid medical diagnoses, understanding levels of care in treatment, taking time off from work, and medications.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicidal Ideation
|
9.1%
2/22 • Number of events 2 • Each adolescent participant was in the study for a duration of 6 months (from consent until follow up assessment).
Adverse events were tracked for adolescent participants only. Caregivers were not monitored/assessed for Adverse Events
|
0.00%
0/19 • Each adolescent participant was in the study for a duration of 6 months (from consent until follow up assessment).
Adverse events were tracked for adolescent participants only. Caregivers were not monitored/assessed for Adverse Events
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Acute Food Refusal
|
0.00%
0/22 • Each adolescent participant was in the study for a duration of 6 months (from consent until follow up assessment).
Adverse events were tracked for adolescent participants only. Caregivers were not monitored/assessed for Adverse Events
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Each adolescent participant was in the study for a duration of 6 months (from consent until follow up assessment).
Adverse events were tracked for adolescent participants only. Caregivers were not monitored/assessed for Adverse Events
|
Additional Information
Dr. Claire Aarnio-Peterson
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place