Pharmacokinetic and Safety Comparison of Two Capecitabine Tablets in Patients With Colorectal or Breast Cancer

NCT ID: NCT04420871

Last Updated: 2020-06-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

48 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-12-10

Study Completion Date

2019-01-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A multicenter, randomized, open-label, three-period, and reference-replicated crossover study was conducted in 48 patients with colorectal or breast cancer under fed conditions to assess the bioequivalence between two formulations of capecitabine.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This was a multicenter, open, random, balanced, three-period, three-sequence and semi-repetitive cross study with 48 subjects. Eligible subjects were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive one period of test formulation or two period of reference formulation, followed by a 1-day washout period and administration of the alternate formulation. Serial blood samples for pharmacokinetic assessment were collected at 0 hours (predose) up to 8 hours postdose. The plasma concentrations of capecitabine were analyzed by LC/MS-MS. Pharmacokinetic parameters (non-compartmental model) were assessed with WinNonlin software. The pharmacokinetic parameters assessed were area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the time of last measurable concentration (AUC0-t), AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞), the peak plasma concentration of the drug (C max ), time needed to reach maximum concentration (Tmax), the elimination half-life (t1/2), and terminal elimination rate (λz). All were analyzed using an ANOVA model after logarithmic transformation of the data. For establishing bioequivalence (BE) for capecitabine, reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) acceptance criteria and average bioequivalence (ABE) acceptance criteria were used. Safety and tolerability was assessed during the entire study period.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Patient Participation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

A multicenter, randomized, open-label, three-period, and reference-replicated crossover study
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

capecitabine reference formulation at a single dose of 150 mg

150 mg of Xeloda® produced by Genentech USA, Inc., a subsidiary of the company, was used as the reference intervention in this study.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

150 mg of Xeloda®

Intervention Type DRUG

Subjects were allocated to one of three groups randomly and equally with a 1-day wash time period. 150 mg of Xeloda® produced by Genentech USA, Inc., a subsidiary of the company, was used as the reference intervention in this study.The subjects randomly received single oral administration of 150 mg of Xeloda®.

capecitabine test formulation at a single dose of 150 mg

The tablet of 150 mg of capecitabine from Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (17H0053DE4, Jinan, Shandong Province, China) was used as the test formulation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

150 mg of capecitabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Subjects were allocated to one of three groups randomly and equally with a 1-day wash time period.The tablet of 150 mg of capecitabine from Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (17H0053DE4, Jinan, Shandong Province, China) was used as the test formulation.The subjects randomly received single oral administration of 150 mg of capecitabine.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

150 mg of Xeloda®

Subjects were allocated to one of three groups randomly and equally with a 1-day wash time period. 150 mg of Xeloda® produced by Genentech USA, Inc., a subsidiary of the company, was used as the reference intervention in this study.The subjects randomly received single oral administration of 150 mg of Xeloda®.

Intervention Type DRUG

150 mg of capecitabine

Subjects were allocated to one of three groups randomly and equally with a 1-day wash time period.The tablet of 150 mg of capecitabine from Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (17H0053DE4, Jinan, Shandong Province, China) was used as the test formulation.The subjects randomly received single oral administration of 150 mg of capecitabine.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed colorectal or breast cancer receiving capecitabine monotherapy or combination chemotherapy.
* Eligible patients were within 18-70 years of age.
* ECOG score was 0-2.
* Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \> 50%.
* There was no serious persistent toxicity to capecitabine treatment before screening (laboratory tests ≤ grade 1 (NCI CTCAE 5.0 standard)
* Hand-foot syndrome ≤ grade 2 after recovery from the previous treatment period).

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients were known allergy to fluorouracil or 5-fluorouracil.
* Patients with complete lack of known dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity.
* Patients with abnormal hepatic and renal function (serum creatinine≤ 1.5 ×ULN; CLcr ≥ 51 mL/min; bilirubin≤ 1.5 ×ULN; AST, ALT≤2.5×ULN)
* Needed to accept phenytoin, warfarin, other coumarin derivatives anticoagulants, folic acid, and CYP2C9 substrates during the research.
* Patients with brain metastases or other metastases of the central nervous system (except those who were treated at least 6 months prior to the start of the study and were stable and asymptomatic).
Minimum Eligible Age

28 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

69 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

yu Cao, Doctor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

the study director of phase I clinical research center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Phase Ⅰ Clinical Research Center

Qingdao, Shandong, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wang CJ, Li T, Lin PP, Tao Y, Jiang X, Li X, Wen Q, Cao Y. Pharmacokinetic and Safety Comparison of Two Capecitabine Tablets in Patients with Colorectal or Breast Cancer Under Fed Conditions: A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Three-Period, and Reference-Replicated Crossover Study. Adv Ther. 2021 Sep;38(9):4798-4814. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01817-4. Epub 2021 Aug 4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34347254 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

QL-KPTB-150

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.