Evaluation of Conjunctival Autografting With MMC Application Versus Ologen Implantation of Recurrent Pterygium
NCT ID: NCT04419038
Last Updated: 2020-06-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
63 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-01-15
2019-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Conjunctival Autograft or Limbal Conjunctival Autograft for Recurrent Pterygium Using Mitomycin C
NCT04463901
Comparison Between Sutureless and Glue Free Versus Sutured Limbal Conjunctival Autograft in Primary Pterygium Surgery
NCT02009072
Recurrent Pterygium Surgery Using Mitomycin C With Limbal Conjunctival or Amniotic Membrane
NCT01319721
Amniotic Membrane Associated With Conjunctival Autograft Versus Conjunctival Autograft for Recurrent Pterygia
NCT00802620
Micro-Conjunctival Autografting Combined With Amniotic Membrane Transplantation Treating Recurrent Pterygium Trial
NCT05362253
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
All patients had a recurrent nasal pterygium after one surgical session for removal of the primary one. Any patient with primary nasal pterygium, or patients with recurrent pterygium who had more than one session for surgical removal were excluded. As well, patients with cicatrizing conjunctival disease or previous conjunctival surgery were excluded from the study.
A comprehensive ophthalmic examination, including best-corrected visual acuity testing, slit-lamp examination, Goldmann applanation tonometry, fundus examination, and examination of ocular motility, was carried out for all patients. According to their corneal extent, pterygia were classified into 3 grades:
Grade 1: Fibrovascular proliferations extend up to one quarter of the corneal diameter.
Grade 2: Fibrovascular proliferations extend up to the center of the cornea. Grade 3: Fibrovascular proliferations extend beyond the visual axis.
Consents were taken from all patients and research was approved by the institutional review board. All measures were in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.
As for group A, 0.2 mg/mL MMC was prepared by reconstituting 2 mg vial of Mitomycin with 10 mL sterile water for injection. When using Mitomycin 10 mg vial, the same concentration was achieved by reconstituting the 10 mg vial 10 mL sterile water for injection. Then 1 ml of the prepared solution was diluted with 4 ml of saline to achieve 0.2 mg/mL (0.02% solution). This solution is stable for 2 weeks under refrigeration, and 24 hours at room temperature (59° to 86°F).
As for group B, 1×2 or 2×2 square millimeter porous collagen matrix was used for each patient
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
conjunctival autografting with MMC
Group A included 32 eyes of 32 patients who underwent conjunctival autografting augmented with topical application of Mitomycin C (0.2 mg/mL).
conjunctival autografting augmented with topical application of Mitomycin C
Group A included 32 eyes of 32 patients who underwent conjunctival autografting augmented with topical application of Mitomycin C (0.2 mg/mL).
conjunctival autografting augmented with Ologen implantation
Group B included 31 eyes of 31 who underwent conjunctival autografting augmented with Ologen implantation.
conjunctival autografting augmented with Ologen implantation
Group B included 31 eyes of 31 who underwent conjunctival autografting augmented with Ologen implantation.
conjunctival autografting augmented with topical application of Mitomycin C
Group A included 32 eyes of 32 patients who underwent conjunctival autografting augmented with topical application of Mitomycin C (0.2 mg/mL).
conjunctival autografting augmented with Ologen implantation
Group B included 31 eyes of 31 who underwent conjunctival autografting augmented with Ologen implantation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
conjunctival autografting augmented with topical application of Mitomycin C
Group A included 32 eyes of 32 patients who underwent conjunctival autografting augmented with topical application of Mitomycin C (0.2 mg/mL).
conjunctival autografting augmented with Ologen implantation
Group B included 31 eyes of 31 who underwent conjunctival autografting augmented with Ologen implantation.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* recurrent pterygium with more than one session for surgical removal
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Menoufia University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Amin Faisal Ellakwa
clinical professor
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wagdy FM, Farahat HG, Ellakwa AF, Mandour SS. Evaluation of Conjunctival Autografting Augmented with Mitomycin C Application versus Ologen Implantation in the Surgical Treatment of Recurrent Pterygium. J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan 12;2021:8820926. doi: 10.1155/2021/8820926. eCollection 2021.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
81046
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.