Adjuvant Lenvatinib Prevents Recurrence of High-risk Patients With HBV-related HCC After Liver Transplantation
NCT ID: NCT04415567
Last Updated: 2020-06-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
23 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-06-01
2020-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Lenvatinib Following Liver Transplantation in Patients With High-Risk Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT04168944
Relenvatinib in the Tatment of Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Transplantation
NCT04237740
Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib as an Adjuvant Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT04227808
Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib as a Conversion Therapy for HCC
NCT04241523
Lenvatinib for the Treatment of Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Transplant
NCT05103904
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The participants were divided into lenvatinib group and control group according to their willingness to take lenvatinib as adjuvant therapy after LT. Of the 23 patients, 14 pantients in lenvatinib group began to take lenvatinib about a month after LT except for routine treatment, while the other 9 patients in control group received routine treatment and follow-up after transplantation. Clinical data and demographic characteristics was obtained. This study was conducted according to the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki and approved by Ethics Committee of Xin Hua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (No. XHEC-D-2020-068). All patients enrolled in this study provided informed consent.
Usage of lenvatinib and immunosuppressants The participants in lenvatinib group received oral lenvatinib (Eisai, Japan) 12 mg/day (for bodyweight (BW) ≥60 kg) or 8 mg/day (for BW \<60 kg) in 28-day cycles until HCC recurrence or serious adverse events (SAEs) or voluntary withdrawal. Dose interruptions followed by reductions for lenvatinib-related toxicities (to 8 mg and 4 mg/day, or 4 mg every other day) were permitted. All 14 patients took lenvatinib for more than 3 cycles.
The induction immunosuppression strategies for all participants enrolled in the study involved IV infusion of 20mg of basiliximab within 2 hours prior to operation and a second dose 4 days later, oral tacrolimus started on the fourth day after LT at a dose of 0.04mg/kg (BW) and adjusted according to its plasma concentration, taking mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) from the next day after surgery at a dose of 500mg/kg(BW), and rapid withdrawal of glucocorticoids with the initial dose of 500mg. Maintenance immunosuppression which was started about one month after LT included sirolimus (4 mg/M2 per day) plus oral tacrolimus with the plasma concentration maintained at 5-8 ng/ml.
All patients were followed up monthly within six months after LT and every three months within two years. During each follow-up, complete blood count, urinalysis, serum AFP level, liver and kidney function test, and blood concentration of FK506 were recorded. Chest and abdominal computed tomography was implemented at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and annually thereafter. Other radiological examinations such as radionuclide bone scan, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) were obtained when local recurrence or distant metastasis was suspected.
The DFS was defined as the period between the day of LT and the day of HCC recurrence confirmed by imaging, while the OS was defined as the duration from LT to death of patients for any reason or to end of follow-up. Common terminology criteria for adverse events version 5.0 (CTCAE V5.0) was used to assess the AE during oral administration of lenvatinib. The FK506 dosage and blood concentration of each patients in the first six months after liver LT was recorded for evaluate the influence of lenvatinib on the immunosuppressive therapy.
Mean and standard deviations were used for descriptive statistics. The patient characteristics in each group were compared by one-way ANOVA and chi-square tests. Repeated measures analysis of variances was used for comparing the difference of FK506 dosage and blood concentration between two groups. The OS and DFS were statistically analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Statistical significance was set at P\<0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software Version 10.0.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
lenvatinib
high-risk patients with HBV-related HCC who took lenvatinib as adjuvant therapy after liver transplantation
Lenvatinib
The patients in lenvatinib group received oral lenvatinib (Eisai, Japan) 12 mg/day (for bodyweight (BW) ≥60 kg) or 8 mg/day (for BW \<60 kg) in 28-day cycles until HCC recurrence or serious adverse events (SAEs) or voluntary withdrawal. Dose interruptions followed by reductions for lenvatinib-related toxicities (to 8 mg and 4 mg/day, or 4 mg every other day) were permitted. All 14 patients took lenvatinib for more than 3 cycles.
control
high-risk patients with HBV-related HCC who received routine treatment and follow-up after liver transplantation
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lenvatinib
The patients in lenvatinib group received oral lenvatinib (Eisai, Japan) 12 mg/day (for bodyweight (BW) ≥60 kg) or 8 mg/day (for BW \<60 kg) in 28-day cycles until HCC recurrence or serious adverse events (SAEs) or voluntary withdrawal. Dose interruptions followed by reductions for lenvatinib-related toxicities (to 8 mg and 4 mg/day, or 4 mg every other day) were permitted. All 14 patients took lenvatinib for more than 3 cycles.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. The extrahepatic metastasis was excluded preoperatively.
3. The patients were defined as "high-risk" for recurrence according to the following criteria:
(1) beyond Milan criteria confirmed either by radiology before LT or by pathology after LT, (2) tumor with intrahepatic vascular invasion, (3) Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)≥400ng/L before LT, (4) presence of microvascular invasion (MVI), (5) tumor with histological poor differentiation according to Edmondson-Steiner classification system(21), (6) multiple satellite lesions around the largest tumors detected either by radiology before LT or by histology after LT, (7) tumor penetrating hepatic capsule, (8) recurrent HCC after resection. 4. ECOG score between 0-1 within 1 week before took lenvatinib. 5. The patients have received regular antiviral treatment. 6. Life expectancy more than 3 months.
Exclusion Criteria
2. The patients suffered from other incurable malignancies within 5 years or at the same time.
3. Distant metastasis of tumor was confirmed by imaging before or within 1 month after transplantation.
4. The patients have not received regular antiviral treatment.
5. The patients had a history of mental illness or abuse of psychoactive drugs.
6. The patients deemed unsuitable by attending doctors.
8 Years
69 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Jinyang Gu
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jinyang Gu
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jinyang Gu, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School
Shanghai, , China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kudo M, Finn RS, Qin S, Han KH, Ikeda K, Piscaglia F, Baron A, Park JW, Han G, Jassem J, Blanc JF, Vogel A, Komov D, Evans TRJ, Lopez C, Dutcus C, Guo M, Saito K, Kraljevic S, Tamai T, Ren M, Cheng AL. Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018 Mar 24;391(10126):1163-1173. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30207-1.
Briggs A, Daniele B, Dick K, Evans TRJ, Galle PR, Hubner RA, Lopez C, Siebert U, Tremblay G. Covariate-adjusted analysis of the Phase 3 REFLECT study of lenvatinib versus sorafenib in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2020 Jun;122(12):1754-1759. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-0817-7. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
Siegel AB, El-Khoueiry AB, Finn RS, Guthrie KA, Goyal A, Venook AP, Blanke CD, Verna EC, Dove L, Emond J, Kato T, Samstein B, Busuttil R, Remotti H, Coffey A, Brown RS Jr. Phase I trial of sorafenib following liver transplantation in patients with high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Cancer. 2015 Mar;4(2):115-25. doi: 10.1159/000367734.
Teng CL, Hwang WL, Chen YJ, Chang KH, Cheng SB. Sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma patients beyond Milan criteria after orthotopic liver transplantation: a case control study. World J Surg Oncol. 2012 Feb 17;10:41. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-10-41.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
XH-20-010
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.