NIV for COPD: Hospital to Home

NCT ID: NCT04413643

Last Updated: 2024-04-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

6 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-05-09

Study Completion Date

2024-04-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a pilot study to evaluate the impact of providing patients admitted with acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) with non-invasive ventilation (NIV)home devices prior to discharge on hospital readmission rates and other secondary outcomes.

Aim 1 To test whether continuation of NIV at home after being initiated during hospitalization for AECOPD improves subsequent admission-free survival in patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure secondary to COPD

Hypothesis 1: The use of targeted NIV during hospitalization with continuation upon discharge to home will improve one-year all-cause mortality as compared to published mortality in the current literature.

Hypothesis 2: The use of targeted NIV during hospitalization with continuation upon discharge to home will reduce readmission rates for AECOPD within-institution historical data.

Aim 2 To evaluate the feasibility of a larger multisite randomized controlled trial in veterans using inclusion and exclusion criteria specified in this pilot.

Outcomes

Primary: Event-free survival (re-hospitalization for AECOPD, time to readmission for AECOPD, and all-cause mortality)

Secondary:

1. Unplanned readmission rates (all complications)
2. Time to readmissions for admissions other than AECOPD.
3. Arterial blood gas/Venous blood gas (ABG/VBG): PaO2, PaCO2 and serum bicarbonate at Baseline, 6 and 12 months
4. Pulmonary function (handheld spirometer or in-laboratory based on specific institution resources) at Baseline, 6, and 12 months 5.6 minute walk test at Baseline, 6,and 12 months

6.Health related quality of life (HRQOL) measured by the St. Georges respiratory questionnaires (SGRQ) at Baseline, 1,3,6,9 and 12 months 7.Adherence to NIV at Week 1-2, Months 1,3,6,9 and 12 8.Sleep assessed by type 3 portable monitors 9.Sleep assessed by questionnaires: Insomnia severity index (ISI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Functional Outcomes of Sleep Short Form (FOSQ-10) at Baseline, 1,3,6,9 and 12 months 11.Utilization of healthcare services (number of visits to outpatient clinics and emergency services, number of inpatient admissions)

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with the economic and social burden of disease anticipated to increase annually. Acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) are associated with significant in-hospital mortality (6-8%), high readmission rates (60-80%), and even more dramatic 1-year mortality (23-49%).

The use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) has been extensively evaluated in both patients with stable disease in the home setting and in AECOPD during hospitalization. It is widely accepted that NIV used during AECOPD in the inpatient setting reduces rates of endotracheal intubation, as well as length of ICU and hospital stay. Long-term use of NIV, particularly at higher pressures, in the home setting in COPD patients with evidence of chronic compensated respiratory acidosis (PaCO2 \>45mmHg) decreases elevated PaCo2 and serum bicarbonate levels, improves pulmonary function, and improves quality of life. Little is known about whether patients initiated on NIV during an AECOPD and subsequently transitioned to long-term home NIV on discharge demonstrate reduced AECOPD rates, readmission rates, or differences in morbidity and mortality. The few existing randomized trials aimed at this patient population suffer from criticisms of lack of power, varying degrees of patient symptoms, conflicting results, and inconsistent approaches in NIV strategies. Nonetheless, this is an important population to address, as AECOPD frequently leads to accelerated loss of lung function (pre-AECOPD function not recovered), decreased quality of life (QOL), more frequent exacerbations, and higher overall mortality. If NIV can minimize the loss of lung function during the transition period following AECOPD, QOL, physical activity tolerance, readmission rates and overall mortality may improve.

Economic analyses of the use of NIV in patients with AECOPD transitioning from the inpatient to home setting are also sparse, but of high value as healthcare transitions toward bundled payments and penalties for readmissions. This pilot study seeks to better inform the literature on the role of NIV initiated during inpatient AECOPD and continued long-term following discharge home in patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure due to COPD. The investigators hypothesize that the use of NIV during acute inpatient treatment of AECOPD followed by continuation of NIV therapy long-term at home will improve admission free survival, improve quality of life, reduce 1-year exacerbation rates, and reduce 30d readmissions.

This is a prospective 1-year interventional pilot study that will occur at 4 Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals (Sacramento, Durham, Pittsburgh, and San Francisco).

The total enrollment goal across all sites is 50. Total study period expected includes an enrollment period of approximately 10-12 months and follow-up period of 12 months for a total study duration of approximately 2 years.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive Noninvasive Ventilation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

This is a feasibility trial intended to inform a larger clinical trial based on outcomes data collected.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Noninvasive Ventilation

Subjects will be introduced to NIV and educated on sleep disordered breathing. NIV will be initiated during hospitalization following resolution of acute respiratory failure. NIV settings will be based on inspiratory and expiratory positive airway pressures (IPAP, EPAP), rates, and tidal volumes tolerated during the acute phase of treatment. Initial settings will be set with goals of tolerance and acceptance of therapy. Minimum pressure difference between IPAP and EPAP settings will be 5cmH20. Volume assured pressure support mode with a target tidal volume (Vt) of 8ml/kg ideal body weight will be used. Final device settings and patient parameters will be documented after 10 minutes of acclimation to the device. Data from the device will be reviewed the following day. Tolerance, mask comfort, and acceptance of therapy will be assessed. Changes to settings, mask interface, or other comfort features will be performed at this initial reassessment period.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Noninvasive Ventilation

Intervention Type DEVICE

The use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) has been extensively evaluated in both patients with stable disease in the home setting and in AECOPD during hospitalization. It is widely accepted that NIV used during AECOPD in the inpatient setting reduces rates of endotracheal intubation, as well as length of ICU and hospital stay. Long-term use of NIV, particularly at higher pressures, in the home setting in COPD patients with evidence of chronic compensated respiratory acidosis (PaCO2 \>45mmHg) decreases elevated PaCo2 and serum bicarbonate levels, improves pulmonary function, and improves quality of life. Little is known about whether patients initiated on NIV during an AECOPD and subsequently transitioned to long-term home NIV on discharge demonstrate reduced AECOPD rates, readmission rates, or differences in morbidity and mortality.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Noninvasive Ventilation

The use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) has been extensively evaluated in both patients with stable disease in the home setting and in AECOPD during hospitalization. It is widely accepted that NIV used during AECOPD in the inpatient setting reduces rates of endotracheal intubation, as well as length of ICU and hospital stay. Long-term use of NIV, particularly at higher pressures, in the home setting in COPD patients with evidence of chronic compensated respiratory acidosis (PaCO2 \>45mmHg) decreases elevated PaCo2 and serum bicarbonate levels, improves pulmonary function, and improves quality of life. Little is known about whether patients initiated on NIV during an AECOPD and subsequently transitioned to long-term home NIV on discharge demonstrate reduced AECOPD rates, readmission rates, or differences in morbidity and mortality.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Admission for acute hypercapnic respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation or NIV
2. Resolution of acute respiratory failure reflected by normalization of pH and downgrade of clinical status to ward or floor status.
3. Severe COPD defined by GOLD stage 3 (FEV1 30-50%) or 4 (FEV1 \< 30%) OR GOLD C or D. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) done within 3 years preceding admission are acceptable to document an obstructive ventilatory defect and decrease diffusion capacity consistent with emphysema and COPD. If no PFTs are available, bedside spirometry will be performed to confirm COPD.
4. Chronic compensated respiratory acidosis based on PaCO2 \>52 adjusted for pH 7.40, on pre-admission laboratory values or after resolution of acute respiratory failure.
5. Able to consent without surrogate and complete all required study visits.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) \>15/h. Sleep testing done within the prior 3 years with no increase in body mass index (BMI) \>2kg/m2 or major change in cardiopulmonary conditions (new reduced ejection heart failure \[HFrEF\], atrial fibrillation \[AFib\], opioid use with morphine dose equivalent (MDDE) \>120mg, or cardiothoracic surgery for lung resection or coronary artery bypass grafting) will be accepted for AHI severity.
2. BMI\>35 kg/m2
3. Congestive heart failure (HFrEF, EF\< 45%)
4. Other cause of chronic respiratory failure: Obesity hypoventilation syndrome, spinal cord injury (cervical or thoracic) neuromuscular disease, diaphragmatic paralysis, chest wall restrictive ventilatory defect
5. Lack of stable housing, homelessness, or unreliable electricity source in home environment.
6. Use of NIV at home within past three months
7. Failure to tolerate NIV during initial hospitalization
8. Unable or unwilling to comply with the protocol
9. Age \<18 years
10. Inability to consent due to limited cognitive capacity
11. Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

ResMed

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kathleen Sarmiento

Staff Physician, Medicine Service

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kathleen Sarmiento, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

San Francisco VA Health Care System

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

San Francisco VA Health Care System

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Murphy PB, Rehal S, Arbane G, Bourke S, Calverley PMA, Crook AM, Dowson L, Duffy N, Gibson GJ, Hughes PD, Hurst JR, Lewis KE, Mukherjee R, Nickol A, Oscroft N, Patout M, Pepperell J, Smith I, Stradling JR, Wedzicha JA, Polkey MI, Elliott MW, Hart N. Effect of Home Noninvasive Ventilation With Oxygen Therapy vs Oxygen Therapy Alone on Hospital Readmission or Death After an Acute COPD Exacerbation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 Jun 6;317(21):2177-2186. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.4451.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28528348 (View on PubMed)

Budweiser S, Hitzl AP, Jorres RA, Heinemann F, Arzt M, Schroll S, Pfeifer M. Impact of noninvasive home ventilation on long-term survival in chronic hypercapnic COPD: a prospective observational study. Int J Clin Pract. 2007 Sep;61(9):1516-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01427.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17686094 (View on PubMed)

De Backer L, Vos W, Dieriks B, Daems D, Verhulst S, Vinchurkar S, Ides K, De Backer J, Germonpre P, De Backer W. The effects of long-term noninvasive ventilation in hypercapnic COPD patients: a randomized controlled pilot study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2011;6:615-24. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S22823. Epub 2011 Nov 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22135493 (View on PubMed)

Storre JH, Matrosovich E, Ekkernkamp E, Walker DJ, Schmoor C, Dreher M, Windisch W. Home mechanical ventilation for COPD: high-intensity versus target volume noninvasive ventilation. Respir Care. 2014 Sep;59(9):1389-97. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02941. Epub 2014 Jul 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25074944 (View on PubMed)

Oscroft NS, Chadwick R, Davies MG, Quinnell TG, Smith IE. Volume assured versus pressure preset non-invasive ventilation for compensated ventilatory failure in COPD. Respir Med. 2014 Oct;108(10):1508-15. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2014.07.010. Epub 2014 Jul 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25123526 (View on PubMed)

Mansfield D, Naughton MT. Effects of continuous positive airway pressure on lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and sleep disordered breathing. Respirology. 1999 Dec;4(4):365-70. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1843.1999.00206.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10612570 (View on PubMed)

Gunduz C, Basoglu OK, Tasbakan MS. Prevalence of overlap syndrome in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients without sleep apnea symptoms. Clin Respir J. 2018 Jan;12(1):105-112. doi: 10.1111/crj.12493. Epub 2016 Jun 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27148977 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

18-25750

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.