Bread Study: Comparison of the Tolerance of Spelt and Wheat Bread

NCT ID: NCT04401956

Last Updated: 2021-10-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-05-15

Study Completion Date

2021-09-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This project aims to verify the hypothesis that spelt products are more tolerable than bread wheat products in a target group of individuals with self-diagnosed wheat sensitivity. In addition, the influence of different manufacturing processes will be considered.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Wheat cereals are known to be capable of triggering wheat allergy and celiac disease. The prevalence of both diseases is about 1%. Recently, another clinical entity was described, the non-celiac wheat sensitivity (NCWS). The origin and mechanisms of NCWS are unclear at present, but the existence of this new disease entity has been proven by double-blind placebo-controlled challenge tests. Three different grain components have been proposed as triggers of NCWS, gluten, α-amylase trypsin inhibitors or fermentable carbohydrates (FODMAPs).

It is reported that individuals with self-diagnosed NCWS quite often tolerate spelt products much better, even though spelt shows a higher gluten content than bread wheat products. Therefore, the question arises whether this putative spelt tolerance can be confirmed on an objective basis and whether the underlying molecular mechanisms can be elucidated. So far, human study addressing such questions are lacking.

This project aims to verify the hypothesis that spelt products are more tolerable than bread wheat products in a target group of individuals with self-diagnosed wheat sensitivity. In addition, the influence of different manufacturing processes on wheat sensitivity will be revealed.

For this purpose, the trial involves individuals with self-diagnosed wheat sensitivity and spelt tolerance. Six different kinds of bread will be tested, including 4 wheat and spelt breads, each of them produced following a traditional or a conventional way. Aim of this part is to objective bread wheat and spelt intolerance in a defined population. To find out whether FODMAPs or gluten affect the tolerance of bread, two additional breads will be tested, a gluten-free bread with added gluten and a gluten-free bread with added FODMAPs.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Non-celiac Gluten Sensitivity Wheat Intolerance

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Human Nutrition NCWS Spelt Wheat Bread

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Gluten free bread with added gluten

Bread will be eaten by the participants for 4 consecutive days.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

bread

Intervention Type OTHER

Different types of bread

Gluten free bread with added FODMAPs

Bread will be eaten by the participants for 4 consecutive days.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

bread

Intervention Type OTHER

Different types of bread

Traditional manufactured wheat bread

Bread will be eaten by the participants for 4 consecutive days.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

bread

Intervention Type OTHER

Different types of bread

Traditional manufactured spelt bread

Bread will be eaten by the participants for 4 consecutive days.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

bread

Intervention Type OTHER

Different types of bread

Conventional manufactured wheat bread

Bread will be eaten by the participants for 4 consecutive days.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

bread

Intervention Type OTHER

Different types of bread

Conventional manufactured spelt bread

Bread will be eaten by the participants for 4 consecutive days.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

bread

Intervention Type OTHER

Different types of bread

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

bread

Different types of bread

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥18 ≤70 years
* Signed declaration of consent
* Willingness to adhere to the prescribed diet for the duration of the study
* Subjective bread wheat intolerance
* No known spelled intolerance
* No acute or chronic gastrointestinal diseases (e.g. celiac disease / wheat allergy)
* No participation in another clinical trial (current or within the past 30 days)
* Gluten-containing diet at least 6 weeks before the start of the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Taking intestinal therapeutics, antibiotics, immunosuppressants or similar
* Pregnancy / lactation
* Relevant violations of the nutritional protocol
* Occurrence of relevant diseases (possibly individual decision)
* Revocation of consent
* Accommodation in a clinic or similar facility based on an official or judicial order
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Hohenheim

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Stephan C. Bischoff, MD, Professor

Professor Dr. med.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Hohenheim

Stuttgart, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ErnMed-Brot

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id