Bread Study: Comparison of the Tolerance of Spelt and Wheat Bread
NCT ID: NCT04401956
Last Updated: 2021-10-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
24 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-05-15
2021-09-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
It is reported that individuals with self-diagnosed NCWS quite often tolerate spelt products much better, even though spelt shows a higher gluten content than bread wheat products. Therefore, the question arises whether this putative spelt tolerance can be confirmed on an objective basis and whether the underlying molecular mechanisms can be elucidated. So far, human study addressing such questions are lacking.
This project aims to verify the hypothesis that spelt products are more tolerable than bread wheat products in a target group of individuals with self-diagnosed wheat sensitivity. In addition, the influence of different manufacturing processes on wheat sensitivity will be revealed.
For this purpose, the trial involves individuals with self-diagnosed wheat sensitivity and spelt tolerance. Six different kinds of bread will be tested, including 4 wheat and spelt breads, each of them produced following a traditional or a conventional way. Aim of this part is to objective bread wheat and spelt intolerance in a defined population. To find out whether FODMAPs or gluten affect the tolerance of bread, two additional breads will be tested, a gluten-free bread with added gluten and a gluten-free bread with added FODMAPs.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Gluten free bread with added gluten
Bread will be eaten by the participants for 4 consecutive days.
bread
Different types of bread
Gluten free bread with added FODMAPs
Bread will be eaten by the participants for 4 consecutive days.
bread
Different types of bread
Traditional manufactured wheat bread
Bread will be eaten by the participants for 4 consecutive days.
bread
Different types of bread
Traditional manufactured spelt bread
Bread will be eaten by the participants for 4 consecutive days.
bread
Different types of bread
Conventional manufactured wheat bread
Bread will be eaten by the participants for 4 consecutive days.
bread
Different types of bread
Conventional manufactured spelt bread
Bread will be eaten by the participants for 4 consecutive days.
bread
Different types of bread
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
bread
Different types of bread
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Signed declaration of consent
* Willingness to adhere to the prescribed diet for the duration of the study
* Subjective bread wheat intolerance
* No known spelled intolerance
* No acute or chronic gastrointestinal diseases (e.g. celiac disease / wheat allergy)
* No participation in another clinical trial (current or within the past 30 days)
* Gluten-containing diet at least 6 weeks before the start of the study
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnancy / lactation
* Relevant violations of the nutritional protocol
* Occurrence of relevant diseases (possibly individual decision)
* Revocation of consent
* Accommodation in a clinic or similar facility based on an official or judicial order
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Hohenheim
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Stephan C. Bischoff, MD, Professor
Professor Dr. med.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Hohenheim
Stuttgart, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ErnMed-Brot
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id