Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Pediatric Patients With Active Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) (NCT NCT04394351)
NCT ID: NCT04394351
Last Updated: 2025-10-27
Results Overview
Peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count was measured from esophageal biopsies. A total of at least 9 mucosal pinch biopsies were collected from 3 esophageal regions: 3 proximal, 3 mid, and 3 distal. The peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count at each visit was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils in the most inflamed hpfs across the 3 regions. If the quantity of eosinophils was missing for 1 or 2 esophageal regions, the peak eosinophil count was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils from the region(s) where eosinophil quantities were available.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
102 participants
At Week 16
2025-10-27
Participant Flow
This study consisted of 3 parts: Part A (double-blind 16-week treatment period), Part B (36-week extended active treatment period) and Part C (open-label extension period of up to 108 weeks).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo (Placebo)
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part B: Placebo to Dupilumab Low Dose
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo in Part A and received lower exposure dupilumab in Part B. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W
|
Part B: Placebo to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo in Part A and received higher exposure dupilumab in Part B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part B: Dupilumab Low Dose to Dupilumab Low Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part C: Dupilumab
Participants who completed Part A and B were eligible to enroll in Part C and receive Dupilumab extended active treatment
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A (16 Weeks)
STARTED
|
34
|
31
|
37
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part A (16 Weeks)
COMPLETED
|
33
|
29
|
37
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part A (16 Weeks)
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part B (36 Weeks)
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
14
|
18
|
29
|
37
|
0
|
|
Part B (36 Weeks)
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
14
|
18
|
29
|
36
|
0
|
|
Part B (36 Weeks)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Part C: (Up to Wk108+12Wk Follow-up)
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
61
|
|
Part C: (Up to Wk108+12Wk Follow-up)
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
8
|
|
Part C: (Up to Wk108+12Wk Follow-up)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
53
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo (Placebo)
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part B: Placebo to Dupilumab Low Dose
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo in Part A and received lower exposure dupilumab in Part B. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W
|
Part B: Placebo to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo in Part A and received higher exposure dupilumab in Part B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part B: Dupilumab Low Dose to Dupilumab Low Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part C: Dupilumab
Participants who completed Part A and B were eligible to enroll in Part C and receive Dupilumab extended active treatment
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A (16 Weeks)
Adverse Event
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part A (16 Weeks)
Physician Decision
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part A (16 Weeks)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part B (36 Weeks)
Adverse Event
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Part C: (Up to Wk108+12Wk Follow-up)
Physician Decision
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
|
Part C: (Up to Wk108+12Wk Follow-up)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
16
|
|
Part C: (Up to Wk108+12Wk Follow-up)
Protocol Violation
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
|
Part C: (Up to Wk108+12Wk Follow-up)
Other
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
32
|
Baseline Characteristics
Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Pediatric Patients With Active Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=34 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=31 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=37 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Total
n=102 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
7.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.03 • n=5 Participants
|
7.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.07 • n=7 Participants
|
6.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.11 • n=5 Participants
|
7.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.05 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
78 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
92 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
84 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on Part A FAS which included all randomized participants in Part A.
Peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count was measured from esophageal biopsies. A total of at least 9 mucosal pinch biopsies were collected from 3 esophageal regions: 3 proximal, 3 mid, and 3 distal. The peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count at each visit was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils in the most inflamed hpfs across the 3 regions. If the quantity of eosinophils was missing for 1 or 2 esophageal regions, the peak eosinophil count was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils from the region(s) where eosinophil quantities were available.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=34 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=37 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=31 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Percentage of Participants Achieving Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count of Less Than or Equal to (≤) 6 Eosinophils/High Power Field (Eos/Hpf) at Week 16
|
2.9 percentage of participants
Interval 0.07 to 15.33
|
67.6 percentage of participants
Interval 50.21 to 81.99
|
58.1 percentage of participants
Interval 39.08 to 75.45
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on Part A FAS which included all randomized participants in Part A.
Peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count was measured from esophageal biopsies. A total of at least 9 mucosal pinch biopsies were collected from 3 esophageal regions: 3 proximal, 3 mid, and 3 distal. The peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count at each visit was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils in the most inflamed hpfs across the 3 regions. If the quantity of eosinophils was missing for 1 or 2 esophageal regions, the peak eosinophil count was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils from the region(s) where eosinophil quantities were available.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=34 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=37 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=31 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Percentage of Participants Achieving Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count of <15 Eosinophils/High Power Field at Week 16
|
2.9 percentage of participants
Interval 0.07 to 15.33
|
83.8 percentage of participants
Interval 67.99 to 93.81
|
67.7 percentage of participants
Interval 48.63 to 83.32
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on Part A FAS which included all randomized participants in Part A.
Peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count was measured from esophageal biopsies. A total of at least 9 mucosal pinch biopsies were collected from 3 esophageal regions: 3 proximal, 3 mid, and 3 distal. The peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count at each visit was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils in the most inflamed hpfs across the 3 regions. If the quantity of eosinophils was missing for 1 or 2 esophageal regions, the peak eosinophil count was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils from the region(s) where eosinophil quantities were available. Least squared (LS) mean and standard error (SE) from analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with Baseline measurement as covariate and the treatment, baseline weight group strata as fixed factors.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=34 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=37 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=31 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Percent Change From Baseline in Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count at Week 16
|
20.98 percent change
Standard Error 12.23
|
-86.09 percent change
Standard Error 11.84
|
-77.93 percent change
Standard Error 12.89
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on Part A FAS which included all randomized participants in Part A.
EoE-HSS is a validated histologic scoring system that measures other histological abnormalities in addition to density of eosinophilic infiltration. Severity (grade) and extent (stage) of abnormalities will be scored using a 4-point scale (0 normal; 3 maximum change). Higher total score indicated greater severity \& extent of histological abnormalities. For each of 3 esophageal regions (proximal, mid, and distal), the ratio of the sum of assigned score for each evaluated feature divided by maximum possible score (maximum value is 24) was calculated. The mean grade scores summed over the 3 regions was the final score used in primary analysis, the mean grade score ranged from 0 to 3, with higher score indicating more severe.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=34 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=37 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=31 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Change From Baseline in Mean Eosinophilic Esophagitis Histology Scoring System (EoE-HSS) Grade Score at Week 16
|
0.023 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0498
|
-0.879 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0481
|
-0.757 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0524
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on Part A FAS which included all randomized participants in Part A.
EoE-HSS is a validated histologic scoring system that measures other histological abnormalities in addition to density of eosinophilic infiltration. Severity (grade) and extent (stage) of abnormalities will be scored using a 4-point scale (0 normal; 3 maximum change). Higher total score indicated greater severity \& extent of histological abnormalities. For each of 3 esophageal regions (proximal, mid, and distal), the ratio of the sum of assigned score for each evaluated feature divided by maximum possible score (maximum value is 24) was calculated. The mean stage scores summed over the 3 regions was the final score used in primary analysis, the mean stage score ranged from 0 to 3, with higher score indicating more severe.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=34 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=37 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=31 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Change From Baseline in Mean Eosinophilic Esophagitis Histology Scoring System (EoE-HSS) Stage Score at Week 16
|
0.048 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0482
|
-0.835 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0466
|
-0.721 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0507
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on Part A FAS which included all randomized participants in Part A. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
A Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) is a way to generate a single numerical value to represent a complex gene expression signature. Changes in NES score represented the overall changes in the expression of that molecular phenotype. The NESs calculated for T2INF reflect the expression at Week 16 relative to Baseline of the pre-specified gene set as a way to evaluate normalization of type 2 inflammation with treatment. For each subject, an NES of 0 indicates no change from baseline, a negative score shows a reduction in disease score (more like normal) and positive score shows worsening (more active disease). NES does not have a minimum/maximum score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=21 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=24 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=15 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) for the Relative Change From Baseline in the Type 2 Inflammation Signature (T2INF) at Week 16
|
0.34 Score on a scale
Interval -1.84 to 1.65
|
-1.895 Score on a scale
Interval -2.03 to -1.61
|
-1.930 Score on a scale
Interval -2.0 to -1.39
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on Part A FAS which included all randomized participants in Part A. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
A Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) is a way to generate a single numerical value to represent a complex gene expression signature. Changes in NES score represented the overall changes in the expression of that molecular phenotype. The NESs calculated for the EDP reflect the expression at Week 16 relative to Baseline of a gene set that is differentially expressed between esophageal biopsies from EoE participants compared to healthy controls as a way to evaluate normalization of the molecular pathology. For each subject, an NES of 0 indicates no change from baseline, a negative score shows a reduction in disease score (more like normal) and positive score shows worsening (more active disease). NES does not have minimum/maximum score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=21 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=24 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=15 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) for the Relative Change From Baseline in the Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) Diagnostic Panel (EDP) at Week 16
|
0.180 Score on a scale
Interval -2.53 to 2.39
|
-2.630 Score on a scale
Interval -2.85 to -2.25
|
-2.710 Score on a scale
Interval -2.84 to -0.8
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on Part A FAS which included all randomized participants in Part A.
The EoE-EREFS is a validated endoscopic scoring system for inflammatory and remodeling features of EoE including edema, rings, exudates, furrows, and stricture. The score was assessed in the proximal and distal esophageal regions with each region scored from 0 to 9 with total scores ranging from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate worse endoscopic inflammatory and remodeling findings.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=34 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=37 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=31 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Absolute Change From Baseline in EoE Endoscopic Reference Total Score (EoE-EREFS) at Week 16
|
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.45
|
-3.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.42
|
-3.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.48
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on Part A FAS which included all randomized participants in Part A.
PESQ-C is a novel, observer-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by caregivers of all pediatric EoE participants in the study. PESQ-C measures the signs of EoE observed by the caregiver, including stomach pain, heartburn, acid reflux, regurgitation, vomiting, food refusal, and trouble swallowing food. Data from a 14-day period preceding the baseline visit and a 14-day period preceding week 16 will be used to calculate the proportion of days with 1 or more EoE symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=34 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=37 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=31 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Days With 1 or More EoE Signs as Measured by Pediatric EoE Sign/Symptom Questionnaire - Caregiver Version (PESQ-C) at Week 16 (for Participants Aged ≥1 to <12 Years)
|
-0.17 proportion of days
Standard Error 0.054
|
-0.28 proportion of days
Standard Error 0.052
|
-0.18 proportion of days
Standard Error 0.060
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on Part A FAS which included all randomized participants in Part A.
PESQ-C is a novel, observer-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by caregivers of all pediatric EoE participants in the study. The PESQ-C measures the signs of EoE observed by the caregiver, including stomach pain, heartburn, acid reflux, regurgitation, vomiting, food refusal, and trouble swallowing food. WOCF approach was used for imputing the missing data due to rescue treatment/AE/lack of efficacy, and the multiple imputations approach was used for the missing data due to other reasons. LS mean SE derived from ANCOVA model.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=34 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=37 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=31 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Number of Sign-free Days During the 14-day Period Preceding Week 16 as Measured by the PESQ-C (for Participants Aged ≥1 to <12 Years)
|
8.93 sign-free days
Standard Error 0.756
|
10.38 sign-free days
Standard Error 0.735
|
8.93 sign-free days
Standard Error 0.840
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on Part A FAS which included all randomized participants in Part A.
PESQ-C is a novel, observer-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by caregivers of all pediatric EoE participants in the study. The PESQ-C measured the occurrence of signs of EoE and was completed once daily via an electronic diary. Data from a 14-day period preceding the baseline visit and a 14-day period preceding week 16 will be used to calculate the total time segments within a day (night, morning, afternoon, evening) with 1 or more EoE symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=34 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=37 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=31 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Total Segments Within a Day (Night, Morning, Afternoon, Evening) With 1 or More EoE Signs as Measured by the PESQ-C at Week 16
|
-0.11 proportion of segments
Standard Error 0.032
|
-0.16 proportion of segments
Standard Error 0.031
|
-0.09 proportion of segments
Standard Error 0.036
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on Part A FAS which included all randomized participants in Part A. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
The PESQ-P was a participant-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by participants ≥8 to \<12 years of age. The PESQ-P measured occurrence of signs of EoE and was completed once daily via an electronic diary. Data from a 14-day period preceding the baseline visit and a 14-day period preceding week 16 will be used to calculate the proportion of days with 1 or more EoE symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=17 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=19 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Days With 1 or More EoE Signs by Pediatric EoE Sign/Symptom Questionnaire - Participant Version (PESQ-P) (for Participants Aged ≥8 to <12 Years) at Week 16
|
-0.26 proportion of days
Standard Error 0.068
|
-0.13 proportion of days
Standard Error 0.077
|
-0.16 proportion of days
Standard Error 0.067
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on Part A FAS which included all randomized participants in Part A. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
The PESQ-P was a participant-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by EoE participants ≥8 to \<12 years of age. The PESQ-P measures the signs of EoE, including stomach pain, heartburn, acid reflux, regurgitation, vomiting, food refusal, and trouble swallowing food. The PESQ-P score was calculated based on the daily responses over a 14-day period (i.e., the 14 days prior to the baseline visit and the week 16 visit). The score ranges from 0 to 1. WOCF approach was used for imputing the missing data due to rescue treatment/AE/lack of efficacy, and the multiple imputations approach was used for the missing data due to other reasons. LS Mean SE from ANCOVA.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=17 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=19 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Number of Symptom-free Days During the 14-day Period Preceding Week 16 as Measured by the PESQ-P (for Participants Aged ≥8 to <12 Years)
|
10.49 sign-free days
Standard Error 0.953
|
8.69 sign-free days
Standard Error 1.081
|
9.13 sign-free days
Standard Error 0.936
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on Part A FAS which included all randomized participants in Part A. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
The PESQ-P was a participant-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by EoE participants ≥8 to \<12 years of age. The PESQ-P measured the occurrence of signs of EoE and was completed once daily via an electronic diary. Data from a 14-day period preceding the baseline visit and a 14-day period preceding week 16 will be used to calculate the total time segments within a day (night, morning, afternoon, evening) with 1 or more EoE symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=17 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=19 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Total Segments Within a Day (Night, Morning, Afternoon, Evening) With 1 or More EoE Signs as Measured by the PESQ-P (for Participants Aged ≥8 to <12 Years) at Week 16
|
-0.15 proportion of segments
Standard Error 0.040
|
-0.08 proportion of segments
Standard Error 0.045
|
-0.08 proportion of segments
Standard Error 0.039
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on Part A FAS which included all randomized participants in Part A.
The PEESSv2.0-C is a caregiver-reported outcome measure that assesses the frequency and severity of EoE symptoms among pediatric participants. The PEESSv2.0-C consists of 20 items and has a one-month recall period. Each item had a 0-4 scale, which was transformed to 0-100 as follows: 0 = 0, 1 = 25, 2 = 50, 3 = 75, 4 = 100. The mean total PEESSv2.0 score was computed as the sum of all the item scores over the number of items answered. The total PEESSv2.0-C score ranges from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate greater symptom burden among pediatric EoE participants. Values after first rescue treatment use were set to missing (censoring). WOCF approach was used for imputing the missing data due to rescue treatment/AE/lack of efficacy, and the MI approach was used for the missing data due to other reasons. LS mean SE from ANCOVA model.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=34 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=37 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=31 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Change From Baseline in Total Score as Measured by the Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis Symptom Score (PEESS) Version 2.0 Caregiver Version (PEESSv2.0-C) at Week 16
|
-11.83 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.909
|
-19.86 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.577
|
-10.10 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.785
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and 16Population: Analysis was performed on pharmacokinetic analysis set (PKAS) that includes all participants who received any study drug and had at least 1 non-missing result following the first dose of study drug. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure and 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category.
Concentration of functional dupilumab in serum at Baseline, Week 4 and 16 was reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=36 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=28 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Concentration of Functional Dupilumab in Serum at Baseline, Week 4 and 16
Week 16
|
163 milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Standard Deviation 60.8
|
86.0 milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Standard Deviation 29.2
|
—
|
—
|
|
Part A: Concentration of Functional Dupilumab in Serum at Baseline, Week 4 and 16
Baseline
|
0 milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Standard Deviation 0
|
—
|
—
|
|
Part A: Concentration of Functional Dupilumab in Serum at Baseline, Week 4 and 16
Week 4
|
75.7 milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Standard Deviation 25.7
|
40.6 milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Standard Deviation 11.2
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Week 52Population: Analysis was performed on Part B safety analysis set (SAF) which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of Part B study drug. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count was measured from esophageal biopsies. A total of at least 9 mucosal pinch biopsies were collected from 3 esophageal regions: 3 proximal, 3 mid, and 3 distal. The peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count at each visit was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils in the most inflamed hpfs across the 3 regions. If the quantity of eosinophils was missing for 1 or 2 esophageal regions, the peak eosinophil count was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils from the region(s) where eosinophil quantities were available.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=14 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=17 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=29 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
n=35 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part B: Percentage of Participants Achieving Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count of ≤6 Eosinophils/High Power Field at Week 52
|
92.9 percentage of participants
|
52.9 percentage of participants
|
65.5 percentage of participants
|
62.9 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Week 52Population: Analysis was performed on Part B SAF which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of Part B study drug. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count was measured from esophageal biopsies. A total of at least 9 mucosal pinch biopsies were collected from 3 esophageal regions: 3 proximal, 3 mid, and 3 distal. The peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count at each visit was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils in the most inflamed hpfs across the 3 regions. If the quantity of eosinophils was missing for 1 or 2 esophageal regions, the peak eosinophil count was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils from the region(s) where eosinophil quantities were available.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=14 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=17 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=29 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
n=35 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part B: Percentage of Participants Achieving Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count of <15 Eosinophils/High Power Field at Week 52
|
92.9 percentage of participants
|
64.7 percentage of participants
|
69.0 percentage of participants
|
85.7 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52Population: Analysis was performed on Part B SAF which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of Part B study drug. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count was measured from esophageal biopsies. A total of at least 9 mucosal pinch biopsies were collected from 3 esophageal regions: 3 proximal, 3 mid, and 3 distal. The peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count at each visit was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils in the most inflamed hpfs across the 3 regions. If the quantity of eosinophils was missing for 1 or 2 esophageal regions, the peak eosinophil count was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils from the region(s) where eosinophil quantities were available.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=14 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=17 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=29 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
n=35 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part B: Percent Change From Baseline in Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count at Week 52
|
-92.72 percent change
Standard Deviation 19.229
|
-76.83 percent change
Standard Deviation 41.228
|
-85.41 percent change
Standard Deviation 22.851
|
-90.97 percent change
Standard Deviation 14.482
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52Population: Analysis was performed on Part B SAF which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of Part B study drug. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
EoE-HSS is a validated histologic scoring system that measures other histological abnormalities in addition to density of eosinophilic infiltration. Severity (grade) and extent (stage) of abnormalities will be scored using a 4-point scale (0 normal; 3 maximum change). Higher total score indicated greater severity \& extent of histological abnormalities. For each of 3 esophageal regions (proximal, mid, and distal), the ratio of the sum of assigned score for each evaluated feature divided by maximum possible score (maximum value is 24) was calculated. The mean grade scores summed over the 3 regions was the final score used in primary analysis, the mean grade score ranged from 0 to 3, with higher score indicating more severe.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=14 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=17 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=29 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
n=35 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part B: Change From Baseline in Mean Eosinophilic Esophagitis Histology Scoring System (EoE-HSS) Grade Score at Week 52
|
-0.804 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.3099
|
-0.885 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2962
|
-0.773 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.3374
|
-0.967 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.3920
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52Population: Analysis was performed on Part B SAF which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of Part B study drug. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
EoE-HSS is a validated histologic scoring system that measures other histological abnormalities in addition to density of eosinophilic infiltration. Severity (grade) and extent (stage) of abnormalities will be scored using a 4-point scale (0 normal; 3 maximum change). Higher total score indicated greater severity \& extent of histological abnormalities. For each of 3 esophageal regions (proximal, mid, and distal), the ratio of the sum of assigned score for each evaluated feature divided by maximum possible score (maximum value is 24) was calculated. The mean stage scores summed over the 3 regions was the final score used in primary analysis, the mean stage score ranged from 0 to 3, with higher score indicating more severe.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=14 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=17 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=29 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
n=35 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part B: Change From Baseline in Mean Eosinophilic Esophagitis Histology Scoring System (EoE-HSS) Stage Score at Week 52
|
-0.767 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.3114
|
-0.855 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.3485
|
-0.784 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.3183
|
-0.892 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.3181
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52Population: Analysis was performed on Part B SAF which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of Part B study drug. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
The EoE-EREFS is a validated endoscopic scoring system for inflammatory and remodeling features of EoE including edema, rings, exudates, furrows, and stricture. The score was assessed in the proximal and distal esophageal regions with each region scored from 0 to 9 with total scores possibly ranging from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate worse endoscopic inflammatory and remodeling findings.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=14 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=22 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
n=30 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part B: Absolute Change From Baseline in EoE Endoscopic Reference Total Score (EoE-EREFS) at Week 52
|
-5.82 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.722
|
-3.64 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.342
|
-4.50 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.203
|
-4.77 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.081
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52Population: Analysis was performed on Part B SAF which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of Part B study drug. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
PESQ-C is a novel, observer-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by caregivers of all pediatric EoE participants in the study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=6 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=9 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=18 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
n=27 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part B: Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Days With 1 or More EoE Signs Measured by Pediatric EoE Sign/Symptom Questionnaire - Caregiver Version (PESQ-C) at Week 52
|
-0.20 proportion of days
Standard Deviation 0.373
|
-0.47 proportion of days
Standard Deviation 0.395
|
-0.49 proportion of days
Standard Deviation 0.339
|
-0.30 proportion of days
Standard Deviation 0.299
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 52Population: Analysis was performed on Part B SAF which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of Part B study drug. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
PESQ-C is a novel, observer-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by caregivers of all pediatric EoE participants in the study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=6 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=9 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=18 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
n=27 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part B: Number of Sign-free Days During the 14-day Period Preceding Week 52 as Measured by the PESQ-C (for Participants Aged ≥1 to <12 Years)
|
11.58 sign-free days
Standard Deviation 3.968
|
12.10 sign-free days
Standard Deviation 4.652
|
11.35 sign-free days
Standard Deviation 3.947
|
12.13 sign-free days
Standard Deviation 4.053
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52Population: Analysis was performed on Part B SAF which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of Part B study drug. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
PESQ-C is a novel, observer-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by caregivers of all pediatric EoE participants in the study. The PESQ-C measured the occurrence of signs of EoE and was completed once daily via an electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=6 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=9 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=18 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
n=27 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part B: Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Total Segments Within a Day (Night, Morning, Afternoon, Evening) With 1 or More EoE Signs as Measured by the PESQ-C at Week 52
|
-0.03 proportion of segments
Standard Deviation 0.249
|
-0.24 proportion of segments
Standard Deviation 0.221
|
-0.26 proportion of segments
Standard Deviation 0.250
|
-0.17 proportion of segments
Standard Deviation 0.187
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52Population: Analysis was performed on Part B SAF which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of Part B study drug. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
The PESQ-P was a participant-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by participants ≥8 to \<12 years of age. The PESQ-P measured occurrence of signs of EoE and was completed once daily via an electronic diary. Data from a 14-day period preceding the baseline visit and a 14-day period preceding week 16 will be used to calculate the proportion of days with 1 or more EoE symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=3 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=6 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=11 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
n=12 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part B: Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Days With 1 or More EoE Signs by Pediatric EoE Sign/Symptom Questionnaire - Participant Version (PESQ-P) (for Participants Aged ≥8 to <12 Years) at Week 52
|
-0.33 proportion of days
Standard Deviation 0.322
|
-0.43 proportion of days
Standard Deviation 0.369
|
-0.42 proportion of days
Standard Deviation 0.400
|
-0.26 proportion of days
Standard Deviation 0.396
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 52Population: Analysis was performed on Part B SAF which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of Part B study drug. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
The PESQ-P was a participant-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by participants ≥8 to \<12 years of age. The PESQ-P measures the signs of EoE, including stomach pain, heartburn, acid reflux, regurgitation, vomiting, food refusal, and trouble swallowing food.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=3 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=6 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=11 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
n=12 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part B: Number of Symptom-free Days During the 14-day Period Preceding Week 52 as Measured by the PESQ-P (for Participants Aged ≥8 to <12 Years)
|
9.33 sign-free days
Standard Deviation 8.083
|
11.67 sign-free days
Standard Deviation 5.715
|
10.64 sign-free days
Standard Deviation 4.943
|
13.63 sign-free days
Standard Deviation 0.874
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52Population: Analysis was performed on Part B SAF which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of Part B study drug. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
The PESQ-P was a participant-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by EoE participants ≥8 to \<12 years of age. The PESQ-P measured the occurrence of signs of EoE and was completed once daily via an electronic diary. Data from a 14-day period preceding the baseline visit and a 14-day period preceding week 16 will be used to calculate the total time segments within a day (night, morning, afternoon, evening) with 1 or more EoE symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=3 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=6 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=11 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
n=12 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part B: Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Total Segments Within a Day (Night, Morning, Afternoon, Evening) With 1 or More EoE Signs as Measured by the PESQ-P (for Participants Aged ≥8 to <12 Years) at Week 52
|
-0.17 proportion of segments
Standard Deviation 0.164
|
-0.26 proportion of segments
Standard Deviation 0.269
|
-0.21 proportion of segments
Standard Deviation 0.293
|
-0.16 proportion of segments
Standard Deviation 0.284
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52Population: Analysis was performed on Part B SAF which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of Part B study drug. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
A Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) is a way to generate a single numerical value to represent a complex gene expression signature. Changes in NES score represented the overall changes in the expression of that molecular phenotype. The NESs calculated for the EDP reflect the expression at post-baseline relative to Baseline of a gene set that is differentially expressed between esophageal biopsies from EoE participants compared to healthy controls as a way to evaluate normalization of the molecular pathology. For each subject, an NES of 0 indicates no change from baseline, a negative score shows a reduction in disease score (more like normal) and positive score shows worsening (more active disease). NES does not have minimum/maximum score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=8 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=12 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=16 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
n=21 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part B: Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) for the Relative Change From Baseline in the EoE Diagnostic Panel (EDP) at Week 52
|
-2.715 Score on a scale
Interval -2.755 to -2.505
|
-2.615 Score on a scale
Interval -2.81 to -2.43
|
-2.625 Score on a scale
Interval -2.775 to -2.55
|
-2.670 Score on a scale
Interval -2.71 to -2.53
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52Population: Analysis was performed on Part B SAF which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of Part B study drug. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
A Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) is a way to generate a single numerical value to represent a complex gene expression signature. Changes in NES score represented the overall changes in the expression of that molecular phenotype. The NESs calculated for T2INF reflect the expression at post-baseline relative to Baseline of the pre-specified gene set as a way to evaluate normalization of type 2 inflammation with treatment. For each subject, an NES of 0 indicates no change from baseline, a negative score shows a reduction in disease score (more like normal) and positive score shows worsening (more active disease). NES does not have minimum/maximum score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=8 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=12 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=16 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
n=21 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part B: Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) for the Relative Change From Baseline in the Type 2 Inflammation Signature (T2INF) at Week 52
|
-1.960 Score on a scale
Interval -2.0 to -1.895
|
-1.965 Score on a scale
Interval -1.995 to -1.765
|
-1.920 Score on a scale
Interval -1.965 to -1.865
|
-1.920 Score on a scale
Interval -1.93 to -1.85
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52Population: Analysis was performed on Part B SAF which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of Part B study drug. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Body weight for age percentile was calculated based on the growth charts from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for ages 0 to 20 years (for ages 2 to \<12 years) and World Health Organization (WHO) growth charts for ages 0 to \<2 years (for ages 1 to \<2 years). These charts included a set of smoothed percentiles along with CDC LMS (Lambda-Mu-Sigma) parameters to allow the calculation of percentiles.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=14 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=16 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=29 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
n=35 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part B: Change From Baseline in Body Weight for Age Percentile at Week 52
|
-0.02 Percentile
Standard Deviation 13.893
|
5.48 Percentile
Standard Deviation 12.644
|
4.75 Percentile
Standard Deviation 11.968
|
5.96 Percentile
Standard Deviation 11.519
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52Population: Analysis was performed on Part B SAF which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of Part B study drug. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
BMI for age z-score indicates how much higher or lower a participant's BMI for age is relative to a reference growth chart (based on the growth charts from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention \[CDC\] for ages 0 to 20 years \[for ages 2 to \<12 years\]). A z-score of "0" represents the population mean. An increase in the mean change in BMI for age z-score (ie, increase in the standard deviation \[SD\] from the reference growth chart) indicates an increase in BMI for age relative to the reference.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=14 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=15 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=27 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
n=32 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part B: Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) for Age Z-score for Participants ≥2 Years of Age at Week 52
|
-0.0206 z-score
Standard Deviation 0.54625
|
0.0687 z-score
Standard Deviation 0.47605
|
-0.0549 z-score
Standard Deviation 0.88582
|
0.0987 z-score
Standard Deviation 0.72329
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52Population: Analysis was performed on Part B SAF which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of Part B study drug. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Weight for age z-score indicates how much higher or lower a participant's weight for age is relative to a reference growth chart (based on the growth charts from CDC for ages 0 to 20 years \[for ages 2 to \<12 years\] and World Health Organization (WHO) growth charts for ages 0 to \<2 years \[for ages 1 to \<2 years\]). A z-score of "0" represents the population mean. An increase in the mean change in weight for age z-score (increase in the SD from the reference growth chart) indicates an increase in weight for age relative to the reference.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=14 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=16 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=29 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
n=35 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part B: Change From Baseline in Weight for Age Z-score at Week 52
|
0.0640 z-score
Standard Deviation 0.46264
|
0.2016 z-score
Standard Deviation 0.39446
|
0.1445 z-score
Standard Deviation 0.40310
|
0.2049 z-score
Standard Deviation 0.40305
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52Population: Analysis was performed on Part B SAF which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of Part B study drug. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Weight for height z-score indicates how much higher or lower a participant's weight for height is relative to a reference growth chart (based on the growth charts from CDC for ages 0 to 20 years \[for ages 2 to \<12 years\] and WHO growth charts for ages 0 to \<2 years \[for ages 1 to \<2 years\]). A z-score of "0" represents the population mean. An increase in the mean change in weight for height z-score (increase in the SD from the reference growth chart) indicates an increase in weight for height relative to the reference.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=2 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=3 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=9 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
n=12 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part B: Change From Baseline in Body Weight From Height Z-score at Week 52
|
0.0962 z-score
Standard Deviation 0.48902
|
-0.0100 z-score
Standard Deviation 0.51706
|
-0.2700 z-score
Standard Deviation 1.04895
|
-0.0151 z-score
Standard Deviation 0.67968
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 32 and 52Population: Analysis was performed on PKAS. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure and 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category.
Concentration of functional dupilumab in serum at Week 32 and 52 was reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=14 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=18 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=29 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
n=37 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part B: Concentration of Functional Dupilumab in Serum at Week 32 and 52
Week 32
|
105 mg/L
Standard Deviation 49.8
|
142 mg/L
Standard Deviation 48.5
|
99.0 mg/L
Standard Deviation 42.8
|
186 mg/L
Standard Deviation 59.5
|
|
Part B: Concentration of Functional Dupilumab in Serum at Week 32 and 52
Week 52
|
101 mg/L
Standard Deviation 44.3
|
149 mg/L
Standard Deviation 59.1
|
83.0 mg/L
Standard Deviation 33.2
|
179 mg/L
Standard Deviation 75.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Week 16 in Part APopulation: Analysis was performed on Part A SAF which included all randomized patients who received any Part A study drug.
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation patient administered with a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A serious AE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, life-threatening, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or a medically important event. The term TEAE is defined as AEs starting or worsening after the first intake of the study drug. TEAEs include both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. An AESI was defined as one of scientific and medical concern specific to the Sponsor's product or program, for which ongoing monitoring and rapid communication by the Investigator to the Sponsor was appropriate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=34 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=37 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=30 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) and TEAEs Leading to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug
Participants with any TEAE
|
31 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
—
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) and TEAEs Leading to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug
Participants with any Serious TEAE
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) and TEAEs Leading to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug
Participants with any AESI
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) and TEAEs Leading to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug
Participants with any TEAE leading to permanent discontinuation of study drug
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 16 up to Week 52 in Part BPopulation: Analysis was performed on Part B SAF which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of Part B study drug.
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation patient administered with a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A serious AE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, life-threatening, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or a medically important event. The term TEAE is defined as AEs starting or worsening after the first intake of the study drug. TEAEs include both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. An AESI was defined as one of scientific and medical concern specific to the Sponsor's product or program, for which ongoing monitoring and rapid communication by the Investigator to the Sponsor was appropriate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=14 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=18 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=29 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
n=37 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) and TEAEs Leading to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug
Participants with any TEAE
|
14 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
28 Participants
|
34 Participants
|
|
Part B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) and TEAEs Leading to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug
Participants with any Serious TEAE
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Part B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) and TEAEs Leading to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug
Participants with any AESI
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Part B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) and TEAEs Leading to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug
Participants with any TEAE leading to permanent discontinuation of study drug
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Week 16 in Part APopulation: Analysis was performed on ADA analysis set (AAS) which included all participants who received any amount of study drug (active or placebo) and had at least one non-missing anti-drug antibody result following the first dose of study drug or placebo. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Treatment-emergent ADA was defined as a negative result or missing result at baseline with at least one positive post baseline result in the ADA assay. Samples positive in the dupilumab ADA assay were characterized for ADA titers (low, moderate and high). The low treatment-emergent ADA titer as defined as titer level \<1000, moderate as 1000 to 10000 and high as \>10000.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=25 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=31 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=26 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Positive Treatment-emergent Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) Response
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Week 16 in Part APopulation: Analysis was performed on AAS which included all participants who received any amount of study drug (active or placebo) and had at least one non-missing anti-drug antibody result following the first dose of study drug or placebo. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure and overall number of participants analyzed = 0 denotes that no participant had positive treatment-emergent ADA response to measure titer level.
Treatment-emergent ADA was defined as a negative result or missing result at baseline with at least one positive post baseline result in the ADA assay. Samples positive in the dupilumab ADA assay were characterized for ADA titers (low, moderate and high). The low treatment-emergent ADA titer as defined as titer level \<1000, moderate as 1000 to 10000 and high as \>10000.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=1 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=1 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Positive Treatment-emergent Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) by Maximum Titer Category
Treatment-emergent ADA Titer: Low
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Positive Treatment-emergent Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) by Maximum Titer Category
Treatment-emergent ADA Titer: Moderate
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Positive Treatment-emergent Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) by Maximum Titer Category
Treatment-emergent ADA Titer: High
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 16 up to Week 52 in Part BPopulation: Analysis was performed on AAS which included all participants who received any amount of study drug and had at least one non-missing anti-drug antibody result following the first dose.
Treatment-emergent ADA was defined as a negative result or missing result at baseline with at least one positive post baseline result in the ADA assay. Samples positive in the dupilumab ADA assay were characterized for ADA titers (low, moderate and high). The low treatment-emergent ADA titer as defined as titer level \<1000, moderate as 1000 to 10000 and high as \>10000. No participant exhibited a treatment-emergent ADA response in Part B and titer was not reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=14 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=18 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=29 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
n=37 Participants
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part B: Number of Participants With Positive Treatment-emergent Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) Response and Titer
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Week 100Population: Here 'n' = number of evaluable participants at the specified timepoint
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=41 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part C: Percentage of Participants Achieving Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count of <15 Eos/Hpf At Week 100
|
92.7 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Week 160Population: No data was collected for this endpoint. No participants reached end of part C treatment period (week 160).
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 100Population: Here 'n' = number of evaluable participants at the specified timepoint
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=41 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part C: Percent Change in Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count (Eos/Hpf) From Baseline to Week 100
|
-91.50 Percentage of change
Standard Deviation 13.348
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 160Population: No data was collected for this endpoint. No participants reached end of part C treatment period (week 160).
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 100Population: Here 'n' = number of evaluable participants at the specified timepoint
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=41 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part C: Absolute Change in Mean EoE-HSS From Baseline to Week 100
EoE-HSS Grade Score
|
-0.851 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.3909
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Part C: Absolute Change in Mean EoE-HSS From Baseline to Week 100
EoE-HSS Stage Score
|
-0.850 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.3648
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 160Population: No data was collected for this endpoint. No participants reached end of part C treatment period (week 160).
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 100Population: Here 'n' = number of evaluable participants at the specified timepoint
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=32 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part C: Absolute Change in EoE-EREFS From Baseline to Week 100
|
-5.34 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.535
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 160Population: No data was collected for this endpoint. No participants reached end of part C treatment period (week 160).
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 100Population: Here 'n' = number of evaluable participants at the specified timepoint
The PEESSv2.0-C is a caregiver-reported outcome measure that assesses the frequency and severity of EoE symptoms among pediatric participants. The PEESSv2.0-C consists of 20 items and has a one-month recall period. Each item had a 0-4 scale, which was transformed to 0-100 as follows: 0 = 0, 1 = 25, 2 = 50, 3 = 75, 4 = 100. The mean total PEESSv2.0 score was computed as the sum of all the item scores over the number of items answered. The total PEESSv2.0-C score ranges from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate greater symptom burden among pediatric EoE participants.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=43 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part C: Change in Total Score as Measured by the PEESSv2.0- Caregiver Version Questionnaire From Baseline to Week 100
|
-25.03 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.867
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 100Population: Here 'n' = number of evaluable participants at the specified timepoint
A Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) is a way to generate a single numerical value to represent a complex gene expression signature. Changes in NES score represented the overall changes in the expression of that molecular phenotype. The NESs calculated for the EDP reflect the expression at post-baseline relative to Baseline of a gene set that is differentially expressed between esophageal biopsies from EoE participants compared to healthy controls as a way to evaluate normalization of the molecular pathology. For each subject, an NES of 0 indicates no change from baseline, a negative score shows a reduction in disease score (more like normal) and positive score shows worsening (more active disease). NES does not have minimum/maximum score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=39 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part C: NES for the Relative Change in the EDP Transcriptome Signature From Baseline to Week 100
|
-2.720 Score on a scale
Interval -2.8 to -2.51
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 160Population: No data was collected for this endpoint. No participants reached end of part C treatment period (week 160).
A Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) is a way to generate a single numerical value to represent a complex gene expression signature. Changes in NES score represented the overall changes in the expression of that molecular phenotype. The NESs calculated for the EDP reflect the expression at post-baseline relative to Baseline of a gene set that is differentially expressed between esophageal biopsies from EoE participants compared to healthy controls as a way to evaluate normalization of the molecular pathology. For each subject, an NES of 0 indicates no change from baseline, a negative score shows a reduction in disease score (more like normal) and positive score shows worsening (more active disease). NES does not have minimum/maximum score.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 100Population: Here 'n' = number of evaluable participants at the specified timepoint
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=39 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part C: NES for the Relative Change in the Type 2 Inflammation Transcriptome Signature Baseline to Week 100
|
-1.970 Score on a scale
Interval -2.0 to -1.9
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 160Population: No data was collected for this endpoint. No participants reached end of part C treatment period (week 160).
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 100Population: Here 'n' = number of evaluable participants at the specified timepoint
Body weight for age percentile was calculated based on the growth charts from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for ages 0 to 20 years (for ages 2 to \<12 years) and World Health Organization (WHO) growth charts for ages 0 to \<2 years (for ages 1 to \<2 years). These charts included a set of smoothed percentiles along with CDC LMS (Lambda-Mu-Sigma) parameters to allow the calculation of percentiles.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=46 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part C: Change in Body Weight for Age Percentile From Baseline up to Week 100
|
10.63 Percentile
Standard Deviation 18.227
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 100Population: Here 'n' = number of evaluable participants at the specified timepoint
Difference in the 100-week change from baseline in BMI-for-age Z-score. BMI-for-age Z-scores are based on a reference growth chart (based on the growth charts from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention \[CDC\] for ages 0 to 20 years \[for ages 2 to \<12 years\]. A z-score of "0" represents the population mean. The Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean of the reference population. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the population mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the population mean.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=45 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part C: Change in Body Mass Index for Age Z-score From Baseline up to Week 100
|
0.2009 z-score
Standard Deviation 0.67389
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 100Population: Here 'n' = number of evaluable participants at the specified timepoint.
Difference in the 100-week change from baseline in weight-for-age Z-score. Weight-for-age Z-scores are based on a reference growth chart (based on the growth charts from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention \[CDC\] for ages 0 to 20 years \[for ages 2 to \<12 years\]. A z-score of "0" represents the population mean. The Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean of the reference population. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the population mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the population mean.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=46 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part C: Change in Weight for Age Z-score From Baseline up to Week 100
|
0.3376 z-score
Standard Deviation 0.59272
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 160Population: No data was collected for this endpoint. No participants reached end of part C treatment period (week 160).
Weight for age z-score indicates how much higher or lower a participant's weight for age is relative to a reference growth chart (based on the growth charts from CDC for ages 0 to 20 years \[for ages 2 to \<12 years\] and World Health Organization (WHO) growth charts for ages 0 to \<2 years \[for ages 1 to \<2 years\]). An increase in the mean change in weight for age z-score (increase in the SD from the reference growth chart) indicates an increase in weight for age relative to the reference.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 100Population: Here 'n' = number of evaluable participants at the specified timepoint
Difference in the 100-week change from baseline in Weight for height Z-score. Weight for height Z-scores are based on a reference growth chart (based on the growth charts from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention \[CDC\] for ages 0 to 20 years \[for ages 2 to \<12 years\]. A z-score of "0" represents the population mean. The Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean of the reference population. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the population mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the population mean.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=15 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part C: Change in Weight for Height Z-score From Baseline up to Week 100
|
0.3301 z-score
Standard Deviation 0.84791
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 160Population: No data was collected for this endpoint. No participants reached end of part C treatment period (week 160).
Weight for height z-score indicates how much higher or lower a participant's weight for height is relative to a reference growth chart (based on the growth charts from CDC for ages 0 to 20 years \[for ages 2 to \<12 years\] and WHO growth charts for ages 0 to \<2 years \[for ages 1 to \<2 years\]). An increase in the mean change in weight for height z-score (increase in the SD from the reference growth chart) indicates an increase in weight for height relative to the reference.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Week 100Population: Here 'n' = number of evaluable participants at the specified timepoint
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=41 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part C: Percentage of Participants Achieving Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count of ≤6 Eos/Hpf (400×) at Week 100
|
70.7 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Week 160Population: No data was collected for this endpoint. No participants reached end of part C treatment period (week 160).
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 100Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=61 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part C: Percentage of Participants (With Food Elimination Diet Regimens at Baseline) That Have a Re-introduction of a Previously Eliminated Food Group From Baseline up to Week 100
|
14.8 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 160Population: No data was collected for this endpoint. No participants reached end of part C treatment period (week 160).
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 152Population: No participants completed 160 weeks, longest duration was 152 weeks.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=61 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part C: Number of Participants With TEAEs
|
53 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 152Population: No participants completed 160 weeks, longest duration was 152 weeks.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=61 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part C: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent SAEs
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 152Population: No participants completed 160 weeks, longest duration was 152 weeks.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=61 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part C: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AESIs
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 152Population: No participants completed 160 weeks, longest duration was 152 weeks.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=61 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part C: Number of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Treatment
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 52 up to Week 152Population: Anti-Drug Antibody Analysis Set (AAS): The Part C AAS included all participants who received any amount of study drug in Part C and had at least 1 non-missing ADA result following the first dose of study drug. Analysis was based on treatment received.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=39 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part C: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent ADA Responses
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Week 100Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo
n=42 Participants
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part C: Concentration of Functional Dupilumab in Serum at Week 100
|
180 mg/L
Standard Deviation 96.9
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Part A: Pooled Placebo (Placebo)
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
Part B: Placebo to Dupilumab Low Dos
Part B: Placebo to Dupilumab High Dose
Part B: Dupilumab Low Dose to Dupilumab Low Dose
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
Part C: Dupilumab
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo (Placebo)
n=34 participants at risk
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=30 participants at risk
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=37 participants at risk
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part B: Placebo to Dupilumab Low Dos
n=14 participants at risk
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo in Part A and received lower exposure dupilumab in Part B. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W
|
Part B: Placebo to Dupilumab High Dose
n=18 participants at risk
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo in Part A and received higher exposure dupilumab in Part B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part B: Dupilumab Low Dose to Dupilumab Low Dose
n=29 participants at risk
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
n=37 participants at risk
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part C: Dupilumab
n=61 participants at risk
Participants who completed Part A and B were eligible to enroll in Part C and receive Dupilumab extended active treatment
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural pain
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sleep apnoea syndrome
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukocytosis
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Infections and infestations
HCoV-OC43 infection
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Throat tightness
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oesophageal food impaction
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Perirectal abscess
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Investigations
Endoscopy gastrointestinal
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Part A: Pooled Placebo (Placebo)
n=34 participants at risk
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo matched to higher exposure dupilumab or lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W). Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part A: Dupilumab Low Dose
n=30 participants at risk
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Part A. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W
|
Part A: Dupilumab High Dose
n=37 participants at risk
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Part A. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part B: Placebo to Dupilumab Low Dos
n=14 participants at risk
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo in Part A and received lower exposure dupilumab in Part B. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W
|
Part B: Placebo to Dupilumab High Dose
n=18 participants at risk
Participants who received subcutaneous (SC) injection of placebo in Part A and received higher exposure dupilumab in Part B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW
|
Part B: Dupilumab Low Dose to Dupilumab Low Dose
n=29 participants at risk
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of lower exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Lower exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab Q2W)
|
Part B: Dupilumab High Dose to Dupilumab High Dose
n=37 participants at risk
Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of higher exposure dupilumab in Parts A and B. Higher exposure dupilumab regimen were exposures approximating those in adolescents and adults receiving 300 mg dupilumab QW.
|
Part C: Dupilumab
n=61 participants at risk
Participants who completed Part A and B were eligible to enroll in Part C and receive Dupilumab extended active treatment
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
8.8%
3/34 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
8.8%
3/34 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
14.3%
2/14 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
27.6%
8/29 • Number of events 9 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
13.1%
8/61 • Number of events 8 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Ear infection
|
5.9%
2/34 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
8.2%
5/61 • Number of events 5 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Molluscum contagiosum
|
5.9%
2/34 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
5.9%
2/34 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 6 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
6.6%
4/61 • Number of events 4 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral upper respiratory tract infection
|
5.9%
2/34 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
13.8%
4/29 • Number of events 4 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
4.9%
3/61 • Number of events 4 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
|
2.9%
1/34 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
10.8%
4/37 • Number of events 4 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
8.2%
5/61 • Number of events 7 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
30.0%
9/30 • Number of events 9 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
16.2%
6/37 • Number of events 6 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
21.4%
3/14 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
33.3%
6/18 • Number of events 7 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
24.1%
7/29 • Number of events 7 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
29.7%
11/37 • Number of events 11 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
8.2%
5/61 • Number of events 6 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
17.6%
6/34 • Number of events 15 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 7 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
11.1%
2/18 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
10.3%
3/29 • Number of events 6 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
13.5%
5/37 • Number of events 7 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
18.0%
11/61 • Number of events 24 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
8.8%
3/34 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
11.1%
2/18 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
10.3%
3/29 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
10.8%
4/37 • Number of events 4 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
4.9%
3/61 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
5.9%
2/34 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
4.9%
3/61 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
2.9%
1/34 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
16.7%
3/18 • Number of events 9 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
10.3%
3/29 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
10.3%
3/29 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
8.2%
5/61 • Number of events 5 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
11.1%
2/18 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site reaction
|
20.6%
7/34 • Number of events 8 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
13.3%
4/30 • Number of events 11 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
10.8%
4/37 • Number of events 11 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
28.6%
4/14 • Number of events 34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
27.8%
5/18 • Number of events 21 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
13.8%
4/29 • Number of events 17 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
13.5%
5/37 • Number of events 18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
8.2%
5/61 • Number of events 32 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site erythema
|
2.9%
1/34 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
10.8%
4/37 • Number of events 8 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
11.1%
2/18 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
2.9%
1/34 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
21.4%
3/14 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
11.1%
2/18 • Number of events 4 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
10.3%
3/29 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
16.2%
6/37 • Number of events 7 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
18.0%
11/61 • Number of events 18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
16.7%
3/18 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site pain
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
21.4%
3/14 • Number of events 6 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
4.9%
3/61 • Number of events 5 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
5.9%
2/34 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
27.8%
5/18 • Number of events 7 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
13.8%
4/29 • Number of events 4 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
13.5%
5/37 • Number of events 6 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
13.1%
8/61 • Number of events 11 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinitis allergic
|
8.8%
3/34 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
10.3%
3/29 • Number of events 4 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
5.9%
2/34 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 4 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
14.3%
2/14 • Number of events 4 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
11.1%
2/18 • Number of events 4 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
10.8%
4/37 • Number of events 7 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
8.2%
5/61 • Number of events 5 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Eczema
|
2.9%
1/34 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
11.1%
2/18 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
4.9%
3/61 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
5.9%
2/34 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
21.4%
3/14 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Seasonal allergy
|
5.9%
2/34 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
13.8%
4/29 • Number of events 4 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
6.6%
4/61 • Number of events 5 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
5.9%
2/34 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
2.9%
1/34 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
13.3%
4/30 • Number of events 5 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
22.2%
4/18 • Number of events 4 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
10.3%
3/29 • Number of events 5 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
10.8%
4/37 • Number of events 4 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
9.8%
6/61 • Number of events 9 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Fear of injection
|
5.9%
2/34 • Number of events 9 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye swelling
|
2.9%
1/34 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
10.3%
3/29 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Hordeolum
|
2.9%
1/34 • Number of events 4 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection viral
|
2.9%
1/34 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Beta haemolytic streptococcal infection
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Conjunctivitis
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
11.1%
2/18 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
13.8%
4/29 • Number of events 4 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
6.6%
4/61 • Number of events 5 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Croup infectious
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
6.6%
4/61 • Number of events 4 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Ear infection viral
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Eye infection
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastrointestinal viral infection
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Groin infection
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Impetigo
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
28.6%
4/14 • Number of events 4 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
13.8%
4/29 • Number of events 4 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
10.8%
4/37 • Number of events 4 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
4.9%
3/61 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Otitis media
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 4 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis streptococcal
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
14.3%
2/14 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
21.3%
13/61 • Number of events 15 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Rhinitis
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
11.1%
2/18 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Stoma site infection
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tonsillitis
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Eosinophilic oesophagitis
|
2.9%
1/34 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
14.3%
2/14 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oral pain
|
2.9%
1/34 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
11.1%
2/18 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Lip blister
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oral discomfort
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site haemorrhage
|
2.9%
1/34 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site swelling
|
2.9%
1/34 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
General disorders
Influenza like illness
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site induration
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site inflammation
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 4 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site oedema
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 4 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
General disorders
Malaise
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
General disorders
Vessel puncture site pain
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
|
2.9%
1/34 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
17.2%
5/29 • Number of events 6 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
2.9%
1/34 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
14.3%
2/14 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
11.1%
2/18 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
9.8%
6/61 • Number of events 6 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Upper-airway cough syndrome
|
2.9%
1/34 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Wheezing
|
2.9%
1/34 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchial hyperreactivity
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
4.9%
3/61 • Number of events 4 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Laryngospasm
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
10.8%
4/37 • Number of events 4 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal cobble stone mucosa
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhoea
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
14.3%
2/14 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
11.1%
2/18 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
4.9%
3/61 • Number of events 4 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry skin
|
5.9%
2/34 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
4.9%
3/61 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash papular
|
2.9%
1/34 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
4.9%
3/61 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hand dermatitis
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Keratosis pilaris
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Perioral dermatitis
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Petechiae
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash erythematous
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin lesion
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
5.9%
2/34 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Enuresis
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Food allergy
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
11.1%
2/18 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Immunisation reaction
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
2.9%
1/34 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
2.9%
1/34 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
16.7%
3/18 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 3 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
6.6%
4/61 • Number of events 4 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal discomfort
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Tendon pain
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Lethargy
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Otorrhoea
|
2.9%
1/34 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Ear pain
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctivitis allergic
|
2.9%
1/34 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Eye disorders
Dry eye
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye pruritus
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Eye disorders
Ocular hyperaemia
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
13.8%
4/29 • Number of events 7 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ligament sprain
|
2.9%
1/34 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Arthropod bite
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Arthropod sting
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Face injury
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.3%
2/61 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Gas poisoning
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Nasal injury
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Sunburn
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wrist fracture
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Investigations
Blood potassium increased
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Investigations
Hepatic enzyme increased
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Iron deficiency
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Skin papilloma
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Genital pain
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Genital rash
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal discomfort
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Anaphylactic reaction
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Limb injury
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/61 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 4 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Throat irritation
|
0.00%
0/34 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Number of events 1 • From signing of the informed consent up to week 152.
|
Additional Information
Clinical Trials Administrator
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The investigator has the right to independently publish study results from the investigator's site after a multi-center publication, or a defined period after the completion of the study by all sites. The investigator must provide the sponsor a copy of any such publication derived from the study for review and comment in advance of any submission, and delay publication, if requested, to allow the Sponsor to preserve its proprietary rights.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER