Placenta Accreta Spectrum Protocol

NCT ID: NCT04384510

Last Updated: 2020-05-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

1500 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-03-01

Study Completion Date

2020-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Aim of this project is to study diagnosis and management approaches of PAS and to assess safety and efficacy of different conservative approaches compared to planned hysterectomy. We aim at improving selection process and patient counselling for women who would like to consider alternatives to hysterectomy. To achieve these objectives, creation of an international database collected by PAS-experienced centers that represent all continents would promote conduction of large studies that provide higher level of evidence on different options of management of PAS

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is a complex placentation disorder associated with high maternal morbidity; complications of PAS include hemorrhage, blood transfusion, multiple organ failure, and death

* The incidence of PAS has been increasing steadily in response to the increase in cesarean delivery rate
* Available evidence supports planned preterm cesarean hysterectomy with the placenta left in situ as the standard treatment of PAS

However, hysterectomy is traumatic to many women due to its operative sequences, impact on fertility, and disruption of self-image. Therefore, several conservative management options were proposed as an alternative to hysterectomy

* Although many of conservative approaches yielded satisfactory results, their implementation as a part of standard protocols has been limited
* There is primarily because evidence supporting most of these approaches is limited to case series, which is insufficient to support their safety. As a sequence, clinical trials are challenged by the lack of the margin of safety that would support ethical rationale of future studies. Availability of large multicenter studies is anticipated to provide robust evidence regarding optimal management of PAS and appropriate patient selection for conservative management

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Placenta Accreta

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS)

This cohort presents patients who were suspected or diagnosed either antenatal or intrapartum with placenta accreta spectrum

Planned Cesarean hysterectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

This procedure refers to planned delivery of the fetus through Cesarean incision, leaving the placenta in situ and proceeding with hysterectomy

Conservative management

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

This term describes a single or combined intervention of uterine artery ligation, internal iliac artery ligation, prophylactic balloon placement in the aorta or internal iliac artery, uterine artery embolization, compression sutures, or excision and reconstruction of uterine wall

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Planned Cesarean hysterectomy

This procedure refers to planned delivery of the fetus through Cesarean incision, leaving the placenta in situ and proceeding with hysterectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conservative management

This term describes a single or combined intervention of uterine artery ligation, internal iliac artery ligation, prophylactic balloon placement in the aorta or internal iliac artery, uterine artery embolization, compression sutures, or excision and reconstruction of uterine wall

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Pregnant women diagnosed with PAS, aged between 18 to 48 years.
* Women should be delivered by the corresponding center.

Exclusion Criteria

* Inadequate follow-up
* Authorization to use anonymous patient data for research purposes.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

48 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sherif Abdelkarim Mohammed Shazly

MBBCh, MSc

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Aswan Faculty of Medicine

Aswān, , Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Sherif Shazly, MBBCh, MSc

Role: CONTACT

+201276791283

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Amr S Abdelbadie, MBBCh, MD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Jauniaux E, Collins S, Burton GJ. Placenta accreta spectrum: pathophysiology and evidence-based anatomy for prenatal ultrasound imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;218(1):75-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.067. Epub 2017 Jun 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28599899 (View on PubMed)

Silver RM, Barbour KD. Placenta accreta spectrum: accreta, increta, and percreta. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2015 Jun;42(2):381-402. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2015.01.014.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26002174 (View on PubMed)

Silver RM, Branch DW. Placenta Accreta Spectrum. N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 19;378(16):1529-1536. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1709324. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29669225 (View on PubMed)

Sentilhes L, Kayem G, Chandraharan E, Palacios-Jaraquemada J, Jauniaux E; FIGO Placenta Accreta Diagnosis and Management Expert Consensus Panel. FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: Conservative management. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Mar;140(3):291-298. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12410. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29405320 (View on PubMed)

Jauniaux E, Alfirevic Z, Bhide AG, Belfort MA, Burton GJ, Collins SL, Dornan S, Jurkovic D, Kayem G, Kingdom J, Silver R, Sentilhes L; Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Placenta Praevia and Placenta Accreta: Diagnosis and Management: Green-top Guideline No. 27a. BJOG. 2019 Jan;126(1):e1-e48. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15306. Epub 2018 Sep 27. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30260097 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PAS-ID

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.